There is a underdog prop that I really like. Wanted to bring discourse to this:
Trevor Lawrence more RUSHING YARDS than Tua Tagovailoa +100
Rationale:
- Tua is hampered by an ankle injury that limits his mobility. Over the last two games, he has -21 rushing yards (Georgia) and 9 rushing yards (Oklahoma) when dealing with this injury.
- Trevor Lawrence has not had a negative rushing yard day in his last nine contests. Obviously - for those that have watched Lawrence - he isn't lighting up the world with a meager 15 rush yard/game. But, Tua has three negative rushing yardage games over his last nine contests, averaging 9.3 on the ground.
- For those unaware, sacks count in an individual's rushing totals at the college game. Both of these teams have fantastic offensive lines and fantastic defenses (Clemson 1st in Sacks, 19th in Sacks Allowed; Alabama is 5th in Sacks and 10th in Sacks Allowed)
- To touch on the sacks again, Lawrence gets rid of the ball in 2.1 seconds after the snap on average, the quickest rate in college football. HOWEVER (to touch on both sides of the argument), Lawrence did go down three times against Notre Dame after taking only two sacks in his previous six games. That totals Lawrence going down five times over the last seven games, while Tua has been sacked eight times in his last seven (twice against Georgia, none against Oklahoma).
To sum up, based on the stats over the last nine games and factoring in Tua's ankle injury, it's surprising to me Lawrence is a dog in this. I would view this as more of a pick 'em. Both of these two have solid athleticism but are true pocket passers. Both have great offensive lines, playing against great defenses. It all comes out as a wash overall, except when you factor in the ankle injury, then I believe you have to take a shot on Lawrence in this with him being the underdog.