Could you please explain a little more how there won't be a lookahead to LSU with them playing a team they've won 8 straight against, and how a road win over a legit Ole Miss team who just beat Florida is not a big win but just a momentum builder?
Sounds to me like you are just trying to convince yourself this isn't a horrible spot for SC, which it absolutely is.
Hate to really get into anyone with this game as UK is my team and I come off as a homer, but from a completely objective standpoint, it's one of the best spots in SEC play thus far.
And to be honest, I highly doubt there are many people who think UK is better than SC...just about anyone who pays attention to CFB knows UK has beaten four cupcakes (I'll count UL as one), and really struggled to move the ball against Bama, benefiting from turnovers and the Tide getting complacent with an early lead.
I said going into the Ole Miss game, it was a make or break for the season. If they lost to Ole Miss in what was amounting to be a "MUST WIN" game, the season would quickly slide down the tubes. A win on the other hand can change a lot for them. I've always kept it in the back of my mind that the OM and UK games go together, they were either going to win both or lose both because of where the program and team were at. Going into the Ole Miss game this was a team and program who just came off 2 poor efforts versus shit schools, a team who hadn't won an SEC-conference game in a whole year and was currently 0-2 in the conference, a team who was without a leader on offense (McKinley), and a team and coach who were clearly beginning to get fustrated with the poor performances. The game wasn't fun anymore for the kids, you could see they were playing with little emotion but after the Ole Miss game, the celebration on the field and in the lockerroom was an atmosphere that the coaches haven't seen in a long time. It was like a rebirth for a team struggling to find a way. It was a good win to get the Mouse off their back and it was a good win to build confidence into the team. These are 18-22 yr old kids, emotion and confidence can go a long way for them.
Now as far as this being a bad spot, I disagree. Like I said above, that Ole Miss win is something this team will build off of. I think this team already knows what can happen if you "look-ahead" because if they went to Vandy looking-ahead to UGA, they left with a loss. These kids watch sportscenter, they know the final score was Bama 17-14 over UK, they know the final score was close. The coaches believe they have enough ammo to get them fired up and keep them focused. I think the players know last week means nothing if they don't build on it. I also think the players know the LSU game will mean nothing with a loss this weekend. Quite frankly, I think the team knows its not good enough to look-ahead to LSU. I actually believe this being a 12:30 game helps SCarolina. I was a college student once and I know I'm not alone when I say this, games at 12:30 suck. The atmosphere never measures up to a night game, not even close. I don't believe UK is sandwiched inbetween Ole Miss and LSU. South Carolina is sandwiches between UF and UGA for LSU.
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 1083589" vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 align=middle width=125>lindetrain</TD><TD class=alt1>And don't get me wrong, damn impressive job by Smelley last week.
But, can Ole Miss even be considered in the top 8-9 SEC defenses? Has SC's offense shown any signs of consistency this year, to the point where you can believe they'll go into Lexington in a tough spot, an early game, and light up one of the better defenses in the conference? I think they'll have their moments, but I think they're far from a strong offense, and I don't believe they'll go into Commonwealth and do much.
I see this being a game won mostly by UK's defense/lost by SC's offense. I know they UK offense has had its struggles, but I think they're competent enough to put up enough for the D to take care of the rest. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Now going back to that Ole Miss game. I knew coming into the game, the back 7 of Ole Miss wasn't all that strong BUT their front 4 are legit and I would give them top 3-4 in the conference on the DL. You have Hardy and Jerry for Ole Miss who will both play in the NFL. They also have solid depth as a team on the DL and that DL was going to test the Carolina OL right away and for the most part, Smelley had time to throw. I understand UK is going to run a lot of man coverage and bring a lot of blitz but SC has 4 options in the passing game they will use heavily and that is putting your DB's on an island. See, I don't think UK will score more than 17 points, I think its likely they score around 13 points. I think UK is going to have a lot of trouble on offense and I strongly believe when the game is over, South Carolina will have more first downs, win time of posesssion, and out gain UK, its just a matter of not beating themselves with bad turnovers. Actually like SC by a TD in this game.