My commentary from last week:
It is unfair though to be a Monday morning QB and critisize his plays after they've lost. So I will pick on two that I don't like that have yet to go.
I think Stanford is highly questionable. The only team they beat on the road was UW and that was the game when Locker got hurt so the team wasn't ready to respond in his absence. The talent between these two is similar, maybe even an edge to the Bruins. You know Chow will make all the halftime adjustments to keep them in the game just as he does every week, so unless Stanford can get out to a multiple TD lead at the half they are in deep shit.
I also question just how good Akron is at this point. They clearly are a middle of the pack MAC team. EMU is not good, but they have proven time and time again they can be dangerous, so I wouldn't want to be laying those points on the road either. Favorites in the MAC are just very suspect to begin with which is why I wouldn't take NIU either, but that one is probably a little better given Toledo's situation.
And I don't necessarily see AZ/Cal as an UNDER game, but I suck at totals anyway. Tenn -7 might be alright, but 7.5 is dangerous.
I think the best plays he recommends are OSU -pts vs. Baylor as the Pokes should run for about 350 and may pass for another 200. I think Iowa is a solid lay, and I think Nevada will come free and clear of USU by about 5 TDs.
Damn I'm good. Had that shit nailed. The only thing I was wrong about was Tennessee who could have comfortably laid a lot more points so the diff between 7 and 7.5 ended up not mattering. I was so on the money with those predictions. Hopefully I can replicate that.