Week 8 (10/18-10/20) CFB Picks and News

Mack: It’s about us

Monday, October 15, 2007, 11:08 AM
Mack Brown found the silver lining in Texas’ midseason schedule, which featured lightly regarded Iowa State last week and Baylor this week.
“We have not been a great football team,” Brown said Monday. “We have not been consistent. … This part of the season is more about us than who we’re playing.”
In other words, the Longhorns need to work on their own house before worrying about the neighborhood.
When asked about blowing out an opponent for just the second time this season, Brown said that the team needs to stop worrying about margins of victory.
“This team lives in the shadow of expectations from two years ago,” he said. “This team just needs to worry about winning. They don’t need to worry about the expectations.”
He says the team knows that it must execute or else fall victim to another upset like so many other teams this season.
“We can win the rest of the games or we can lose the rest of the games depending on how we play,” Brown said.
 
Jerome Hayes Out for the Year
By Mike Section: Injuries
Posted on Mon Oct 15, 2007 at 11:26:36 AM EDT
</I>


Sad news indeed. Official word out of Penn State is that Jerome Hayes tore his ACL against Wisconsin.
Penn State defensive end Jerome Hayes (Bayonne, N.J.) will miss the remainder of the 2007 season after suffering a serious knee injury in Saturday's 38-7 win over No. 19 Wisconsin. A redshirt sophomore, Hayes tore the anterior cruciate ligament in his right knee during a play in the third quarter, according to Dr. Wayne Sebastianelli, Penn State Director of Athletic Medicine. Hayes will have surgery within the next two weeks and rehabilitation will take approximately nine months, according to Sebastianelli.


This hurts. Hayes was making a solid contribution this year with 17 tackles, 3 TFL, and 2.5 sacks. He will undoubtedly miss the rest of the year and probably all of spring practice as well. You have to figure he was one of the leading candidates to replace Dan Connor at linebacker next year too, so this will hurt his chances of doing that. As far as this year's team, we should be ok. We have plenty of depth at defensive end which is where Hayes was primarily playing. I'm confident Maurice Evans, Josh Gaines, Aaron Maybin, and Chris Rogers can carry the load. And now that Kevion Latham's redshirt has been lifted look for him to get into the rotation as well.
 
WELCOME TO NUMBER ONE. DI DI MAO!

Scene: Vietnamese boathouse. Jim Tressel is being led into a room filled with men with guns. Reference: The Deer Hunter, for those not raised on watching scary Vietnam movies on Betamax.
1577633877_13954e6286_o.jpg
From Mr2Cents, as usual.
Welcome. We’re the rest of college football. Jim Tressel, we play this game now. You sit here. South Florida, sit over there. Three. No less, no more. Spin the barrels. Welcome to hell. You’re number one? Nice. Spin the barrels anyway.
The preseason top ten? They were at this table, too. MAO! (Slap!) 16 losses between all of them. The consensus number one, USC? Lost to unranked Stanford. Spin the gun. Now! MAO! (Slap!) Favored by forty one points and they lost, sucker. You thought you stood a chance? LSU sat at this table, too, ’till they lost to Kentucky in three overtimes, stung by the first team that could pass effectively against six man blitzes. MAO! (Slap!)
Spin the barrels. MAO! Congrats. Number one gets to sit at the table. Quite a prize, no?
Louisville played the part of the Yugo: they started smoking early and often, losing to unranked teams until they spun wrong and ended up in the river. West Virginia couldn’t handle South Florida. I said put your money on the table, Tressel! What? You don’t understand Vietnamese? MAO! (Slap!) Texas lost to an unranked. Florida lost to an unranked. Cal was in the chair for three seconds before they pulled the trigger and lost to to an unranked team.
You spin the barrels, sometimes you hear a click, and we all laugh and drink a little more mao tai and laugh like maniacs. Sometimes you hear boom, and we’re laughing and grabbing the mop while you go talk to your ancestors and play your silly Yankee baseball in the sky forever. Either way, it’s a hell of game for us. We just watch and point while you die.
MAO! (Slap!) Oklahoma was here, too, laughing all the way before they lost to an unranked team. Virginia Tech ran into a werewolf with a chainsaw for a dick and had to reboot on offense. You sure you want to be here? Because you know what happens when you play this game, right? One gun. One bullet. Spin.
Could be Michigan State. Could be Wisconsin. You don’t know. Shoot! MAO! No one gets out of this shack alive. You get cocky, you look around, and all of sudden some unranked team is beating you with a bamboo cane. Ask anyone who was in this chair before. You play, you pay. Christ, we had Illinois in the top 25 for a hot minute there before they lost to–yup–unranked Iowa.
Now pick up the gun. MAO! Fun, eh? South Florida, your turn. This time, we do four bullets and Rutgers on Thursday.
MAO!
1578073169_2ffada9310.jpg

In this game, no one wins.
 
Cobb out for the year

By Suzanne Halliburton | Monday, October 15, 2007, 03:33 PM
Texas fullback Antwan Cobb is out for the season after suffering a knee injury late against Iowa State.
Cobb, a former Pflugerville High standout, sprained his left anterior cruciate ligament. He was being used as a tailback at the time of his injury.
With Cobb out for the year, the Longhorns now don’t have a true fullback, although it’s not a position they use much. Luke Tiemann, the only other fullback, still is out for another week with a bad wrist.
Texas coach Mack Brown said Monday that Chris Ogbonnaya, the second-team tailback, will move to fullback. Freshman tight end Blaine Irby also could see some snaps at fullback. He started practicing there last week.
Cobb also played on special teams. He scored a touchdown on a 16-yard pass against Arkansas State, his first collegiate play. In all, he had eight carries for 34 yards.
 
What's Wrong With Wisconsin?

Posted Oct 15th 2007 4:55PM by Bruce Ciskie
Filed under: Wisconsin Football, Big 10
rashard-mendenhall.jpg
12-1 a year ago. Starters aplenty returning on both sides of the ball. Defensive coaching staff returning intact. Solid recruiting class joining the fray.

So, what the hell happened at Wisconsin, anyway?

We could take the blind-eye point of view, choosing to give bundles of credit to Wisconsin's wonderful opposition. However, there's a fatal flaw with that plan.

The flaw? Most of those teams suck. Week One opponent Washington State is 2-5 (0-4 Pac-Ten) and just got beat 53-7 by Oregon. UNLV, beaten by Wisconsin on the second Saturday of the season, is also 2-5 overall (1-2 Mountain West). The Rebels have lost two games by fewer than ten points (Nevada and Wisconsin). The Citadel is 4-2, but they're a I-AA (er, FCS) team.

Iowa, who led Wisconsin into the fourth quarter, just picked up their first Big Ten win in eight tries dating back to last season. Michigan State ran for 3,000 yards against Wisconsin a week before they lost at home to Northwestern. MSU appears to have a bowl team, but they're not a juggernaut, and they shouldn't have given a legitimate top-ten team that kind of scare.

Of course, we now know that Wisconsin isn't a legitimate top-ten team. Not even close. Just ask Rashard Mendenhall (pictured), who had a field day running against a shockingly soft defense.

But what has gone wrong? How could last year's 12-1 team turn into this overrated lot?
For this team, it starts and ends with what has become an unsightly defense. The Badgers ranked first in the Big Ten in scoring defense last year (12.1 points per game allowed). They were fourth in run defense (114.8 yards per game), first in pass defense (138.3 yards), first in total defense (253.1), first in pass efficiency defense (84.2 - 20 points better than Ohio State), first in red-zone defense (64.3 percent scoring rate allowed), and they allowed the fewest first downs (178).

Despite only losing a handful of starters, Wisconsin has taken some sizable steps backward on defense this year. Here are their current Big Ten rankings in the same categories listed above:
  • Scoring defense: 25.9 (9th)
  • Run defense: 162.6 (9th)
  • Pass defense: 216.0 (5th)
  • Total defense: 378.6 (7th)
  • Pass efficiency defense: 130.6 (8th)
  • Red-zone defense: 92.3 percent scoring rate allowed (11th)
  • First downs allowed: 135 (6th)
As you can tell, the Badgers are getting gashed in all areas. On Saturday, they allowed some five yards per carry against a relatively average running offense in Penn State, but were destroyed in the first half by the passing of Anthony Morelli (?). Watching replays of some of Penn State's big plays, it's clear that Wisconsin has too many holes in its coverage for one star (Jack Ikegwuonu) to cover up. Ikegwuonu has, for the most part, not been the problem so far. In fact, he's played quite well most of the time. It's his counterpart at cornerback, Allen Langford, who has earned much scorn.

Langford hasn't done much well this season. He's not physical. When he tries to be physical, he doesn't get an adequate jam on the receiver. He looks lost in coverage most of the time, and he has taken to lining up 7-10 yards off the receiver so he doesn't give up a big play. Of course, this simply invites teams to run screens and quick slants, and no one has really shied away from that yet.

Sophomore safeties Shane Carter and Aubrey Pleasant replaced established starters who graduated (Joe Stellmacher and Roderick Rogers), and they've done nothing to fill those holes. Carter has whiffed on big hits and chances for big plays, and Pleasant can't locate the football. He also takes terrible angles to ballcarriers.

The middle linebacker position has been a disaster. Elijah Hodge was a disappointment, and Culmer St. Jean is a freshman. Outside of those two, options for head coach Bret Bielema and defensive coordinator Mike Hankwitz are limited.

Langford's job appears safe for now, though freshman Aaron Henry has shown some upside, especially as a blitzer. His coverage skills are iffy, and he is a freshman, but at this point, what do the coaches have to lose? Roll some coverages to help him out and see what he can do. Langford's not going to suddenly remember how to cover receivers.

Pleasant appears to have lost his free safety job to sophomore Kim Royston, who is a bit taller and has more range than Pleasant. Carter's job is his to keep for now.

Wisconsin's problems are mainly due to the play of the secondary and linebackers, who just can't seem to get in a rhythm. The run defense has suffered, in part, because they can't plug the hole left by Mark Zalewski, who was a solid player and a good leader in the middle. Because his presence has been missed this much, the ability of outside 'backers DeAndre Levy and Jonathan Casillas to get pass pressure has been limited. Combine that with a defensive line that doesn't generate much pressure without a blitz, and you have quarterbacks getting more time to pick apart that secondary.

It's all working in a vicious cycle for the disappointing Badgers.

What's the solution? Well, I can't imagine they'll allow this season to happen without there being consequences. No, Bielema's not in trouble. However, a defensive-minded head coach can't be pleased with his defense getting chewed up like this. Could Hankwitz or anyone else on the defensive staff be in trouble?

If this alarming trend continues, it wouldn't surprise me.

As for the rest of the team, they're not without fault. The Badgers haven't been as strong as usual on special teams, and the offense has sputtered at times. Certainly, injuries have played a role in the offensive struggles. Receivers Luke Swan and Paul Hubbard are out (Hubbard should be back soon), and the depth behind them entering the season was questioned. True freshmen David Gilreath and Kyle Jefferson have been forced into action. Jefferson is a dynamic talent, but again, he's a freshman.

P.J. Hill is healthy, but the offensive line has struggled a bit to open holes. QB Tyler Donovan has managed games rather nicely, and he's limited his bad decisions, but he's hamstrung by the receiver issues and the sieve-tastic play of the line in front of him. In some ways (mobility, improv skills), he's better than departed starter John Stocco. But Stocco was a much more consistent and steady player, and that's what this team needs right now.

The way things are going, four losses for this team looks like a given. That would leave them a far cry from that Big Ten title contender Badger fans thought they had before the season started. If the defense doesn't tighten up, a 7-5 (3-5 Big Ten) season isn't out of the question.

Hey, I hear Detroit's nice in late December.
 
October 15, 2007

HOW FIRED ARE YOU?

How fired is your beleaguered coach? A good question to ask this time of year, especially if you’ve been going to work, doing a shitty job, and losing football games. The current round up of those lining up to meet the vocational grim reaper and their relative metaphorical equivalents follow.
Houston Nutt.
How fired is he? Explosively fired, man. Hmm…if he were an element, he’d be pure sodium. You know, the stuff your friend Todd decided to steal from the chem lab in high school? Because he read it was explosive and whatnot, right? And put it in his back pocket and sat down, removing a clean, sirloin-sized chunk of his buttocks? (Todd was cool like that. Kids with parents in jail typically are.)
1397982905_67addca05d.jpg

Fired? Oh, I’ll make them all pay, I will! MUHAHAHAHAHAHA
Houston Nutt shouldn’t be near any open flame right now. If he were transported on trucks, they’d have to have a special sticker to cross state lines with him, and you’d swerve several lanes over to avoid getting to close to it. Tactical scrutiny has now gotten easier and more common than ever: against Auburn, Darren McFadden received a mere 17 carries without the excuse of being drastically behind, as the Tigers only scored nine points in four quarters. (Tuberville, up by a field goal, decided to protect the lead by running. This is not a joke. He did.)
Most damning is Nutt’s political situation: his protector and sponsor, Frank Broyles, is stepping down as AD after this year, leaving Nutt and an extremely, um…”participatory” fanbase to shake the torches at the gates until he goes, even if they don’t have a clue who’ll take the gig once Boss Hawg is gone. They’ve got planes and shit, man. You can’t fight that.
We just consider it a miracle they didn’t unfurl the banner and unleash the five hundred pounds of malathion they’ve got in the back on the crowd, or weed, or whatever else you know an Arkansas pilot hustles around in a Cessna to make ends meet.
He should go into… Restaurant management. The mix of speed-freak mania and lack of attention to detail should be instantly recognizable to any of our brothers and sisters in the filthy half-apron club. Nutt doesn’t know where these chicken fingers are going, and he doesn’t care–but they’ve been under the goddamn heat lamp for three minutes now, and they’re going somewhere with you right now, kid. Oh, and your ass looks like candied ham in those pants. Meet him in the office in five.
Bill Callahan, Nebraska.
How fired is he? So fucking fired.
How soon? Soon. As in possibly today, if you believe rumors, and we always do. The rumor mutates by the hour, but either Nebraska AD Pederson, Callahan, the defensive staff, or varying combinations thereof will all be gone before the coffee in your break room goes cold. The latest unverified, sexy rumor: the extremely unsexy Buddy Ryan will come in to be the interim coach when Callahan is given the cornhole and unceremoniously booted from his job. We want this to happen if only to watch Ryan, perpetually drunk on rageahol, corrupt youth by offering cash bounties on opposing players and get into a fistfight with inflatable mascot/nightmare vision Lil’ Red. Because he will do both.
<EMBED src=""http://www.youtube.com/v/Yp6rrDWJH00 width=425 height=350 type=application/x-shockwave-flash wmode="transparent"></EMBED>
He should become… a high school physics teacher.
Student: My, that’s a big book, Mr. Callahan.
Mr. Callahan: Yes, it is. Physics requires dedication, Tommy.
Student: Can you teach me what’s in the book, sir?
Mr. Callahan: Of course not. There will be a test tomorrow, though.
Student: I hate you, Mr. Callahan.
Mr. Callahan: I’ll be in the teacher’s lounge, reading Popular Mechanics, Tommy. Good luck.

The talent for making simple things into complex, incomprehensible arcana with poor results just seems like too perfect a fit.
Dennis Franchione, Texas A&M
How fired is he? That information will cost you $1200 dollars a year, payable to Mike McKenzie, Esq. We’ll guess completely and utterly fired.
How soon? Depends on when and if A&M decides to jump on the new hottness of firing coaches prior to the final game of the season. The gambit worked perfectly for Florida when they pre-empted the competition in the Urban Meyer sweepstakes; if A&M does decide to follow suit, we could be talking a matter of weeks.
If not, they’ll drag it out ’til just after the Texas game. Either way, Franchione’s taken away the inevitable lawsuit following his firing with Newslettergate, and taken away any defense with his playcalling and performance in the Miami and Texas Tech games. The Aggies and Huskers combined are killing the vulture populations of the Heartland; caught between two such tantalizingly awful smells, they’re dropping dead of exhaustion flying between the two.
He should become…a personal injury attorney. Lionel Hutz, move over. Coach Fran’s about to make sure you get the settlement you deserve. Remember, you’re limping on the left leg, client, the left leg. The one Fran labeled for you on the top of your shoe.
300px-Godothatvoodoo.jpg

Feel the power of a Mexican law degree, citizens of Texas! This message brought to you by Franchione and McKenzie, attorneys-at-law.
Oh, there’s more, especially in the Pac-10. Later.
 
Michigan teammates: Hart will play

Posted: Monday October 15, 2007 3:01PM; Updated: Monday October 15, 2007 3:01PM

ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) -- Mike Hart's teammates fully expect him to play this week.
Michigan defensive end Tim Jamison guaranteed that Hart, who appeared to hurt his right ankle in the first half Saturday against Purdue, would be on the field for the 24th-ranked Wolverines when they play Saturday night at Illinois.
Offensive tackle Jake Long agreed.
"There's no doubt in my mind he'll play," Long said Monday.
Michigan coach Lloyd Carr, meanwhile, said he won't know until later in the week whether the star running back will be healthy enough to play. Hart didn't play in the second half on Saturday.
Hart, Michigan's career rushing leader, seemed to be relatively healthy in the second half as he smiled and laughed with teammates while watching the game, walking on the sidelines without an obvious limp.
On Monday, Hart was listed as the No. 1 tailback on Michigan's depth chart.
Brandon Minor, Hart's backup, limped off the field during the first drive of the second half after he appeared to hurt his left ankle. Minor was later carted off the field and left the stadium with a protective boot covering his left foot.
Third-string running back Carlos Brown scored twice in the fourth quarter of the 48-21 win over the Boilermakers.
Carr said Hart and Minor's work ethic would assist their recovery.
"Both of them will leave no stone unturned to get back as quickly as they can," Carr said.
In only a half, Hart scored twice and had 21 carries for 102 yards -- setting a school record with his seventh straight 100-yard game.
A senior from Syracuse, N.Y., Hart also moved past Wisconsin's Anthony Davis for fifth among the Big Ten's career rushing leaders with 4,757. He trails Wisconsin's Ron Dayne -- who ran for a conference-record 7,125 yards -- Ohio State's Archie Griffin, Indiana's Anthony Thompson and Michigan State's Lorenzo White.
 
Notre Dame to Go Green Saturday

1581688584_5655db4f0e.jpg
Don’t adjust your TV sets on Saturday, those are the Notre Dame Fighting Irish playing…in their throwback Kelly Green uniforms with yellow numbers when they take on the USC Trojans.
Coach Charlie Weis made the announcement Friday [August 3], saying the team would wear green jerseys to honor the 1977 team. Weis was a senior at Notre Dame when the 11th-ranked Irish wore their normal blue jerseys for warmups, then donned green for the game and defeated No. 5 USC 49-19 en route to the national championship…
Since then, the green jerseys have been met with mixed results. The Irish wore green in victories over USC in 1983 and 1985 — although in 1985 they wore blue in the first half then switched to green for the second half.
Lou Holtz had the Irish wear green twice: in a 39-28 win over Florida in the 1992 Sugar Bowl and a 41-24 loss to Colorado in the 1995 Fiesta Bowl. The Irish also wore green in a 35-28 loss to Georgia Tech in the 1999 Gator Bowl and in a 14-7 loss to Boston College in 2002 after the Irish started the season 8-0.
Personally, I much prefer the forest green and gold jerseys that debuted two seasons ago against USC–but that is just my queer eye, I suppose.
 
Matt Carufel Leaves Notre Dame


This is intriguing news. Matt Carufel was a highly recruited, 4-star, offensive lineman out of Cretin-Derham Hall. In 2006 he was the best player coming out of Minnesota and the 5th best OT accoring to Rivals.

I was actually at a USC/Notre Dame game in 2006 when Carufel was visiting. I noticed the CDH letterman's jacket on the sideline and then of course in the coming months he committed to the Irish over offers from Florida, Miami, Iowa and Minnesota.

As of last week he has decided to leave South Bend and is likely going to choose between Minnesota and Iowa to continue his football career. He won't be able to play a snap until 2009 so he won't be helping the gophers anytime soon but this has bigger implications than just PT at TCF Stadium.

Notre Dame has been sniping players from Cretin for years and finally having 1 kid who soured on the program there can only help (even just a little). For now the one kid that matters is WR Mike Floyd who is considering Notre Dame. Does this have any impact on his college decision? Hard to say. If he has any sort of relationship with Carufel I'm sure he'll get the 411 on why Matt was disenfranchised with the Irish. And I'm sure the CDH coaches will get a full debriefing. Could this be the year that MN lands the kid Notre Dame wants and we finally get our foot in the door at CDH? Since it is one of the top 2 or 3 programs in the state it would be nice to start keeping the best from St. Paul in state for 4 more years.

WE'RE COMIN'! WE'RE COMIN'!!!

attachment.php
 
Versus Hates Pac-10 Favorites

Posted Oct 15th 2007 10:18PM by Brian Grummell
Filed under: California Football, UCLA Football, USC Football, Pac 10, Featured Stories, The Word
jim-harbaugh-gatorade-usc-425.jpg

There have been four stunning Pac-10 losses this year:

Stanford 24 - USC 23
Oregon State 31 - California 28
Utah 44 - UCLA 6
Cincinnati 34 - Oregon State 3


Three of those games were televised on the Versus network, all but the Cincinnati - Oregon State tilt.

Curiously, Versus basically replaced TBS in grabbing a handful of Pac-10 games. The same TBS that televised USC's loss to Kansas State in 2002 and USC's near-loss to Stanford in 2004. Those were USC's only TBS appearances. In other words, televised appearances on marginal sports networks are pretty much terrible news for USC and now Pac-10 favorites in general.

Weird, huh? It's not quite the Lou Holtz pep talk curse, but close.
 
MID-MAJOR MONDAY IS ALL ABOUT THE O
By SMQ
Posted on Mon Oct 15, 2007 at 08:51:32 PM EDT
</I>

I didn't watch Boise State's potentially epic, four-overtime shootout Sunday night with Nevada, eventually won by the Broncos by the very hoop-esque score of 69-67, but I do know it wasn't the seismic offensive event in the mid-major landscape this week it might seem:

c5d39154-2000-4f3e-91b7-34d1c76f9a38.jpg

You know what? Just go ahead and keep those hands up, ref. It's more efficient.
- - -

Boise State 69 Nevada 67 (4 OT)
Points: 136 Yards: 1,267
First Downs: 58 Yds./Play: 7.8
Length of TD Drives (regulation only): 64, 68, 65, 62, 74, 66, 80, 71, 63, 64
- - -
After Nevada converted a late BSU fumble into a field goal for a 44-41 lead, the Broncos rallied for overtime, somehow stretching an eight play, 34-yard drive over three and a half minutes, just enough to run the clock all the way to zero (you can never be too sure) as the tying field goal sailed true. In extra time, the offenses turned in four touchdowns in five plays - two passes for Boise, two runs for Nevada - before settling for field goals in the third frame. Both teams also scored touchdowns in the fourth OT, but the ultimate difference in the highest-scoring game in 70 years? Two points: Boise connected on its mandated conversion, and Nevada threw incomplete. The ultimate argument for stopping the stat sheet at the regulation: did any team before overtime was instituted in 1996 have a chance to score this many points? They did not. Both defenses have an extra game's worth of points tacked on to their season total.

Hawaii 42 San Jose State 35 (OT)
Points: 77 Yards: 945
First Downs: 52 Yds./Play: 5.5
Length of TD Drives (regulation only): 35, 86, 65, 87, 67, 65, 97, 45
- - -
Hawaii becomes the first team I'm aware of - I don't know if this is a record, only that I've never seen it - to get off 100 snaps in a single game, even in overtime, and achieved this despite slightly losing time of possession, 30:26 to 29:34. The Warriors threw an incredible 75 passes, yet still had enough time for 26 runs (although 15 of these were by Colt Brennan, meaning June Jones called somewhere in the vicinity of 90 pass plays, give or take a sneak). The result is the most inflated 600 yards of total offense you'll ever see: 601 yards in 101 snaps = 5.95 per play. This is roughly average.
The most surprising fact here, given the final, is that the game was only 14-7 at the half, and San Jose State's lone score was a punt return at the end of the second quarter. Things didn't pick up until the third, when SJSU ran back the second of Brennan's four interceptions (more on this later) for a touchdown, and later scored touchdowns on three straight long drives, covering a total of 217 yards in just 17 plays - going back to the punt return just before the half, the Spartans scored 35 points in a little under 19 minutes of game time. Down two touchdowins in the fourth, Hawaii responded with a 97-yard TD drive and, following a critical San Jose fumble at midfield, a 45-yard drive capped by the tying touchdown with 31 seconds to play. A Brennan touchdown pass in the first overtime was followed by a clinching interception by Myron Newberry.
A win is a win, but make no mistake...you know what, on second thought, Hawaii deserves its own post. I'm going to wait on this.
Ohio U. of Ohio 48 Eastern Michigan 42
Points: 70 Yards: 935
First Downs: 47 Yds./Play: 6.4
Length of TD Drives: 51, 35, 60, 61, 60, 38, 56, 80, 75, 20, 78
- - -
This game was not as close as the score makes it appear: Ohio scored touchdowns on its first four possessions, only the last one matched by EMU, and led throughout the game. The Eagles did have the benefit of an 80-yard fumble return for touchdown in the second quarter but still trailed 31-14 at the half and only pulled within a score with a little over a minute to play in the game. Shocking aspect of this game: Ohio's offense, in general, which beat its season average in total offense by almost 200 yards. Of course, it was Eastern Michigan, which last month gave up 434 yards to Howard. So maybe not such a surprise.
Buffalo 43 Toledo 33
Points: 76 Yards: 953
First Downs: 47 Yds./Play: 6.0
Length of TD Drives: 49, 9, 80, 67, 57, 54, 73, 74, 48, 39
- - -
Break up dem Bulls! Buffalo wins two straight! For only the second time in its I-A life, BU is on an actual winning streak (the Bulls beat Ohio and Army back-to-back in 2001, its most successful season prior to this one), thanks in large part to a school record 244-yard rushing effort by James Starks. I take back my line about Hawaii's play count: Toledo matched it, in regulation, no less, by getting off 101 snaps here, to even less effect - the Rockets averaged just 5.1 yards per play to Buffalo's whopping 7.4 on 42 fewer snaps, so the final yardage numbers (518 for Toledo to 435 for Buffalo) are meaningless. This game featured 30 possessions, and the Rocket defense got rolled on most of them.

06a8ff1e-461e-493b-b489-d4e9ccd42af3.jpg

I assume he broke this tackle.
- - -

Houston 56 Rice 48
Points: 104 Yards: 1,189
First Downs: 51 Yds./Play: 7.5
Length of TD Drives: 77, 69, 65, 80, 67, 17, 78, 5, 14, 64, 65, 81, 80, 74,
- - -
I'd like to be very clear about this: Rice is a horrible football team. I have to point this out because, by apperances, Rice is a competitive team within the context of C-USA. Last week, the Owls embarrassed Southern Miss, defending C-USA East champion, in Hattiesburg winning . Here, they challenge defending league champion Houston on the road by scoring 48 points in three quarters. This looks close.

But Rice is so obviously bad, it's painful even to describe. Against USM two weeks ago, the Owls had scoring "drives" of 10, 12, 26 and 7 yards - their one "extended" drive, 69 yards, was entirely the result of a single 56-yard run - and when the Eagles woke up in a 24-point hole in the fourth quarter, they stormed back on 80, 95 and 57-yard touchdown drives in a span of less than eight minutes and were a two-point conversion from a tie that against any other I-A team I would describe as "improbable." Against Rice, it was exactly what should have been happening all night. Facing the crosstown Cougars Saturday, the Owls picked up 24 points on possessions covering 17, 5, 14 and 30 yards and led entering the fourth quarter 48-35. All Houston did from there is what it was doing all night, and what Southern had done in incomplete form: march down Rice's inept throat for three touchdowns. And, in this case, the win. UH had scored touchdowns on its first four possessions in the first quarter, drives of 77, 69, 65 and 67 yards on just 14 total plays, and beginning in the middle of the third scored on four its last five non-clock-killing drives, of 78, 81, 80 and 74 yards. Rice moved the ball well this time, racking up 441 yards and 23 first downs, but Houston finished with 748 yards total offense, just shy of 500 in the first and fourth quarters alone.
Tulsa 38 Marshall 31
Points: 69 Yards: 1,022
First Downs: 51 Yds./Play: 6.6
Length of TD Drives: 71, 81, 80, 73, 80, 56, 63, 61, 68, 63
- - -
Tulsa's offense is becoming legend on Mid-major Monday, and if any team had the chance to crack the hundred-play barrier - especially given the offensive coordinator's philosophy on such matters - I would have guessed it would have been the anachronistically named Hurricane. Obviously, nothing came cheap here: every touchdown drive by both teams, all ten of `em, went at least 56 yards and averaged about 70 yards. There was only one turnover, a late fumble by the Hurricane that led to Marshall's final touchdown, the only score of the fourth quarter by either team. TU just outgunned `em. Also: Marshall, undefeated king of the MAC a decade ago, is 0-6 with a loss to a I-AA team.
East Carolina 45 UTEP 42 (OT)
Points: 87 Yards: 1,096
First Downs: 55 Yds./Play: 6.9
Length of TD Drives: 80, 80, 71, 78, 61, 70, 42
- - -
Too many field goals here for such little defense, seven altogether, plus a fumble return for a touchdown in the first half by the Pirates. So it's good to see ECU say "to hell with the kickin', we're ending this in the end zone" in overtime, answering a UTEP three-and-out/field goal on the first possession with an efficient, four-play romp to the win. The key: rather than play it safe on 3rd-and-1 from the Miner 16, ECU's Rob Kass dropped back and hit Davon Drew for 15 yards to set up an easy sneak for the touchdown. Daring greatly, etc.
Kass threw three picks to Trevor Vittatoe's three touchdowns on the other side, in addition to a 13-minute deficit in time of possession in UTEP's favor, but the fumble return was the great equalizer in the end.
Mid-Major Game of the Week
While you were reserving André Woodson for your 2008 fantasy team...
- - -
Compared to its MAC colleagues, Temple was the `85 Bears Saturday against post-wild finish Akron, holding the Zips to a mere 235 yards (!) through the first three quarters. Yet still the Owls trailed 20-3 via two interceptions and a pair of missed field goals when they got the ball back with two minutes remaining in the third quarter, seemingly doomed to follow their first win of the season with another offensively inept walkover; to that point, Temple had only put together 165 yards worth of offense, and the one field goal on the board. Something at that point - a fire, a yearning, a spirit...let's call it the "Ever-Striving Grasp of Humanity" - entered Temple QB Adam DiMichele, who, armed with the Ever-Striving Grasp of Humanity in the face of a 17-point deficit, on a team that went 19 straight games from the end of 2004 through late 2006 without scoring more than 17 points in any single contest, put his struggling team on his shoulders for a gallant charge at victory. DiMichele put the Owls in scoring position on a clearly possessed, 34-yard scramble, finishing the drive early in the first quarter with a short touchdown pass to cut the Zip lead to 20-10. After trading punts, DiMichele accounted for all 51 non-penalty-aided yards on another Temple scoring drive, invoking the long-suffered but ever poignant Spirit of Mankind to complete consecutive passes of 22 yards to the superbly-named Marquise Liverpool and 19 yards for a touchdown to Bruce Francis. Trailing by just three after bestowing the Breath of Life unto the Owl defense for a crucial 3rd-and-2 stop at midfield, DiMichele embarked from his own 19 ith 2:06 remaining on the piece d'resistance of his ode to the human will. Moved by the laughter of children, he scrambled 14 yards for a first down, then ten yards for another. Buoyed by the gentle, awkward poetry of lovers stumbling to a picnic through the tall grasses of summer, the quarterback converted a 3rd-and-7 fo 12 yards, a 17-yarder on first down inside the Akron 20. Welling with the triumphant strains of Stolzel and Vivaldi, DiMichele reached deep within him with half a minute remaining, firing man's ceaseless optimism of peace and progress into the hands of Dy'Onne Crudup for the winning touchdown with 27 seconds to play. A subsequent interception of Akron's last gasp heave with no time on the clock symbolized humanity's status as the ultimate pinnacle of nature's design.

755052.jpeg

Adam DiMichele aims to validate the elusive spark of consciousness, Temple's second win.
- - -

For his inspirational embodiment of all that drives the Spirit of Humanity to achieve, DiMichele was named the MAC East Division's co-Offensive Player of the Week.

Many of you answered last week when I asked when Buffalo and Temple had last won on the same day, coming up with two occasions in the annals of futility that those separate, equally unlikely events had somehow corresponded. Now answer this, research hounds: when is the last time Temple and Buffalo have each won two weeks in a row?
Obligatory Brennan Stat Watch
While desperately attempting to retain grains of skepticism.
- - -
Brennan set anew career high for attempts, obliterating the 61 he slung in Hawaii's overtime win at Louisiana Tech earlier this year, and for completions, hitting 44 of 75 passes for 544 yards (second to last year's bowl game against Arizona State), 4 touchdowns and 4 interceptions (second only to the five he threw at Idaho two weeks ago) in the Warriors' overtime win at San Jose State.
Pace for the Season: Brennan has missed one game entirely and was pulled for the second half of another; he's played roughly 20 quarters in six games. Assuming he plays the entirety of each of Hawaii's remaining five games, he would double his current numbers, finishing 382 of 564 (67.7 percent) for 4,790 yards with 40 touchdowns and 20 interceptions. This is nowhere near his pace of 2006, which was: 405 of 559 (72.5 percent), 5,549 yards, 58 touchdowns and 12 interceptions against an unquestionably tougher schedule that included Alabama, Oregon State, Purdue, Arizona State and three WAC bowl teams.
An Arbitrary Mid-Major Top 10
This is more of a power poll.
- - -
1. Boise State (5-1) - I'm not sure it makes sense to elevate one team after a wild overtime win while demoting another, but I'm disgusted enough with Hawaii to overlook internal consistency here. At least BSU played a team (Washington) reasonably worth losing to.
2. Hawaii (7-0) - Disgusted.
3. BYU (5-2) - Whipped Utah-felling UNLV (game does not appear as close as the 24-14 score, from the numbers) to remain the only undefeated team in MWC play.
4. Troy (4-2) - Week off, but stock rises anyway with Oklahoma State's rare road win in Lincoln, less than a month after the Cowboys fell on their face in the harsh confines of Movie Gallery Stadium. Should have huuuuuge stats Saturday against North Texas.
5. Air Force (5-2) - Falcons are 4-1 in the MWC after beating winless Colorado State by 24. In unrelated news, Sonny Lubick is considering retirment.
6. New Mexico (4-2) - Each half of Wyoming's running back tandem broke 100 yards against TCU's vaunted D last week, but were held to 38 yards between them Saturday in the Lobos' 20-3 road upset. Now with wins over Arizona and Wyoming!
7. Wyoming (4-2) - The Mountain West is kind of a lot better than any other non-BCS league, I think.
8. Fresno State (4-2) - Although the WAC may be close, if it weren't for Utah State and Idaho languishing at the bottom. Fresno takes care of the Vandals to move to 3-0 in-conference and an overtime loss at Texas A&M from 5-1.
9. Tulsa (4-2) - Score! Score, baby! Hell yeah!
10. Navy (4-2) - The Midshipmen haven't any problems scoring their own selves with more primitive tools: they're averaging 35 per game and put up 48 on Pitt, though it coincides with the nation's lowest-rated pass efficiency D. Still a sucker for the flexbone, currently racking up 345 yards on average. Steppin' Up

09-06-06dnews-14b.jpg

The Record vs. BCS Conferences
- - - Last week: 2-1
Avg. Score: 30-43
This year: 17-95
Avg. Score: 19-39
- - -
Click here to view all of the season's inter-division upsets.


Hail to the Conquering Heroes
- - -
Stanford followed its groundbreaking upset of the year in which it forced a one-time candidate for the Trophy Which Must Not Be Named into four interceptions in one half by allowing 344 yards and a fourth quarter comeback to a disappointing redshirt freshman who had been averaging 170 yards through his first six games. And didn't pick him off once. Andy Dalton led TCU to 494 yards and a pair of fourth quarter touchdowns to knock off the Cardinal 38-36 in Palo Alto.
Elsewhere, Pittsburgh was even more generous to Navy in a game that rapidly devolved into a frothing, saliva-drenched carnival of senile Holth fun. Any chance to see the past come alive in the form of the flexbone is a good one, and Dave Wannstedt's decade of playoff-level NFL gameplanning couldn't get his bigger, faster team in position to stop the Middies' high school option scheme: 331 yards on 70 carries, and the typical big gains on the rare passes (18.4 per catch). Say what you will about the nation's 102nd-ranked defense, but when it counts, it held to win on fourth down inside the five-yard line against a true freshman quarterback coached by Wannstedt, so...you know, shut up.
ed20f531-75fb-4769-91a0-8665db3f03f1.jpg

Viva la NFL gameplanning experience!
- - -

...and What Never Had a Prayer
- - -
Technically, this was the first winning week of the season for mid-majors, but the third class-hopping game was enough of a (wholly predictable) bloodbath to negate the minor gains by Navy and TCU to the underdog in general. Ohio State's 48-3 waxing of Kent State was every bit the ceremonial intra-Ohio beatdown the score suggests, with the Buckeyes scoring on their first possession and then six of their next eight, with a punt return and an interception return for touchdowns mixed in for good measure. Kent got on the board with a little under three minutes to play, the second straight week OSU has let a shutout slip away in the lazy throes of a blowout. They're really slipping there.

Coming Up
Optimism in the week ahead.
- - -
Best Game: Neither Wyoming, of its loss to New Mexico, nor Air Force is a Mountain West frontrunner, but the winner stays in the race with one conference loss. For Wyoming, this means keeping up with BYU and Utah still to come; fr Air Force it means advancing to 5-1 with BYU, Utah, TCU and Wyoming in the rearview.
Most Realistic Upset: I say with the utmost confidence that Navy will have more success offensively against Wake Forest net Saturday than Florida State did against the Deacons Thursday night. Whether that will be enough to offset the atrocious Academy defense is another question. Staying on the East coast, I don't think East Carolina over N.C. State would be an upset at all: the Pirates beat the Wolfpack to send Chuck Amato packing at the end of the last regular season, as well as North Carolina earlier this season, and NCSU has losses in the last two years alone to ECU, Akron, Southern Miss and Central Florida.
Most Unrealistic Upset: Central Michigan ought to be excited about QB Dan LeFevour, who's accounted for three touchdowns in a single quarter two weeks in a row, but whatever success CMU's offense is able to eke out at Clemson, its defense will be yielding in much bigger chunks to the Tigers. C.J. Spiller and James have been quiet over the last three-four weeks - a MAC softie might be just what the statsheet doctor ordered.
Most Inevitably Gruesome Blowout: I know Georgia Tech is not the type of offense that tends to blow lesser teams out of the water, and Army is undeniably better at 3-4, but the Cadets have allowed more than 400 combined yards on the ground and six rushing touchdowns the last two weeks against Tulane and the aforementioned Chippewas of CMU. Good luck with Tashard Choice.

<!-- poll box --><TABLE width="40%" align=center><TBODY><TR><TD></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- End poll box --><!-- End center content section -->
 
Decision on Monk expected soon

Razorbacks senior wide receiver could redshirt

Posted: Monday October 15, 2007 9:16PM; Updated: Monday October 15, 2007 9:16PM

LITTLE ROCK (AP) -- It's now or never for Marcus Monk -- as far as this season is concerned.
Arkansas coach Houston Nutt said a decision is needed this week on whether Monk will redshirt. The 6-foot-6 receiver played briefly in last weekend's 9-7 loss to No. 18 Auburn, but Nutt said the senior is still eligible to redshirt.
"I was going to talk to him later this afternoon or tomorrow morning -- see how he's feeling," Nutt said Monday.
Nutt said the big question is how healthy Monk would be if he does try to play this season. Monk, the Razorbacks' career leader in touchdown catches, hurt his knee in August and didn't play a down until the Auburn game.
"What you don't want to get into -- you just don't want one game out of the deal, or two games," Nutt said. "For the second half of the season, you'd like to think we could get the majority of that."
Arkansas is at Ole Miss this weekend.
The Razorbacks' passing game has struggled, in part because of injuries to Monk, tight end Ben Cleveland and receiver Crosby Tuck. Monk caught 50 passes for 962 yards and 11 touchdowns last season.
"His family's heavily involved. What we're trying to do is give him -- first of all -- what the doctors think, the trainers, the rehab people," Nutt said. "I think in his heart, he really wants to play, and we'd love for him to play."
 
Temple probable for Texas Tech

Posted: Monday October 15, 2007 9:14PM; Updated: Monday October 15, 2007 9:14PM

COLUMBIA, Mo. (AP) -- Missouri coach Gary Pinkel said Monday that running back Tony Temple, who missed Saturday's loss at Oklahoma with a sprained ankle, was probable for this week's game against Texas Tech.
Temple is the leading rusher for the 15th-ranked Tigers with 351 yards, a 4.9-yard average and three touchdowns. Missouri was held to a season-low 57 yards rushing by Oklahoma, well below the previous low of 195 yards.
"He's our catalyst on the offense," Pinkel said. "He likes to run the football well and he does. That's definitely going to be a huge bonus to have him back."
 
<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD class=storytitle colSpan=3>Monday Morning Quarterback </TD></TR><TR><TD class=primaryimage vAlign=top>

</TD><TD noWrap width=3></TD><TD vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=4 width="60%" bgColor=#f5f5f5 border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD vAlign=center noWrap>By Matt Zemek
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Oct 15, 2007
</TD><TD noWrap>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

With the season at its midway point, the pressure of gameday coaching is beginning to bring out the best and worst in America's sideline sultans of Saturday. A season short on tight games and wrenching strategic decisions finally witnessed a day when late-game choices were hard to make.
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3>

ByMatthew Zemek

Mr. Zemek's e-mail: mzemek@hotmail.com

The lead story in the coaching world from this past Saturday should not rate as a surprise: Jeff Tedford once again looked very small in a big-time situation.

Let's be clear at the outset: Tedford is a very good coach, perhaps the king of the B-plus coaches in the United States. Tedford is excellent at being good--what he's done in Berkeley is no small feat. Almost every athletic director would give a hefty sum to employ Tedford as his new football coach. Let's not think, then, that this is a hit piece directed toward a person with considerable integrity and humility. After all, it was Tedford who graciously refused to engage in public relations (or scoreboard) politicking for the 2005 Rose Bowl berth that eventually went to Texas. If you want to find a good human being in the coaching profession, Tedford would be on the list.

With that "let's-not-have-a-Mike Gundy-Jenni Carlson coach-columnist war" preamble out of the way, let's frame this brief discussion in simple and clear terms: Tedford's overall coaching ability is not on trial here; we're only trying to determine whether Tedford deserves elite status as a college head coach. One could say, in fact, that a lot of criticisms aired by columnists toward coaches, especially on subjects such as play calling and strategy, are not intended to suggest that the coach is "bad," but that the coach is simply not performing at the level needed for his program to attain its proper place in the college football pecking order. That's food for very extended thought, but we'll leave that subject for fuller treatment at a later date. For today, the MMQ knows this much: Tedford is developing the kind of reputation that no truly elite coach can acquire.

The biggest problem with California's loss to Oregon State, capped by the final-sequence debacle involving redshirt freshman quarterback Kevin Riley inside the Beaver red zone, was not that it happened in the first place. No, the truly worrisome element of the un-Bear-able upset is that it's part of a pattern in Berkeley. Whenever Cal faces a game that draws national attention and, with it, intense scrutiny about the Bears' ability to reach the proverbial "next level" as a program, Jeff Tedford almost invariably presides over some kind of train wreck. Back in 2004, the Holiday Bowl against Texas Tech represented a moment when Cal needed to take care of business on national television. The Bear players said the right things, but their level of play suggested otherwise. The embarrassing blowout loss took some starch out of a program that has the irritating habit of playing well until it really matters.

In 2006, Tedford brought his team into November with Pac-10 and Rose Bowl prizes well within reach. But as soon as the business end of the 2006 season came across the calendar, the Berkeley boys lost crucial games with no help from their head coach. Tedford's decision to kick a field goal inside the Arizona 10 midway through the fourth quarter led to a four-point defeat. Later that November, Tedford watched Pete Carroll take him apart in terms of both adjustments and situational strategy, as USC wrested the conference crown from Cal in a Coliseum collision that could have gone the other way if the coaching matchup had turned out differently. Tedford's tenure in Berkeley has been marked by two characteristics: an ability to lead his team out of the gate strong, and an even more noticeable ability to immediately wilt in the searing spotlight once the stakes are substantially elevated.

It's this sustained pattern of losing not just as a highly-ranked favorite, but losing immediately after the pressure falls on the Golden Bears, that makes Tedford's reputation suffer so severely. It's also why Tedford deserves the blame for the fiasco involving Nate Longshore's backup on Saturday against Oregon State. (If Longshore had committed such a blunder, it would have been a different story--coaches should be evaluated differently, based on the experience levels possessed by their players.) It was interesting to hear Tedford say in the postgame presser that Kevin Riley's mistake didn't cost his team the game. Tedford reasoned that one play doesn't decide a game. While that statement might be true enough, it nevertheless remains that Tedford could have prevented that play from happening... and enabled his team to get to overtime.

Here's what hasn't been said (but should have been) by TV talking heads about the Kevin Riley brain cramp: late-game situations such as that one are not just a matter of telling the quarterback to throw the ball away. When you're trying for a late touchdown but can still tie with a field goal in the final seconds of regulation, a huge key is for the coach to give his quarterback--especially if it's a young signal caller such as Kevin Riley--a simple play. The truly unfathomable element of Cal's colossal blunder against Oregon State was that Riley evidently lacked a play in which security was not built into the equation. If Riley really did have a play which allowed him to throw the ball away if his first option was covered, it's hard to imagine the Bears not getting their field goal. One can debate exactly what was (or wasn't) said on the Cal sideline, but the larger lesson is surely this: as a coach, you don't just tell your player to throw the ball away in a given situation; you provide a play (or scheme or package) that makes a quick release an inherent part of the play itself. What makes the whole episode that much worse for Tedford is that DeSean Jackson's cramping injury gave Cal's coach extended minutes with Riley on the sideline; it's not as though Cal's lack of timeouts prevented Tedford from being able to coach up his young quarterback. Tedford had time, and the "Stupidity at Strawberry Canyon" still ensued. That's just unacceptable for any coach who wants to become an elite member of this select fraternity.

On to other strategic case studies from a delicious Saturday...

The last time Steve Spurrier and Butch Davis coached against each other in college, Miami pulled away in the fourth quarter to beat Florida in the 2001 Sugar Bowl in New Orleans. On Saturday in Chapel Hill, the two men--back on NCAA sidelines and done with the merciless (and, frankly, unappealing) pros--went at it again. Their "Clash of the Carolinas" provided enough situational dilemmas to last a full season.

Where to begin in discussing the many questionable decisions made by both Spurrier and Davis on Saturday? Let's start with Davis.

What in the world was the former Miami master thinking when he tried for two points in a 21-9 game in the fourth quarter against Spurrier's Gamecocks? Here's the simple point-spread math that should have been so easy for Davis to understand: the difference between 12 and 11 points is substantial. In a 12-point game, the field goal is removed from the equation. In an 11-point game, the field goal is in play. If a game is in the fourth quarter, a 13-point deficit always demands a two-point try. A 12-point lead demands a kick. Duh!

But Davis wasn't done sabotaging his team's chances of making a comeback. Again, the head (Tar) Heel couldn't put two and two together when it came to scoreboard arithmetic, with even more crippling results.

With Carolina down 12 (not 11) because of his strategic mistake, Davis initially opted to kick a field goal with his team deep in South Carolina territory near the six-minute mark of regulation. Someone on the UNC sideline must have informed Davis of the point spread, because a timeout was called just before the ball was snapped. However, as Tar Heel partisans would soon find out, this final timeout robbed the home team of 35-40 precious seconds that really could have come in handy at the end of the ballgame. Mere indecision proved to be fatal, even though the proper choice was ultimately made on that fourth-down play (which, cruelly, still failed, leaving the Heels down 12, anyway).

What's even more galling for North Carolina fans is that once UNC did score a touchdown to get the lead from 12 to just six points, Davis still couldn't make the right move. Knowing that he'd have to try an onside kick (given the lack of timeouts caused by the blunder mentioned above), Davis should have known that South Carolina--if it recovered the onside kick--would start around the UNC 40 and therefore have a chance to kick a field goal with Ryan Succop. Davis should have kicked the PAT to keep his team down by five, and therefore able to stay in the game if USC kicked a field goal. By going for the two-point conversion, Davis left his team vulnerable to instant defeat with a field goal (given the nine-point margin it could have created.) Just as Davis needs to realize the difference between a 12-point spread and an 11-point spread, he also needs to realize the difference between a 4-point margin and a 3-point margin. It's of considerable strategic value to reduce a deficit to a field goal, but there's little point in reducing a deficit from six to four... especially when a five-point margin keeps a team in the game when the opposition tacks on a field goal. Butch, you go for two when down five, not six; when down 13, not 12. Got it?

Now, we turn to Spurrier, who made good decisions but bad play calls.

Given the disappearance of his offense, especially his offensive line, combined with North Carolina's lack of timeouts, it was smart and disciplined for Spurrier to swallow his medicine and avoid a preference for the forward pass in the final six minutes of Saturday's game against the Tar Heels. In that respect, Spurrier showed wisdom. The Head Ball Coach (note to other sportswriters and fans: it's the Head Ball Coach, not the OL' Ball Coach--can we get that straight?) also made a good decision by electing to have Succop, his trusted kicker, go for a game-sealing field goal with 48 seconds left and USC, up six, facing fourth and 3 at the UNC 31. Spurrier's fundamental decisions showed why the man has attained an elevated place in the pantheon of SEC coaches.

However, for all of Spurrier's sound instincts, there was a noticeable ***** in the Visored One's armor: even if you make good decisions, you need to back up those moves with good play calls, and it was here that Spurrier fell short.

It's true enough that Chris Smelley is not as experienced as Blake Mitchell (though recent games would suggest that Smelley is the slightly better quarterback on an overall level... more on this in a bit), but one must remember that USC had no business throwing the the ball to begin with in the final minutes against UNC. The problem with USC's play selection in the late stages of the North Carolina game was that the runs were vanilla runs. In the process of trying to conserve a lead, Spurrier seemed unwilling to be aggressive within a conservative framework (which is quite possible to do). One of Spurrier's "aggressively conservative" plays from his Florida days was the "X quick," a handoff to a receiver in motion who would run hard at the time of the snap to gain momentum in the attempt to turn the corner. The play does risk the receiver going out of bounds, but a simple instruction from Spurrier should have prevented a mishap. All in all, some misdirection or change-of-pace runs were worth trying against North Carolina's pursuit-based defense. Spurrier--while smart to run the ball exclusively--was nevertheless too timid within his run-only framework, and it was that lack of imagination that truly cost him on Saturday. With better play selection, the Gamecocks wouldn't have had to sweat out two Hail Marys in a game they once led by 18 points.

In the above paragraph, there was a parenthetical reference to Chris Smelley in comparison to Blake Mitchell. This leads to an interesting debate concerning the way in which Spurrier should handle his quarterbacks in the coming weeks. It's this columnist's opinion that while Smelley has greater overall aptitude, Mitchell--by virtue of his experience--is a better man in road environments. (After all, Mitchell won at Georgia by displaying good ball security.) It therefore follows that when the Gamecocks enter enemy lairs in Knoxville and Fayetteville, Mitchell should start, if only for a series or even just the first snap. Spurrier might want to devote considerable thought to the possibility of using his play-by-play QB rotation with Smelley and Mitchell, as he did with Doug Johnson and Noah Brindise against Florida State in 1997 as head coach at Florida.

Next in the crosshairs is the man who replaced Spurrier at Florida: Ron Zook. Just one week after experiencing a truly transcendent moment as a collegiate head coach, Zook looked like a rookie against Iowa in a display that was painful to watch.

With Illinois leading the Hawkeyes, 6-3, late in the third quarter, Zook's defense stopped Iowa at the Illini 15 to force 4th and a long 2. In a three-point game, there seemed to be little chance that Kirk Ferentz would dare to go for the first down and pass up a short field goal that would have tied the game. When an illegal formation penalty was called on Iowa, everyone in the ballpark thought that the penalty would be declined and that the Illini would not be trailing heading into the fourth quarter.

Unfortunately for Illinois, though, there were two people in Kinnick Stadium who didn't think the penalty should be declined: ESPN2 broadcaster Ray Bentley, and--more importantly--Zook himself. One 3rd and 7 touchdown strike later, Iowa had the winning points in a game that ended 10-6 in favor of the Hawkeyes.

What should determine a coach's decision on the matter of accepting or declining penalties involving third and fourth downs? It's not terrifically complicated: if a team must get a touchdown and a penalty puts that touchdown in grave jeopardy, you take a third-down penalty at the expense of (temporarily) passing up a fourth down scenario. Is that too hard to comprehend? The Illinois-Iowa scenario met neither of the two criteria, since a field goal offered significant value for the Hawkeyes and the touchdown was not placed in grave jeopardy by the penalty.

What's the classic scenario in which it's wise to take a penalty and deny a fourth down in the process? If you know your football strategy, you already have the situation in mind. (Waiting... waiting... waiting... okay, if you don't have it by now, you need to attend some football strategy seminars in the offseason to build up your knowledge base...) If you're leading by four to seven points in the final minute of regulation and your opponent, a run-based team, has a 4th and goal on or inside the 1, you take a five-yard penalty even if it forces third down. On a larger level, you take five-yard penalties to replay third down if they prevent "4th and very short" situations for the opposition. You generally don't take penalties if the fourth-down yardage is anything more than a long one yard. In Zook's case, the difference was between "3rd and a long 7" and "4th and a long 2." That just doesn't justify accepting a penalty, and Iowa made the Zooker pay.

And as we close, just remember: don't chip kick a kickoff the way Houston Nutt did against Auburn, and don't blame Les Miles for doing against Kentucky what he did against Florida: trusting his running backs and his offensive line. Just tip the cap to Kentucky for gutting out an amazing win. See you next week.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD class=storytitle colSpan=3>Weekly Affirmation </TD></TR><TR><TD class=primaryimage vAlign=top>

</TD><TD noWrap width=3></TD><TD vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=4 width="60%" bgColor=#f5f5f5 border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD vAlign=center noWrap>By Matt Zemek
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Oct 15, 2007
</TD><TD noWrap>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Before addressing all the officiating controversies that erupted this past weekend, a few words about our friend, the Bowl Championship Series, are in order.
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3>

ByMatthew Zemek

Mr. Zemek's e-mail: mzemek@hotmail.com

Short-Form Weekly Affirmation: Fast Track Gold Club

The pro-BCS arguments have already been voiced this weekend, hours in advance of the first BCS rankings. John Saunders of ABC/ESPN said on The Sports Reporters that this crazy season is proving to be its own internal playoff system. You know, he may have a point. After all, LSU's loss eliminated the...

What? Wait a minute--you mean Les Miles' Tigers are still in the mix? Shoot. Oh well, we definitely know that Oklahoma's loss to Colorado knocked the...

Huh? You're fixin' to tell me that the Sooners are still in this dadgum race? Darn. But hey, we sure know that Kentucky's loss to South Carolina has the...

Waaaa? Kentucky's in the thick of the national title chase with Florida coming into Lexington this Saturday? Crap. Well, we pro-BCS people still know one thing in this crazy season of ours: Florida has been eliminated.

WHAT?! You're trying to say that if Florida runs the table, South Florida and Boston College lose, and Arizona State doesn't go undefeated, the Gators could play Oklahoma (or another one-loss team with a good resume) for all the marbles in New Orleans?

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we once again arrive at the simplest of conclusions: the Bowl Championship Series simply can't address the uniqueness of each and every college football season. The only redeeming value of the BCS is that it provides the opportunity for No. 1 to play No. 2 when the one magic scenario emerges: two and only two unbeaten teams at the end of the regular season. When this golden script isn't written, this system is absolutely worthless; actually, that's being charitable. The BCS--when the magic scenario doesn't materialize--is not just value-neutral, but value-negative for college football, given its cultural and emotional diminishment of the classic matchups and conference tie-ins associated with the New Year's Day bowls.

Please, BCS proponents, don't say this system is a playoff, because practically everybody has lost, and is therefore just as much a contender as at the beginning of the season. Only Michigan and a few other teams have truly been eliminated from the national title conversation. Colorado came THIS CLOSE to making the big game with two losses in 2001; this season, we could have our first two-loss entrant in the Big Easy's Big One. In the meantime, I want my college football tradition back (unless we get a plus one after the top four teams play in two of the four current BCS bowls).

Here are this week's reflection questions for you to think about...

How different a coach is Houston Nutt in 2007, compared to 2006? Be as honest as possible...

Is Steve Pederson of Nebraska good or bad as an athletic director?

Why are Colt Brennan's Heisman credentials even being discussed at this point?

Why are anyone's Heisman credentials being discussed at this point?

Why isn't anyone talking about the superb job Lloyd Carr has done since Appy State and Oregon? What did Carr do at age eight that has earned him such frosty, black-hole treatment from national talking heads and pundits?

After this upcoming Saturday's game pitting Michigan against Illinois, will the losing coach receive more negative publicity than the winning coach receives positive publicity?

If you want to teach sportsmanship and good morals to your children, but you also think Les Miles' decisions simply stunk in the third overtime against Kentucky, a question: do you know what Miles did well after the game ended in Commonwealth Stadium? Ask around if you don't.

If you want to teach sportsmanship and good morals to your children, but you're irate at Mark Richt for doing a subpar job with this year's Georgia team, did you see what Richt did at the end of the Vanderbilt game? More importantly, does your reaction to Richt's personal conduct exceed the force of your emotions connected to Richt's coaching performance?

Based on the two examples above, a follow-up question: do you generally remember acts of character on a football field, or do you more strongly retain and recall the performance-only aspects of a game in your mind's eye? Where do your deepest emotions truly reside?

If Cincinnati played Louisville with a one-man advantage, would the Bearcats finally be able to beat the Cardinals?

Did you ever consider the possibility that a Florida-Kentucky football game would easily exceed a Florida-Kentucky basketball game in importance?

And finally, who plays the role of the sympathetic underdog Thursday night: South Florida or Rutgers?

Next up, a series of quick-hitters...

In case you didn't notice, Minnesota blew a big lead late to Northwestern. Somewhere, Glen Mason is smiling.

The Big Ten championship could be decided by this potentially true statement: Ohio State will face the post-Wisconsin Anthony Morelli. (The empirically proven truth is that Michigan had the good fortune of facing the pre-Wisconsin Anthony Morelli.)

As sure as the sun rises in the east, Boston College will go down against Virginia Tech a week from this Thursday in Blacksburg. Come on--barely easing past a horrible Notre Dame team? Zero field goal kicking? The Eagles might be undefeated now, but they're looking at a long, hard fall in the coming weeks unless they substantially ratchet up their level of play.

Got to see more than a few snaps of the new-look Arizona State Sun Devils on Saturday night. The good people of Phoenix and Tempe are unaccustomed to seeing a major football team compete with such zest for a full 60 minutes on a weekly basis. The Devils actually hustle and display mental toughness. Imagine that. Dennis Erickson might be a carpetbagger who lacks a strong ethical compass, but he sure can coach.

The award for "most bizarrely beautiful seven-game sequence in college football history" goes to the Virginia Cavaliers. They lead the ACC despite getting thumped at Wyoming and squeaking by Middle Tennessee and Connecticut by a combined three points. Credit Al Groh for getting his team to win games, no matter how ugly. A win over Virginia Tech at season's end will almost certainly put the Hoos in the ACC title game.

Another reason why college sports are overhyped and drain way more human resources than they ever have a right to in a world where billions of people live on less than a dollar a day: just stop for a second and contemplate all the ink, newsprint, bandwidth, wiring, TV cameras, production trucks, and other man-made products used (or, more accurately, WASTED) to document the life of Jimmy Clausen in relationship to his courtship and career at Notre Dame. Can we please introduce some restraint to the coverage and hyping of the recruiting process? I know that's asking a lot, but the Weekly Affirmation strives to attain the greatest moral goods in society.

Just making sure of something here: if you're wondering why USC is struggling so much, are you aware that the Trojans' entire starting offensive line has been wiped out by injury? It's not as though Pete Carroll and Steve Sarkisian have ceased to understand how to coach offense. When a dominant O-line turns into a MASH unit, a team will suffer considerably. If Kentucky and Florida were to lose their offensive lines, Andre Woodson and Tim Tebow would suddenly look a lot more average.

Temple has a two-game winning streak, and Buffalo is 3-1 in the Mid-American Conference. Words don't do justice to the character and commitment displayed by the student athletes at these two programs, which have had to take a lot of beatings over extended periods of time. Way to go, young men. You represent the very best of college athletics, even if your games are played out of the public spotlight.

Long-Form Weekly Affirmation: Premium Members

In this week's essay, we deal with a subject that needs to receive more attention from anyone concerned with the competitive integrity of college football games: officiating. While talking about the teams and games that will decide conference crowns and multi-million-dollar bowl bids, we--as a college football community--have to talk about the ways in which these games are officiated and reviewed from the replay booth. Too much effort is produced by coaches and athletes for a bad call to decide a result; too much of an emotional investment is given to the sport for its biggest contests to be unfairly shaped by insufficient procedures that don't support the upstanding gentlemen who do their best to officate a game on the field. Officials are trying their best, along with the athletes and coaches; with that said, though, a number of procedures and officiating mechanics are not producing fair outcomes on the field.

The emerging problem with college football officiating is that the speed and physicality of the sport are just too overwhelming for human beings to fully monitor. The incredibly close calls examined by replay--week after week, month after month, season after season--are simultaneously clear yet complex, if that makes any sense. In other words, replay continues to show us--during every football weekend--how certain plays can be impossible to accurately see in real time, but easy to interpret with replay technology. One should understand that more and more football plays demand the time, perspective and image manipulation offered by replay if they're to be called and interpreted correctly. I don't think any officiating supervisor or coordinator could possibly dispute that fundamental assertion.

With this as prelude, then, just consider some of the wild plays from the past weekend's games:

In the final minute of the FIRST HALF of the Alabama-Ole Miss game (yes, the final minute of the second half wasn't the only controversy-filled minute of this game), Penn Wagers' SEC crew conferred before ruling that a Tide ballcarrier was down. A whistle had not blown the play dead, but when the "down" ruling was made, that decision apparently prevented Ole Miss coach Ed Orgeron from being able to challenge the play. One can safely make this claim because Orgeron clearly would have challenged the ruling if given a chance to do so. Replay clearly showed that the runner had fumbled, but with the "down" ruling, the play was viewed to be dead and therefore out of the scope of replay review. The sequence illustrated one of many jurisdictional issues involving replay, and the larger subject of what is or isn't reviewable based on certain rulings by officiating crews.

Then, in the last minute of the Alabama-Ole Miss game (in a situation you've probably been made aware of, given its impact on the contest), replay clearly showed that an Ole Miss receiver went out of bounds on his own power before coming back in, which created an illegal touching penalty that preserved the Tide's 27-24 win. The call was correct, but there was considerable confusion about whether or not that kind of play was even subject to review in the first place. There was never any doubt that the Ole Miss receiver stepped out of bounds before coming back in; the question was if the receiver went out of bounds on his own power or not. Since that particular element of the play would decide the legality of the catch, the ultimate ruling on the play was a matter of judgment, not necessarily empirical evidence. And since judgment calls are hard to quantify, there was a great deal of uncertainty among all relevant parties as to the jurisdiction of replay in this instance.

A big play involving officiating occured in the Illinois-Iowa game, and while Ron Zook never should have accepted a penalty to give Iowa an extra third down, the fact remains that if the officials had administered the game better, the Illini might have pulled out a 6-3 victory. A few plays before Zook's ill-fated decision, Iowa had a 4th and inches with 2:15 left in the third quarter at the Illinois 24. After a timeout for a measurement, the teams went back to the line of scrimmage as the Hawkeyes prepared for their fourth-down play. The umpire stood over the ball, as he always will after an on-field (officials) timeout. Usually, the referee--who stands several yards behind everyone--is supposed to wait for the umpire to fully clear the area before restarting the clock and whistling the ball ready for play. On this occasion, however, the referee blew his whistle with the umpire just behind the Illinois defensive front and not fully clear from the tackle box. With the Illini not yet able to load the box to stop a short-yardage play, Iowa quick-snapped and got the first down. The umpire was standing in the very area where two or three linebackers should have been standing in an attempt to plug gaps and stuff a quarterback sneak. But with the referee's quick whistle, Illinois was prevented--not by Iowa, but by the officials themselves--from being able to mount an adequate defense. A few Illini players protested, but the referee wouldn't allow a do-over. Nothing but poor game administration jobbed Illinois. The overwhelming irony of this instance is that in most cases, "umpire over the ball" game administration usually hurts the offense, as the referee blows his whistle before the quarterback is ready. This is why teams that get first downs with two seconds left in a half fail to spike the ball in time to stop the clock before the end of the half. (Remember the 1998 Rose Bowl between Washington State and Michigan. Remember the 2006 Kentucky-Florida game. Remember, too, the end of last year's Washington-USC game. Happens all the time.) All in all, this particular officiating mechanic needs to be substantially revised. The referee should never be allowed to blow the "ready for play" whistle until the umpire has fully cleared the scrimmage area.

In the Georgia Tech-Miami game, a Yellow Jacket defender stole the ball from a Miami ballcarrier just before hitting the ground. In real time, it was virtually impossible for the official to see. On replay, it was easy. But since Tech coach Chan Gailey and other Yellow Jacket coaches in the press box were unable to get a clear look at the play within a reasonable amount of time, Miami was able to run the next play and keep the ball. This sequence illustrates the limitations placed on teams by the system that allows just one coach-based challenge per half. If this larger issue of replay jurisdiction is to become more genuinely equitable and fair, the NCAA will allow not just one challenge from the coaching staff, but one challenge from a player as well. It's hard to ask a player to run to his coach in the middle of a game and demand a challenge, but in retrospect, that was the only legal avenue Georgia Tech had after that play. If players were given one challenge per half, that jurisdictional issue would have been solved.

Finally, in the Boston College-Notre Dame game, a ball spot--for the first time I can remember--was actually changed as a result of replay. The goal-line ball-spot reviews in the LSU-Kentucky and Oregon State-Cal games weren't reversed because--as is normally the case with ball spots--it's hard to get the accurate camera angles (looking around or over the piles of bodies and limbs) that can clearly identify discrepancies between the live-ball spot and the actual progression of the ball. But with NBC's overhead camera, an angle needed to overturn a ball spot was provided. Given this mechanism, the replay booth was able to make a proper adjustment, and the trajectory of the Eagle-Irish affair wound up being permanently and profoundly altered as a result. This brings up yet another jurisdictional issue: if an overhead camera can substantially influence one game, where are the binding standards (if any) for the kinds of cameras that should exist at each and every game?

Can you see the picture here? Officials on the field--with the exception of the Illinois-Iowa crew--did a fine job on Saturday. But in so many cases, the mechanisms and procedures surrounding replay prove that for every answer or solution provided by the current replay system, there are thousands more dilemmas, questions and uncertainties. We're quickly reaching the point where replay--if it is to retain value and fairly arbitrate college football games--should have much more expansive jurisdiction over individual games. Everything should be reviewable--pass interference, judgment calls, you name it--and officials' on-field rulings should not constrict the ways in which replay is allowed to be used. Once these rules and provisions are accordingly adjusted, we might finally reach a time in college football when bad calls no longer decide games. That would be great, wouldn't it? It's time to give a hard look to a subject that elicits a lot of emotion, but needs a lot more constructive action.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
USC's Booty to start throwing

Injured quarterback eyeing returing vs. Notre Dame

Posted: Tuesday October 16, 2007 12:16AM; Updated: Tuesday October 16, 2007 12:17AM

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- John David Booty said he plans on throwing Tuesday in practice, and the quarterback hopes to play this weekend when No. 13 Southern California faces rival Notre Dame.
Booty sat out USC's 20-13 victory over Arizona last Saturday after breaking the middle finger on his throwing hand the previous weekend, when the Trojans (5-1, 3-1 Pac-10) were upset by Stanford.
Mark Sanchez filled in and completed 19 of 31 passes for 130 yards and one touchdown with two interceptions in his first career start.
"I'm throwing tomorrow. I'm not sitting out anymore," Booty said after practice Monday. "It feels good. I probably will wear a glove on my throwing hand. I'm not trying to do anything amazing. If I can throw effectively, I want to play.
"It's the coach's decision, not mine."
USC coach Pete Carroll said it was too early to make a decision.
"Same deal. We're going to go with Mark as the starter going into practice (Tuesday)," Carroll said. "We'll see where we are. Mark's going to get all the reps with the first string.
"It's Mark's day tomorrow. Then we'll see what happens with John. We'll just wait, watch, see what he feels like afterward."
Carroll hopes several other injured players are able to return to action against Notre Dame (1-6), including linebacker Bruce Cushing, who has played very little this season because of a sprained ankle, and leading rusher Stafon Johnson, who missed the last two games with a sprained foot.
Both players believe they'll be able to play at Notre Dame, so did offensive tackle Sam Baker, who left the Arizona game in the first half with an injured hamstring.
Linebacker Rey Maualuga wasn't so optimistic. He left the Arizona game with an injured hip.
"They're saying it's a hip pointer. I came out because I felt a pop," he said. "I'm not able to run. It was one of the worst pains I've felt. Once it happened, I knew I couldn't go on. I can't jog without it being painful."
 
Second-half Collapses Ruining UW's Season

Posted Oct 16th 2007 8:37AM by Sean Hawkins
Filed under: Washington Football, Pac 10
jake-locker-asu.jpg
The warning signs have been there since the second half vs. Boise State, way back in the second game of the year. UW wouldn't score in the third or fourth quarter that day, but due to some Boise State inexperience at QB, the Huskies held on for the victory. But they haven't won a game since, and now at 2-4, a promising 2-0 start is starting to evaporate. Saturday night's 44-20 blowout at unbeaten ASU was bit surprising in the final tally, but the way this one unfolded is really a microcosm of UW's 2007 season.
Once again, the Huskies played well for the first 30 minutes, leading 17-13. But once again, they folded in the second half and were basically run off the field. QB Jake Locker has been, well, he's been a redshirt frosh still trying to get his feet wet, and there are usually week's full of on-the-job lessons that have to be learned. He had a lousy night throwing the football vs. ASU, just 10-for-28, and his 48 rushing yards were actually a season-low. Louis Rankin was better, with 80 yards rushing, but that was the first time since the opening week that he was above 50 rushing yards in a game. The offense clearly has issues, but the troubling thing for UW is the defense of late, especially in the second half. Bob Condotta of the Seattle Times pointed out just how bad they've been. Consider:
  • In just the last four games, all losses, UW has been outscored 105-41 in the second half. Three of those games saw them give up at least 30 second-half points!
  • In that same four-game stretch, UW's total defense has been abysmal, giving up an average of just north of 500 yards per game. Even worse is the fact that they are giving up 279 rushing yards on average in those four games, and wearing down big-time in the second half, giving up 158.75 rushing yards after halftime.
Brutal. So why the struggles? Is it a lack of quality depth that just flat-out gets tired against superior opponents? Is it the opponents making adjustments to a QB they've never seen before, and once they settle in they figure him out? Sort of like a young hard-throwing MLB pitcher that rolls through a lineup the first time, then they tee off on him and send him to the showers before the fifth inning? Or is there something bigger going on here? Is this what some Notre Dame fans used to point to about Ty Willingham and his lack of in-game adjustments? Or how he was always known as a good recruiter, but never a guy that's great at being a "game day" coach, whatever that means?
There are tons of questions as to why this is happening, but there is no denying it now - UW has a real problem on their hands with second-half collapses, and they need to figure it out, fast. Oregon comes to Seattle on Saturday with a lights-out offense that is rolling right now, and one shudders to think what Dennis Dixon could do against the Husky defense if they keep rolling over in the second half!
 
We're All Aggie Fans Today...


Sure we won, but is that really any excuse not to a have a healing picture?


Aggiesarenumber1.jpg

According to the sender of the pic above, it was apparently on the TexAgs board...until the mods took it down. But thanks to us, your friends here at the MZone, it lives on.

Yes, college football (and beautiful women) fans, you can thank us later for saving it from the digital dustbin. God, I miss college right now.
 
<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD class=storytitle colSpan=3>Cavalcade of Whimsy - Predicting the BCS </TD></TR><TR><TD class=primaryimage vAlign=top>
485972.jpg


</TD><TD noWrap width=3></TD><TD vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=4 width="60%" bgColor=#f5f5f5 border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD vAlign=center noWrap>By Pete Fiutak
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Oct 16, 2007
</TD><TD noWrap>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Who's the right coach to Nebraska? How should coaches handle overtime? What ten teams will end up in the BCS, and how? Steve Slaton and West Virginia could end up in an interesting situation if everything breaks the right way. These topics and more in the latest Cavalcade of Whimsy.
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3>
</B></EM>
[FONT=verdana, arial, sans serif]Fiu's Cavalcade of Whimsy[/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, arial, sans serif]
a.k.a. Frank Costanza's Festivus Airing of the Grievances [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, arial, sans serif][SIZE=-2]

By Pete Fiutak
What's your beef? ... E-mail with your thoughts
Past Whimsies
[/SIZE][/FONT]2006 Season | Preseason Part One, Part Two | Week 1
Week
2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6
If this column sucks, it’s not my fault … I fired Frank Solich, who was only a year removed from playing in the national title game, and in an attempt to prevent the column from making a freefall into mediocrity, hired Bill Callahan. Unfortunately, I ignored what had made it so dominant for so many years. I’m now at the end of an off-ramp holding a sign saying, “Will Direct Your Athletic Department For Food."

And unlike Nebraska, his team is sure to get in a bowl …
Nebraska, ready to make everything all better? Want to push the back button on the DVR and try this whole thing over again? One name: Paul Johnson. He has his Navy team at 4-2 with the nation’s number one rushing offense. He’s taken a program that’s unable to get any appreciable D-I talent and molded it into a disciplined mini-juggernaut that’s gone to four straight bowl games with a 39-17 since 2002. Again, he's doing this with a different level of athlete. Nebraska, I’m begging you. Pull down your drawers and flash a big, fat vertical smile to the spread offense, realize that you actually had it right all along, and go back to running the option. Don’t be afraid of the wishbone. Go back to what you do best, and you’ll scare the bejeebers out of the rest of the Big 12.

If you’re going to put it on a tee for me …
The body of George Gipp, the legendary Notre Dame star, was exhumed this week to test his DNA, for unspecified reasons. 1) Technically, it's true. The Notre Dame running game couldn't be ranked any lower with Gipp at tailback. 2) And you thought Ty Willingham had a tough time recruiting. 3) The corpse took a limo to the College Football Hall of Fame and announced it'd be quarterbacking for the Irish next year.


You'd think he could at least help Notre Dame get a running back or two … Those Pep Talks Lou Holtz is doing on ESPN are the real deal. I know from personal experience. In between the second and third periods of Game 7 of the 1981 Campbell Conference Finals between the Minnesota North Stars and the Calgary Flames, a young Pete Fiutak walked past Holtz, then the Minnesota Golden Gopher head coach, on the way to the john.

Young, impressionable, nervous Fiu with voice crackling like Peter Brady singing “Time To Change”: “Um, uhh, hi Coach Holtz. How’s it goin’?"

Holtz: “Son, I’m doin’ fine.” (slaps young Fiu on the back and walks on by)

Inspired, young Fiu goes out the next day and pulls off an improbable C+ on his math test.

Yeah, and in 1986, a show about four old biddies starring Bea Arthur could be a hit …
Here’s my TV show pitch. “The Golden Coaches.” Picture four mature coaches living together and experiencing the joys and angst of their golden years in Miami. Strong-willed Holtz, spacey Bowden, lusty Southern Belle Spurrier, and the matriarch, Paterno, occasionally clash, but are there for one another in the end, with the signature moment coming each week when they raid the refrigerator for an ice cream sundae binge session. I’m only half joking here. Listening to those four is as entertaining as anything else on television.
If you have four cases left, and one has a million dollars, and the rest have less than $10,000, you play the odds and always, always, always pick another case so you get a better deal from the bankerPitt head coach Dave Wannstedt and Minnesota’s Tim Brewster, after each lost tough overtime games this week by unnecessarily going for two and the win, would each like to personally thank LSU's Les Miles for taking the overtime coaching spotlight away. If you’re in overtime, you don’t go for two until you absolutely have to. If you’re so confident in your offense, then kick the extra point, score a touchdown on your next overtime possession, and put the pressure on the other team.

At least she didn't miss a block …
Last week, Joe Paterno chastised a woman driver for blowing through a stop sign. After the legendary head coach was through, a man came out and said he was her husband, causing Paterno to remark, “Boy, that’s your problem.” Pass rushers dream of the moment when they have a free shot on a quarterback. I dream of someday being able to nail a moment like that right on cue, and this week, to be able to come up with a decent line about Gipp..

“All you did was weaken a country today, Kaffee. That’s all you did. You put people in danger. Sweet dreams, son.” …
O.K. Kentucky, you can admit it now. When you made the controversial decision to keep on Rich Brooks, never in a hundred million years did you actually think the program would actually be good under his command. Appalachian State is now the new comparison for every big upset, and for the foreseeable future, the Rich Brooks situation will be used by every sucky head coach as the reason why he should get more time.

There’s less than two feet between a halo and a noose …
You can’t call LSU head coach Les Miles gutsy and brave one week after powering the ball on Florida time and again, and then dog him for going with what worked all season long in the third overtime on the road.

I like to think the last thing that went through his head...other than that bullet...was to wonder how the hell Andy Dufresne ever got the best of him.” … I could be reading this all wrong, but I get the sense that LSU was getting way too full of itself, and it proved costly. It seemed like Les Miles and the entire program never dreamed Kentucky, or anyone, could crank out 375 yards of total offense and 43 points on its defense in 12 quarters. “I’m surprised at how well Kentucky moved the football,” Miles said right after the game. Everyone keeps asking how all the upsets keep happening all across the country, and the short answer continues to be arrogance. The big programs, say all the right things, but they just don’t believe in their heart of hearts that they can be beaten by a supposedly inferior team.

“Thank you Mr. Cowboy, I’ll take it under advisement. Hit it again.” … In the NFL, where the talent level is about dead even, give or take a Tom Brady or LaDainian Tomlinson, a defense can pretty much focus on stopping one player and erase him from the opposing team’s gameplan. The offenses adjust, and then the chess game kicks in. In college football, where you often have a wild disparity in talent level, particularly in certain areas, with a future NFL draft pick sometimes matching up against a guy who’ll be working the Pizza Hut/Taco Bell counter at the local Target 18 months from now. The good college offensive coordinators don't get cute, and hammer the mismatches over and over again. I know Wake Forest came up with a big pick, but if you’re Florida State and you don’t have a running game, and you have Greg Carr, you throw him a deep jump ball on first down. You throw him a deep jump ball on second down. Third and ten? Throw a deep jump ball to Carr. Everyone knows it's coming, and it takes a special play to stop it.

Hmmmmm. Turner Gill. Nebraska, Hmmmmmm … A big college football pajamagram goes out to two of the most downtrodden bottom-feeders of the last few years. When asked who the best college football fans are, I always say they’re the longtime season ticket holders for programs like Temple and Buffalo. A two-game winning streak is hardly anything to get excited about at most places, but consider this. After beating Akron on a last second touchdown pass, Temple has won as games in the last two weeks than it had over the previous 36. The program’s last two-game winning streak came in the middle of the 2002 season. For Buffalo, after beating Toledo, it’s now 3-4 and actually in the race for the MAC East title. Only once has UB won three games in a season since getting to the D-I level, and this is the first two-game winning streak since late in the 2001 season.

Extremely curious Mike Rozier ankle injuries and Irving Fryar dropped passes aside …
It’s mid-October in 1983. How many out there were going, “Miami in the national title hunt?” And then the Canes beat an unbeatable Nebraska team in an all-timer of a national championship. It’s mid-October in 2007. How many out there are going, “South Florida in the national title hunt?” Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the new Da U.

Upon further review (tongue sticking out), thhhpptptphhhth …
To anyone out there still dim enough to be against instant replay, watch the Alabama – Ole Miss game and then say it doesn’t make the game better. The Rebels probably win it if there wasn’t an extra set of eyes on a final deep catch that was correctly overturned. The receiver was clearly out of bounds and came back in play.

What, you didn’t see the promos for the game when you were getting your NHL fix? … If the nation’s number two team loses a game televised on Versus, did it really happen?

You think that’s bad, try getting him to brush his teeth, wipe himself every time after “blasting a dookie” on the potty, and to let you listen to anything other than The Wiggles on a car ride lasting more than six minutes …
Never work with kids or animals. Every parent has been there, metaphorically watching their little redshirt freshman quarterback hoplessly trying to scramble for a touchdown with no time outs left and no chance to spike the ball. Like Cal head coach Jeff Tedford, who hasn’t slammed a proverbial clipboard or thrown a headset when dealing with kids?

If you’re a man, then don’t act like you need a time out …
Amazingly, the Oklahoma State head coach Mike Gundy rant is still getting play all over the place. To keep the fun going, and working on the Gundy classic, “I’m a man! I’m 40!” line that’ll have a spot in our sports hearts for the rest of time, here are five other ways to know you’re a man if you’re a college football fan.

5. You remember a time when Nebraska, Notre Dame and Miami didn’t suck.
4. When you wear a jersey, you get the same looks as the creepy mom with the mini-skirt, teased hair and mass produced Fleetwood Mac t-shirt.
3. The AIG commercials make you think.
2. There’s a part of you that you don’t particularly like that thinks those cheerleaders should probably put some more clothes on, and then feels sort of wrong when you're happy they didn't. .And then you rewind the DVR. Twice.
1. The game that’s making or breaking your mood for the week is being played by people at least half your age.

You’re a dillhole. Make up for it … Do you have extra tickets? Have a spare $20? Go to www.specialspectators.org. Special Spectators is an organization that takes seriously ill children to college games for a unique experience. They have raffles available for the BCS Championship game and the Rose Bowl, or you can just donate your extra tickets to help out the worthy cause.


If only JaMarcus Russell, Calvin Johnson, Adrian Peterson, and Marshawn Lynch were around to make the 2007 season interesting … Whether or not you personally agree with the concept, it’s undeniably time to admit that there’s no real reason for a limitation on when a player can go to the NFL. Adrian Peterson would’ve been able to rip apart NFL teams three years ago. Darren McFadden would’ve been the starting tailback on at least 15 teams last season. The college game will be just fine. Let the kids go earn their millions whenever they want.

Just like you don’t fall in love with, and by a cappuccino maker for, the masseuse who does that ,,,
don’t make the mistake of getting to comfy cozy with anyone in the Pac 10. I like this Oregon team. You like this Oregon team. This Oregon team will get tagged at least once more. So will Cal, Arizona State is overdue for a loss, and USC has at least two more coming its way..

The C.O.W. airing of the grievances followed by the feats of strength


There’s no need to watch college football until January. Now that the initial BCS rankings are out, I’m going to clue you in on what’s going to happen in the BCS race. The ten teams in the big money matchups will be …

10. Arizona State – Rose Bowl
No one is believing in the Sun Devils, mainly because no one has seen them play. Those late night games in the desert are always off the map for most, but that’ll soon change. The offensive line has a few issues in pass protection, but with a physical style, to go along with all the normal ASU speed and athleticism, ASU should be able to keep up in home games against Cal and USC, and should be able to overcome an upcoming loss at Oregon to go 11-1 and win the Pac 10 title. Dennis Erickson's team will then go to Pasadena to play ….

9. Boise State – Rose Bowl
The Rose Bowl will lose the number one team to the BCS Championship game, so it’ll get its first pick from all the at-large teams. Even so, the selection people will be a bit hamstrung by their options, and will end up being happy to get all the Bronco fans streaming down from Boise, while getting huge TV ratings with everyone looking for the 2007 Fiesta Bowl magic to kick in again. There won’t be any Big Ten teams available, and after Boise State beats Hawaii when everyone is watching, and runs the rest of the table, it’ll move up enough in the BCS rankings to get into the top 12 and earn an automatic spot.

8. LSU – Sugar Bowl
The LSU schedule eases up big-time, with the two road games left, after a home date with Auburn, coming against Alabama and Ole Miss. Nick Saban will pull out all the stops against his former team and give the Tide the early signature win in his tenure. The Tigers will still win the West and will still go on to win the SEC title, while also eliminating the East representative from the BCS chase. LSU will sell out the Superdome against …

7.
Kansas – Sugar Bowl
If you’re waiting for the schedule to get nasty, it doesn't get too bad, with road games against Colorado, Texas A&M, Oklahoma State, along with home dates against Nebraska and Iowa State. 13th in the initial rankings, Mark Mangino’s team will keep moving up and up as others start dropping with key losses late. KU won’t win the North, losing to Missouri in the regular season finale, but it won’t be by much. Mizzou will lose a rematch in the Big 12 title game to …

6. Oklahoma – Fiesta Bowl
The Sooners will obliterate Iowa State, Texas A&M and Baylor to get into the number two spot in the BCS rankings, after South Florida loses to Rutgers, BC loses to Virginia Tech and LSU loses to Alabama, and then they’ll run into a Texas Tech buzzsaw in Lubbock to ruin the national title hopes. However, they’ll get a whale of a showdown against …

5. Oregon – Fiesta Bowl
The world will jump all over the Ducks, currently tenth in the BCS, after they beat USC (and badly), and ruin Arizona State’s unbeaten season. Just when it seems like they’ll be in the national title discussion, UCLA will pull a performance out of its ear in a shootout in Pasadena.

4. Virginia Tech – Orange Bowl
The Hokies enter the national title picture with a win over Boston College, and then they’ll lose to Georgia Tech to bring things to a screeching halt. However, they’ll beat Florida State, Miami and Virginia, and the Cavaliers will have already lost at least once along the way, forcing a BC – VT rematch in the ACC title game. The Hokies will come up with a second win over the Eagles.

3. South Florida – Orange Bowl
Here we go with the big debate of the 2007 season. South Florida will lose at Rutgers in a thriller, but will beat Connecticut, Cincinnati, Syracuse, Louisville and Pitt to finish 11-1 to earn an automatic spot in the BCS as the Big East champion. The computers will all have the Bulls in the top two, with at least one having them number one, but because of the recency effect, with the voters remembering the Rutgers loss and forgetting about the West Virginia win, the humans will screw things up by putting them just low enough to open the door for ….

2. West Virginia – BCS Championship
Currently ninth in the BCS rankings, the Mountaineers will start creeping up with impressive win after impressive win. They’ll beat Mississippi State, Rutgers, Louisville, Cincinnati, Connecticut and Pitt to finish 11-1, and get just enough love from the computers to go along with the respect from the human polls. I’m not saying it’s right that West Virginia will get in over South Florida, I’m just predicting here. The Mountaineers will get the number two spot, USF will be three, and the college football world will be buzzing.

1. Ohio State – BCS Championship
You’re not happy about it, and SEC fans are going to have a conniption over a Big Ten team getting into the big dance again, but Ohio State is going to make up for past sins. With wins over Michigan State, at Penn State, Wisconsin, Illinois, and at Michigan, in yet another classic, the Buckeyes will earn more respect than it’ll likely receive, and on a mission, they’re not going to make the same mistake two years in a row.


Nuggets for the upcoming week, now made with white meat, at participating restaurants …
- In case you missed it, Houston WR Donnie Avery has been on fire over the last three weeks, coming up with one of the best performances of the season with a 13-catch, 346-yard, two touchdown day in the win over Rice. However, if you want to get ahead of the pack, start paying attention to Cougar RB Anthon Alridge. A wisp at only 5-9 and 175 pounds soaking wet, he’ll slide to around the third round of the draft next year, but he’ll end up being a situational superstar. He'll be the type of player every scout will beg their GMs to take..
- In the hard-to-do department, Baylor threw the ball 43 times against Kansas, completing 22, and only came up with 154 yards. The Bears averaged 3.58 yards per attempt.
- Watch out for two eligible Big Ten teams, likely Northwestern and Indiana, to get shut out of bowl spots. With almost no chance of two Big Ten teams getting into the BCS, there simply aren’t going to be enough openings.
- Miami is in big trouble for a bowl. It’ll likely beat NC State and Virginia at home, but will likely lose all three road games against Florida State, Virginia Tech, and Boston College to finish 6-6.

C.O.W. shameless gimmick item …
The weekly five Overrated/Underrated aspects of the world
1) Overrated: Kodi Burns and Tyrod Taylor (for now) ... Underrated: Brandon Cox and Sean Glennon
2) Overrated: Ron Zook … Underrated: Getting a three-year contract extension after a decent start to one season
3) Overrated: Reggie Bush and $280,000 ... Underrated: Joe McKnight
4) Overrated: USC right now ... Underrated: USC in about a month when it starts to get healthy
5) Overrated: Tim Tebow getting crushed by phone calls from LSU fans ... Underrated: Tim Tebow, as a recruit, getting crushed by text messages from Urban Meyer

My Heisman ballot this week would be … I vote based on a combination of three things: Most valuable player, most outstanding player, and the signature player of the season. I might wildly change my mind weekly, but I’ll sort it all out at the end. 1) Michael Crabtree, WR Texas Tech, 2) Matt Ryan, QB Boston College, 3) Mike Hart, RB Michigan, 4) Graham Harrell, QB Texas Tech, 5) Brian Brohm, QB Louisville

“You know I'm born to lose, and gambling's for fools/But that's the way I like it baby, I don't wanna live forever” …
The three lines this week that appear to be a tad off. (Keep riding the horse. I’m 1-2, but I’m 1-2 every week. 5-13 overal. As always, enjoy these just for pure amusement.) … 1) Oklahoma -28 over Iowa State, 2) Oregon -11 over Washington, 3) Southern Miss -4 over Marshall.

Sorry this column sucked, but it wasn’t my fault …
the computers loved my column and had it ranked high, but the humans hated it, and now it needs others to fall so it can get into the hunt.


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
GL this week RJ, you are one of the hardest working guys in CFB. Glad to see it paying off for you. This year has been tough for me so far. I can't seem to catch a break on the close games. Had Tulsa -13.5 and they look like they are going to win by 14 and give up a TD with 1:04 to play. Just seems like that kind of stuff keeps happening this year. Going to stay after it though, with the hopes it will turn around.
 
GL this week RJ, you are one of the hardest working guys in CFB. Glad to see it paying off for you. This year has been tough for me so far. I can't seem to catch a break on the close games. Had Tulsa -13.5 and they look like they are going to win by 14 and give up a TD with 1:04 to play. Just seems like that kind of stuff keeps happening this year. Going to stay after it though, with the hopes it will turn around.

Thanks, Tim.

Yeah, it's been a tough year but keeping the chin up and still trading in positive territory, which is more than I can say about The Best CFB Cappers on the Net.

GL this week.
 
LIFE ON THE MARGINS, WEEK SEVEN
By SMQ
Posted on Tue Oct 16, 2007 at 05:27:28 PM EDT
</I>


Weekly obsessing over statistical anomalies and fringe idiosyncracies. Don’t get carried away by these scores from last weekend...
(As always, click here for a definition of 'Swing points')
<TABLE cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=3><TBODY><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #a44a4a"><TD align=middle></TD><TD align=middle>South Carolina</TD><TD align=middle>North Carolina</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Total Offense</TD><TD align=middle>282</TD><TD align=middle>398</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=right>1st Downs</TD><TD align=middle>15</TD><TD align=middle>22</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Yds./Play</TD><TD align=middle>4.9</TD><TD align=middle>5.0</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=right>Yds./Possession</TD><TD align=middle>19.1</TD><TD align=middle>26.5</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Turnovers</TD><TD align=middle>2</TD><TD align=middle>3</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=right>Swing Points</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Final Score: South Carolina 21, North Carolina
- - -
It’s probably wrong to characterize this score as “misleading” when South Carolina led 21-3 at the half and half of the Tar Heels’ first half drives went backward. It should be recognized, though, how thoroughly USC was dominated over the final two quarters: after picking up a first down at the start of the third, the Cocks went the rest of the game – six full possessions, one ending in a missed field goal following a UNC turnover – without moving the sticks once. South Carolina hasn’t always been a juggernaut under Spurrier, but that kind of half-long malaise must be unprecedented for any OBC-led team. North Carolina hit its stride at the end of the third quarter, moving 61 yards for a touchdown and following it with two drives well into USC territory that failed to score (one interception, one failed fourth down conversion) and then racing 62 yards on back-to-back big plays to cut the score to 22-15. The Heels had a chance to win this game with the ball at the Gamecock 31 when time ran out; taken with its tough loss to Virginia Tech and borderline beatdown win over Miami, the tenor must be optimistic for Butch Davis and his redshirt freshman quarterback. Spurrier’s team, meanwhile, has won the games its supposed to win, but aside from the fumble return fest against Kentucky, hasn’t looked particularly good in any of them. <TABLE cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=3><TBODY><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #a44a4a"><TD align=middle></TD><TD align=middle>Oregon State</TD><TD align=middle>California</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Total Offense</TD><TD align=middle>339</TD><TD align=middle>478</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=right>1st Downs</TD><TD align=middle>17</TD><TD align=middle>23</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Yds./Play</TD><TD align=middle>4.5</TD><TD align=middle>6.3</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=right>Yds./Possession</TD><TD align=middle>24.2</TD><TD align=middle>36.8</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Turnovers</TD><TD align=middle>1</TD><TD align=middle>3</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=right>Swing Points</TD><TD align=middle>+13</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Final Score: Oregon State 31, California 28
- - -
<EMBED src=""http://www.youtube.com/v/n-emgrBvpfs width=275 height=220 type=application/x-shockwave-flash wmode="transparent"></EMBED>
Yes, Kevin Riley, this was a kinda dumb play.
- - -
There’s the much-replayed ending, obviously, which submarined an 85-yard drive that should have at least sent the game to overtime, but Cal left at least six and possibly ten more points on the field by missing a field goal on its first possession and failing to score on four straight runs by Justin Forsett after moving the ball 77 yards to the OSU two in the third quarter. That goalline stand to preserve a six-point lead is probably the game’s crucial sequence, though, as Football Outsiders notes in its weekly awarding of the John L. Smith Trophy, there’s plenty of second-guessing to go around:

  • There was much discussion in the SDA comment thread of giving the award to Cal’s Jeff Tedford after his redshirt-freshman quarterback inexplicably opted to run, costing the Bear’s a chip-shot field goal attempt to tie their game against Oregon State. Tedford does deserve some blame for that situation. He’s got to drill it into the quarterback’s head that he absolutely, under no circumstances, can run the ball. Yet, at some point, it’s up to the player to understand the situation and execute. There were 14 seconds left in the game, too much time for Cal to attempt the field goal right there, so running another play was the right call. Yet Tedford does not escape scrutiny for another decision in the game, one that was largely lost based on how the contest ended. Cal had just scored a touchdown to take a 14-10 lead with 43 seconds left in the first half when Tedford opted to call for a squib kick, despite the fact that Oregon State had all three timeouts remaining. The Beavers got the ball at their own 42, and moved 23 yards in four plays to kick a 52-yard field goal. What’s more, they only needed a single timeout to do it. Forty-three seconds is an eternity in college football, and you cannot concede possession near midfield with that much time remaining. Those three points ended up being the difference in the game.” - - -
At midseason, it’s interesting to see the heretofore sorry state of Beaver ball-handling turn into a relative advantage for a change. I started this feature on a weekly basis because of Oregon State’s bizarre loss to Cincinnati, the first of several turnover-heavy chokes by the Beavers, who entered Saturday as the most generous offense in the country. Finishing on the plus side of the margin – just as OSU did when it upset USC and won a string of impossibly close games at the end of last season – makes all the difference in the world.

Notes: I considered including Missouri’s loss to Oklahoma, as the Tigers gained slightly more yards and more first downs and led entering the fourth quarter, yet lost by ten. The game was really a dead heat, though, with the teams moving the ball about equally well and Missouri losing mainly on crucial turnovers. But it doesn’t follow that Mizzou certainly would have won without them: the giveaways and “swing points” (Oklahoma was +17) served to break a tie, if you will, not turn a game that was going the other direction.
The same can be said of Louisville’s 28-24 win over Cincinnati, which was evenly matched (the offenses finished 13 yards apart in total yards) but turned on Cincy’s four turnovers, two of them coming deep in UL territory. Colorado moved the ball with Kansas State (460 yards for KSU to 411 by the Buffs) but turned it over four times, failed on three fourth down conversions and allowed a blocked punt that broke CU’s back late in the third quarter. Thus an even game down-to-down becomes a 27-point romp.
 
Thanks, Tim.

Yeah, it's been a tough year but keeping the chin up and still trading in positive territory, which is more than I can say about The Best CFB Cappers on the Net.

GL this week.

I think I know who you are talking about lol...fellow Horn fan I believe.
 
REPORTS: FRANCHIONE BOUGHT OUT, DONE. EXCELSIOR!

hedley_lamarr.jpg
Buyout?
Sports talk types in Dallas and Birmingham reporting that Dennis Franchione’s buyout has been hammered out, and that Franchione will leave Texas A&M following the 2007 season for the low, low price of 8 to 10 million dollars American, or roughly the combined yearly salaries of 200ish Americans making the average national wage.
Aggie fans, if this is true: EXCELSIOR! Your team might watch tape and prepare instead of attending endless motivational seminars. The number one name on Aggie AD Bill Byrne’s list according to ESPN’s Chuck Cooperstein: Tommy Tuberville, who won’t leave but who will chip a few more gold bricks out of Bobby Lowder’s tower of football Mammon thanks to the overtures.
Other fun, truthy candidates:
–Terry Bowden (though we want him to go to Arkansas in a marriage made in hell)
–Gary Patterson
–Will Muschamp
–Bo Pelini
–Jimbo Fisher
–Paul Johnson
–Jerry Moore. Hot hot hot!
 
Notre Dame will start Sharpley at QB

Irish coach Weis says Jimmy Clausen is 'banged up'

Posted: Tuesday October 16, 2007 1:27PM; Updated: Tuesday October 16, 2007 5:37PM

<TABLE style="CLEAR: both" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=300 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=10>
1.gif
</TD><TD class=cnnimgadpad width="100%">
t1_sharpley.jpg

Evan Sharpley will serve as Notre Dame's third starting quarterback this season.
Andy Altenburger/Icon SMI


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE style="CLEAR: both" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=300 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=10>
1.gif
</TD><TD class=cnnimgadpad>
advertisement_down.gif
<NOSCRIPT>
</NOSCRIPT>
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=10>
1.gif
</TD><TD class=cnnstoryclpad></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>SOUTH BEND, Ind. (AP) -- Evan Sharpley will start at quarterback for Notre Dame against No. 13 Southern California, making the junior the third starting signal-caller for the Fighting Irish this season.
Coach Charlie Weis said he decided to let Sharpley make his first career start for the Irish (1-6) because the junior has been steadily improving. Also, freshman Jimmy Clausen, who has been starting, is banged up. He's been sacked 23 times.
"I think Evan this week gives us the best chance of winning," Weis said Tuesday.
Asked whether the move was permanent, Weis said: "It's a permanent switch for the USC game."
Sharpley has been the No. 2 quarterback for all seven games this season. Demetrius Jones started the season-opener and transferred to Cincinnati after losing the job. Clausen, the first Notre Dame quarterback in at least 56 years to start his second game as a freshman, started the next six.
Sharpley has led the Fighting Irish to four of its seven offensive touchdowns, despite playing significantly less time than Clausen.
Sharpley, who has passed for three touchdowns and two interceptions in six games, has a 111.42 pass efficiency rating compared with Clausen's 89.51. Clausen has one touchdown pass and five interceptions.
Three of the four touchdown drives Sharpley has led have been 79 yards or longer. The other was 37 yards long. Clausen has led the Irish on TD drives of 9, 80 and 2 yards.
Weis had said Clausen had been the starter because he's been more accurate, completing 81-of-141 for a 57.4 completion rate, compared with Sharpley's 43-of-80 passing for a 53.8 completion rate. But Clausen had his worst outing last week, going 7-of-20 for 60 yards against Boston College with two interceptions.
Sharpley, who was backup to Brady Quinn last season, replaced Clausen early in the second half against Boston College and was 11-for-29 for 135 yards and a touchdown. Another TD pass was called back because of a holding penalty. Sharpley also rallied the Irish in the second half of a loss to Purdue.
Weis said Clausen took the news well. Watching from the sideline could help Clausen, he said.
"The game slows down for you when you're not in," Weis said. "The game happens really fast when you're in there."
Weis also announced that James Aldridge, leading the Irish with 249 yards rushing on 67 carries, is doubtful for the game with a high ankle sprain. That's bad news for an Irish squad that already is last in the nation in rushing at 32.1 yards a game.
Travis Thomas, who has rushed for 20 yards on 18 carries, Armando Allen, who has 126 yards on 35 carries and Robert Hughes, who has 39 yards on 12 carries, will all see increased playing time.
 
Callahan says he won't step down

Nebraska coach feels bad for fired AD Steve Pederson

Posted: Tuesday October 16, 2007 1:33PM; Updated: Tuesday October 16, 2007 4:53PM

<TABLE style="CLEAR: both" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=300 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=10>
1.gif
</TD><TD class=cnnimgadpad width="100%">
t1_callahan.jpg

Bill Callahan was supposed to be the coach who would return Nebraska to glory, but he's only managed a 26-18 record.
AP


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE style="CLEAR: both" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=300 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=10>
1.gif
</TD><TD class=cnnimgadpad>
advertisement_down.gif
<NOSCRIPT>
</NOSCRIPT>
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=10>
1.gif
</TD><TD class=cnnstoryclpad></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- A day after the man who hired him was fired, embattled Nebraska coach Bill Callahan insisted he won't be resigning anytime soon.
Callahan said Tuesday that he didn't know how the dismissal of athletic director Steve Pederson would affect his job status. The fourth-year coach said he was saddened by Pederson's firing, but he sidestepped questions about whether he felt responsible for it.
"I feel responsible for the results of this program," Callahan said. "I feel responsible for a lot of things, good and bad. Ultimately, it lies on my shoulders to provide the results you have to provide."
Chancellor Harvey Perlman named Nebraska coaching legend Tom Osborne as interim athletic director on Tuesday. Perlman said Monday that the next AD -- interim or permanent -- would decide Callahan's fate. If Callahan were fired, the university would be forced to buy out his contract for more than $3 million.
Callahan said his confidence in his own abilities haven't been shaken.
"I know in my heart of hearts I'm doing an excellent job, a good job," Callahan said.
He said his self-evaluation was based on more than the wins and losses.
"It's everything that has to do with organization, preparation, game-planning, direction of the staff, direction of the whole, entire program. I have no hesitation about that," he said. "There are so many things we've done in a positive nature. I'm confident we've done some great things here."
Nebraska plays Texas A&M at home on Saturday.
After the Huskers reached the Big 12 championship game in 2006, they've slipped back this season.
The Huskers are 4-3 after losing 45-14 to Oklahoma State last week. That came after a 41-6 road loss to Missouri. The defense ranks 104th nationally after giving up more than 400 yards in five straight games, and allowing 40 points four times.
"It's unfortunate we're in a championship game last year in December, and here we are struggling," Callahan said. "It happens. Why it happens? Boy, I wish I could tell you all the reasons. We know we're struggling more than what normal teams do when they are struggling because we've given up a lot of points and a lot of yards. That's where the hurt lies."
The firing of Pederson on Monday increases the heat on Callahan.
Pederson fired Frank Solich after a 9-3 regular season in 2003, and went outside the Nebraska family to hire Callahan, who had just been fired by the Oakland Raiders.
Progress under Callahan has stalled after last year's team finished 9-5 and went to the Cotton Bowl.
"Our players are looking now at our coaching staff to see what type of mood and attitude we bring to the meetings and to the field," Callahan said. "It's very important they see us in a positive light."
Callahan came in with the reputation as an outstanding recruiter, and each of his signing classes have ranked in the top 25 nationally. He dumped the triple-option offense that had been Nebraska's identity for decades and installed a West Coast offense.
The Huskers are 26-18 overall in Callahan's four seasons, 14-14 against the Big 12, 3-8 against teams in the Top 25 and 0-6 against the top 10.
Callahan was Pederson's fourth choice after Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Al Saunders, Arkansas coach Houston Nutt and Dallas Cowboys defensive coordinator Mike Zimmer all withdrew their names from consideration.
Ten days after he was fired as Oakland Raiders coach -- and 40 days after Solich's dismissal -- Callahan took over the program.
Callahan said he won't look over his shoulder as he coaches.
"There are no guarantees in this business, no matter where you're coaching, especially when you're struggling," he said. "Nothing has been said to me relative to dismissals or anything of that nature. We're just going to press on."
 
Lubick thinking about retirement

Colorado State lost 13th consecutive game Saturday

Posted: Tuesday October 16, 2007 2:06PM; Updated: Tuesday October 16, 2007 2:06PM

FORT COLLINS, Colo. (AP) -- After his team lost for the 13th consecutive time, Colorado State coach Sonny Lubick says he has been thinking about retiring at the end of the season.
Lubick, 70, is in his 15th year at Colorado State and is the most successful coach in school history, winning or tying for six conference championships and taking the team to nine bowl games.
But the Rams are 0-6 this year and have the second-longest active losing streak in the nation, behind Florida International's 18 straight. Colorado State lost to Air Force 45-21 on Saturday night.
Lubick said Monday the losses are forcing him to think about what he might do when this season is over, including whether to retire.
"Yeah, those thoughts go through people's minds," he said.
Lubick, who makes about $500,000 annually, is under contract through the 2009 season.
Colorado State athletic director Paul Kowalczyk said he has no plans to talk with Lubick about his future until the season ends.
"It will be just like last year; we will sit down at the end of the season to discuss things," Kowalczyk said.
Kowalczyk acknowledged some fans are getting restless.
"The bottom line is that we all want the same thing: a successful program," he said. "I think it's good that this is our common goal and that everyone is going to work hard to make the program successful."
 
Illini's Zook up for contract extension

Posted: Tuesday October 16, 2007 1:45PM; Updated: Tuesday October 16, 2007 1:46PM

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. (AP) -- With Illinois in the midst of a successful season, coach Ron Zook is up for a three-year contract extension through 2012 that includes a $200,000 raise if he takes the Illini to a bowl game.
The university's board of trustees is to vote on the deal, recommended by the school's chancellor, during a Wednesday meeting.
Under the proposed extension, Zook's annual compensation would go from $1.055 to $1.305 million next season, according to the board meeting agenda. It would increase by another $200,000 per year Illinois makes it to a bowl game under his leadership, bringing his total compensation to $1.505 million.
The Illini need one more win to be bowl-eligible.
"It's not something I'm thinking about right now," Zook told reporters after practice Monday. "It makes you feel good that they feel like we've made progress. Like I've said all along, we've got a long way to go. This is where we want to be. I'm excited about the opportunity to stay here."
Zook's original five-year deal runs through the 2009 season. After going 4-19 his first two seasons, the Illini are 5-2 overall and 3-1 in the Big Ten heading into Saturday's game against No. 24 Michigan (5-2, 3-0).
"Our football program has made considerable progress under his leadership," athletic director Ron Guenther said in a statement. "We look forward to working with coach Zook and his staff to continue building the program."
 
UK receiver arrested on drug charges

Posted: Tuesday October 16, 2007 1:53PM; Updated: Tuesday October 16, 2007 1:53PM

LEXINGTON, Ky. (AP) -- Kentucky wide receiver Anthony Stewart is facing charges of drug trafficking.
Records at the Fayette County Detention Center show the 21-year-old was jailed Monday on charges of trafficking in marijuana and trafficking in a controlled substance.
Stewart is a junior from Anderson, South Carolina who played in one game last year and redshirted in 2005.
Coach Rich Brooks said Tuesday that Stewart is suspended pending the outcome of the court proceeding.
 
MIDSEASON META: COLT IS NOT A CANDIDATE
By SMQ
Posted on Tue Oct 16, 2007 at 02:18:08 PM EDT
</I>


I haven't followed the still-nascent race for the Trophy Which Must Not Be Named, and with any luck, this will be the last time I mention. No single player stands out that much.
Maybe because there is no frontrunner, SportsCenter was still teasing into commercial breaks this morning by asking whether Colt Brennan has a chance to win the H*i*m*n (I didn't mean to watch, but I was in public and it couldn't be avoided), the Colt Brennan Blog is still sizing up his chances for an invitation to New York and I'm getting hits after chronicling the Warriors' latest win Monday from a site called Brennan For Heisman, which informs readers
  • Hawaii Warriors QB Colt Brennan nears all-time records for college football passing, touchdowns, and completion percentage - yet his playing seven hours behind the East Coast keeps him off most Heisman voters radar.
    - - -
Is this the nature of our unjust, regionally biased system? That young Colt can't get a break simply because of where he plays?
Here, as Zadie Smith might say, are some facts:
<TABLE><CAPTION align=top>Top 13 BCS QBs by Passer Rating...and Colt Brennan</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #99bea4"><TD align=middle></TD><TD align=middle>Comp. %</TD><TD align=middle>Yds./Pass</TD><TD align=middle>TD %</TD><TD align=middle>INT %</TD><TD align=middle>Rating</TD><TD align=middle>Avg. D Rank*</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>A</TD><TD align=middle>70.7</TD><TD align=middle>9.3</TD><TD align=middle>11.1</TD><TD align=middle>2.2</TD><TD align=middle>181.1</TD><TD align=middle>73.9</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>B</TD><TD align=middle>74.4</TD><TD align=middle>9.1</TD><TD align=middle>8.9</TD><TD align=middle>0.9</TD><TD align=middle>178.4</TD><TD align=middle>102.9</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>C</TD><TD align=middle>70.4</TD><TD align=middle>9.1</TD><TD align=middle>8.9</TD><TD align=middle>1.2</TD><TD align=middle>173.5</TD><TD align=middle>71.0</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>D</TD><TD align=middle>65.5</TD><TD align=middle>9.8</TD><TD align=middle>8.8</TD><TD align=middle>2.0</TD><TD align=middle>173.1</TD><TD align=middle>49.3</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>E</TD><TD align=middle>62.5</TD><TD align=middle>10.8</TD><TD align=middle>7.1</TD><TD align=middle>3.6</TD><TD align=middle>169.8</TD><TD align=middle>84.7</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>F</TD><TD align=middle>67.7</TD><TD align=middle>9.3</TD><TD align=middle>7.7</TD><TD align=middle>1.4</TD><TD align=middle>168.7</TD><TD align=middle>61.6</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>G</TD><TD align=middle>71.6</TD><TD align=middle>8.5</TD><TD align=middle>6.9</TD><TD align=middle>1.0</TD><TD align=middle>163.5</TD><TD align=middle>75.2</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>H</TD><TD align=middle>65.4</TD><TD align=middle>8.5</TD><TD align=middle>10.1</TD><TD align=middle>3.8</TD><TD align=middle>162.2</TD><TD align=middle>83.4</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>I</TD><TD align=middle>63.0</TD><TD align=middle>8.4</TD><TD align=middle>9.3</TD><TD align=middle>2.5</TD><TD align=middle>159.0</TD><TD align=middle>88.0</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>J</TD><TD align=middle>66.3</TD><TD align=middle>8.7</TD><TD align=middle>8.1</TD><TD align=middle>3.5</TD><TD align=middle>158.9</TD><TD align=middle>79.3</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>K</TD><TD align=middle>69.5</TD><TD align=middle>8.5</TD><TD align=middle>7.1</TD><TD align=middle>3.6</TD><TD align=middle>157.2</TD><TD align=middle>92.1</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>L</TD><TD align=middle>57.1</TD><TD align=middle>8.7</TD><TD align=middle>8.4</TD><TD align=middle>2.1</TD><TD align=middle>153.2</TD><TD align=middle>84.8</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>M</TD><TD align=middle>63.7</TD><TD align=middle>7.3</TD><TD align=middle>8.6</TD><TD align=middle>1.6</TD><TD align=middle>149.9</TD><TD align=middle>58.3</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>N</TD><TD align=middle>68.9</TD><TD align=middle>7.7</TD><TD align=middle>5.9</TD><TD align=middle>2.2</TD><TD align=middle>148.5</TD><TD align=middle>72.5</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
* - Average rank of opponents' pass efficiency defense (I-AA opponents auto-ranked 120, which is generous).
- - -
This isn't a trick: Colt is on the list. Can you find him? If you're still under the impression Brennan has picked up where he left off last year, singing the eyelashes off WAC secondaries for 500 yards and five touchdowns a game, you might guess Brennan was Quarterback B, with a high completion rate and few interceptions against a terrible slate of defenses. Nope: QB B is Graham Harrell, who is currently on pace to beat Brennan's NCAA-best 72.6 completion rate last season but has yet to face a secondary up to par even by the standards of the lowest possible handicap.

Colt%20Brennan.jpg

Nothing personal, kid. You just don't have and don't deserve a chance.
- - -

Actually, Brennan is Quarterback K. These are his peers in each category:

Completion percentage: Brennan has completed 69.5 percent of his passes, roughly equivalent to Quarterback C, Dennis Dixon, and Quarterback N, Chase Daniel.
Yards Per Pass: Brennan's 8.5 yards per pass is on pace with Quarterback G, Pat White, and Quarterback H, Todd Boeckman.
Touchdown % (TDs per attempt): Brennan's touchdown percentage is almost the lowest in the board, slightly better than White's and even with that of Quarterback E, Mike Teel.
Interception % (INTs per attempt): Brennan's interception percentage also skews to the low end (he threw five against Idaho and four Friday against San Jose State), again rivaling Teel's.
Passer Rating: Brennan's rating is nearest to the quarterback immediately in front of him on the list, Rudy Carpenter.
Average Pass Efficiency Defense Rank: Only Harrell on this list has faced a softer set of secondaries to date than Brennan, which will change before season's end.
Three quarterbacks - Sam Bradford, Harrell and Dixon - are ahead of Brennan by every measure; several more have been better in four out of five, including Quarterback D, who, considering his schedule, has probably been the most impressive: Tim Tebow.
Here are some more facts: if Brennan is a candidate for anything, he is the stat candidate to end all stat candidates. His candidacy before the season was based entirely on his gaudy numbers last year, which were impressive more for their efficiency than their record-breaking accumulation - any competent passer can rack up yards and touchdowns when they chuck it every play, but Brennan also shamed the rest of the country in terms of completion percentage, yards per pass, touchdown percentage and passer rating, measures that have nothing to do with how often you throw the ball, only how well.
He hasn't remotely approached the sheer spectacle of last year's stats or their machine-like efficiency. He's throwing for fewer yards and fewer touchdowns, but also completing a lower percentage of his passes for fewer yards per completion with dramatically more interceptions. Brennan wasn't invited to New York after near-perfection last season, and he won't be this season, but the "plays in Hawaii" argument won't fly anymore. It's not where Brennan plays, but how, and against whom, that's going to sink his candidacy, such as it ever had any buoyancy to begin with. We'll realize soon enough that Brennan is who we really always thought he was: a limited, good-not-great former walkon working in an advantageous system that occasionally puts up huge numbers against terrible competition by way of simple saturation - when you launch 75 passes in one game, as Brennan did Friday against San Jose State, yards tend to follow. Last year, Hawaii looked somewhat special offensively; now, it looks like the mirror image of Navy, the flexbone of the air, commanding statistical awe because it does what it does against the worst and does virtually nothing else. Remember: "In June Jone's system, even Timmy Chang excelled." This season, Brennan is Timmy Chang.
Re: the terrible competition, I should say that Colt Brennan is a good quarterback and I would never pick on him specifically if he wasn't getting undue hype, and especially if his team wasn't currently sitting at 17th, 16th and 18th, respectively, in the mainstream polls, a testament to blind, unthinking auto-promotion at its most rancid. Hawaii is 7-0 against the following teams:
<TABLE cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=3 width=780><TBODY><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #99bea4"><TD align=middle>Opponent</TD><TD align=middle>Avg. Stat Rank</TD><TD align=middle>Score</TD><TD align=middle>Skinny</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>NORTHERN COLORADO (0-7)</TD><TD align=middle>107.6 (I-AA)</TD><TD align=middle>63-6</TD><TD align=left>Even I-AA teams consider UNC a patsy.</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>LA. TECH (2-4)</TD><TD align=middle>76</TD><TD align=middle>45-44 (OT)</TD><TD align=left>Tech's wins are Central Arkansas and N.M. State. Again: overtime.</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>UNLV (2-5)</TD><TD align=middle>77</TD><TD align=middle>49-14</TD><TD align=left>Easily the best win. Vegas has lost three straight now, but beat Utah.</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>CHARLESTON SOUTHERN (3-3)</TD><TD align=middle>64.9 (I-AA)</TD><TD align=middle>66-10</TD><TD align=left>At least Charleston has beaten a fellow I-AA team. Hell, three of 'em!</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>IDAHO (1-6)</TD><TD align=middle>85.5</TD><TD align=middle>48-20</TD><TD align=left>Brennan throws five picks. Vandals' one win is over I-AA Cal Poly.</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>UTAH STATE (0-6)</TD><TD align=middle>102.5</TD><TD align=middle>52-37</TD><TD align=left>Sometimes, 0-6 speaks for itself. This is one of those times.</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>SAN JOSE STATE (3-4)</TD><TD align=middle>82.6</TD><TD align=middle>42-35 (OT)</TD><TD align=left>Spartans' wins: UC-Davis, Utah State and Idaho. Again: overtime.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
For all intents and purposes, Hawaii has the proven chops of a very good I-AA team right now. Even among their brethren in the Bowl Subdivision, Utah State, Louisiana Tech and Idaho are essentially dressed up I-AA programs, one of which took the Warriors to overtime, as is San Jose State most seasons; I give the Spartans the benefit of the doubt for being 3-4, but their wins are against the aformentioned class and they were shut out by Stanford, which (USC felling notwithstanding) is not a good team. The gem of the schedule so far is beating 2-5 UNLV. In what way, under what custom, by what measure or even leap of the imagination, is this a top 20 resumé? When Auburn, a team with real wins over Kansas State, Florida and Arkansas, sits behind Hawaii in both human polls? It's a disgrace to the mainstream rankings, and will be to the BlogPoll, too, if we don't change our ways. I think Hawaii has two chances to earn a ranking, in its final two games: vs. Boise State and vs. Washington. It will have to pass them both before I even consider the Warriors for the top 20. And Colt for H*i*m*n? After nine interceptions against Idaho and San Jose State, there is nothing to consider.
 
BUYS AND SELLS, WEEK SEVEN: TRENDY EDITION

Orson and Hannibal go over the week’s ledger, trendy style.
HANNIBAL’S BUYS
ncf_g_brohm_195.jpg
Celebrate! You never go out of style.
Louisville: Knit jacquards with stripe and basketwork motifs
By the laws of cool, the Cardinals should’ve been all washed up by now. All those naive dreams of peace and love, a touchdown on every drive, it all sounds great in theory, until everyone realize for all the pretension you have no plan for defense. My, though, but how the mood has changed: with just one conference loss, off a convincing, turnover-free win at undefeated Cincinnati with West Virginia, South Florida, Rutgers and UConn still in front of them, the
Cards could still mature into Big East champions. Going with UL may sound like a bold statement, but all-American quarterbacks never go out of style.
Michigan:
Culture of paradox, play of contrasts, new aesthetic rules rooted in the old. Unostentatiously sumptuous, with accessories meant to disrupt the mundane with bright and unexpected accents. Forget those “wardrobe malfunctions” that made the headlines: in its natural setting, with the right accessories, this understated look can’t miss. More evidence that layered looks are
about more than just covering up.
ORSON’S BUYS
url
Hiro could run the Statue of Liberty, no problem.
Boise State. Television division, “Heroes”
Like Heroes, seemed poised for one year of esoteric brilliance before fading back into the basement of geek adoration (superheroes! trick plays! blue turf!). Yet both have come roaring back into form in midseason, admittedly both in unreal fashion (superpowers for Heroes, winning without defense against Nevada in four overtimes.) Hawaii is fading like The Office, as they’re both passing into banal self-parody, leaving Boise to assume the humble mantle of saving the world all by its lonesome in the WAC. Boise is a stylish buy going into the WAC stretch with Ian Johnson and his equally esoteric but stylish knit hats as a logical accessory.
Florida Extremely personal personal scents. Oh,Tom Ford may be lambasted for <AHREF ="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/10/crotch-scented-.html">his perfume with just that special whiff of crotchstink, but just you wait–it’s the future and you’ll be bathing in the stuff like Charles Bronson dousing himself in Mandom in no time. Urban Meyer’s group of young hand-picked mutants may reek of essential teen hormones, but they, too, are the future, and will show it when they cruise off the delicious fumes of defeat anger/bye week rest/essence of preparation against Kentucky. Odiferous, stenchy youth–it’s the must-have scent for the Gator fan in 2007. Crave it, you will.
Texas Tech The road-safe rally car.
A VW GTI MkV of a team with nimble skills, ample horsepower, and now an extra tuff crash rating thanks to new defensive coordinator.
HANNIBAL’S SELLS
Wisconsin: Men’s flares
You thought the ‘retro’ thing was cool, huh? Not that we have anything against a physical running game, but you have to remember: playing no defense whatsoever was never cool to begin with.
Miami and Florida State: Flannel shirt (probably tied around the waist; leather jacket
optional over plain white tee).

leggings2.jpg
We’re all moving to Seattle! Flannel!
The fastest route to a sure fashion “don’t” is to keep trying to look like what you used to look like. Dressing for the team you are today may mean cleaning out your closet and re-building your offense from scratch – don’t go on pretending you have the hairline (or the waistline) you did those half dozen times your college band scored actual groupies when the whole world can see you’ve put on a few and would be better off just slowing down already. Get back to basics: you got by on your looks and charm in the early nineties, but the real secret to your success? Even then, it was the offensive line.
Illinois: Atkins Diet
OMG, you didn’t really fall for that low carb, Juice Williams hype, did you? Like, Arrelious Benn may be all that, but until he gets a quarterback who can do something other than take an option look down the line, keep the Illini in the closet.
ORSON’S SELLS
Purdue. Old-man hipster chic.
Oh, old man chic works every now and then. That guyabara you had looked great for three seasons or so, along with the heavy creased poly slacks and the bowling shoes. Joe “Diabeetus” Tiller would have been proud, since he’s been pimping the same game for years: munch up early on cannon fodder, then take a 5-0 or 6-0 record into the heart of their Big Ten schedule and end up around .500 for the year. It’s time to modernize that look, hipster, before you cross the line between camp and schlock…which is precisely what Purdue’s paleo-spread has seemed to have done.
Kansas: Leggings.
leggings2.jpg
BOOOOOO!!!
Oh, Leggings came back for this year, but they’re designed to conceal something that should be exposed: talent. Kansas has hidden behind a weak slate of opponents and is sailing into their Big 12 schedule sans matchups with Texas, Oklahoma, or Texas Tech, meaning they’ll be wearing a cotton mini with leggings when the championship games and bowl season comes around. As with leggings, trust what you can see, and aside from a matchup with Missouri, we think Kansas is one trend destined to both last longer than it should and disappear with a snap of a stylish finger and thumb.
HANNIBAL’S HOLDS
LSU: Little black dress
When in doubt, don’t be afraid to go with a sure thing. So that grad student stole your thunder at the last cocktail party with her heathery deep-V halter. Stay confident next time that your figure can still pull off that slinky number and that overwhelming talent and a rocking defense is still the combination for winning football, and you’ll come out ahead.
Penn State: Toggs Amphibious Neoprene Stockingfoot Chest Waders
They’re functional, dammit, and if they got the job done in 1982, they’ll get the job done while all the hipsters are wetting their black cotton stretch pants cause they lost two games. Get a job.
Missouri: Versatile Gigi wrap
Seeking a trend-proof style that traveled well, Gary Pinkel struck an inspired pose with Chase Daniel, this fall’s must-have run-pass threat who could create the “illusion of fit” in any offense. Even Daniel was completely hemmed in by Oklahoma’s run defense, he had the Tigers in a position to win late on the road with his prolific arm. Traditionalists may balk, but now that the conservative, broad-shouldered red look is definitely out, the Tigers might prove yet that
perfect “dress down” alternative in the Big 12 North.
ORSON’S HOLDS.
South Florida Music: Maroon 5
We don’t turn them off when they pop up on the radio, and their gloriously and unabashedly trashy sound certainly meshes with nouveau-and-not-afraid-to-admit it South Florida. They even combine most of their public attention on their respective front men–fashion-forward types (Levine, white disco suits, Grothe, a white “athletic quarterback.)
But hype around either of these cannot be more overtaxed or overwrought–South Florida will lose a game soon, possibly multiples, and most likely because of the same traits that got them to this point: Grothe’s reckless play. He takes chances, wins games–yay, scrambling daredevil banditoback! He takes chances, throws into double coverage for a pick–boo, careless, conceited bastardback!
Either way, both will be overexposed very shortly. You still won’t change the channel, of course, but you’re certainly not picking up the whole album.
 
Baylor QB doubtful for game

Tuesday, October 16, 2007, 12:30 PM
Baylor sophomore quarterback Blake Szymanski may miss Saturday’s game against Texas because of a mild concussion. Baylor team officials said Szymanski will continue to undergo evaluation leading up to the game.
Syzmanski has thrown for 1,934, which ranks seventh on the school’s single-season list. His 15 touchdowns are tied for third.
 
Georgia Tech's Air Attack Doesn't Pass

Posted Oct 16th 2007 3:07PM by Ian Cohen
Filed under: Georgia Tech Football, ACC, BCS, NCAA FB Coaching
77322103.jpg
I don't know if you read as many preseason previews as I did during the summer; being able to name 3/5ths of Rice's two deep at the OL position is a good indication that you have. If not, I'll clue you in to one of the most frequently parroted predictions: that Georgia Tech would undergo one of the most drastic additions-by-subtractions in the country. Yeah, they'd be losing a four-year starting QB and one of the most physically gifted wide receivers of college football's last decade (at least), but look what they had in Taylor Bennett! Most people noted how his height advantage over Reggie Ball would open up the previously inaccessible middle of the field, but despite having seen firsthand the transition from wink-wink 5'10" Marques Hagans (now a fantasy fixture as Rams WR) to the statuesque, "prototype" QB-ing of Christian Olsen and Kevin McCabe, I still bought into the Jackets as perhaps the only true threat to unseat the Hokies as an ACC frontrunner.

Well, if you need further proof that lighting up the West Virginia defense isn't exactly a guarantee that you're the next Texas Tech, Bennett has undergone some serious scrutiny as of late. Even if the Miami victory buys him some time, there's still the matter of Tashard Choice rushing for better than 200 yards in a game that ended 17-14. That's not a ringing endorsement for your passing attack...or if you want to get less vague, you can bring up the fact that they're 108th in the country and don't run the wishbone, although Choice's hardnosed, injury-courting style has lifted them to the 17th most potent run game.

Fortunately for Tech, they have the opportunity to lean on their strengths, as upcoming tilts with Army, Duke and UNC feature defenses with mediocre run defenses. So there you go, guys- that trademark Chan Gailey Seven Win Season isn't out of reach just yet.
 
Oh, mercy...

greek doesn't even have them on the board anymore?

The only board I've seen with this line consistently up is Bookmaker. I jumped on it early as a trend/system play (Texas just flat out owns Baylor. Name the number, Texas covers it) at -24.

With a new QB, I'm liking my chances even more.
 
Nebraska defense loses 'Blackshirts'

Posted: Tuesday October 16, 2007 9:52PM; Updated: Tuesday October 16, 2007 9:52PM

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- Nebraska fans would agree that the "Blackshirts" have disappeared this season. Now there is tangible evidence.
A series of woeful performances led to Tuesday's shedding of the black practice jerseys traditionally worn by the starters and a few other select players.
"It's a decision we all made," defensive coordinator Kevin Cosgrove said. "We're going to earn those things back. That's all I have to say."
The awarding of the black practice jerseys began in 1962 under coach Bob Devaney, who wanted to make it easier to identify his defensive players during practices.
He sent an assistant coach out to a Lincoln sporting goods store to buy practice jerseys for the defense. Unable to get enough jerseys of one color to outfit the entire squad, the decision was made to give the first-string players the black ones.
The collective defensive unit has become nationally known as the "Blackshirts."
The Huskers rank among the nation's worst defensive teams this season. They are 104th overall, allowing 457 yards a game. They've allowed two opponents more than 600 yards and another more than 550.
They've surrendered 40 points or more on four occasions and are 87th in scoring defense at 31 points a game.
Backup safety Ben Eisenhart said he's glad the black shirts have come off.
"If you're going to give up 600 yards a game, then we shouldn't have black shirts on," he said. "The way we're playing right now is just sick. Nobody on the team had a problem with that today. We don't deserve to wear them."
Eisenhart said he didn't know how long the black shirts would be put away.
"When things get cleaned up, we can put them back on," he said. "Until then, we might as well wear the reds."
 
Callahan signals that he is out at Nebraksa

<SCRIPT type=text/javascript><!--google_ad_client = "pub-0237893561790135";google_alternate_color = "ffffff";google_ad_width = 300;google_ad_height = 250;google_ad_format = "300x250_as";google_ad_type = "text_image";//2007-06-19: entriesgoogle_ad_channel = "0603066557";google_color_border = "FFFFFF";google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";google_color_link = "003399";google_color_text = "333333";google_color_url = "999999";//--></SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT><IFRAME name=google_ads_frame marginWidth=0 marginHeight=0 src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0237893561790135&dt=1192638930703&lmt=1192638930&alt_color=ffffff&format=300x250_as&output=html&correlator=1192638930703&channel=0603066557&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fanblogs.com%2Fnebraska%2F007220.php&color_bg=FFFFFF&color_text=333333&color_link=003399&color_url=999999&color_border=FFFFFF&ad_type=text_image&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Freader%2Fview%2F&cc=100&ga_vid=834816700.1182524384&ga_sid=1192638930&ga_hid=738886608&ga_fc=true&flash=9&u_h=1024&u_w=1280&u_ah=994&u_aw=1280&u_cd=32&u_tz=-420&u_java=true" frameBorder=0 width=300 scrolling=no height=250 allowTransparency></IFRAME>
With the firing of Steve Pederson as Athletic Director at Nebraska and the appointment of Tom Osborne as the interim (at least) AD, the writing is clearly on the wall for Huskers head coach Bill Callahan. And he knows it.
Callahan is saying all the right things...
"I feel responsible for the results of this program," Callahan said. "I feel responsible for a lot of things, good and bad. Ultimately, it lies on my shoulders to provide the results you have to provide." ...
"I know in my heart of hearts I'm doing an excellent job, a good job," Callahan said.
He said his self-evaluation was based on more than the wins and losses.
"It's everything that has to do with organization, preparation, game-planning, direction of the staff, direction of the whole, entire program. I have no hesitation about that," he said. "There are so many things we've done in a positive nature. I'm confident we've done some great things here."
...
"It's unfortunate we're in a championship game last year in December, and here we are struggling," Callahan said. "It happens. Why it happens? Boy, I wish I could tell you all the reasons. We know we're struggling more than what normal teams do when they are struggling because we've given up a lot of points and a lot of yards. That's where the hurt lies."
... but giving clear signals that he is on the way out at Nebraska.
Callahan knows that he's out after the season. His brown sweater at the press conference was a non-verbal statement that he's no longer "N".

Yeah, I would say that Callahan's choice to wear a brown sweater to his press conference -- when everyone knows damn good and well that he owns 800+ red ones -- is a pretty clear sign that the coach has checked out of the program.
Callahan has a 26-18 record in his four years in Lincoln, with fourteen of those eighteen losses against the Big XII conference opponents. Under his leadership, the Huskers are 3-8 against teams in the Top 25 and 0-6 against the top 10.
If Pederson was the root of the problems at Nebraska, then Callahan is the gnarled weed the Huskers reaped... brown sweater and all.
 
Auburn is Getting Their Act Together... I Think

Posted Oct 17th 2007 8:53AM by Ryan Ferguson
Filed under: Auburn Football, LSU Football, SEC
auburn-fooball-400.jpg

Does anyone really know what to make of Auburn? I mean, really know?

This team moves in mysterious ways. The Tigers did not start the season with a bullrush. Nay. Nayyyy. They barely beat Kansas State in their home opener, lost to South Florida in a night game at Jordan-Hare stadium, and then lost to Mississippi State... also at home.

And since that time, they're undefeated, knocking off New Mexico State, Florida, Vandy and Arkansas.

What's also perplexing about Auburn is the way they win. Again, rather hard to pin these guys down. Against Florida, Brandon Cox launched a precision aerial attack the Gators couldn't stop and won 20-17. Vandy was blown out. And their win over the Razorbacks was perhaps the ugliest of the bunch: 3 field goals, 1-13 on 3rd down, and just 101 yards through the air, but 189 yards on the ground for a 9-7 victory. And a big fat beautiful 'W' in the W-L column.

Perplexing. Now Auburn travels to the Bayou to take on a beaten-down, miserable ('sick', says Les Miles) LSU team, who is either angry and hungry for redemption or ripe for the plucking. Which is it? You got me.

Vegas still favors LSU by 12 points, which seems a bit absurd. Auburn was an 18-point underdog against Florida. And Tommy Tuberville just loves winning games on the road for some reason. The Tigers are road warriors: if you've had the misfortune of one of their house calls in the last few years, chances are your team posted up an 'L'.

Is Brandon Cox the most unpredictable quarterback in college football? I never have any idea how effective Auburn's offense will be. The Tigers rarely rack up large numbers of points. Still, more often than not, he does just enough to win. Recall that Auburn's two losses came on very narrow margins... just like most of their wins.

Speaking of that: their defense is quite good. In fact, if you absolutely pinned me down and asked me which team has the better defense, I'd say Auburn. And if you go for a submission hold while you've got me plastered against the mat, I'd squeal, "Auburn has the best defense in the SEC!" That would have been a heretical statement just two weeks ago. I've watched teams go up against both LSU and Auburn's defense and I have to tell you, that Auburn stop squad is looking really good. That's an aggressive, swarming front seven. Hard to run at them. Hard to run around them.

Offensively, we've all seen that LSU has problems on offense (via the Kentucky game). But even a gimpy Flynn and his corps of dropped-pass receivers seems to be more effective than Auburn's offense on an average day. Still, Auburn somehow plays at a level just high enough on offense to win most of their games.

At the end of the day, you really know that Auburn has gotten their act together when FanHouse picks them to beat the Bayou Bengals, 13-10.
 
Doba Must Go Columns Making the Rounds

Posted Oct 17th 2007 8:28AM by Sean Hawkins
Filed under: Washington State Football, Pac 10
bill-doba-240-05ac.jpg
The 2007 season has been a titanic disaster for WSU. Now 2-5 after a 53-7 embarrassment of epic proportions at Oregon, WSU takes the week off to try and regroup. But not only are the natives restless, even the media is starting to sound the alarms that this should be the end of the Bill Doba reign in Pullman.
First it was Howie Stalwick, freelance journalist who covers WSU for various publications, saying that with WSU sinking every week and no real end in sight, the end is near. Then WSU alum and P-I writer Jim Moore added on yesterday, alluding to how you can basically feel it in the air, that Doba's run out of time and most likely it will end upon the completion of the season.
Maybe the most damaging of all was Bud Withers of the Seattle Times writing last week about the disastrous recruiting under Bill Doba's watch. How bad has it been? Basically Doba and staff have whiffed on over 50% of the players they signed on letter-of-intent day from 2003 - 2005. What I mean by whiff is that over 50% of the players who signed on the dotted line aren't even in the program anymore. Poor recruiting has led to a shaky position in regards to depth, where many backups are far too young, inexperienced and just not very good Pac-10 level players. WSU is traditionally a thin program anyway, but when the recruiting is this bad, it's almost impossible to compete with the power programs in the Pac-10.
It's not so much that the media is starting to weigh in on this. After all, the program hasn't returned to postseason play since the 2003 Holiday Bowl, which was largely a senior-laden team led by Mike Price recruits. It's really not that hard to figure out. Now that the program is 100% Doba, the recruiting foibles show how the talent gap has widened considerably, to the point that against BCS teams, WSU hasn't even been competitive this season. The Oregon game was exhibit A as to how wide that gap really is, where it was 40-0 at the half and according to many people who were at the game, the score could have been much, much worse if Mike Bellotti didn't take his foot off the gas in the third quarter.
Over the years coach Doba has been pretty much Teflon. The guy is a pure class act in every sense of the word, and is widely respected by fans, media and opposing coaches. Plus, Doba really stepped up and did what everyone considered a big favor to the program when Mike Price bailed on WSU before the 2002 Rose Bowl. It's not as if Doba asked for this job, but he was willing to help out in a pinch by assuming the role. After all, the guy was a lifer assistant in his 60's when this job fell in his lap. At the time it was deemed the perfect fit, as the Cougars had a very good thing going, coming off a pair of 10-win seasons and a Pac-10 title in 2002. The approach of keeping things moving in the same direction was a big thumbs-up from fans and media alike.
But if you ask anyone involved in college athletics, they'll tell you first and foremost that recruiting is the lifeblood of a program. If you aren't successful in recruiting, you are dead in the water. And given what's happened under Bill Doba, WSU football has become a listless program with little hope for future success under the current regime. A quick check of the 2007 commitment lists show WSU, as of this writing, still doesn't have a single recruit committed to be a Cougar. That's right, the number is still at zero. The writing is officially on the wall. As painful as it is to admit for WSU fans, the time has come for change. Here's hoping that when this does likely happen, it'll be handled with the same dignity and class that Doba has shown in his years at WSU.
 
Back
Top