Tuesday Totals Discussion

[Dmoney416]

Lean over in VT/Neb, not sure if I can pull the trigger though.

 

[RetroVK]

are these low totals a reaction to how the rule changes have affected the first few weeks?

I think USC and WVU can cover the total themselves.

already involved in wvu and at a bad number .. i dont want to get F'd in the A in that game anymore than i already am .. but agree with you .. that number looks LOW

 

[Dmoney416]

Cal is a shade low IMO as well. They could get 45-50 there.

 

[Dmoney416]

I will admit being clueless and dead wrong on the Georgia game.

 

[Dmoney416]

How is Mich/Wisky have the same total as Bama/Georgia?

 

[hoopsstar22]

I'm going to be 55 by the time all these fuckers are out....

 

[Dmoney416]

I'm going to be 55 by the time all these fuckers are out....

Seriously. This is ridiculous.

 

[Dmoney416]

Oregon under 61 for medium.

 

[RetroVK]

realize its an acc conference game and weathe is a concern but isnt the clemson total low ?

 

[Dmoney416]

realize its an acc conference game and weathe is a concern but isnt the clemson total low ?

In my opinion, yes, but not enough for me to bet it.

I know that MW had this in the low 40s.

 

[RetroVK]

mw is sharp. ... could never bet it over without knowing for sure the sun is shining anyway.

 

[RetroVK]

lol .. theya rent going to get over money with south carolina uab at that number. ...i want no part but that was a mistake.

 

[Dmoney416]

Big bet on NMSU over 51.5.

Edit: 51.5, not 51.

 

[Dmoney416]

SJSU experts - 47.5 in Hawaii?

 

[JPicks]

Big bet on NMSU over 51.5.

Edit: 51.5, not 51.

got it at 53

 

[RetroVK]

SJSU experts - 47.5 in Hawaii?

for first 59 minutes 51 seconds or the full game ?

 

[Dmoney416]

for first 59 minutes 51 seconds or the full game ?

Full game good sir. Hawaii with a meaningless FG up 1 to cover the over and the spread?

 

[RetroVK]

Full game good sir. Hawaii with a meaningless FG up 1 to cover the over and the spread?

:36_11_6:


damn they put out a high one for unlv game .. wanted to go over .. have to think now.

 

[Dmoney416]

Thats a high number in Kansas St.

 

[Dmoney416]

Ok, well five for me for now.

Be back in a little bit.

 

[RetroVK]

its too high .. maybe they bet it down to a playable level.

 

[RetroVK]

list five consolidated please.

 

[M.W.]

Clemson's OL injuries are going to take a toll. 48.5 is still too high.

Early plays:

MSU/Ind over 49
UNC/Miami under 44.5
Purdue/ND under 45.5
Tenn/Aub over 37.5
Md/Clem under 48.5
BG/Wyo under 40
USF/NCSU under 44
CU/FSU under 41.5

Other looks:

WMU/Temple under 47.5
Stan/Wash under 52.5
TCU/OU under 55
Army/A&M over 40.5
ASU/Memphis over 56.5

 

[CapTwo]

pitt/cuse under 46.5 is the only one im locked in so far....

really like that MD/clemson under too, and will probably play it, MW.

 

[M.W.]

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Dmoney416
Mich St. Over 49 medium - gonna trust my number here.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

you better .. i am trusting it .. lol

I had it at 58, so I'm glad to have you gentlemen on the same side.

 

[M.W.]

pitt/cuse under 46.5 is the only one im locked in so far....

My number was lower than 46.5 as well at 44. I'm envisioning 34-10, 31-13, or a backdoor cover at 27-17.

 

[Dmoney416]

list five consolidated please.

Sorry for late reply:

NM/NMSU Over 51.5 (2.2u to win 2)
Mich St./Indiana Over 49 (1.65u to win 1.5)
Oregon/Wash St. Under 61 (1.65u to win 1.5)
Cincy/Akron Under 60 (1.1u to win 1) - hate to do the favorite/under thing, but the number warranted it.
NW/Iowa Over 41 (1.1u to win 1)