I've read it 3 times now, and don't understand his comparison of a major college campus, where action can actually be taken by powerful people to make a statement, to inner city Chicago where that action couldn't legitimately happen. He makes some valid points, but to me they're completely lost with the shock value he uses, and whether he did his due diligence or not, saying that this statement was made only because of a redneck in a truck throwing slurs and a shit swastika is irresponsible. We know it was a lot more than that, it's the culture in general on a large campus.
I get that, as with anything, there's a sense of politicizing this (from the faculty in this case), but I can't believe that was the motive behind this entire thing when actually reading into what has been going on. And I guess it helps that I believe it, because I pretty much know that culture exists and existed on my campus to a lesser extent, likely because we weren't as big as Mizzou.