Very interesting here.Clemson has gone under by an average of 18.5 points per game in its four first-round games.
37-17 vs. Oklahoma (under by 9.5)
31-0 vs. Ohio State (under by 25.5)
6-24 loss to Bama (under by 16.5)
30-3 vs. Notre Dame (under by 22.5)
Oh man, I was being a smart-ass but I do appreciate it as a recruiting junkie. I was a closet Clemson fan during the Deshaun era and that 40-35 game was one of my more profitable bowl games ever(in many ways).There weren't any 5-stars anywhere but the DL, except for Mack Alexander who was the CB whose injury in the 2015 championship game may have cost us the title.
Wilkins played all 4 of those games, Dexter Lawrence played in '16 and '17, and Xavier Thomas played last year. That's all the defensive 5-stars.
My most profitable bowl game was played on Christmas Day 1999. Arizona State vs, Wake Forest coached by Jim "Santa Claus" Caldwell. I remember calling in my bets from my aunt's basement on Christmas Eve/Christmas morning at 1:00 a.m. It took like 45 minutes to get all my bets in at ESB on the Demon Kelvins (it seemed that their whole defense was named Kelvin that year) and the under and all the pointspread props (adjusted pointspreads/totals) and parlays (using the adjusted totals/pointspreads).Oh man, I was being a smart-ass but I do appreciate it as a recruiting junkie. I was a closet Clemson fan during the Deshaun era and that 40-35 game was one of my more profitable bowl games ever(in many ways).
This is going to be such a great game, thanks for the thread.
That is really cool.My most profitable bowl game was played on Christmas Day 1999. Arizona State vs, Wake Forest coached by Jim "Santa Claus" Caldwell. I remember calling in my bets from my aunt's basement on Christmas Eve/Christmas morning at 1:00 a.m. It took like 45 minutes to get all my bets in at ESB on the Demon Kelvins (it seemed that their whole defense was named Kelvin that year) and the under and all the pointspread props (adjusted pointspreads/totals) and parlays (using the adjusted totals/pointspreads).
Anyway, Deacs were +3.5, total was circa 45.5, and the 23-3 Wake victory was a bonanza. $10,000 -- my biggest win ever on a college game.
My most profitable bowl game was played on Christmas Day 1999. Arizona State vs, Wake Forest coached by Jim "Santa Claus" Caldwell. I remember calling in my bets from my aunt's basement on Christmas Eve/Christmas morning at 1:00 a.m. It took like 45 minutes to get all my bets in at ESB on the Demon Kelvins (it seemed that their whole defense was named Kelvin that year) and the under and all the pointspread props (adjusted pointspreads/totals) and parlays (using the adjusted totals/pointspreads).
Anyway, Deacs were +3.5, total was circa 45.5, and the 23-3 Wake victory was a bonanza. $10,000 -- my biggest win ever on a college game.
I posted this link in traderjoe's thread, but I thought I'd post it again here.
Is Clemson really better than last season? Here are 4 key questions facing the Tigers
After Dabo Swinney's rant about a lack of respect for his team and claim that this Clemson team is better than last year's title-winning edition, Pete Thamel dives into the four biggest questions facing Little Ole Clemson.sports.yahoo.com
Yahoo Sports spoke to six coaches and assistants who’ve faced Clemson this year to figure out if this edition of the Tigers compared to last season’s iconic team that blasted Notre Dame and Alabama in the College Football Playoff by an average of nearly four touchdowns.
I think the expansion of legal gambling and technology have curtailed line moves in comparison to 15-20 years ago. You have big groups with insane amounts of money that ultimately “bracket” numbers once the initial lines settle in place. They decide their numbers and hammer them every time it moves to what they have calculated as a green light. For a game of this magnitude I think there are many groups on both sides of this affair. Some books may move the line .5/1 point one way and it gets hit hard and returns and vice versa. This is just a theory I developed from listening to different people that make plays for others for a living.I find it odd that tOSU has all of these advantages, yet the line hasn’t moved off the 2 in two weeks. What to make of that?
I think your theories may have some considerable meritI think the expansion of legal gambling and technology have curtailed line moves in comparison to 15-20 years ago. You have big groups with insane amounts of money that ultimately “bracket” numbers once the initial lines settle in place. They decide their numbers and hammer them every time it moves to what they have calculated as a green light. For a game of this magnitude I think there are many groups on both sides of this affair. Some books may move the line .5/1 point one way and it gets hit hard and returns and vice versa. This is just a theory I developed from listening to different people that make plays for others for a living.
Also, I think here at CTG we have some very passionate and vocal Big Ten advocates that at times mix exorbinant alcohol consumption and posting. Again, just another theory I developed.
Entering last year's Natty, Tua's efficiency was 205.2. 11.44 yards per attempt and 16.5 yards per completion.
Burrow figures entering this year Natty, 204.6, 10.9 and 14.0, respectively.
Now 5-0 to the under.Clemson has gone under by an average of 18.5 points per game in its four first-round games.
37-17 vs. Oklahoma (under by 9.5)
31-0 vs. Ohio State (under by 25.5)
6-24 loss to Bama (under by 16.5)
30-3 vs. Notre Dame (under by 22.5)
Now 6-2 SU and 7-1 ATS in playoff games 14-2 SU & ATS overall in postseason since Venables arrived.Since Venables took over as DC, Clemson is 13-2 SU & ATS in the postseason.
5-0 SU / 4-1 ATS in conference championships
3-0 SU & ATS in bowls (vs. LSU, Ohio State, and Oklahoma)
5-2 SU / 6-1 ATS in playoff games