updatedMonday Night/Showdown Slate
NYG@PIT
Giants have a bad P/RB matchup.
Steelers have a meh P/RB matchup.
Jones has a meh pressure rate situation, and meh pass potential. Singletary~ has a bad rush potential.
Wilson has a meh pressure rate situation (grain of salt).
Pace of play is 14th (meh).
- Tracy played 67% of snaps to Singletarys 21%. I know last week was a blowout for the Giants, and Singletary was just returning from injury, but Tracy still got the first touches of the first 2 drives when the game was still tied 0-0, do I think it'll be closer in snaps? Of course, but singletary is 8.4K, Tracy is 4.4K, it's a no brainer imo but I think Singletary is unplayable. This WR group is really just 3, don't get cute with Hyatt. It's Slayton/W. Robinson/Nabers. Nabers has a sick target/aDOT combo that he can be considered, even for capt. 37%/10.75 are overall WR1 possibility metrics. I hate Wandales 4 aDOT, but his target share of 29% makes him serviceable in PPR formats. I do like that Slayton is the cheapest, and has the biggest aDOT of 13.4, making him interesting as a HR hitter target. If you want to punt further, T. Johnson plays like 90% of snaps, do not go to bellinger.
Pickens had sick numbers with Fields, 29% target share/12.45 aDOT. It's a small sample size of course, but last week Pickens had a huge 33.33%/16.9 line, I just got done saying Nabers metrics could make him overall WR1 material, well these can too, and if I'm choosing, go with the one that'll have less ownership (Pickens imo). The 4 other non RB pass catchers had 11 to 15% of targets, none were over a 7.5 aDOT. Muth feels a bit to expensive for my liking. You can take a shot with Austin, but I kind of like Van Jefferson at 4K, he had only 3 targets, but 2 were RZ targets (converting 1 for a TD), a guy that cheap you click because of injury opportunity/mispricing, or TD hunting/equity, and he has it imo --- he also played the 2nd most snaps among WRs (behind pickens of course). D. Washington is a stretch, I'd rather just go to T. Johnson at that point. Harris/Warren were in there closest 50/50 split of the season last week, Harris had 22 opps (1 target), Warren 15 opps (3 targets), I guess DK Warren (1 ppr), FD Harris (0.5 ppr), helps that Warren is 2K cheaper, but I think I'll more likely play him in scenarios/lineups where I see a neutral to positive pass script.
updated
He’s 13.5 at my local book. You still like it?I think Tracy is slowly but surely taking over the top backfield spot, we seen enough of singletary over the years we know what he is, pretty meh. Tracy has some special qualities and he played lot of wr in college which gives a good offensive coach another different kind of weapon on a team in need of them. So annoyed DK was posting only a rush prop for him. Over 9.5 rec I’d be all over, I actually even like his over 26.5 rushing a bit.
He’s 13.5 at my local book. You still like it?
Strong consideration to Pitt o1.5 fgs
That TD getting taken off the board because of the facemask was brutal for that propHope you played bro, nice and easy! Not happen no Pickens yet!
That TD getting taken off the board because of the facemask was brutal for that prop
Yes
RT got the facemask on the pass rush
Nicely done!Got Warren over 13.5 and the alt of 25+ for +225!
Just need the Pickens bomb!
I'm still confused as to why yahoo is showing Warren w/13 receiving yards and so is DK in their live trackerGot Warren over 13.5 and the alt of 25+ for +225!
Just need the Pickens bomb!
I'm still confused as to why yahoo is showing Warren w/13 receiving yards and so is DK in their live tracker
I got paid on the o/u but not on the alt from themDK paid me for me warren and lad Ff over and Warren alt and lad game over so I dunno what all that bout
I got paid on the o/u but not on the alt from them
TerribleThey called the screen pass in the 2nd (5:41) a run. Brutal.
Terrible
They reversed the initial payout on the over. I didn't even see the play so just gonna assume we got jobbed lol
Last play of 1st half was a 4 yd receptionIt still says he has 2 catches. One went for 9 then the screen for 18 or whatever. This is stupid
Question.DK paid me for me warren and lad Ff over and Warren alt and lad game over so I dunno what all that bout
Guess this answers my question.Terrible
They reversed the initial payout on the over. I didn't even see the play so just gonna assume we got jobbed lol
Question.
Do they take the money back if he were to suffer a huge negative play?
Last play of 1st half was a 4 yd reception
He wasn't targeted in the 2h and the 18 yarder was called a run so assume it was lateral. Watch them change the ruling later.
Guess this answers my question.
I don't understand paying out during a game on a prop.
I get that they want that money being reinvested (for those with small balances).
Just odd.
So close. I can see this both ways.At first, I would have said legit complaint.
I think the reasoning is the pass was slightly behind from Russ.
Edit: I still think it's parallel at worst though as I keep looking .
Had I been at book what they done after I cashed ticket?
They changed this during the game so you wouldn't have cashed it yet.
Usually enough people whine on SM to get these changed.
This isn't on the book, it's on the NFL.
NFL scoring made the call there.