Championship Week writeups and hopefully feedback

Br@ssknux

Pretty much a regular
Well, the final week of the college football regular season was a disaster as far as the win/loss record. 4-10-1, which brought the season total of the games I wrote up this year to a few games UNDER .500.You might recall that my initial group of games I liked was much more voluminous than usual. There was a total of 36 games I liked, which I whittled down to 14. Overall, had I written up all 36, the record would have been 20-15-1, which means the games I jettisoned went 16-5. I can sure pick 'em!! In a last ditch effort to get back to the.500 mark, I give you the following. Fade if you must. I certainly can't argue with that strategy.

Friday:

1. North Texas +9 @UTSA: These two teams played earlier this year and I was on the wrong side of it then, as I laid points with the Roadruners. It made sense because UTSA was a mismatch for the UNT defense, or so I thought, until the Roadrunners fumbled and bumbled their way to a single digit point performance in the first half and then had to score late just to get the outright win. Much like the first game, the offenses should have a major edge over the defenses. UNT ranks 33rd or better in every major offensive category and the UTSA defense leaves a lot to be desired. They've had some bad pass D performances against teams that can only jokingly be called "adequate". They've also been lucky with facing backup QBs on offenses. such as Jared Zeno at UAB, the Lyddy kid from La Tech and the 4th stringer at Rice. Despite all that, they still manage to be 88th in yards per play against, 81st in yards per pass attempt and no ability to pressure the passer, so Austin Aune should have plenty of time to be comfortable back there, and his rank of 11th in the country in yards per pass attempt lines up pretty well against that weak UTSA pass defense. On the flip side, the Mean Green will have a devil of a time getting the Roadrunners off the field, but the back door will be wide open, even if UTSA is up big(say, 15 points).

Probably gonna pass on the Pac 12 game. I was tempted to play USC when the line dipped below 3, but with my luck, this will be the week that the referees call illegal man downfield during the many times Caleb Williams escapes the pocket. Also, I'd hate to be on the business end of a potential cosmic regression to the mean when it comes to turnovers, with USC having been blessed with an obscenely out of whack turnover margin. That game could go either way, so I'll avoid the despair or watching USC luck their way into the playoff, although I must admit, I'd rather see them in there than Ohio State
 
I don’t know what to do with USC game either. I want to think USC finds a way into the playoff but in the first matchup, USC won the turnover margin, Utah gave up big plays on special teams, Utah could not run the ball, Utah missed a fg, and Utah still won the game.
 
Win or lose I look forward to your write-ups each week as I find them to be enormously helpful. Thanks for posting them.

Also at a loss for what to do with this sc game. This is a tailor made spot for Wittingham but sc has a bit too much voodoo going for them for me to feel comfortable stepping in their way. Still annoyed that I had to settle for a push with +3 UCLA when they had their shot vs sc.
 
Another great year of reading supplied by you, Br@ss- regardless of the results. And, we all know that a couple games under .500 is not shameful for us amateurs. Your past successful years shouldn't make us think that .500 this year is some sort of disaster. Heck, I track many "professional" touts, and quite a few aren't sniffing 91-93, or whatever your regular season record ended up being this year. Looking forward to your views on some of these big numbers for Saturday.
 
Another great year of reading supplied by you, Br@ss- regardless of the results. And, we all know that a couple games under .500 is not shameful for us amateurs. Your past successful years shouldn't make us think that .500 this year is some sort of disaster. Heck, I track many "professional" touts, and quite a few aren't sniffing 91-93, or whatever your regular season record ended up being this year. Looking forward to your views on some of these big numbers for Saturday.
Well said :dabs:
 
Win or lose I look forward to your write-ups each week as I find them to be enormously helpful. Thanks for posting them.

Also at a loss for what to do with this sc game. This is a tailor made spot for Wittingham but sc has a bit too much voodoo going for them for me to feel comfortable stepping in their way. Still annoyed that I had to settle for a push with +3 UCLA when they had their shot vs sc.
Thanks Ali. Yeah, just sitting back and enjoying that PAC 12 game tonight is the right move for me. I've had terrible luck with USC. I only backed them once and won, but if I do it again, I can see a full year's worth of regression caving in on them.

When I say regression, here's what I mean. Per cfbstats.com, they fumbled the ball 9 times and lost 1. They lost 1 fumble ALL SEASON. The turned the ball over 4 times for the entire year. Good job by Caleb Williams being totally careful and not taking chances I guess? On the flip side, their opponents were credited with fumbling 11 times, but they were only credited with forcing 7. So their opponents just flat out dropped the ball for them 4 times. They recovered 7, so their ratio of forcing/recovering fumbles is 1:1. Incredible. Ultimately, USC had 26 takeaways and 4 turnovers for a +22 margin. For context, only 11 teams in the whole country had a turnover margin better than 10, and the second best team in TO margin was Duke at 14. I was truly remarkable luck for the Trojans this year.
 
Another great year of reading supplied by you, Br@ss- regardless of the results. And, we all know that a couple games under .500 is not shameful for us amateurs. Your past successful years shouldn't make us think that .500 this year is some sort of disaster. Heck, I track many "professional" touts, and quite a few aren't sniffing 91-93, or whatever your regular season record ended up being this year. Looking forward to your views on some of these big numbers for Saturday.
Here's another true gentleman. Thanks to you Seven, one of the best of many great monikers on this site. Still lots to look forward to with the bowls, I agree. I'll have a few more that i'll get to later today and tonight, and maybe some tomorrow morning.
 
Thanks Ali. Yeah, just sitting back and enjoying that PAC 12 game tonight is the right move for me. I've had terrible luck with USC. I only backed them once and won, but if I do it again, I can see a full year's worth of regression caving in on them.

When I say regression, here's what I mean. Per cfbstats.com, they fumbled the ball 9 times and lost 1. They lost 1 fumble ALL SEASON. The turned the ball over 4 times for the entire year. Good job by Caleb Williams being totally careful and not taking chances I guess? On the flip side, their opponents were credited with fumbling 11 times, but they were only credited with forcing 7. So their opponents just flat out dropped the ball for them 4 times. They recovered 7, so their ratio of forcing/recovering fumbles is 1:1. Incredible. Ultimately, USC had 26 takeaways and 4 turnovers for a +22 margin. For context, only 11 teams in the whole country had a turnover margin better than 10, and the second best team in TO margin was Duke at 14. I was truly remarkable luck for the Trojans this year.
Phil Steele special next season...
 
2. TCU ML(-122) v Kansas State: I think everyone remembers the first game between these two when K State was up 28-10 and looked unstoppable even with Will Howard until Howard got hurt. We should remember, however, that TCU had completely flipped the momentum and were within 28-24 when Howard was first injured. I definitely think the Howard and Martinez injuries are responsible for K State not covering the 3.5 in that game, but probably not the game result. TCU outgained the Wildcats by 100 yards ultimately. They still need to win this game to make sure they're safe and sound in the playoff. Also, Joe Gillespie's defense has really settled in during the second half of the year and the Frogs have been dominant in second half adjustments. I'm a big K State fan, but I don't think the TCU train gets taken off the tracks in this one.
 
3. Coastal Carolina +8 @Troy: For the Sun Belt title game, a lot depends on whether or not Grayson McCall plays, and I've heard from a couple different places that he will. If so, there probably isn't a quarterback in the country who is worth as many points to the line as he is. I've mentioned this, but with McCall under center, Coastal is 29-3 when McCall starts in his career and he has a 74/7 TD/NT ratio. I realize that Troy has a fantastic defense, but there is no way in hell I'm going to pass up a chance to take 8 with Grayson McCall and Jamey Chadwell against a Sun Belt team. We're getting value here because Coastal got destroyed last week against JMU, but that game was over before it started because JMU was ineligible for any kind of post season play since it's their first season in FBS, and the game meant absolutely nothing to Coastal since they were already in the title game and McCall wasn't going to play. If McCall is in there, it says a lot about his resolve and probably shines positively on the team that the game means enough for him to get out there and play. Troy also has a bit of a pedestrian offense so I don't see them scoring at a clip that Coastal can't keep up. If McCall doesn't play, I'll probably try to get out of this, but it's good value at this number.
 
Not playing the American game for now, but if Plumlee plays for UCF it might be worth a play at +4 because as much as I like the Green Wave, I don't think they can stop Plumlee from running all over them. If he doesn't play though, I don't have any interest in getting in front of Tulane as a home favorite.
 
4. Georgia -17(-115) v LSU: I hate this spot for LSU. They have no shot at the playoff, their QB looks to be at least less than 100%(and he needs to run to be effective) and they're playing a Georgia team that I think will be motivated to bury them despite their safely secured spot in the playoff. Every time Georgia is engaged, they handle their business...I've just been terrible at recognizing when those spots are. They haven't won the SEC title since they've started this un under Smart, and all their guys are saying all the right things about their motivation. LSU's defense has improved, but I don't think it'll be a good match for Georgia's offense, especially on 3rd down. LSU doesn't have anyone who can cover those tight ends(who does?) and I think Georgia will be able to run at will on the Tigers run D. If Daniels is hobbled, it takes away one of their best third down weapons(his scrambling), so it will be tough for the Tigers to consistently move the chains. This one looks like a party for the Bulldogs to me.
 
5. Purdue+16.5 v Michigan: I've heard more than a couple talking heads say that this is a carbon copy of the situation for Michigan had in this game last year when they clobbered Iowa in the Indy. You would think it is, because they are again coming off a shellacking of Ohio State in The Game, but it really isn't. There was a lot more urgency in that game because Michigan had a loss in this game last year and they hadn't even shared a piece of the Big Ten title since 2004, which is a lifetime for them. Had Michigan lost to Iowa last year, their place in the playoff would have been very much in doubt, which is not at all the case this year They can lose and they'll still be in, and they won the Big Ten title last year. Also, Purdue, as we know is a great dog away from home under Brohm, and we can't forget that Michigan only two weeks ago were a missed Jake Moody FG away from losing to Illinois. Purdue can run it adequately with Devin Mockobee, giving them at least a little bit of balance on offense, and we know that O'Connell can at least move the ball against just about anyone Defensively, Purdue's weakness is the pass game, but they are pretty decent against the run. I'm not sure Michigan will be emptying the playbook via the pass, so we might see the Boilermakers play loose and free and get off to a good start in this one. A spread this high is tailor made for Purdue, especially when Michigan has reason to not be 100% engaged.
 
I have no interest betting on either North Carolina or Clemson, so I won't.

Boise/Fresno is a tough one because both teams have so many injuries on the defensive side of the ball. Boise looks better on paper, but that's because Fresno was without Haener for so long Tossup game with him IMO.

Best of luck to everyone!
 
Well, we saw somewhat of a cosmic regression to the mean from USC. That and some bad tackling, which is the understatement of the century.

I said above that I hope USC gets in over Ohio State. Logically, I don't think a team should be penalized for qualifying for another game, especially when the team that benefits was just sitting on their couch with their pom poms. But can you imagine USC trying to tackle those Georgia tight ends? No thanks, I'll take Ohio State.
 
USC woulda scored on every possession if Williams didn't hurt his leg on the long run in the 3rd series when they kicked a fg to go up 17-3....their defense gabe them a couple stops and thats all that was necessary if CW isn't injured.
Instead, Utah scored on every possession for them.
 
Well, we saw somewhat of a cosmic regression to the mean from USC. That and some bad tackling, which is the understatement of the century.

I said above that I hope USC gets in over Ohio State. Logically, I don't think a team should be penalized for qualifying for another game, especially when the team that benefits was just sitting on their couch with their pom poms. But can you imagine USC trying to tackle those Georgia tight ends? No thanks, I'll take Ohio State.
Alex Grinchs' D was in more of a giving mood than his namesake.
 
USC tackling on second level was absolutely horrendous. Linebackers were non existent, and secondary continued to try and tackle high which just doesn't work against bigger more physical players.
 
Brass I was curious if you had any comments on MAC Championship. I'm kind of surprised that Toledo is up to 3.5. Obviously Toledo has the better defense and have done a particularly good job of defending the pass 6.0 ypa. Ohio though has been very consistent just winning and covering 8 weeks in a row. Ohio is the much more opportunistic team at +13 TO ratio vs. -9 for Toledo and I think the pass rush is pretty even 31/23 vs. 31/21 in sacks/allowed. Toledo RZ TD numbers better 72% vs. 61% which kind of surprises me. Any thoughts on this game?
 
USC tackling on second level was absolutely horrendous. Linebackers were non existent, and secondary continued to try and tackle high which just doesn't work against bigger more physical players.
On the long touchdown by the TE late in the game, I thought #7 was trying to gently escort him into the end zone. On the last TD, same guy(#7) first engaged with the RB at around the 25 and just went along for the ride from there. It was remarkable. Chances are, the only feedback he'll get from his coaches will be a pat on the head and a reassurance that they think he's a swell guy.
 
Brass I was curious if you had any comments on MAC Championship. I'm kind of surprised that Toledo is up to 3.5. Obviously Toledo has the better defense and have done a particularly good job of defending the pass 6.0 ypa. Ohio though has been very consistent just winning and covering 8 weeks in a row. Ohio is the much more opportunistic team at +13 TO ratio vs. -9 for Toledo and I think the pass rush is pretty even 31/23 vs. 31/21 in sacks/allowed. Toledo RZ TD numbers better 72% vs. 61% which kind of surprises me. Any thoughts on this game?
Sorry, just saw this Timmy. My initial look at this game had a lean toward Toledo, but the stats are year long, and there's no doubt this has been a case of two teams in different directions. Ohio had won and covered 7 in a row(covered 8 as you mentioned) while Toledo had failed to cover 6 in a row with 3 of those being straight up losses as at least a TD favorite. The loss of Roark was tough for the Bobs, but the backup Harris at least kept the momentum going. It was a no play for me at 3 but I took it at Ohio +3.5. My fear was that the Toledo D would expose Harris, but I played it based on the momentum of the two teams, plus it's never a bad idea to play a MAC dog. (something like a 29-11 run for dogs this year...Sevenpointroaddog has been following that). Down 10-7 at half, we'll see what happens.
 
Hoping for the Gillespie adjustments and the second half surge that TCU has displayed all year.

I swear if TCU loses this and they drop them out for Alabama......
 
For the millionth time: If you need one foot, don't have your quarterback run 5 yards backwards and hand it to a stationary back at the 6 yard line.
I'm watching on my phone, right before a fucking wedding starts w sound muted trying to be polite lol...and I thought I was going to scream. Two of the worst telegraph running plays in a row I have ever seen. How do you not trust Duggan there with some kind of RPO? Jesus I was beside my self that they fought all the way back and then tinkled it away.
 
Back
Top