Post your thoughts!
Dolphins win over the Bills?Dolphins should win the AFC East
Eagles should win the NFC East
49ers are the same trash we expect under Shanahan and Lynch. Complete failures. Not shocking, losers lose.
Dolphins win over the Bills?
It's a bold predictionDolphins win over the Bills?
Lions scored 35 in a loss and Washington scored 28 in a win. Total opens 47 and at DK is 46.5. Shouldn’t this be going over?
Akers over Henderson.When it comes to fantasy football draft position for RB's and there backups/perceived roles, it looks like mistakes could have been made on
Pierce over Burkhead
Hall over Carter
Etienne over Robinson
and maybe
Montgomery over Herbert.
but obviously these can change over the course of the season.
There are a lot of great American pastimes when it comes to the NFL, but nothing may be more sacred than Overreaction Monday after the first Sunday of the season.
Some of the things I'm looking forward to tomorrow:
- Trey Lance sucks and the Niners are going to finish below .500
- Green Bay sucks and Aaron Rodgers should retire immediately.
- The Bengals were always frauds and just got hot at the right time last year.
- The Eagles are the real deal and are going to win the Super Bowl.
- Pittsburgh in 2022 is New England in 2021, they're going to fight for a playoff spot and Tomlin may be coach of the year.
- Arizona's done.
- The Raiders are done.
- The Rams are done.
- Dallas is done.
And on and on. I should say, there are a couple in there that I kind of agree with, btw. But most of it is ridiculous.
I only watched so much football today, so I don't have takes on every game, but one thing that jumped out at me is that I now really think the shortened pre-season favors a specific type of team. Teams that have their roster somewhat set going into camp who take pre-season somewhat seriously seem to be way ahead of those who either needed to figure out their roster (which makes sense because generally they're a bad team to start with) but also those teams that rested their starters.
To me, Cincy looked lost for a good part of that game today. But while I do believe the Super Bowl hangover is a real thing, I also think that all their additions on the OL will need time to jell and that Burrow may need another game to get all of the whiskey and cigars out of his system and be fully engaged in the marathon. I am someone who actually believes the Bengals are going to be OK this year.
On the other side of that game, this sounds kind of awful, but I think losing Watt may kill that Steelers team. Also, Harris went out today so ... They really showed up today, and I don't think anybody is going to pretend Tomlin can't coach. But I think when it's all said and done, this win may be the high point of their season.
I do think people are going to overreact a ton on Green Bay tomorrow too, but don't forget, last year they started the season laying a gigantic egg as well. And then, if you remember, Detroit was kind of punching them in the face and Rodgers flipped the switch. Suddenly he remembered he liked playing football and the next thing you know, they'd won like seven straight. Problem this year is, he no longer has arguably the best WR in the game on his team. I've though all summer that it was going to be a long year for Green Bay and I still believe it. The score today surprised me, and I worry it puts Minny in the spotlight when I—someone who bet them to win the division—would really prefer less pressure on them, but oh well.
Great win for Chicago, and I don't really want to take a lot away from them, but from San Fran's standpoint, I throw that game out. Really tough spot to start a rookie. On the road, in a downpour, I just move on. Huge win for the Bears though.
In the other early games, I couple of things hit me with a couple of specific teams.
The Browns don't look like they trust Jacoby Brissett much at all. Which may not be fair of me to say—especially since I'm someone who's always liked him, and because their running game is so good, they only need the guy to do so much. But the thing, for me, with the Browns is, this team is going to run all over you. And I think people will discount this score and the game, but don't look past this team. I think there's value there.
On the other side, I think Carolina is who you think they are. Cleveland basically dominated this game—but that's when Baker gets dangerous. Because then you take him off the leash and he just does things. I was on the total in this game and the moment I started to feel great about it was when Carolina fell behind by two scores. That's when Baker is going to get you points. It may not be for his team, but they're coming. Which happened today and I think may happen quite a bit this year. It's just who he is.
I lost on Indy today, and one thing that really stood out to me—and I feel bad about this because Frank Reich did a lot for the Birds to win it all—but the coaching from Indy was fucking atrocious. First, late 4th quarter, Indy's driving. Third down they get the ball to midfield setting up a 4th and 1. And not a long 4th and 1. There's like a minute to go, game is tied. They play for OT and punt. With this offense. Then, in OT, they get down inside the 30. A FG wins it, but they waste two downs basically losing three yards a play trying to set the ball up for the winning kick. It was still a 40+ yard FG, what are you doing. Why are you going backwards? Anyway, it's probably just first game jitters or whatever, but it was 'extremely' concerning. Nice moral victory for Houston though.
Last, the Eagles. Because the Eagles are going to the Super Bowl. I kid, I kid. But this was a bit of the other side of the coin from Indy and Cleveland with Brissett. Early in the game, Philly gets inside the 10 for a first and goal. First play, and RPO that Detroit reads perfectly, Philly gets nothing. Second down, as you may imagine, they run and get down to like the three. Third down, they let Hurts kind of roll to his right where maybe he's going to pass, but really it's stretching it out so he can cut it up and score. He doesn't. So now it's 4th and goal. At this point Philly is, if I remember right, still losing the game. Not only do they not take the points, Sirianni gives the ball to Hurts to make the decision. Hurts takes the snap, reads the play, runs it in easily. Point being, to me, you do not do that if you do not trust your QB. Even if you're going to go for it, you can kind of tie his hands. That's not what the Eagles did. It was only one play, but it really suggests to me that they fully trust Hurts to be the guy.
On the other side of the ball for them, though, it felt like that defense let down a lot in the second half. It's only one game, but it's something to watch.
Why I didn't take the over in Detroit (or Arizona) I have no idea. I get that Goff is no Stafford, but Detroit is still Detroit. And dammed if that team doesn't look a lot like all those other teams who get down by 10 and then either lose by 28 or lose by 4 because they trade scores for the final two quarters.
Speaking of Stafford, I'm not sure he's healthy. I think the Rams may have issues because of him and because Ramsey may have gone from shutdown corner to a turnstile in less than a year. Buffalo roasted that guy.
Also, Buffalo is good.
Also, Tua is 3-0 vs. Belicheat.
Also, I stayed off the over in Arizona because the total was so high, but that's dumb because if you just blindly bet the highest total over every week and the lowest total under every week, I believe you generally profit on the season.
Also, I tailed a Giants play and I still have no idea how it hit. I saw a little bit of that first half and that team looked god awful. I believe this is two years in a row where Tenny has lost their home opener.
Oh, last thing, I didn't watch the Chargers game, but the score didn't shock me. I think the Raiders are the AFC West's Detroit. They'll have a game or two where Carr and Adams cook you for 38, but mostly they're going to lose like 31-24.
OK, that's it. For now. Hello all, bye all. Ha.
Add Akers over HendersonWhen it comes to fantasy football draft position for RB's and there backups/perceived roles, it looks like mistakes could have been made on
Pierce over Burkhead
Hall over Carter
Etienne over Robinson
and maybe
Montgomery over Herbert.
but obviously these can change over the course of the season.
Too early for those first 3. I'd buy Herbert over Monty since the new staff isn't married to either of them.When it comes to fantasy football draft position for RB's and there backups/perceived roles, it looks like mistakes could have been made on
Pierce over Burkhead
Hall over Carter
Etienne over Robinson
and maybe
Montgomery over Herbert.
but obviously these can change over the course of the season.
What a stinger this was. Have both on the roster and was busy Thursday so left Akers in the lineup. My Zac Taylor moment of the week.Add Akers over Henderson
Bucs/Boys - Cowboys injuries are going to make it tough on them for the short term. Probably a good under team. Much easier to handle them with the run but then that runs clock anyway. Thought Elliott looked better than normal. Parsons was excellent. TB oline performed better than expected but with how badly the cowboys played, I am not sure what to take away from this game for the bucs team. WR crew certainly got open enough though against a decent secondary.
Raiders/Chargers - Carr had a bad game and I am not talking about the sacks he took that he didn't need to or the interceptions, I am talking about the tunnel vision to one receiver most of the game. He was also highly inaccurate at points in the game, including an easy td throw in the rz. That just isn't how you win football games at this level. Renfrow was so demoralized he looked very unrenfrow like. I was shocked at the lack of pass rush from the raiders given the personnel. This could be a result of the Chargers oline, I simply don't know. Chargers were impressive and by far the better team to my eye. I think the score was a little deceiving. I did think the Chargers run game was lacking.
Only two games I got to watch on Sunday.
Some of the things I'm looking forward to tomorrow:
- Trey Lance sucks and the Niners are going to finish below .500
- Green Bay sucks and Aaron Rodgers should retire immediately.
- The Bengals were always frauds and just got hot at the right time last year.
- Pittsburgh in 2022 is New England in 2021, they're going to fight for a playoff spot and Tomlin may be coach of the year.
- The Eagles are the real deal and are going to win the Super Bowl.
- Arizona's done.
- The Raiders are done.
- The Rams are done.
- Dallas is done.
Last 5 bullet points are true.
Steelers, Ravens, Texans and Bears all significantly outgained in victory (or tie)
Need to look more at YPP in those
I love this point.
One thing about Overreaction Monday is how people will focus on the score or the spread, but it's deeper than that.
The Steez were not only out-gained, they needed five turnovers, a blocked XP, and a missed FG to win that game. And they lost TJ Watt who was essentially the reason that team led the league in sacks last year. This would scare me to death if I'm looking at this team long-term.
In a similar situation, the Cowboys not only lose Dak, but they looked bad before they lost him and their head coach is still Mike McCarthy. Cooper Rush better be mobile, because if he isn't, Dallas is going to be fucked for weeks and dig themselves a hole they won't recover from.
Going further, here were the top teams in turnover diff last season, in order:
I feel like a really good defense can get somewhere around where NE/Buffalo got last year in back to back years—and Buffalo and NO might be that good on that side of the ball. But once you get into double digits, that's really hard to replicate from season to season IMO.
- Dallas/Indy +14
- GB +13
- AZ +12
- Minny +11
- TB +10
- Buffalo +8
- NE/NO +7
So if you look at Dallas (because who doesn't want to pick on Jerry's kids), you say 'OK, this team will regress to the mean in terms of TOs.' Add that on top of all the losses they suffered in the offseason and now the loss of Dak. That's a problem.
Likewise, this worries me a lot for GB and AZ.
Also, I'm not sure I like the way Arizona is responding to this loss at all.
I keep thinking that whatever is going on down there between Murray and Kingsbury is a lot of noise, but I think I might be wrong. I may want this team to be good because when they are good, they're a ton of fun to watch and bet. But something may really be rotten there and again, if they come back to the mean in terms of turnovers ...
Well, fuckknuckles. The Birds lose Derek Barnett for the year on the DL with a knee injury.
Also, the Bucs may lose Godwin for "a few weeks" with a hamstring.
Oh, and sort of as expected if you saw the concern when it happened, the Ravens lose CB Kyle Fuller for the year.
I didn’t think Dallas was making the playoffs before Dak got hurt, didn’t know how they were gonna score on bucs d and they might have actually been worse than I thought. Rush has like no chance of success with these limited weapons and declining oline, I think above all the others their d success was almost totally predicated on turnovers. They basically got 2 dudes but those 2 can be game wreckers, especially the pen st kid who name escaping me right now, he a beast!! He might be the most disruptive defensive player in the league w watt out. Then the corner is a ball hawk but he is always way too aggressive and gets burnt plenty! Teams gonna figure out real fast if they find a way to neutralize them there not much to worry bout.
I’m not convinced CeeDee a true 1 and even if he is it won’t matter much as teams can key on him, other than Shultz there nothing else that can make ya pay for single coverage while dedicating more to taking those guys away. Unless Dallas can really get the run game going they in danger of finishing at the bottom the nfc least. I liked Philly to win div before yesterday, now I think giants and Washington are at least as good as Dallas!
The rookie. Or the rookie last year ... Parsons? Micha Parsons. Totally agreed.
Asked by reporters after the game why the unit didn’t let the clock run all the way down, Zac Taylor said the change at long-snapper (Clark Harris suffered an injury early and was ruled out) was the reason:
“New operation. We snapped there with 13 seconds, I understand that, trust me, we’d rather do something different. But just trying to make sure the operation ran smoothly, it turned out that we sacrificed some seconds just to make sure that we were all on the same page there.”
This is so poor.....how about taking the delay of game first to run all the time off, then if you're worried about the Steelers timing the snap you can snap it early in the next playclock?
Either way, it’s pretty clear Taylor knows exactly what the miscue cost the team.
It’s a similar story on the would-be Ja’Marr Chase touchdown that the team inexplicably decided not to challenge despite it appearing like the star wideout had a game-winner near the sidelines:
“Part of it was that that’s the hardest place for us to see in the entire field is that spot. I didn’t think there was a chance there was a touchdown there initially. So, we got on the ball to run it in quickly. It’s hard with all the craziness in that moment, all the communication to get that ‘Stop, stop. Let’s evaluate this.’ We just couldn’t get it done fast enough by the time we’d seen a replay and realized ‘Oh shoot, he might have gotten in there.’ We’ve just got to learn from those. It’s a fine line — when you get the ball on the inch, you just want to punch it in real quick. In hindsight, maybe he was in and we could have given ourselves a chance.”
On this one, it sounds like personnel up in the booth needed to relay to Taylor whether or not to throw a challenge flag and the communication simply wasn’t fast enough. That’s reading between the lines, at least.
This guy is in desperate need of a time and replay management coach.
Look at Hunt out here calling the Birds to win it all. You love to see it. And this post was in no way edited, I don't know what you're even talking about.
Wrong play. Talking about this play. Steeler fan ref starts to spot it at the pylon too lol. He knows.They can’t challenge within the final 2 minutes of the game, that’s a booth review only (unless the rule has changed?). And Chase was out which seemed pretty clear on the replay as you could see the toe on his right foot on the white sideline.
If they didn’t change the rule, the fact he didn’t even realize he can’t initiate the challenge in the final two minutes should be concerning as well. If they did throw the challenge flag it’s a penalty I think too.
As I championed on this site many, many years ago…yes every team needs a “common sense” coach that handles all of that stuff.
It's possible JP. They have a great oline.
Unless Stafford is out for the Rams, them done already after losing to top team is funny. The NFC West has become much weaker as well.
Realistically done are Lions, Panthers, Jets, Jags and now Cowboys.
The first 4 were done before it started.
Goff frustrates the hell out of me when I look for actual improvement. He’s Mr. Checkdown when they need to get passed the sticks.Is it weird to say I'm not sure if the Lions are done?
There's a chance that division outside of Minny ends up being pretty weak. It would require Goff being, well, good—and that not may really be possible. And it would require their defense to probably play above their talent level, but maybe ...
I also think Washington is going to be bad. Along with Atlanta and Seattle.
Wrong play. Talking about this play. Steeler fan ref starts to spot it at the pylon too lol. He knows.
Unless Stafford is out for the Rams, them done already after losing to top team is funny. The NFC West has become much weaker as well.
Realistically done are Lions, Panthers, Jets, Jags and now Cowboys.
The first 4 were done before it started.
The NFC West suddenly looks weak.Yeah I agree. I was joking with jp but I do think Arizona might be in trouble.