D
ddk997
Guest
money;money;money;money;money;
Last edited by a moderator:
D
ddk997
Guest
San Antonio Spurs +119 ML * 6 units
Orlando Magics - 4 * 3 units
Orlando Magics - 4 * 3 units
D
ddk997
Guest
Short on time today, went 2-2 yesterday still having a positive day. Let's continue the trend tonight bitches
D
ddk997
Guest
GL steed, we're sweeeping this board tonight for sure.
CappingCrunch
Cereal King
GL!! 5 more hrs til game time..
D
ddk997
Guest
3 hours till game time, got the brewha's ready to start flowwwin... KING OF BEERS.
Thought about this for a while, Magics are now a 3 basket favorite considering many are jumping on the Magics. Gonna add a safe bet, although we won't need it, JUST IN CASE Lebron decides to carry the team on his shoulder..:shake:
played at 4:51pm EDT
Orlando Magics ML -199 * 5 units (for 3)
from above the Spurs ML is 6 units for 7.3 FYI.
Good Luck everyone on the same page tonight, lets pound those brews together tonight.
CappingCrunch
Cereal King
:cheers:
boomer23us
Pretty much a regular
GOOD LUCK DDK
D
ddk997
Guest
way to fucking go magics...that's how we do it
JPicks
Pretty much a regular
So Killa just sent me a PM and told me that I'd be smart to start tailing your plays. Can't argue with today's results and the amount of views your getting lately so here I am. Huge props on the Magic game. You nailed that shit. You keep a record or just post winners every night?
Skullshifter
Pretty much a regular
nice plays , 2 for 2 . unfortunately i zigged when I should have zagged on the o/u's.
D
ddk997
Guest
Thanks Jpicks, and thanks Killa. I struggle to keep records, but I do print out all my bets I make, so I will be sure to post up my record tomorrow with my card. Thanks man.
Thanks Skullshifter, that over/under was a tough one, I really didn't expect them to be both in the 90's by the end of the third. Defense was sloppy by both squads, although they came out firing on all cylinders in the first.
wrap-up: went 3-0 tonight including the magics ML I played, which no one may have caught considering it's in the middle of the page. Overall good day...now it's back to work for tomorrow.
Thanks Skullshifter, that over/under was a tough one, I really didn't expect them to be both in the 90's by the end of the third. Defense was sloppy by both squads, although they came out firing on all cylinders in the first.
wrap-up: went 3-0 tonight including the magics ML I played, which no one may have caught considering it's in the middle of the page. Overall good day...now it's back to work for tomorrow.
D
ddk997
Guest
*6 9-1
*5 3-3
*4 1-2
*3 6-8
*2 3-8
22-22
+ 30.9
I think the record proves my lower bets are terrible.
Hello.
I think it is better if you just post your selections and don't bother with keeping a record.
Jan 29th
San Antonio Spurs +119 ML * 6 units win
Orlando Magics - 4 * 3 units win
Orlando Magics ML -199 * 5 units(for 3) win
Jan 28<SUP>th
</SUP>Dallas Mavericks - 6 (-120) * 6 units win
Charlotte Bobcats + 11 * 5 units lose
Minnesota Timberwolves + 1 * 3 units lose
Chicago Bulls - 2.5 * 3 units win
Jan 27th
San Antonio Spurs + 125 ML * 5 units (for 6.3) winner
Indiana Pacers +430 ML * 3 units (for 13) loser
Jan 26th
New York Knicks +125 ML *5 units (for 6.3) winner
New Jersey Nets + 2 *4 units loser
New Orleans Hornets - 2.5 * 3 units winner
Portland Trail Blazers-10 *3 units winner
Jan 25th
OVER LA Lakers 200.5 * 3 units loser
Charlotte Bobcats +185 ML * 3 units (for 5.5) loser
LA LAKERS - 3.5 (FIRST HALF) * 6 units winner
Jan 24th
New York Knicks +300 ML * 4 units (for 12) loser
Jan 23rd
Golden State Warriors + 230 ML * 2 units (for 4.6) loser
Dallas Mavericks + 148 ML * 4 units (for 6) winner
Jan 21st
Phoenix Suns - 5 * 3 unit loser
Dallas Mavericks - 1 * 3 unit loser
Portland Trail Blazers + 1 * 2 units loser
Jan 19th
Detroit Pistons - 3.5 *3 winner
Phoenix Suns + 8 *3 loser
Los Angeles Lakers - 4 *4 winner
Philadelphia 76ers - 4 * 2 units loser
Chicago Bulls + 2.5 * 2 units loser
Jan 16<SUP>th
</SUP>OVER LA Lakers 215 * 6 units loser
Atlanta Hawks - 1.5 * 4 units loser
Jan 15<SUP>th
</SUP>Chicago Bulls + 8.5 * 3 units winner
Phoenix Suns + 2 * 3 units loser
Jan 14<SUP>th
</SUP>LA Lakers + 4 * 6 units winner
Portland Trail Blazers - 1 * 3 units loser
Jan 13<SUP>th
</SUP>LA Lakers - 4 * 6 units winner
Charlotte Bobcats + 7.5 * 3 units winner
jan 12<SUP>th
</SUP>Washington Wizards + 3 * 5 units loser
Utah Jazz - 10 * 5 units loser
Jan 11<SUP>th
</SUP>Indiana Pacers - 1.5 * 2 units loser
Jan 10<SUP>th
</SUP>Charlotte Bobcats + 3 * 2 units winner
Jan 9<SUP>th
</SUP>Phoenix Suns - 5 * 6 units winner
Cleveland Cavaliers - 4 * 3 units winner
Jan 8<SUP>th
</SUP>OVER New York Knicks 212 * 2 units loser
Jan 7<SUP>th
</SUP>OVER Cleveland Cavaliers 179 * 5 units winner
Miami Heats ML + 202 * 5 units loser
OVER LA Lakers FIRST-HALF 113 * 2 units loser
Jan 2nd
Denver Nuggets - 7.5 * 2 loser
Portland Trail Blazers - 1 * 2 loser
Los Angeles Lakers -9.5 * 2 winner
*6 6-1
*5 4-4
*4 2-3
*3 8-9
*2 2-9
I notice that you made a record error in every single category.
I notice that almost all of these errors were in your favor.
Quite a coincidence there.
I made just a cursory look over your posted threads on CappingTheGame.
I am sure that I have made a mistake and you can correct me.
I believe that if you are going to post your record that you need to make it accurate.
I notice that you are one of the most viewed handicappers at this particular site and it is important for those viewing your thread to know what is really happening.
You had some very impressive moneyline winners.
You also had a very impressive *6 resume.
There was no need to embellish.
I think it is better if you just post your selections and don't bother with keeping a record.
Jan 29th
San Antonio Spurs +119 ML * 6 units win
Orlando Magics - 4 * 3 units win
Orlando Magics ML -199 * 5 units(for 3) win
Jan 28<SUP>th
</SUP>Dallas Mavericks - 6 (-120) * 6 units win
Charlotte Bobcats + 11 * 5 units lose
Minnesota Timberwolves + 1 * 3 units lose
Chicago Bulls - 2.5 * 3 units win
Jan 27th
San Antonio Spurs + 125 ML * 5 units (for 6.3) winner
Indiana Pacers +430 ML * 3 units (for 13) loser
Jan 26th
New York Knicks +125 ML *5 units (for 6.3) winner
New Jersey Nets + 2 *4 units loser
New Orleans Hornets - 2.5 * 3 units winner
Portland Trail Blazers-10 *3 units winner
Jan 25th
OVER LA Lakers 200.5 * 3 units loser
Charlotte Bobcats +185 ML * 3 units (for 5.5) loser
LA LAKERS - 3.5 (FIRST HALF) * 6 units winner
Jan 24th
New York Knicks +300 ML * 4 units (for 12) loser
Jan 23rd
Golden State Warriors + 230 ML * 2 units (for 4.6) loser
Dallas Mavericks + 148 ML * 4 units (for 6) winner
Jan 21st
Phoenix Suns - 5 * 3 unit loser
Dallas Mavericks - 1 * 3 unit loser
Portland Trail Blazers + 1 * 2 units loser
Jan 19th
Detroit Pistons - 3.5 *3 winner
Phoenix Suns + 8 *3 loser
Los Angeles Lakers - 4 *4 winner
Philadelphia 76ers - 4 * 2 units loser
Chicago Bulls + 2.5 * 2 units loser
Jan 16<SUP>th
</SUP>OVER LA Lakers 215 * 6 units loser
Atlanta Hawks - 1.5 * 4 units loser
Jan 15<SUP>th
</SUP>Chicago Bulls + 8.5 * 3 units winner
Phoenix Suns + 2 * 3 units loser
Jan 14<SUP>th
</SUP>LA Lakers + 4 * 6 units winner
Portland Trail Blazers - 1 * 3 units loser
Jan 13<SUP>th
</SUP>LA Lakers - 4 * 6 units winner
Charlotte Bobcats + 7.5 * 3 units winner
jan 12<SUP>th
</SUP>Washington Wizards + 3 * 5 units loser
Utah Jazz - 10 * 5 units loser
Jan 11<SUP>th
</SUP>Indiana Pacers - 1.5 * 2 units loser
Jan 10<SUP>th
</SUP>Charlotte Bobcats + 3 * 2 units winner
Jan 9<SUP>th
</SUP>Phoenix Suns - 5 * 6 units winner
Cleveland Cavaliers - 4 * 3 units winner
Jan 8<SUP>th
</SUP>OVER New York Knicks 212 * 2 units loser
Jan 7<SUP>th
</SUP>OVER Cleveland Cavaliers 179 * 5 units winner
Miami Heats ML + 202 * 5 units loser
OVER LA Lakers FIRST-HALF 113 * 2 units loser
Jan 2nd
Denver Nuggets - 7.5 * 2 loser
Portland Trail Blazers - 1 * 2 loser
Los Angeles Lakers -9.5 * 2 winner
*6 6-1
*5 4-4
*4 2-3
*3 8-9
*2 2-9
I notice that you made a record error in every single category.
I notice that almost all of these errors were in your favor.
Quite a coincidence there.
I made just a cursory look over your posted threads on CappingTheGame.
I am sure that I have made a mistake and you can correct me.
I believe that if you are going to post your record that you need to make it accurate.
I notice that you are one of the most viewed handicappers at this particular site and it is important for those viewing your thread to know what is really happening.
You had some very impressive moneyline winners.
You also had a very impressive *6 resume.
There was no need to embellish.
D
ddk997
Guest
Some of my record may be inaccurate, I just totaled up all my plays I printed out on paper. I didn't go back and look what I posted on CTG, which may be the huge reason for inaccuracy. Like I stated above to Jpicks, I have a lot of trouble keeping records and I just tried to break it down by my rankings. Whats the need to embellish? What good do I get out from that bro? So I am sorry if made a mistake here and there.
If anybody has been following my views/post ever since I joined CTG, I am not that great of a capper to follow with plays below *5 units, so please if you plan on tailing blindly lower than that, be careful. Now again I play these units following my rankings, and having 5-6 unit plays are rare for me.