I see a 1.93 ERA after 14 innings with one
3.39 ERA large sample with the other. What is the point of this kind of statement?
The point is 1.93 means 3 runs in 14 innings. 5 runs in 14 innings would be the same as with stassi —-the sample size is literally useless you can’t conclude a damn thing based on it. 2 or 3 extra grounders getting past infielders could be the difference between a 1.93 and a 3.4 with Maldonado in a 14 inning sample.