Lot's of good reading in this thread...
'Horn: Not sure where you saw that Malcolm Kelly isn't playing, but I am quite sure that he is. Their biggest loss for this game is DT Granger, for shoplifting of all things.
CMoney: This game may remind you of the Sugar Bowl game v UGA two years ago on the surface, but if you look into the angles of this game, it really shouldn't. Two yrs ago, Slaton and White were not household college football names and that Mountaineer team was able to sneak up on people with the speed of their version of the spread option. Additionally, they had a focused coach and the motivation of being in a BCS game against an allegedly superior foe in UGA. Two years later, Slaton and White are both still here and very well known; there is an immense amount of game tape for the OU staff to look over that the UGA staff wasn't privy to, two years ago. Additionally, you have an interim head coach that likely won't be there next year (see Ga Tech and Arkansas this bowl season) vice having RRod two years ago. And finally, this game is on grass whereas the Sugar Bowl two years ago was on the carpet which the Mountaineers favor. There are a TON of differences from two years ago.
Oklahoma -7 is what I am on. Good luck.
Put me in the WVU camp. To compare this matchup to the matchups in the Rose & Sugar is laughable. Also, its true Oklahomas run D looks great on paper, but they haven't played anything close to what WVU brings to the table offensively.
Missouri? Twice. More of a dynamic offense that played better competition than West Virginia did.
yeah I think just had a case of LNFAD-
Late Night Favorite Anxiety Disorder
Oklahoma is a BCS school and I forgot about WHITE, he has a bad thumb, and he will not take hits and play much like BRENNAN was unwilling to stand in the pocket and just threw the ball, they will hit WHITE and SLATON who will disappear. OKlahoma wants this one more for sure. Pat White and SLATON are flakes they are not leaders who will rally a team, they basically cream bad teams and run the score up, if a team shows up physically they lose its as simple as that, look at PITTS.
The biggest reason why we know this is good is because WHITE, SLATON, and these guys are weak mentally, they lost to South Florida and then in the biggest game of the history of WVU they come out flat and lose
WHY- THese guys are both soft and not prime time players, if they are faster they win, if they are not they lose- WHITE is perfectly content with losing, SO is SLATON and so is the rest of the WVU team. They are okay with losing. How can i make a comment like that?
IF they were not okay with losing, they would not lose to a PITT team at home in their biggest game in history. This shows me that they are not emotionally mature to win and battle and fight, and gut it out for the WIN. They will win if they get up early and things go their way. IF things do not go their way they QUIT as simple as that.
Having said that if they played in the SEC they would lose surely because they would not be able to blow teams out. They are a one track team that can only win a game where they score at will. Once the other team fights they just give up.
The only comparable option attack Oklahoma faced this season was Texas A&M's, which shares many of the same principles except it spends far less time working out of the shotgun. The Sooners held the Aggies' typically potent rushing attack to just 128 yards (83.6 yards below its regular-season average) in a decisive 42-14 victory. West Virginia admittedly has better weapons and a more complex scheme. Nonetheless, the Sooners are well-equipped -- in personnel and scheme -- to keep WVU's read-option attack comparatively in check.
The Sooners are well-versed when it comes to gap discipline in defending the option. It is something coordinator Brent Venables and Stoops make a priority each season. The interesting twist in Oklahoma's approach to defending the option is the extra defender it employs on the front side. Most defenses use three defenders against the triple option -- lead (fullback), keeper (quarterback) and pitch (tailback). Oklahoma takes a more aggressive approach by employing four defenders versus the three offensive options. In doing so, the Sooners suffer far fewer front-side breakdowns. The downside to Oklahoma's aggressive approach is that the backside of the defense can be more vulnerable to a cutback run. But from what we've seen in limited views this season, the Sooners do a very good job of maintaining discipline in backside lanes to avoid such a crisis.
Oklahoma's offensive line will own a massive size advantage in this game. The unit, which averages 323 pounds, will overwhelm West Virginia's smallish defensive front at the point of attack. The more time the Mountaineers' defense is on the field, the more opportunities the Sooners' offensive linemen will have to wear them down. And that's when the two-headed monster of RBs Allen Patrick and Chris Brown will take over. Patrick and Brown are excellent inside runners with the power and straight-line burst to keep the chains moving. Neither is overly elusive in the open field, but rotating out of the game will give Patrick and Brown the fresh legs necessary to wear down West Virginia's undersized linebacker tandem of Reed Williams and Mortty Ivy come the fourth quarter.
Devine, Reyaud, Schmidt can more than pick up the slack if need to.
I never base a pick on a particular player or players but when a good, solid team is getting 7.5 that's too much...especially for a team that was 1 win away from the title game and has had this same core for three years and won at a 90% clip.
I can't disagree with that strategy HUNT it sounds pretty solid to me.
I think if this was a regular season game or RODRICO did not leave I would be on WVU also. Time will tell I guess
ALso HUNT I have -6.5 -125, so a 7 point win and we are both happy. I acted quick and got this nice line, a -6.5 and -7.5 are two different things totally. I have a nice line, I could even go for a solid middle here if I wanted to at this point.
Also watching WVU play on D, i thought they were pretty good. BUt I don't think teams like CINCY are good, I think most big east SOuth FLorida and Cincy they looked like absolute shit in their bowl games on O anyways, so it may be misleading. OKLAHOMA has the good O that just runs downhill, we will see if WVU can handle such a team.
Line was -7 -113 at PINNY, and I bought it down to -6.5 for -125, that book is awesome for JUICE, I went to the Greek and found that I was losing like a few hundred a week on JUICE, most lines on pINNY are -105, many times plus money or even, rarely -110 lines.
I do feel good though at -6.5 it gives me a huge edge in case of a 7 point 35-28 type game, and the win instead of a loss.
If RR wasn't leaving now way this team would be catching 8.5, more like 4 or 4.5
Yeah I live in Canada, so we are allowed to have accounts there.
You guys should just get someone from canada to open the account, and then get them to cash the cheques and give them a free gift once in a while.
THeir Juice makes a huge huge difference when betting.
:36_11_6: sammy you've got me rolling in laughter down here in TX.
as for the game, Big factors that I see in this one....
TIME ~ The time that Bob "I don't care that we're
leading by 32, Keep Scoring!" Stoops has had to prepare
must be pretty damn scarey compared to having a new guy
at the helm who has not earned a lick of respect.
SIZE MATTERS ~ In football, you bet your jingle bells
that size matters and tonight there is a definite difference.
DEFENSE ~ The lack of D on the WV team versus a
a team of OU's ability will show early, but more importantly,
it will show in the 4th quarter.
I like the play on OU all the way up to 12 points.
On whatever you do.....Good Luck