Let’s try that again Serie A ….GL Braddah
Udinese/verona draw +195
Welllll.... I certainly don't want to be presumptuous
...and the FOLLOWING IDEA OF MINE is either "totally dumb/stupid" or, in the alternative, might be MORE APPROPRIATELY PLACED in the "Inside Capping The Game(s)" thread where we can all "sharpen our handicapping skills"
It all comes down to the DEBATE of whether a "data-driven" approach is the way to select winners OR IF "art" trumps "science" (hereafter, "ATrS")
The "ATrS" proponents say that any "data -driven approach" crowd would produce results that would almost immediately driven down into "unprofitability" by the "smart money" almost immediately when the "opening line" was posted AND THAT IF ANTYHING "TRULY PREDICTIVE" came along the bookies WOULD EITHER "take a bigger vigorish" aka, betfair & betCRIS' taking 1.87/1.87 on soccer matches AS OPPOSED TO "1.91/1.91" and /or DROP THE LIMITS to where a CERTAIN AMOUNT OF MONEY wagered would trigger a [pointspread and/or moneyline] movement of the spread.
In fact, when newbies ask which sport is the easiest to beat, a "not uncommon response" is 'the sport with the lowest wagering limit"
What I've been thinking about alllllll morningggg is we SEE FOR OURSELVES by visiting the bar/tavern outside Hialeah Race Track and HAVE "Marty the Bartender" with his "40-star system"... (a data-driven approach)...
...along with "Vibes, the bar patron" and his ARTISTIC selection approaching in what arguably be called a
GREAT CTG Collab play, if successful
Here: see for yourself
Vibes: "First of all, you must clear your mind of everything"
......
Marty:"
that shouldn't take too long"
Have a profitable day brotha
