1PMs/Main Slate
GBP/ATL
Packers have a meh RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Falcons have a meh P/RB matchup.
Love has a good pressure rate (lower end) situation.
Packers TTR is ranked T-12th
Falcons TTR is ranked T-17th (meh).
Pace of play is . O/URank is 8th (meh).
- Injuries - GBP - On D, LB Walker (66%)/Gary (16%) are Q. On O, WRs Doubs/Watson are Q, RB Jones is Q.
- ATL - On D, LB Andersen (99%) is out, and
- From a general game perspective, I don't have a ton of interest in over exposure, or stacking this game too much. But individually, pieces could be had via salaries/injuries
Packers have had 2 stable backs for what feels like a lifetime, if Jones suits up, I'll probably pass on both, but keep in mind, they both played about 48/47% of snaps and had a total of 29 opportunities.... if Jones misses here, Dillon should easily be in line for 24+ total touches... even in a game they led they had 7 targets (3 for dillon), that's a good floor/ceiling combo for a 5.9K priced player. At WR, the packers had 5 play between 35 and 62% of snaps, and we don't know the health of Watson/Doubs yet.... also the one who had 62% was Dontayvion Wicks.... hard pass here, as I think it is a crapshoot, but if Watson suits up with no limitations, I can be convinced as a one-off, if he is out, I'd rather go with Reed, as he seems to be the deep threat, and shared for the team lead at WR for targets (5), but had a massive 15 aDOT/r, no other WR was over 6.5..... If you are streaming TEs weekly in FF, I'd consider picking up Musgrave (or Smythe --- more later), Musgrave had just 4 targets (one should have been a TD he twisted himself up on), but he had a solid aDOT/r of 13.7, which is lovely for a TE, and he is still so cheap.
How can we trust WR/TE's on ATL, idk if I can, I'd like to see them play from behind first before predicting it... because even last year they ran way to much when trailing. They are 4th in rush% to start the year, but the 3 above them? Browns, 2nd quarter positive game script for running, ravens 3rd quarter positive game script, cowboys 4th quarter positive game script, Falcons? Led by more than 7 with 4 minutes left in the 4th. They also had the fewest total plays of the 4 by a mile (72/58/55/48 respectively).... the WR/TEs had 8 targets on 22 pass plays, the 2 RBs had 9..... London/Pitts are cheap, but they may have to get cheaper if this continues.
Now, in saying all that, it seems the RBs look to be script proof.... now Bijan still comes at a price, and he had 63% of snaps, with 16 opportunities (6 targets), but allgeiers price went up just $100, and he had 18 total opps. (3 targets), both had atleast 5 yards/attempt, despite Carolina knowing what's coming.... I think Allgeier is extremely viable.
LVR/BUF
Raiders have a great RB matchup, meh P matchup.
Bills have a great P matchup, good RB matchup.
Garop has a good pressure rate situation.
Allen has a good pressure rate situation.
Raiders TTR is ranked T-19th (meh).
Bills TTR is ranked 1st (great).
Pace of play is . O/URank is T-3rd.
- Injuries - LVR - On O, WR Meyers is D, and WR Carter is Q.
- BUF - pretty clean since start of year.
- A quiet 22 opportunities (3 targets) and 80% snap count (T-3rd highest week 1 among RBs) for Mr. Jacobs. His price actually fell considerably and has a good matchup on paper minus a possible game script blowout, but even in a 1 to 2 TD game, he'll be there, and only means more opp for targets. He's on my radar/list. From a strictly volume based perspective I think Adams is a fine tournament leverage/pivot, as nobody will be playing him at that price range (nor wilson for that matter), as they'd rather have brown/lamb/chase/ridley/allen/etc, not sure if I go here, but he is worth a lineup or 2 if mass entering, as we know he can break a slate. I will add, he played 90% of snaps, had a 35% target share, with an aDOT/r of 10.5... and the guy who had a 38.5% target share (meyers) shouldn't be playing.
Despite mostly dink and dunks, the raiders just let russ have a solid 80%~ completion %, and outside of sutton, is was really a bunch of meh players out there. I think Allen is going to look to bounce bank, and has a great opp to do so. Just like the last 2 years, Gab Davis continues to play slightly more than Diggs, and is the bigger aDOT/r player, I'm not saying not to play Diggs, he had 13 targets (33% target share), but Davis comes $2,100 cheaper, and has the ability to hit homeruns, which is great for tourneys. Looks like Harty was the WR3 week 1, but he played just 22% of snaps, Knox/Kincaid played 84/80% respectively, I'm not going to play a guessing game each week with them, they both had 4 targets (10% target share), but I will say, Knox probably comes lower owned, he is a touch cheaper, and had a better aDOT/r than kincaid... if game or team stacking, and want to be a bit different, I guess I'd go him. They practically played in a neutral script last week and Cook had a solid 18 opps (6 targets), on just 59% of snaps. He is cheap enough to consider as a pivot off the popular Allen stacks for a team that has the highest TTR. Definitely viable.
BAL/CIN
Ravens have a good RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Bengals have a bad P/RB matchup.
Lamar has a meh pressure rate situation.
Ravens TTR is ranked 11th.
Bengals TTR is ranked 5th (great).
Pace of play is . O/URank is T-3rd.
- Injuries - BAL - On D, S Williams (31%) is out. On O, T Stanley, and C Linderbaum are out, both listed as 1's on depth chart, don't have snap numbers right now, but that's big. RB Dobbins is out, and TE Andrews is Q.
- CIN - On O, RB Evans is Q.
- So I know Dobbins is now out, and the BAL RBs come cheap, and they did just have 3 TDs in game 1, but you don't know which will get it if they do, plus lamar is still a vulture of sorts, oh and this OLine is now missing 2 pieces from Week 1. I actually really prefer Lamar here, I'm hoping those issues cause for more time/plays with the ball in his hands, it'll force him to scramble as well, which I like. It looks like BAL finally has found stable WRs as Flowers/OBJ played 84/92% of snaps!, sorry bateman/duvernay, but I won't be having you. Flowers had a solid 47.6% target share (10 targets), but a bad aDOT/r of 3. OBJ had just 3 targets, but he was the deep threat, with a sexier 18 aDOT/r. If Andrews suits up, I think I'll have some shares of him, with OBJ, if he doesn't I'll be heavier on Flowers, but I think everyone will go towards flowers, and OBJ makes a great toruney pivot (I will still have a bit of flowers).
Mixon played 62% of snaps, while I'd like to see that higher, he still had 18 opps (5 targets), I think he is always a fine play, safe floor, potential ceiling combo. I wouldn't cross him off, but idk if I go there. I'm passing on Irv. Smith, he played just 54% of snaps, low target share, and low aDOT/r. As far as the trio, they all played a ton last week, now that may be because they were playing from behind throughout, but boyd was the lowest at 84% of snaps... that kind of makes them all viable/atleast dart consideration. Higgins/Chase combined for over 54% of the targets though, and are obviously the 2 to own for bring backs, where boyd should be reserved for mass entering and wanting a pivot/leverage.
SEA/DET
Seahawks have a good P matchup, meh RB matchup.
Lions have a great P/RB matchup.
Goff has the best pressure rate situation.
Geno has a meh pressure rate situation.
Seahawks TTR is ranked T-14th.
Lions TTR is ranked 3rd (great).
Pace of play is . O/U Rank is 2nd (good).
- Injuries - SEA - On O, T Cross is O. On D, LB Bush (26%) is Q.
- DET - On O, T Decker is D. On D, DE Paschal (26%), is Q.
- Walker was eerily similar to mixon, as I'd like to see a little bit more than 63% of snaps, but he still had 17 opps (5 targets), and he comes at a little bit of a cheaper price. This game has the possibility to be a shootout, and he would be a good pivot from the passing options on both sides. Overall, I probably won't be playing him, at least to much, but he is worth of consideration, and we have seen him break the slate/Carroll ride him like a bronco. One thing to keep in mind for upside compared to Week 1, the Seahawks ran the least amount of plays, and a regression to the mean should mean a boost for all players opportunities. Njigba's priced cheap enough to consider, he did play 59% of snaps and had a 20% target share (5 targets) but he also had the worst aDOT/r of -0.3, yes negative. Lockett played 88% of snaps, with just 4 targets and a meh aDOT/r, if you want to make an arguement for tourneys, sure, but give me the guy who also had a 20% target share, is not that much more expensive, and a great aDOT/r of 12 (Metcalf), over the rest. Pass at TE, like last year they don't just use one, and somehow never had more than a 43% snap share, no ty.
I know everyone is lining up to play Gibbs, and he obviously should see more opps/snaps (he had 9 opps 2 targets on 29% of snaps), but Montgomery played 79% of snaps and had 21 carries.... Lions are decent faves, and they were play in a neutral script, if playing with a lead., what's it going to be 65-35? at worst? for Montgomery. I obviously don't like the 0 targets of montgomery, but I'd rather have him over Gibbs if I go this route...if I do, not sure on my exposure just yet. What I do want is a cheap goff and these WRs. St. Brown might be >20% owned, but can you blame anyone? He played 94% of snaps good for T-6th week one, and had a 28% target share, with an ok 8.5 aDOT/r. What people should also be considering is Josh Reynolds, and his 70% snap rate, 22% target share, 13 aDOT/r, and at 3.7K... min price for WRs are 3K, that's blasphemy... he makes for a good game/team stacking partner, or a pivot off st.brown. Pass on Jones, least targetted, lowest snap count, and shortest aDOT/r.. reynolds cost 100 more.. come on. LaPorta actually played 85% of snaps, which you love to see for a cheap/dart throw TE, don't mind him in some roster constructions over reynolds.
LAC/TEN
Chargers have a great P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Titans have a great P matchup, meh RB matchup.
Tanny has a great pressure rate situation
Herbert has a meh pressure rate situation
Chargers TTR is ranked 6th (good).
Titans TTR is ranked T-12th.
Pace of play is . O/URank is 5th.
- Injuries - LAC - On D, LB Kendricks (100%), LB Bosa are Q. On O, RB Ekeler is Q.
- TEN - On D, CB Fulton (32%), S Hooker (83%) are out. On O, WR Hopkins is Q.
- Ekeler played just 51% of snaps, yet managed 21 opps (5 targets), he was obviously super efficient, but his price went up, and the matchup is a little tougher... I can't stomach clicking his name this week with those factors. LAC has a much better matchup through the air, and it starts with Allen. He played 91% of snaps, and saw a massive 29% target share (9 targets), nobody else was over 16% (5 targets), while also having an ok aDOT/r of 8.3. I think he is a solid play, and will look to play him when I can. M. Williams is a fine pivot, he practically matched the aDOT/r of allen, but had just 5 targets, and 77% snap count... he is cheap enough to consider though. Do not play Quentin Johnston until he proves it, or injuries to the big guys.... he played just 27% of snaps and is more expensive than Palmer who saw 64%,. if you want to dart here, go with Palmer. Pass at TE, both played, both saw 3 targets, we have better situations elsewhere.
I want to say you can never cross Henry off your list, he has slate breaking upside, and is one of a couple of backs than can easily go 200+ 2+, having said that, he somehow played just 48% of snaps last week? Did I miss an injury or something?, Spears played more at 54%.... he still managed 18 opps (3 targets), but that really concerns me, and gives me pause.... idk if I'll have exposure there. I will say, spears seems like an important handcuff. If Hopkins plays, I'm playing him.... everyone will avoid him due to injury concern/reaggravation, but that low ownership is leverage, there is a definite script where they play from behind, he had a MASSIVE 39% target share week 1 (13 targets), with the best aDOT/r of all players on his team (8.6), this was on just 78% of snaps. Burks/Ikhgine had 90/81%, but it was Ikhine who led in targets 7 to 3.... he is cheaper than burks, and probably goes lower owned, he may be the better tournament play imo. If Hopkins is out, I'll probably turn to Chig, last year he was an aDOT guy if I remember correctly, and play 83% of snaps last week, he is a decent dart throw/cheap punt TE option if so.
CHI/TBB
Bears have a good P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Buccaneers have a great P matchup, meh RB matchup.
Baker has a great pressure rate situation.
Bears TTR is ranked T-19th (meh).
Bucs TTR is ranked 10th,
Pace of play is . O/URank is 7th (meh).
- Injuries - CHI - On D, CBs Gordon (45%)/Blackwell (17%) are out.
- TBB - On D, CB Davis (100%) is out.
- I think I might lover over 41 points. Both QBs have top half of the league matchups, and baker should finally see time in the pocket. CHI/GBP last week at 56 points, I think this game might be one I pick one-offs from, as well as personally game stack. Fields finished with a mediocre 16~ DK points, but he had just 1 passing TD, and 2 turnovers... his rushing upside gives him such a big floor/ceiling combo, I don't want to miss it. Not a single RB played 40% of snaps last week... I know they played in a negative game script, but I'm passing until that's figured out, plus Fields can easily vulture some of their value too. The script may also have led to more 3 WR sets, but we need to see a bit more of how it will play out in coming weeks. They are all pretty cheap, and mixing and matchup, or going naked fields are all viable. I probably won't go for claypool... but Mooney saw 84% of snaps, led the team in target share (19.4%), 7 targets, and had the best aDOT/r of 11.8, and he is cheaper than Moore. I'll still have some of both though. I'd like Kmet to be cheaper to really consider... I may still take him, but his aDOT/r of 3 stinks, but he did have 7 targets 2 of which were RZ targets... and he had a couple multiple TD games in last years disappointing season, so I get it he did play 97% of snaps, T-2nd among TE's.
I know R. White was not that efficient, but he did have a 79% snap count, 19 opps (2 targets), you don't often get that volume at 5.5K, so I do think he's viable, not sure I want to go overboard though. What I do like here is the concentration that looks to be continuing with Baker... Evans had a 31% target share, with a decent aDOT/r of 9, godwin was a bit less at 19%, and 7.8, both are virtually priced the same... the projected great pressure rate situation makes me like evans more than godwin, but based off last week most probably agree... I wouldn't mind either, even alternating with a mini game stack with fields. Ironically, like Kmet, Otton actually had a 97% snap count, T-2nd among TE's.... unfortunatelym it only translated to 3 targets... I think he will have some nice floor weeks, and obviously the snaps are nice to see, but I may pass for now, especially because I don't want every piece of this offense.
KCC/JAC
Chiefs have a meh P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Jags have a good RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Mahomes has a meh pressure rate situation.
Lawrence has a good pressure rate situation.
Chiefs TTR is ranked 2nd (great).
Jags TTR is T-7th (good).
Pace of play is . O/URank is 1st (great).
- Injuries - KCC - On O, TE Kelce/RB CEH are both Q.
- JAC - pretty clean since start of year.
- If CEH sits, I'll have interest in Pacheco at 5.7K, but won't go overboard. He did have just 12 opps (4 targets) Wk1 with 48% snap count, CEH had 7/22% I'd think most filter to Pacheco if he's out. 16~ volume floor at 5.7K could payoff, probably won't ever touch mckinnon. The KC WR room is a shitshow. 7 guys got snaps last week, 6 had atleast a 25% snap count, Moore had the most at 69% but had 3 catchless targets..... MVS seems to be the only guy I'll take a shot on unless Rice shows snap/target improvement. MVS had just 2 targets, but a huge aDOT/r of 23... so you're essentially going for the HR (Watson fits this too). Obviously if Kelce plays and isn't limited, he is always a dynamite option that can slate break.....
I obviously have no issues with Ridley, 81% snap count, 34% target share, 8.1 aDOT/r, but he comes at a price, and there's others in that range I like too... what I want to look at is Zay Jones --- sorry to those who drafted Kirk thinking he was the WR2, maybe that'll change but idk --- Jones played 89% of snaps (leading the WRs), to Kirks 60%, but he had a 22% target share to Kirks 9%, and had the biggest aDOT/r of 10.6... DKings also hasn't caught up to that, as he is priced cheaper than Kirk, I'll take it all day. Engram is fine, we've seen his spike weeks, he had a decent TE aDOT/r of 5.2, and 5 targets... I'd save him for game/team stacks, as opposed to one-offs. I like Etienne.... in a world where Lawrence and Co fail to hit projections, Etienne could be a huge leverage. He played 80% of snaps (T-3rd most among RBs), with a solid 23 opps (5 targets), oh and he's cheaper than all the big dogs, with similar usage, in an environment with the highest O/U.....
IND/HOU
Colts have a good P/RB matchup.
Texans have a good RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Richardson has a bad pressure rate situation.
Colts TTR is ranked 16th.
Texans TTR is T-17th (meh).
Pace of play is . O/URank is 10th (bad).
- Injuries - IND - On O, TE Woods has been on IR, and now TE Granson is Q with an injury that popped up sat. If both are out.
- HOU - On D, S Pitre (45%) is out, S Ward has been out. On O, T Tunsil is Q.
- Moss is back, we saw Deon Jackson just play terribly, and turn the ball over, yet they still gave him a 71% snap count, and 19 opps (6 targets)... Moss comes in with no real threat IMO, a path to 20+ touches, and he is only 4.7K ... I understand fading the ownership in tournaments, you can make an arguement maybe richardson vultures, maybe jackson does come in on all 3rd downs and saps moss's ppr value, but sometimes you need to just bite the bullet, becuase the price is egregious, you decide. Richardson seems to like Pittman, and god I hope this continues for my redraft leagues. He saw a 28% target share, with just a 6.1 aDOT/r , but no WR was better in either category. I'll add downs did see 7 targets himself (18%), but had a minor aDOT/r of 2.3... but he is cheap enough to dart throw, and a much better option than pierce. 3 TEs played last week, and they totaled 10 targets, the leader, granson (61% snaps, 6 targets), may be out and some of that should funnel down, cox/olgetree are min priced and could be an option. Ogletree had 2 targets, but they were deep targets, I wouldn't go overboard in this game, but there is a lot of cheap value for atleast one-offs.
Houston backs may seem cheap enough, and maybe Pierce steps up in his roll, but they played 3 last week, and they ranged between 21 and 45% of snaps... pierce had just 14 opps (3 targets)... I can't find myself clicking him (or the others of course). At WR we have 2 options, woods/collins... both played over 70% of snaps, and had almost 45% of the targets... I actually prefer collins here, he's younger, had the extra target, but also a good aDOT/r of 9.8, both are cheap, and you can consider either, but I'll go with him. Pass at TE, schultz led with 4 targets but a negative 2 aDOT/r.....
4PMs/Main Slate
SFO/LAR
49ers have a good P/RB matchup.
Rams have a good RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Purdy has a bad pressure rate situation.
49ers TTR is ranked 4th (great).
Rams TTR is ranked 21st (meh).
Pace of play is . O/URank is 6th.
- Injuries - SFO - On D, CB Womack (14%) is out.
- LAR - On D, S Yeast (100%) is Q. On O, WR Nacua is Q.
- No RB played more snaps than CMC, 85%, he had 27 total opps (5 targets), and the runs averaged at a 6.9 clip.... He's rightfully the most expensive player of the week, and I won't talk anyone off of it. Aiyuk/Deebo are still so cheap in relation to what they produce, both are viable, both had atleast a 25% target shgare, and aiyuk had a solid 13.6 aDOT/r, Deebo a 8.8 aDOT/r. Most people might see a decent road fave/divisional matchup and fade.... but I think you can make a case for a lower ownership game stack in this one, otherwise I'd one-off or avoid at best. I'm passing on Kittle for now, I like his repertoire with Purdy, but he had 6 targets and a terrible aDOT/r of 1.3... plus he is at a position that we either punt or pay big time for.
Williams played 65% to Akers 35% of snaps, like wtf McVay.... while they did had 37 carries combined, which is awesome, they only had 2 total targets... plus there is uncertainty with who it'll be this week.. I'm just passing altogether until we can be sure (if ever). At WR is where we can get fun. In a game where most of the 4th Q didn't matter in terms of passing, Stafford still had over 300 yards passing, where he supported 2 WRs having 100+ yard games. Nacua/Atwell combined for 62% of targets (Nacua 15, Atwell 8), Atwell had a great 14 aDOT/r to Nacuas 7.7... both played 78/79% of snaps. I think either can be played with confidence. Van Jefferson, while leading thie group with 93% of snaps was really a meh factor with just 5 targets and a 5 aDOT.r,,,, passing unless Nacua is out. I will add Higbee was safe PPR floor guy with a low aDOT last year, and while he just had 3 targets last week, he had a big aDOT/r of 12.3, if last year was really because of injuries and such, and this is the new norm, he could be a great play today and for the future (redraft leagues too)... but for now I'll pass.
NYG/ARI
Giants have a meh P/RB matchup.
Cards have a great P/RB matchup.
D. Jones has the worst pressure rate situation.
Giants TTR is ranked 9th.
Cards TTR is ranked 23rd (meh).
Pace of play is . O/URank is 9th (meh).
- Injuries - NYG - On O, WR Robinson is D, T Thomas is Q. On D, LB Ojulari (55%) is D.
- ARI - On D, LB Woods (55%) is out, DE Collier (52%) is out, and S Baker (100%) is Q.
- We can't really take anything from sundays nights loss from a stat perspective, except that the Giants starters may never get scripted out of games, so that's a plus I guess? Barkley is expensive, but is in a more favorable situation, and atleast had 16 opps (4 targets) last week, on just 60%~ of snaps, with a decent 4.3 Y/att... I get it, and maybe he goes lower owned based off week 1, but idk how much or if I go here. At WR, it's a crapshoot... I'll mostl ikely pass, but will say I am still a believer in Hodgins, at 5K it has me a bit worried, but he was the only WR last week to get a ball thrown to him past 5 yards, and was one of 3 that play 60+% of snaps, he could go virtually un owned as the WR1 on the team (if you believe he is). Waller could be fine, he is in the middle pricing that people usually fade, so he will come at low ownership, and also had a decent 7.3 aDOT/r with a 17% target share.. so I get it.
Conner just played 84% of snaps (2nd most), and he got 19 opps (5 targets), he is a super fine play as he is also cheap in a good matchup. No WR had more than 5 targets/17% share, Hollywood is a decent option at 4.9K but my gut doesn't feel good clicking his name... if you want to dart throw an almost min priced WR you could consider M. Wilson, he had 13% target share, 10aDOT/r, and played 90% of snaps. Also nobody is talking about Ertz, but he had 10 targets last week (33%), play 77% of snaps, and is cheap.... I hate that I like a lot of players here, and it doesn't feel good saying to take all these cardinals, so I'd reserve them for one-offs, but just giving low owned tournament options here.
NYJ/DAL
Jets have a meh RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Cowboys have a good P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Z. Wilson has a bad pressure rate situation.
Dak has a great pressure rate situation.
Jets TTR is ranked 24th (bad/worst).
Cowboys TTR is T-7th (good).
Pace of play is . O/URank is 11th (bad).
- Injuries - NYJ - On O, Obviosuly Rodgers... but Greg the Leg is also out. Rest seems fine.
- DAL - On O, WR Cooks is D. T Smith is D, G Martin is Q. On D.
- Low total and injuries/strong defenses will keep people off of this, and for good reason. But if you want to get cute/leverage, maybe going Jets D over the 30%+ owned DAL D could be smart. I'd like to pair that D with one of the RBs, but it is tough. Hall looked great but he is limited in snaps (31%), and cook still only got to 50%, and was not so efficient.... combined they still got 28 opps (5 targets). I really want to play Hall but idk if I can. If you do think DAL wipes the floor with the Jets, you can consider Wilson/Lazard, Wilson seems a bit to expensive for me, but Lazard had a 11.5 aDOT/r with Zach, with 22% targets too.... just know Jets probably don't throw to much unless they are in a positive game script for it (Which the spread indicates).
Pollard played 64% of snaps, despite winning 40-0, and still had 17 Opps (3 targets).... I think he's a fine option, but he will be heavily owned as a pairing with DAL D... so you could take a stand and hope it fails, which I may. If I mentioned Ertz before, I should atleast mention Ferguson and his 1 aDOT/r, as he had a 28% target share week 1... I won't have him, but I get it. Lamb is another way to find leverage here, as nobody will be taking the passing attack in this setting, but it is a decent TTR for DAL, he is the WR1, and without Cooks, he may be even more peppered/volume based play, I know this goes in line with the leverage, but there really is just other options in that price range... so it is a tough click.
WAS/DEN
Commanders have a great P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Broncos have a bad P/RB matchup.
Commanders TTR is ranked 22nd (meh).
Broncos TTR is ranked T-14th.
Pace of play is . O/URank is 12th (bad/last).
- Injuries - WAS - pretty clean.
- DEN - On O, TE Dulcich is O.
- I want to start with L. Thomas, he had 8 targets (28% target share), with a good TE aDOT/r of 7.8, and he is just 3.1K, I don't see anyone playing him, but if those numbers even drop a smidge, he is 2X'ing that salary still --- without a TD. If you think WAS can play with a lead (which is possible), it isn't a bad idea to go Robinson (with maybe the D as a pairing)... he had 61% of snaps but 21 opps (2 targets), he is a cheeky pivot off Kelley and friends. Based off Week 1 (and last year even), McLaurin is the deep threat, Dotson the pepper candidate, and Samuel the gadget guy... I think either can have spike weeks (specifically the first 2), not sure I go here, but I get it.
Mannn Williams/Perine played just 45% of snaps each... but they had 31 opps, 10 (TEN) targets combined.... if one is ever out, fire the other up... while they are cheap enough to hold a PPR floor, and succeed with TDs, I don't think I can stomach it. Jeudy is back, so knock all the other WR stats down a bit from last week... Jeudy was really building something with Wilson at the end of the year, and he was a full participant with no set backs, he'd be my only target here.
