Sammy Meatballs
Sammy Meatballs? Never Heard of Her
Are you Hispanic?They don't like the Hispanic looking folks?
Are you Hispanic?They don't like the Hispanic looking folks?
I took under the 24* for a little, shouldn't these guys rest their stars when they're rolling?
My last name is Johnson. No squiggly lines.Are you Hispanic?
My last name is Johnson. No squiggly lines.
So yes
I'm Hispanic looking because it's 100+ for 7 months and I refuse sunscreenMe and borwester are Hispanic looking
Good no play, methinks. Might hit, but long-term those will not be solid investments.Yeah a lot of flukey points in that half. I would lean under too but not unless they gave us an inflated total which they didnt and the market isn't strong enough to push it up it would appear
Montreal always has the hottest cheerleaders
They seem like warm and kind French Canadians!Montreal always has the hottest cheerleaders
I'm Hispanic looking because it's 100+ for 7 months and I refuse sunscreen
Good no play, methinks. Might hit, but long-term those will not be solid investments.
Remind me to brush up on our French rap before we go to Montreal.
Bonjour bitch.
Je besoin un winner.
This is what I kinda strive for in the afterlifeWhen you pass your skin is gonna make some one hell of a jacket
True, you might only have 10 but the likelihood of hitting a higher percentage is there, IMO.I've been on a mission to be more conservative with my betting the past few years but its tough in the CFL. With only 4 games a week if you're too conservative you end up with 10 bets a season
True, you might only have 10 but the likelihood of hitting a higher percentage is there, IMO.
Lets do some simple math.
As a 100 player....
you play 50 plays and hit 56%, which is great. I'll use standard vig here...
You are up 380
you play 10 plays I think the potential is there to hit 70% in a market such as this....60% is more realistic.
So, @ 70% you are up 430
-----------
60% would be less but if you think you can target a certain number of plays...and get better prices... more money is out there.
Just using arbitrary numbers.
Its a good point and you can't argue the math. The problem I've always had is that as I get more selective, I haven't necessarily improved my win%. So the past couple of years I've found that I just grab value where I see it and I'm better off with the higher volume. Now I'm talking strictly CFL here which is a softer market than most professional sports and I have 100% confidence that I know the league better than any bookmaker. Not so in tighter markets
Hey, and you know yourself better than anyone. You track it very well also.
Off to cook donner here. Bede is almost too strong for his own good. He needs touch...like a pitcher.
Ty Long the same
Howdy boys...was out for my dad’s 75th BDay this evening...just got back. What have I missed in this one so far?