G
Gyno
Guest
Stay tuned
Do you have a notebook?
Guesses...
Bluejays
Cubbies
Denver
Natties
Brewcrew
Team #4
Mets
This will pretty much be the lineup you will be seeing from the Mets
1. Eric Young (S) LF
2. Daniel Murphy (L) 2B
3. Marlon Byrd (R) RF
4. Ike Davis (L) 1B
5. Juan Lagares (R) CF
6. Wilmer Flores (R) 3B
7. John Buck (R) C
8. Omar Quintanilla (L) SS
9. Jenrry Mejia (R) P
Not very good is it..
Good timing on this fade because the Mets are currently on a 3 game winning streak. But keep in mind David Wright
wont be coming back for a while. Hes by far the best player on the team.
Obviously when Harvey starts I will shy away but the other times should be money in the bank.
Other starters are all shaky
Hafner shaky
Wheeler shaky
Niese back from DL soon shaky
Gee also inconsistent. (although I kind of like him)
When the Mets dont have Wright and when Harvey is not pitching this team really sucks.
Lets look at the Mets upcoming schedule:
They go on the road for a while..
3 @ AZ
3 @ LAD
4 @ SD
1 vs Twins
2 vs BRAVES
3 vs Tigers
Not sure what I'll do with Twins game but there are 15 other games and I see the Mets losing many of them. Very tough
stretch of games and don't think the Padres series will be easy. SD could easily get 3 out of 4.
AZ, LAD, ATL and DET will be the meat of this fade.. Mets will likely lose 75% of those games.
This should be a good fade.
Since the schedule is tough shouldn't the prices be high on the favored team? I still don't understand your fade of bad teams everyone knows are bad against good teams everyone knows are good. Seems like a public square bet that you're destined to lose over time
Since the schedule is tough shouldn't the prices be high on the favored team? I still don't understand your fade of bad teams everyone knows are bad against good teams everyone knows are good. Seems like a public square bet that you're destined to lose over time
Look back at his history. He varies plays, adds parlays and plays series. He isn't blindly betting a unit per game, it is a lot more calculated.I'm not hating I'm just looking for clarification because common sense says something like this is -EV
I'm not hating I'm just looking for clarification because common sense says something like this is -EV
Look back at his history. He varies plays, adds parlays and plays series. He isn't blindly betting a unit per game, it is a lot more calculated.
This clears it up a bit. TyLook back at his history. He varies plays, adds parlays and plays series. He isn't blindly betting a unit per game, it is a lot more calculated.
Dude you still haven't explained yourself. You keep just saying it works, which apparently it does, but I'm curious to as what you are doing/seeing differently that makes it profitable when a regular square is going to lose money betting favorites against bad teams. You've clearly found the right approach but what makes it the right approach? Or do you not know?
Tru I hope you kill it this football season..
:shake: Interesting. Ty and again GLIts not as simple as that.. For example right when I got off the White Sox they won 3 straight. I ended up betting them in every game.
Betting with 15 games in mind and betting with 1 game in mind is very different. There are a lot of things that go into my selection. Baseball is very streaky and losing
can become contagious. I'm looking for the bad run, I'm looking for the stretch where a team loses 8 out of 10.
I don't only bet faves, if you look at my regular plays I wager on a lot of dogs. I'm completely aware that even the bad teams win 40% of their games.
what a diaster the last 2 days have been, I drank the koolaid, good luck to you in the future Pete