I hope to lure JOB to post, but what do you guys think about him as a manager?opcorn:
Appreciate the article Dollaz, and totally concur with it and what you said. Still feel like shit today though, just a brutal loss...can't understand for the life of me how Hendley sent Werth that will haunt me for a while....and Jason then striking out with 1st and 3rd one out...this team just snakebit in postseason....As a Nats fan, I didn't want him because of the reputation he had. But, he actually did a good job. I agreed with every move he made last night with the exception of starting Espinosa (who got a big hit)
I thought Max was walking a fine line the entire game trying to manage through all those lefties (that he struggles against). Him being tired and trying to get through them a 3rd time would have been a big risk. Especially, when the Nats had a bunch of really good relievers that were rested and ready to try and get 9 outs. (including 3+ from Melancon)
Baseball is a funny game, if the weak grounder by Ruiz is 6 inches to the left, it's a 1-1 game in the bottom of the 7th. The result as it ended up means Dusty gets questioned.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/dont-blame-this-on-dusty-baker/
Yeah I know Espinosa on deck but I don't care who it was you can't take the bat out of their hands there...he was out by 30 ft. didn't even slide....true on Murphy and Hendley aggressiveness during the year.Obviously a bad send, but Hensley is aggressive and does it all the time. We may not have the first run without his aggressiveness in sending Murphy, who is out by a mile with a good throw. Also, Espinosa was in the on deck circle so what are the odds he drives in another run?
Bad send, but I can at least understand he did it all year. And the Nats probably benefited from it.
Werth has to put the ball in play.
As a Nats fan, I didn't want him because of the reputation he had. But, he actually did a good job. I agreed with every move he made last night with the exception of starting Espinosa (who got a big hit)
I thought Max was walking a fine line the entire game trying to manage through all those lefties (that he struggles against). Him being tired and trying to get through them a 3rd time would have been a big risk. Especially, when the Nats had a bunch of really good relievers that were rested and ready to try and get 9 outs. (including 3+ from Melancon)
Baseball is a funny game, if the weak grounder by Ruiz is 6 inches to the left, it's a 1-1 game in the bottom of the 7th. The result as it ended up means Dusty gets questioned.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/dont-blame-this-on-dusty-baker/
you agreed with him giving Murphy no protection?... he made a switch late in the game that was really poor. That's what lost them the game imo.
In the bottom of the 7th it was first and third with Werth at the plate. Having Harper running to 2nd was so dumb. It's possible they would've still intentionally walked Murphy but it's less likely if first isn't open.
Murphy is by far the most lethal offensive weapon and he was intentionally walked too much. Gotta have an answer for that
Dusty handed the game ball to Russ Ortiz when he pulled him from game 6 of the 2002 WS against the Angels, with the Giants up 5-0 at the time. Managers counting chickens before a game is done is unarguably horrendous, both from the pov of where they're revealing their mindset to be, to the example they're setting for the intensity levels of the players in their charge.
But this goes much deeper into the litany of failure that Dusty delivers wherever he goes. Steve Bartman didn't screw the Cubs in 2003, Dusty's handling of Mark Prior did.
Not taking bases because your scared of an intentional walk is incredibly dumb. Hell, it was stupid when people talkies about it with barry Bonds and we certainly arent talkin about a situation like that here.
Its not dumb. It wasn't the tying run. And it was very unlikely werth would hit into a DP. It was either a fly ball or a strike out. Just shitty managing overall.