I looked into that Davidson over. I really wanted to take the over but then I remember how Harvard got up on Stetson 21-0 in the first 6 minutes and then did nothing the rest of the game. Stetson run defense has been half way decent Furman only got 171 and Harvard 136 rushing. Davidson is now using a WR at QB and the guy can't throw it at all, only 41 yards passing last week. The Davidson kicker sucks which may not be a bad thing as after getting three kicks blocked last week they probably won't be trying any FG's. Stetson like Dayton last week has two weeks to prepare for the Davidson run game. I think I might take a small shot with Stetson tomorrow.
As duck says, the weather was really bad. And as you pointed out before Meitz wasn't QB for Stetson in that one either. But no matter who was QB that day was going to be tough.
Actually, some of that scoring for Harvard was a little misleading. I make some notes, rather than going back completely - I think their opening drive was good. But then Stetson had a very short punt and Harvard got a good return out of it to the S20 and then they got a 37y pick-six. That is how they got to 21 1Q lead. Not alot of offense.
It is tough to know on Stetson. I really wish they would;'ve played that Valpo game.
Stetson at least made Furman work it in terms of covering that 30.5 spot. That is compared to Harvard where a bad special teams play and a turnover just hands them points. And Stetson moved it in the 1H ok on Furman. Now, Furman isn't good. But for Stetson, to them, Furman is tough, Furman is better. So the fact Hatters had a 12 play drive for 69y but missed a FG and they had two other 1H drives that ended with an INT and failed 4th down in Furman territory that shows I think in the 1H against the Furman first line guys that they can sustain some drives at least and then hopefully when they face a lesser opponent they can matchup with, those drives yield pts. Or they get 2 punts blk'd against St Thomas.
I was waiting on Stetson myself for tomorrow. I remember the line steaming for Davidson vs Marist, so I thought if I sat it out maybe can get more pts on Stetson than right now. I think Stetson > Marist, so if the line gets to the same point it would make sense to take Stetson.