Ohio State -7. O/U 47.
Another dog I like at 1st blush
OSU is either going to win by 20 or lose straight up. Bet both ways.
Sounds like there may be a fair amount of Tennessee fans there after Ohio St accidentally leaked the presale code to the public instead of just it's season ticket holdersI don't know if anyone discussed Herbstreit's comments on the day of the selection show. He said ohio would be much better off playing this game on the road because of the disenchantment of its fans. Said they'd be looking for reasons to jump on the team from the get-go. They're already unbridled dicks. Imagine if Tennessee gets a jump start in the game...
I'm curious myself how the crowds are for these games. Most students won't be on campus.
Tennessee fans will show up. They are already telling OSU people to not sell their tickets to Vols fans.Yup,was wondering the same. Some monstrous stadiums in play. 3 of the 7 biggest in the country for the opening round.
Yeah I saw that tweet just a bit ago.Tenn +7.5 is most bet side of the playoffs.. not that it's a huge advantage, but extremely cold temps expected.. does Tenn playmakers have experience playing in cold?
same thinking for me, played under 48. plenty of time for both coaches to prepare is my biggest concernYeah I saw that tweet just a bit ago.
Game is interesting...
Tennessee DL vs OSU OL is big advantage Vols.
OSU apparently with two new OL starters
My question is, how will the Vols score?
I just said this elsewhere but I can see a low scoring tied game in the 3rd and then OSU by 10-14 with a front door cover.same thinking for me, played under 48. plenty of time for both coaches to prepare is my biggest concern
Tenn +7.5 is most bet side of the playoffs.. not that it's a huge advantage, but extremely cold temps expected.. does Tenn playmakers have experience playing in cold?
True but it's not like this OSU team is Ohio born n bred lol.85% of them have prob never even felt temps below freezing, wearing coats when it in the 50s!! I remember years ago when I was going to Houston and El Paso quite a bit I be walking around in shorts and tee shirt on beautiful days in the 50s and these mfers thought I was crazy as they all bundled up! lol. Think it gets colder in Nashville but not sure they get much in the way of 20s w wind feeling like it ripping thru your body! That vols qb def don’t look like someone used to cold temps, I don’t trust him when it 80!!!
We gotta stop with this IU and OSU narrative.OSU dismantled a better team in IU (than Tenny)
Should have beaten Ducks on the road.
Losing to UM looks horrible but UM is their daddy.
Tenn is in Knoxville and the temperature on Saturday there will be 40/23. It will be a good bit colder in Columbus, but it's not like Knoxville is South Texas85% of them have prob never even felt temps below freezing, wearing coats when it in the 50s!! I remember years ago when I was going to Houston and El Paso quite a bit I be walking around in shorts and tee shirt on beautiful days in the 50s and these mfers thought I was crazy as they all bundled up! lol. Think it gets colder in Nashville but not sure they get much in the way of 20s w wind feeling like it ripping thru your body! That vols qb def don’t look like someone used to cold temps, I don’t trust him when it 80!!!
We gotta stop with this IU and OSU narrative.
OSU was the better team, obviously. Their defense is one of the tops in the country and did their job post the 1st possession.
The offense was sporadic that day. They just crossed over 300 yards of offense with that final TD.
Their first offensive drive of the 3rd quarter was pretty.
Otherwise, the TDs were via...
79 yard punt return
7 yard drive after a turnover
44 yard drive
Add in a FG on a 43 yard drive.
As I've said since then, that was a 24-14 type game. Dominant defense by OSU. I guess maybe even 24-10 type game.
Indiana defense played pretty damn good that day.
Since that final score was notched, everyone has used that game to discredit Indiana.
Fair enough, they can't move the ball versus excellent defenses.
Use that as a cap for the playoffs.
Take away games vs top end DLs (OSU and Michigan) and the Hoosiers moved the ball versus everyone else.
------
Now, to your point on IU better than Tennessee.... That's pretty interesting. What would you make the line Vols vs Hoosiers on a neutral site?
Tennessee would win this game for the reason stated above -- top end DL play. Hoosiers have issues there.
Not sure if I trust Tenny offense in general, let alone the cold.
No....but would Ohio St scoring 10-17 points and losing be that big of a shocker?Lot of love for Tennessee around the net…..would a Ryan Day bounce back with a great effort be that big of a shocker?
Well that's an angle right- last impression of OSU right now is that home collapse as 3 TD favs against a pitiful O in UM.. Buckeyes can't possible be good anymore, right? Then you add in the hook on the TD and seems like Tenn slam dunk..Lot of love for Tennessee around the net…..would a Ryan Day bounce back with a great effort be that big of a shocker?
Here's my theory. OSU finally plays up to their alleged roster talent and opens up the offense. Get those talented WR's involved early on quick throws. Draw the CB's in and eventually have a few deep routes to open up. Once they get things clicking, it'll be an avalanche of big plays on all 3 phases of the game. It'll be game over. Or, OSU can play conservative and allow Tennessee to hang around like Michigan, and lose. Quick summary, either OSU wakes the hell up or has already quit. Blowout or loss in my opinion.I just don’t see the scoring by either team for it to be more than 10 unless it turnovers or special teams, I have little doubt the defenses control most this game
Not a bad synopsis but there's more to it than that. The OSU/IU game was more in the range of 17-14 type of game without 2 special teams gaffes, and an unnecessary TD at the end. Just going to add this so things make more sense. OSU piped in extra noise for the game. Therefore, IU had to go to silent count snaps. OSU picked up on certain signals when to bring the house on certain passing downs. IU didn't adjust and paid the price. OSU and Michigan for sure have great defenses like usual. Michigan was much better than their record, just had a tough ass schedule. I have seen enough and read enough about IU and Cignetti that things will get corrected. Maybe IU decides to run the ball more which shouldn't be an issue.We gotta stop with this IU and OSU narrative.
OSU was the better team, obviously. Their defense is one of the tops in the country and did their job post the 1st possession.
The offense was sporadic that day. They just crossed over 300 yards of offense with that final TD.
Their first offensive drive of the 3rd quarter was pretty.
Otherwise, the TDs were via...
79 yard punt return
7 yard drive after a turnover
44 yard drive
Add in a FG on a 43 yard drive.
As I've said since then, that was a 24-14 type game. Dominant defense by OSU. I guess maybe even 24-10 type game.
Indiana defense played pretty damn good that day.
Since that final score was notched, everyone has used that game to discredit Indiana.
Fair enough, they can't move the ball versus excellent defenses.
Use that as a cap for the playoffs.
Take away games vs top end DLs (OSU and Michigan) and the Hoosiers moved the ball versus everyone else.
------
Now, to your point on IU better than Tennessee.... That's pretty interesting. What would you make the line Vols vs Hoosiers on a neutral site?
Tennessee would win this game for the reason stated above -- top end DL play. Hoosiers have issues there.
I saw you mention the pipes in noise angle the other day.Not a bad synopsis but there's more to it than that. The OSU/IU game was more in the range of 17-14 type of game without 2 special teams gaffes, and an unnecessary TD at the end. Just going to add this so things make more sense. OSU piped in extra noise for the game. Therefore, IU had to go to silent count snaps. OSU picked up on certain signals when to bring the house on certain passing downs. IU didn't adjust and paid the price. OSU and Michigan for sure have great defenses like usual. Michigan was much better than their record, just had a tough ass schedule. I have seen enough and read enough about IU and Cignetti that things will get corrected. Maybe IU decides to run the ball more which shouldn't be an issue.
The extra piped in noise was told by some IU fans at the game. OSU was that scared of IU, I shit you not.I saw you mention the pipes in noise angle the other day.
Tell me more. I hadn't heard of any of that.
We have our own Ohio Stadium story from 2006. That was the #1 vs #2 game and the grass was still grass then. They let it grow to the highest height all season to counter Manningham, Arrington and Breaston.
I'm curious myself how the crowds are for these games. Most students won't be on campus.
Counter-point: John Cooper was the last abject loser to do worse.How crazy is it Day could be coaching for his job?? Some these schools have just slightly unreasonable expectations! I get the whole Michigan thing and losing to them this year was a really bad look but damn, good luck getting a coach who will do better!
A prominent cfb capper would make Tennessee -2 on a neutral.Now, to your point on IU better than Tennessee.... That's pretty interesting. What would you make the line Vols vs Hoosiers on a neutral site?
Tennessee would win this game for the reason stated above -- top end DL play. Hoosiers have issues there.
What about self-scouting and breaking tendencies? Does Day do that?If Judkins is in OSU runs the ball 98% of the time. If Henderson is in OSU passes the ball 90% of the time. If the RB lines up directly behind the QB who is in the shotgun OSU runs the ball 100% of the time regardless of who the RB is. It doesn't take an inciteful defensive genius to see these tendencies. Tenn sees it and will cheat their LB's accordingly. That gives them a huge advantage. Every other team OSU has played has seen this and done the exact same all year long. This is also exactly the same tendency Day used last year before Chip Kelly even got to OSU which leads me to believe Day is actually still calling the plays not Kelly. Another point is I have never seen a Chip Kelly team display such easy to read tendencies but Day has done this for years.
I expect some surprises offensively from OSU at the start of the game but if it remains close in the first half Day will take control and call the offense I outlined above. If you don't think these tendencies are correct call up and watch any of the last 5 OSU games played. I think you will find it interesting.
No. He thinks the talent on his roster will just over match the opponent in every game. 95% of the time he's right....but when that doesn't work, he's easily outcoached.What about self-scouting and breaking tendencies? Does Day do that?
yeah I call bullshit on that.The extra piped in noise was told by some IU fans at the game. OSU was that scared of IU, I shit you not.
yeah I call bullshit on that.
I rarely go against ya my man but I have a different view based on what I watched that day along with the box score.We gotta stop with this IU and OSU narrative.
OSU was the better team, obviously. Their defense is one of the tops in the country and did their job post the 1st possession.
The offense was sporadic that day. They just crossed over 300 yards of offense with that final TD.
Their first offensive drive of the 3rd quarter was pretty.
Otherwise, the TDs were via...
79 yard punt return
7 yard drive after a turnover
44 yard drive
Add in a FG on a 43 yard drive.
As I've said since then, that was a 24-14 type game. Dominant defense by OSU. I guess maybe even 24-10 type game.
Indiana defense played pretty damn good that day.
Since that final score was notched, everyone has used that game to discredit Indiana.
Fair enough, they can't move the ball versus excellent defenses.
Use that as a cap for the playoffs.
Take away games vs top end DLs (OSU and Michigan) and the Hoosiers moved the ball versus everyone else.
------
Now, to your point on IU better than Tennessee.... That's pretty interesting. What would you make the line Vols vs Hoosiers on a neutral site?
Tennessee would win this game for the reason stated above -- top end DL play. Hoosiers have issues there.
Few counterpoints...I rarely go against ya my man but I have a different view based on what I watched that day along with the box score.
Doubled in yards and a game wildly dominated in field position for the day with no hope to throw at all once Knowles started blitzing the 2nd drive (Rourke was 6-15 for 36 yards outside the first drive)
- Ohio st punted twice the entire game
- Indiana cross into OSU territory only 3 times and in the red zone only twice
- For contrast Ohio st started 4 drives inside Indiana territory
- Between first and last drives for Indiana they gained a total of 3 yards of offense (on 29 plays)
- Yes ohio st only had one long drive for a touchdown but that’s because they only had 5 drives the entire game that started inside their own territory (2 3 and outs, 1 87 yard drive stopped by a bad snap by backup center at the 1, the 70 TD drive, and 11 plays 43 yds in the 4th leading to a FG as the game was over already at 28-7)
- All other drives started in Indiana territory which limited potential yards even if Indianas D really did hold up well for the day
- It was clear to me Cig was content to milk clock that last drive just trying to get to the locker room running the ball 10 times when they were down 31-7 for a total of 40 yards or so and using almost the entire play clock each snap (used 7 and a half minutes total).
I honestly felt 31-7 was a fair final given all that took place (special teams obviously but you can’t just assume Ohio st doesn’t score those 2 possessions without the muffed snap and the punt return, Ohio st also stopped twice near or at the goal line…credit Indiana but still fortunate with one of those being a backup center bad snap)