No more Cubs minus 1.5

tuck321

Not all those who wander are lost

<tbody>
[TD="width: 8%"]DATE[/TD]
[TD="width: 8%"]HOME[/TD]
[TD="width: 7%"]RUNS[/TD]
[TD="width: 8%"]AWAY[/TD]
[TD="width: 7%"]RUNS[/TD]
[TD="width: 8%"]SU RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 8%"]O/U[/TD]
[TD="width: 8%"]O/U RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 8%"]MONEY LINE[/TD]
[TD="width: 15%"]HOME PITCHER[/TD]
[TD="width: 15%"]AWAY PITCHER[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]04/14/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]8[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]CIN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]1[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]7[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]O[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]-156[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]J Hammel[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]R Iglesias[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]04/13/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]CIN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"]2[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]7½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]O[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]-188[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"]J Lackey[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"]A Simon[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]04/11/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]5[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]CIN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]3[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]7[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]O[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]-186[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]J Lester[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]B Finnegan[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]04/10/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]ARI[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"]3[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"]7[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]8[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]O[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]191[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"]S Miller[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"]J Arrieta[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]04/09/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]ARI[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]2[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]4[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]8[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]U[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]-105[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]Z Greinke[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]K Hendricks[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]04/08/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]ARI[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"]3[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"]2[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]U[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]115[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"]Robbie Ray[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"]J Hammel[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]04/07/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]ARI[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]6[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]14[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]O[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]152[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]R De La Rosa[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]J Lackey[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]04/05/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]LAA[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"]1[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"]6[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]7½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]U[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]116[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"]A Heaney[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"]J Lester[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]04/04/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]LAA[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]0[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]CHC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 7%"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]7[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]O
[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 8%"]129[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]G Richards[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 15%"]J Arrieta[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"]It seems correct to at least split minus 2.5
[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"][/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"][/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"][/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 7%"][/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"][/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"][/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"][/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 8%"][/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 15%"][/TD]

</tbody>
 
You can't talk me of run lines and alternate run lines. Love 'em.
 

I think Tuck's point is summarized in the bottom left corner of his chart, Tip...I didn't really see it at first myself. They haven't won a game by only 1 yet so the "edge" may be to play the higher alt run lines if you're going to play them. Tuck, please correct me if I'm misinterpreting your post.
 
I interpret it to mean there is more value in -2.5 than -1.5.

But my Tuck decoder ring doesn't always work.
 
Ahh, I didn't catch the -2.5 nugget. I like those too.
 
I am saying you look at the games and select about half of them and use minus 2.5 as well with them
See above
It seems correct to at least split minus 2.5
 
Back
Top