Rams vs. Seahawks Discussion Thread

I was actually surprised how well the 9ers line was holding up early. They went right down the field the first few possessions. Horrible call on 4th down to give up possession and then a Tonges fumble moving the ball through the air easily. Also CMC hadn’t seen running lanes like that all season. Sure, the wheels fell off but the 9ers didn’t punt until the 2h. Seattle also only 4/10 on third down vs practice squad guys. It was a blowout win but it’s not like they took the ball 75 yards 5 times down the field.
 
So I thought the first 2 games were close, not sure what to make of it but here's some numbers..

Darnold has thrown 6 int in the 2 games.

Sea won 38-37 on the backwards pass 2pt conversion review and LA had 581 total yds and had more TOP at 40min-28min.

LA won 21-19 but Sea outgained LA 414-249 in the 21-19 game and Seattle missed a 61 yd FG attempt at the gun and had more TOP than LA at 37min-22min.

Weird that the team that won each game had the ball for way less time.

Total Pts 58 v 57
Total Yds 830 v 829
 
Last edited:
TreyDawg said:
So I thought the first 2 games were close, not sure what to make of it but here's some numbers..

Darnold has thrown 6 int in the 2 games.

Sea won 38-37 on the backwards pass 2pt conversion review and LA had 581 total yds and had more TOP at 40min-28min.

LA won 21-19 but Sea outgained LA 414-249 in the 21-19 game and Seattle missed a 61 yd FG attempt at the gun and had more TOP than LA at 37min-22min.

Weird that the team that won each game had the ball for way less time.

Total Pts 58 v 57
Total Yds 830 v 829
Click to expand...

Sam was so bad to start Game 1 and LAR simply tried to hold on.

Game 2 was a blood bath and my Seattle wager was completely wrong. But that’s how things play out sometimes.
 
VirginiaCavs said:
Thanks for the info. Do you have details on the game itself?
Click to expand...
Not particularly except the line is pretty spot on. Seattle -2.58 (Neutral Field Seattle -0.5).

There's a little more discrepancy with the AFC game but change of QB throws a wrench in it.

Denver -1.08 (Neutral Field +0.92)
With Bo Nix. Looks like books giving NE 4-5 points with QB change.
 
Loves2kickass said:
Not particularly except the line is pretty spot on. Seattle -2.58 (Neutral Field Seattle -0.5).

There's a little more discrepancy with the AFC game but change of QB throws a wrench in it.

Denver -1.08 (Neutral Field +0.92)
With Bo Nix. Looks like books giving NE 4-5 points with QB change.
Click to expand...
Those are based on regular season numbers. I'll re-calculate to include post season games.
 
VirginiaCavs said:
Thanks for the info. Do you have details on the game itself?
Click to expand...

Loves2kickass said:
Not particularly except the line is pretty spot on. Seattle -2.58 (Neutral Field Seattle -0.5).

There's a little more discrepancy with the AFC game but change of QB throws a wrench in it.

Denver -1.08 (Neutral Field +0.92)
With Bo Nix. Looks like books giving NE 4-5 points with QB change.
Click to expand...
Including playoff games

Seattle -3.18 (-3)
Denver -1.8 (-2) w/ Bo Nix
 
Posted easier this week by Mason. You can see the BOL rooting #s for the eventual Super Bowl winner.

He's posting current odds and he's usually referring to total futures bets throughout the season.

The house wins any which way on futures.

Seattle is the lowest win though.


Screenshot_20260124-162233.png
 
People flocking to the gates to bet on a Darnold INT and I don't disagree with that really

But time to look at the other side, I much prefer the Stafford INT. He's not been great lately w/o Puka doing Puka things. Guy is a turnover just waiting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top