Pacers vs. Knicks Game 2 Preview Article

VirginiaCavs

CTG Super Moderator
Staff member
Pacers vs. Knicks Game 2 Best Bets: New York Will Bounce Back

Indiana Pacers vs. New York Knicks
Friday, May 23, 2025 at 8 p.m. ET at Madison Square Garden

Key Trend


Tonight's game will be decided by New York's proven ability to bounce back after a loss.

In this year's playoffs, the Knicks are 4-0 ATS after a loss.

It might feel strange to trust a team that lost to cover a six-point spread. But consider that the Knicks led by 14 points with under three minutes to go in the game.

One of my key claims to support a Knicks play tonight is that the fact of their late big lead shows that they are capable of beating the Pacers by double digits.

An understanding of what took place in those final three minutes will support this claim. It is not the case that the Knicks simply ran out of gas and had nothing left to give.

What Happened In Those Three Minutes

It is extremely improbable for a team to lose a 14-point lead in less than three minutes. It is even improbable for a team to have its lead shrink in half in so little time.

For that to take place, one team has to be unbelievably clutch and another team has to make awful mistakes.

First of all, improbable shot-making enabled Indiana to cover the spread in Game 1. The team as a whole shot beyond itself, as evident in its unusually high three-point conversion rate, but Aaron Nesmith was particularly ridiculous. He converted eight of his nine three-point attempts, with many of those makes coming in the waning minutes.

In addition to the Pacers shooting better than we should expect them to shoot tonight, the Knicks' defense was very bad in preventable ways.

When New York built its big fourth-quarter lead, Deuce McBride helped it play great defense. The final score conceals the potential for New York's defense to allow a vastly lower point total in Game 2 and not simply for the reason that Indiana's shot-making will decline.

McBride's ability to limit the field goal efficiency of Pacers point guard Tyrese Haliburton was a proven thing even before the game began.

With a nice lead, it still would normally have made sense for New York's coach to sub in his starting point guard Jalen Brunson, who is a superstar in part because of his ability to close out games.

However, in Game 1, this happened to be a bad decision because the Knicks needed defense. They did not need Brunson's scoring. Brunson could not give them any defense, because he was playing with five fouls. Key defender OG Anunoby also had five fouls.

The threat of fouling out rendered New York's defenders impotent.

With better defense, which one must expect from the Knicks because one must expect their players not to foul as much, they will protect the double-digit lead that they will again attain tonight.

Turnovers and Miscommunication

New York can have an even bigger fourth-quarter lead tonight by avoiding turnovers.

Turnovers played a crucial role in Game 1. The Knicks were up 14 with a few minutes to go even though they lost the turnover battle against a team that, as the stats show, is not particularly good at forcing turnovers — they rank outside the top ten in the category.

One can't expect the Pacers to amass 27 points off turnovers and outscore the Knicks by 23 in points off turnovers.

Moreover, one has to expect better communication from the Knicks on defense. Miscommunication contributed to mistakes that New York's ball-screen defense made, which obviously does not indicate that they were too tired. They lost because they made preventable errors.

Gas in the Tank

New York played lax with its lead. Skeptics might insist that they were too tired, but we know that the Knicks can play sufficiently hard against Indiana for four quarters because we saw them against Detroit.

Like Indiana, Detroit plays at a high tempo. Among playoff teams, the Pistons rank one spot behind the Pacers in pace.

Tonight's key trend — that New York is 4-0 in this postseason after a loss — is something that the Knicks contributed to twice against Detroit.

The Knicks advanced past Detroit because Detroit's fast tempo failed to fatigue them.

New York is a well-conditioned group that, healthier than last year's version, gets key bench minutes especially from its backup point guard and its backup center.

New York's Scoring Will Remain High

The Knicks' offense has always been sharp and productive after a loss.

They already thrived in Game 1, scoring 125 points in regulation, despite missing a lot of free throws and despite underperforming from behind the arc relative to their significantly higher year-long three-point conversion rate.

On offense, the Knicks are powered by their top scorers, who will continue to dominate.

Indiana still does not have someone to guard Karl-Anthony Towns with. They tried Myles Turner. The Pacers also tried Pascal Siakam to a small extent. But Towns' field goal efficiency when guarded by Turner was very high and it was perfect when guarded by Siakam. Thomas Bryant, Turner's backup, obviously can't help.

Because the Pacers lack an answer for Towns, he has scored 35, 40, and 30 points against the Pacers in his last three games against them.

Indiana also can't limit Brunson, who scored 43 points in Game 1 despite making only one three.

With even average days from Brunson and Towns' teammates, who benefit from the attention that Indiana's defense has to devote to New York's top scorers, the Knicks will have no problem exceeding 120 points again.

So far in this postseason, the Pacers have been a dominant Game 1 team. Relative to Game 1, their defense allowed 17 more points in Game 2 against the Bucks and seven more points in Game 2 against Cleveland.

After collapsing at the end of Game 1, New York will continue to keep its foot on the gas pedal to attain a superb point total.

It might feel strange to go against an Indiana team that won and is now dogged by as many as six points, but a larger margin of victory is easier for a team to achieve when it scores so many points.

Takeaway

Indiana's shooting will decline for sure, but the Knicks will also play better defense with guys avoiding foul trouble, avoiding lapses in communication, and avoiding turnovers on offense.

New York's offense will be even sharper with better shot- and free throw-making. Indiana lacks an answer for Towns and Brunson, with the latter also getting his teammates involved.

The Knicks have proven that they can be strong for all four quarters even against up-tempo teams. They are glad to run with the Pacers. Angered by their avoidable collapse, they will maintain a double-digit lead through the end of Game 2 tonight.

Best Bet: Knicks -6 at -113 with BetOnline
 
I do think you gotta take into account keeping pace with Detroit in the 1st series they were probably fresher and honestly pistons just weren’t ready for the moments. I do think Knicks could be in trouble far as a 7 game series but I totally agree they gonna bounce back tonight. I parlayed them w okc last night.

One thing I def don’t think sustainable for pacers is the way they shot gm1, so I’m looking at rebounding props for towns, Robinson, and several other Knicks, def like haliburton under 20.5 points tonight. I considered towns under points cause I think he kinda a big doofus but then I realized same as you he has punished pacers every meeting this year, they simply don’t have anyone to deal with his size. The only pacer I slightly lean over would be tucker cause while he clearly can’t guard towns towns doesn’t really possess the movement to stay with Tucker so he should continue getting open looks. Overall I think rebounding props make a lot of sense as I think the d cranks up but the pace could still be there which should lead to lot of boards. Normally I play Brunson points over when I like the Knicks but 29.5 felt high when I expect New York attempts to make this more a half court game, for Brunson to hit think it has to be close late which obviously we don’t want.
 
Knicks did well to handle Indy offense in the 2h until the final 3 minutes. Problem for that team is there is zero chance they can do that for a full game. As in zero. I think Indy sucked out any good the Knicks could take from that 2h and curious how NYK respond after all the effort but nothing to show for it.

Would I be surprised if Indy win in 5 at this point? Um, no.

That 2h was as floor as it gets for Indy offense and as ceiling as it gets for NYK defense. Yet the end actually happened. Not positive if you are pro Knicks in the series, will see how it transitions into tonight. No side or total for me, no thank you.
 
Knicks did well to handle Indy offense in the 2h until the final 3 minutes. Problem for that team is there is zero chance they can do that for a full game. As in zero. I think Indy sucked out any good the Knicks could take from that 2h and curious how NYK respond after all the effort but nothing to show for it.

Would I be surprised if Indy win in 5 at this point? Um, no.

That 2h was as floor as it gets for Indy offense and as ceiling as it gets for NYK defense. Yet the end actually happened. Not positive if you are pro Knicks in the series, will see how it transitions into tonight. No side or total for me, no thank you.

I think Knicks have to have a come to Jesus moment. I felt like since they were able to score playing pacers pace they went with it, Brunson turned it over 7x which more than I think any game all year. Knicks have to slow the pace imo. This always been way more a conversation in ncaa but I’ve always felt it easier to slow a game down than speed it up. I’d be shocked if pacers won in 5, okc in 5 no doubt but I think this series screams 7, Knicks def have to slow the pace and can’t get suckered into those fools gold points.
 
If I havnt said it (which I’m sure I have) I hate towns game, that said his size alone a problem for Indy, I don’t love counting on this guy tho. Tucker has to stay aggressive on offense cause I think that pacers best answer for towns as towns not willing or able to follow Tucker around to his spots so pacers need Tucker to match towns production. As much I like haliburton he doesn’t string a lot of those games like gm1 together and I’d expect extra defensive focus on him tonight, really like his under 20.5.
 
I dont think either team can stop the other. I couldnt possibly lay 6 on NYK.

Why not? They were up 14 with 3 to go and that after pacers shot insane at beginning the game then again for the comeback. Of course I’ll probably get fuvked ats cause I’m saying this but 6 points the way they play now days means jack fuck imo. Okc is making a joke of 8 point spreads in the west. Just think pacers got what they wanted, Knicks will adjust, and imo there just no damn way pacers shoot like that again in b2b games.
 
I honestly think it gonna look a lot different tonight, doesn’t mean Knicks cover but I think they got suckered into playing that pace game 1 cause they were scoring. Pretty sure they will figure out pacers have nobody to guard towns and Knicks can slow the game down and still get great shots in a half court game. Tibs ain’t my fav coach but he smart and he knows Brunson had more turnovers than any game all year and he knows the pace will wear his squad down. I totally expect it be more physical and they slow it down, think McBride will start checking haliburton more, in the half court Knicks biggest problem is Turner imo, as much as he has no shot against towns size on d it seemed to me Tucker can get free in about any spot he wants, think he have to have a huge game for pacers.
 
I honestly think it gonna look a lot different tonight, doesn’t mean Knicks cover but I think they got suckered into playing that pace game 1 cause they were scoring. Pretty sure they will figure out pacers have nobody to guard towns and Knicks can slow the game down and still get great shots in a half court game. Tibs ain’t my fav coach but he smart and he knows Brunson had more turnovers than any game all year and he knows the pace will wear his squad down. I totally expect it be more physical and they slow it down, think McBride will start checking haliburton more, in the half court Knicks biggest problem is Turner imo, as much as he has no shot against towns size on d it seemed to me Tucker can get free in about any spot he wants, think he have to have a huge game for pacers.
I just don't think they can play a physical slow game for four quarters. Or even two quarters. The only game they did that was game 6 against Boston and w/o Tatum that Boston team isn't close to Indiana's level. Not like I'm on the Pacers here, yet, but I sure as hell couldn't bank on NYK playing that brand of basketball to slow down the Pacers for 48 minutes. I do think the Knicks can actually win a half, but which one I'm not willing to bet at this point. Props or overs only for me.
 
I just don't think they can play a physical slow game for four quarters. Or even two quarters. The only game they did that was game 6 against Boston and w/o Tatum that Boston team isn't close to Indiana's level. Not like I'm on the Pacers here, yet, but I sure as hell couldn't bank on NYK playing that brand of basketball to slow down the Pacers for 48 minutes. I do think the Knicks can actually win a half, but which one I'm not willing to bet at this point. Props or overs only for me.

Love rebounding props, if the pace there even better don’t think they gonna shoot as well. I’m not sure why they can’t slow them down to an extent? Sure if pacers want to hurry and take rushed shots by all means but Knicks have the ability to play late into the shot clock then let Brunson go to work, long as they don’t turn it over I don’t think it be difficult to slow it down a bit.
 
If I havnt said it (which I’m sure I have) I hate towns game, that said his size alone a problem for Indy, I don’t love counting on this guy tho. Tucker has to stay aggressive on offense cause I think that pacers best answer for towns as towns not willing or able to follow Tucker around to his spots so pacers need Tucker to match towns production. As much I like haliburton he doesn’t string a lot of those games like gm1 together and I’d expect extra defensive focus on him tonight, really like his under 20.5.
Tucker? Who is that? Maybe you mean Turner
 
Let's face it. The Knicks were outplayed by DET. And blown out in 4 games vs. Boston before mounting some crazy comebacks, but more so epic collapses by a tired and worn down Celtic's team that couldn't make a shot. It also had a shell of their big man who if he was healthy they likely sweep. The city crowned them like they're some sort of champion level team because they beat a flawed C's team in terms of form and shooting but they're still the Knicks. This is their ceiling.
 
Let's face it. The Knicks were outplayed by DET. And blown out in 4 games vs. Boston before mounting some crazy comebacks, but more so epic collapses by a tired and worn down Celtic's team that couldn't make a shot. It also had a shell of their big man who if he was healthy they likely sweep. The city crowned them like they're some sort of champion level team because they beat a flawed C's team in terms of form and shooting but they're still the Knicks. This is their ceiling.
I mean, are you really impressed by Milwaukee or beat-up Cleveland?
 
I mean, are you really impressed by Milwaukee or beat-up Cleveland?

Destroying Cleveland a couple games I guess was more impressive. But I’m not saying Indy > NY. But the perception was NY was champ level by beating the champ and they’re as far away from a ring as the Hornets. Even if they were up 2-0 in this series.
 
Back
Top