Br@ssknux
Pretty much a regular
Every year I say this is my favorite time of the year, and each year it looks like the way of the bowls is changing. I used to complain about it and put myself through consternation resisting the change from what I liked to what I was sure would be worse, but I've learned to not care so much. At the end of the day, as long as we have games to bet on, and they set lines, I'm happy. A lot of what I was worried about years ago has come true in the form of unintended consequences from our screaming and yelling about who got to play for the national championship, but it's not that bad. At least that's what I tell myself.
A couple of points before I get started on the games. First, take a look at Bookie Assassin's thread here. I think he has a lot of good rules of thumb when betting bowls, especially the one about picking the winner of the game. I often mention that I try not to mess with dogs who I don't think have a reasonably decent shot to win outright unless they're getting 10 or more, i.e. "I think this is a 27-24 game so I'll take the 3.5". Bowls very seldom come down to the spread in most cases and dogs win outright quite a bit because we have so many teams these days that just don't have a ton of motivation. Motivation is of the utmost importance, and it's very hard to spot sometimes.
On that point, the bowls are when we look our smartest and also our dumbest. I remember taking Florida +10 or so a few years ago because I thought Kyle Trask deciding to play was a huge indicator of the Gators resolve before playing Oklahoma. They were own 28-0 by the end of the first quarter I think and he called it a night soon after that. It's gonna happen.
As for Army/Navy, I got Army at +7(-118) so I took it. Not a full writeup because I don't really include the Army Navy game as part of the regular season, but as a game is neither a run of the mill regular season game nor a bowl game. Any time you can get this many points with the dog in this game, you have to take it, even when the dog has had a vastly inferior year on paper or appears to be way behind in overall performance throughout the year. It's the case this year and I don't think these teams are all that far off from each other. Navy has the better offense with Horvath and Tezca, but their defense has been mostly helpless all year while Army has held their own defensively and against a much tougher schedule. Army's offense is certainly not as good as Navy's, but it's been good enough to get some very impressive wins. A team that has won at Kansas State and at UTSA is a TD dog here? I don't think so, especially when we'll get their best effort(obviously) and these games usually play closer than the year-long results indicate anyway. The dog is 10-4 ATS in the last 14 meetings here, so it makes sense to go with them here.
Washington -9.5 WIN
Jacksonville State +1.5 WIN
Old Dominion +3 WIN
Delaware +3 WIN
Memphis +3.5 LOSS
Oklahoma pk LOSS
Miami +3.5 WIN
Ole Miss -17 WIN
Toledo +7 WIN
Southern Miss +1 LOSS
Hawaii -117 ML WIN
New Mexico +2 LOSS
Clemson -2.5 LOSS
Army -7.5 WIN
Georgia Tech +4 PUSH
Houston PK WIN
USC -6.5 LOSS
Iowa +6 WIN
Michigan +7 LOSS
Utah -14 WIN
Miami(FL) +9.5 WIN
Oregon -2 WIN
Indiana -7 WIN
Georgia -6.5 LOSS
Navy -7 WIN
Wake Forest +3 WIN
Ole Miss +3.5 LOSS
Indiana -3.5 WIN
Indiana -8.5 LOSS
Final: 18-10
1. LA Bowl Washington -9.5 v Boise (BR): Other books have this at 10, but I'd lay that number as well. Washington has kind of separated itself as a bit of a tweener, as long as we're talking about games in which the Huskies aren't traveling to an earlier time zone. They lost to the Ohio States and the Oregons of the world, but pretty much handled everyone else. On the flip side, this Boise team is nowhere near as good as previous Boise squads have been. They've given up 200+ yards rushing 6 times and offensively have not run the ball well, even against run of the mill Mountain West defenses like Utah State, New Mexico and Nevada. Washington's defense under former Illini DC Ryan Walters has been very competitive, ranking 19th against the run against a helluva more challenging schedule than Boise. It looks like most of Washington's guys will be playing. Jonah Coleman has been banged up, and Boise's rush defense is a key weakness, but backup Adam Muhammad has been just fine in Coleman's absence. No hesitation here as it relates to Washington's road woes because they went down to LA just a couple weeks ago and easily handled UCLA. Boise has shown some ability to look good against the pass and on 3rd dwn on defense, but a lot of that work has been done against horseshit Mountain West offenses like Nevada, Fresno, San Diego State, Colorado State, etc. I think the Huskies win this going away unless they just don't care to be there, but a game in LA when more than half of their roster is from California makes that unlikely.
A couple of points before I get started on the games. First, take a look at Bookie Assassin's thread here. I think he has a lot of good rules of thumb when betting bowls, especially the one about picking the winner of the game. I often mention that I try not to mess with dogs who I don't think have a reasonably decent shot to win outright unless they're getting 10 or more, i.e. "I think this is a 27-24 game so I'll take the 3.5". Bowls very seldom come down to the spread in most cases and dogs win outright quite a bit because we have so many teams these days that just don't have a ton of motivation. Motivation is of the utmost importance, and it's very hard to spot sometimes.
On that point, the bowls are when we look our smartest and also our dumbest. I remember taking Florida +10 or so a few years ago because I thought Kyle Trask deciding to play was a huge indicator of the Gators resolve before playing Oklahoma. They were own 28-0 by the end of the first quarter I think and he called it a night soon after that. It's gonna happen.
As for Army/Navy, I got Army at +7(-118) so I took it. Not a full writeup because I don't really include the Army Navy game as part of the regular season, but as a game is neither a run of the mill regular season game nor a bowl game. Any time you can get this many points with the dog in this game, you have to take it, even when the dog has had a vastly inferior year on paper or appears to be way behind in overall performance throughout the year. It's the case this year and I don't think these teams are all that far off from each other. Navy has the better offense with Horvath and Tezca, but their defense has been mostly helpless all year while Army has held their own defensively and against a much tougher schedule. Army's offense is certainly not as good as Navy's, but it's been good enough to get some very impressive wins. A team that has won at Kansas State and at UTSA is a TD dog here? I don't think so, especially when we'll get their best effort(obviously) and these games usually play closer than the year-long results indicate anyway. The dog is 10-4 ATS in the last 14 meetings here, so it makes sense to go with them here.
Washington -9.5 WIN
Jacksonville State +1.5 WIN
Old Dominion +3 WIN
Delaware +3 WIN
Memphis +3.5 LOSS
Oklahoma pk LOSS
Miami +3.5 WIN
Ole Miss -17 WIN
Toledo +7 WIN
Southern Miss +1 LOSS
Hawaii -117 ML WIN
New Mexico +2 LOSS
Clemson -2.5 LOSS
Army -7.5 WIN
Georgia Tech +4 PUSH
Houston PK WIN
USC -6.5 LOSS
Iowa +6 WIN
Michigan +7 LOSS
Utah -14 WIN
Miami(FL) +9.5 WIN
Oregon -2 WIN
Indiana -7 WIN
Georgia -6.5 LOSS
Navy -7 WIN
Wake Forest +3 WIN
Ole Miss +3.5 LOSS
Indiana -3.5 WIN
Indiana -8.5 LOSS
Final: 18-10
1. LA Bowl Washington -9.5 v Boise (BR): Other books have this at 10, but I'd lay that number as well. Washington has kind of separated itself as a bit of a tweener, as long as we're talking about games in which the Huskies aren't traveling to an earlier time zone. They lost to the Ohio States and the Oregons of the world, but pretty much handled everyone else. On the flip side, this Boise team is nowhere near as good as previous Boise squads have been. They've given up 200+ yards rushing 6 times and offensively have not run the ball well, even against run of the mill Mountain West defenses like Utah State, New Mexico and Nevada. Washington's defense under former Illini DC Ryan Walters has been very competitive, ranking 19th against the run against a helluva more challenging schedule than Boise. It looks like most of Washington's guys will be playing. Jonah Coleman has been banged up, and Boise's rush defense is a key weakness, but backup Adam Muhammad has been just fine in Coleman's absence. No hesitation here as it relates to Washington's road woes because they went down to LA just a couple weeks ago and easily handled UCLA. Boise has shown some ability to look good against the pass and on 3rd dwn on defense, but a lot of that work has been done against horseshit Mountain West offenses like Nevada, Fresno, San Diego State, Colorado State, etc. I think the Huskies win this going away unless they just don't care to be there, but a game in LA when more than half of their roster is from California makes that unlikely.
Last edited: