2013 Masters
- Thread starter crawdads
- Start date
-
- Tags
- green jacket
Here are tomorrow's tee times and pairings? Fade Gonzalo? Gotta be intimidated by playing with Tiger right?
Bubba Watson (9:25 a.m.) -- Watson, playing alone, as someone on Twitter pointed out, maybe he should use the hovercraft.
Thorbjorn Olesen and Tianlang Guan (9:55 a.m.) -- Great international pairing here, would be amazing to see Guan move up the leaderboard.
Nick Watney and Phil Mickelson (10:25 a.m.) -- You know Mickelson is going to try to shoot a 62 on Saturday, should be great theater.
Matt Kuchar and Bill Haas (12:45 p.m.) -- Two guys who should be higher up the leaderboard than they are.
Steve Stricker and Dustin Johnson (12:55 p.m.) -- Johnson butchered the back nine on Friday but he can go as low as anyone, and he's only five back.
Rory McIlroy and Charl Schwartzel (1:25 p.m.) -- Some great Masters history in this group as Schwartzel took advantage of McIlroy's 2011 collapse.
Bernhard Langer and Sergio Garcia (1:35 p.m.) -- How about Langer in contention at 2 under and age 55?
Tiger Woods and Gonzalo Fernandez-Castano (1:45 p.m.) -- Woods has been playing better than his 3-under score would tell you. Can he produce results on Saturday?
Justin Rose and K.J. Choi (1:55 p.m.) -- Two guys who are so solid on this course. Wouldn't surprised to see either of them in one of the final two pairings on Sunday.
David Lynn and Lee Westwood (2:05 p.m.) -- The two Englishmen playing together for the first time at Augusta.
Adam Scott and Jason Dufner (2:15 p.m.) -- Not a lot of excitement from these two, but if I was picking a pairing to follow, they might be it.
Jim Furyk and Brandt Snedeker (2:25 p.m.) -- Snedeker wants this one badly, Furyk needs it badly (after his 2012 struggles). Can either one make a charge?
Marc Leishman and Angel Cabrera (2:35 p.m.) -- Will probably be the least popular of the final pairings, but two pretty outstanding stories here.
Jason Day and Fred Couples (2:45 p.m.) -- Couples winning would be the sports story of the year.
Bubba Watson (9:25 a.m.) -- Watson, playing alone, as someone on Twitter pointed out, maybe he should use the hovercraft.
Thorbjorn Olesen and Tianlang Guan (9:55 a.m.) -- Great international pairing here, would be amazing to see Guan move up the leaderboard.
Nick Watney and Phil Mickelson (10:25 a.m.) -- You know Mickelson is going to try to shoot a 62 on Saturday, should be great theater.
Matt Kuchar and Bill Haas (12:45 p.m.) -- Two guys who should be higher up the leaderboard than they are.
Steve Stricker and Dustin Johnson (12:55 p.m.) -- Johnson butchered the back nine on Friday but he can go as low as anyone, and he's only five back.
Rory McIlroy and Charl Schwartzel (1:25 p.m.) -- Some great Masters history in this group as Schwartzel took advantage of McIlroy's 2011 collapse.
Bernhard Langer and Sergio Garcia (1:35 p.m.) -- How about Langer in contention at 2 under and age 55?
Tiger Woods and Gonzalo Fernandez-Castano (1:45 p.m.) -- Woods has been playing better than his 3-under score would tell you. Can he produce results on Saturday?
Justin Rose and K.J. Choi (1:55 p.m.) -- Two guys who are so solid on this course. Wouldn't surprised to see either of them in one of the final two pairings on Sunday.
David Lynn and Lee Westwood (2:05 p.m.) -- The two Englishmen playing together for the first time at Augusta.
Adam Scott and Jason Dufner (2:15 p.m.) -- Not a lot of excitement from these two, but if I was picking a pairing to follow, they might be it.
Jim Furyk and Brandt Snedeker (2:25 p.m.) -- Snedeker wants this one badly, Furyk needs it badly (after his 2012 struggles). Can either one make a charge?
Marc Leishman and Angel Cabrera (2:35 p.m.) -- Will probably be the least popular of the final pairings, but two pretty outstanding stories here.
Jason Day and Fred Couples (2:45 p.m.) -- Couples winning would be the sports story of the year.
Toronto_Mike
Scent of a Woman
Ummm Tiger might be DQ'd!?? apparently fucked up his drop
jimmymo
Beer and Betting Belong Together
I've been following this story all night -- gonna be a close call, but I think Tiger is going to claim that he saw the ball come directly back at him and played the option of dropping on the line of the flag and point of entry -- the video says differently though, but the sun was in his eyes and maybe he missed the line -- as long as he thought it was the right line, that is all that matters. HOWEVER, what a lot of people are saying is that he took the "stroke and distance" option, which would have required him to play his next shot as nearly as possible to where his previous shot was played, and he admitted in an interview that he "went back 2 yards" -- that is a violation of the "nearly as possible" requirement. Crazy stuff.
Judge Smails
Vegas For March Madness Coordinator
<iframe id="twitter-widget-0" class="twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" style="display: block; border-color: rgb(238, 238, 238) rgb(221, 221, 221) rgb(187, 187, 187); border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; max-width: 99%; min-width: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; border-top-left-radius: 10px; border-top-right-radius: 10px; border-bottom-right-radius: 10px; border-bottom-left-radius: 10px; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.14902) 0px 1px 3px;" title="Embedded Tweet" width="500" height="210"></iframe>
Hmmm ...<script async="" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" style="display: none;"></iframe>
Hmmm ...<script async="" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" style="display: none;"></iframe>
Judge Smails
Vegas For March Madness Coordinator
darren rovell <s style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(187, 187, 187);">@</s>darrenrovell<small class="time" style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(187, 187, 187); position: relative; float: right; margin-top: 1px;">44s</small>
Tiger gets 2 shot penalty. Most disappointed person? Guy who would have won $22,500 on a $300 bet <s style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(102, 181, 210);">@</s>sportsbook_com that Tiger would be DQ’d
Tiger gets 2 shot penalty. Most disappointed person? Guy who would have won $22,500 on a $300 bet <s style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(102, 181, 210);">@</s>sportsbook_com that Tiger would be DQ’d
Judge Smails
Vegas For March Madness Coordinator
darren rovell <s style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(187, 187, 187);">@</s>darrenrovell<small class="time" style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(187, 187, 187); position: relative; float: right; margin-top: 1px;">44s</small>
Tiger gets 2 shot penalty. Most disappointed person? Guy who would have won $22,500 on a $300 bet <s style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(102, 181, 210);">@</s>sportsbook_com that Tiger would be DQ’d
Tiger gets 2 shot penalty. Most disappointed person? Guy who would have won $22,500 on a $300 bet <s style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(102, 181, 210);">@</s>sportsbook_com that Tiger would be DQ’d
Toronto_Mike
Scent of a Woman
THIS. cause no one has the balls to call him out.
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
no way should he WD... the committee made a ruling before he finished a round, was with a rules official, so he signed a correct card to his knowledge.
Then after the interview with his statement of 2 yards, they enforced a 2 storke penalty...
Media needs to move on and concentrate on the final 2 rounds of the first major of the year...
Then after the interview with his statement of 2 yards, they enforced a 2 storke penalty...
Media needs to move on and concentrate on the final 2 rounds of the first major of the year...
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
Its funny, Id like to see how many rules violations Faldo made in judgements, before HD tv followed every shot and balls were under a microsope and every shot was tweeted out and in front of millions of people in seconds, not via a rotary phone line...
times change, they made a rules adjustment in 33, and this came into play here IMO
times change, they made a rules adjustment in 33, and this came into play here IMO
Gandolf
Leader of the Van Buren Boys
Ask Craig Stadler. He got dinged in 1987 by a viewer.
Tiger ain't above the rules. He screwed up on the drop rule, the penalty is deserved. DQ or not apparently is at the discretion of Augusta's committee, so be it.
He'll either shoot 31 or 37 on the front, depending on how Voss was last night.
Tiger ain't above the rules. He screwed up on the drop rule, the penalty is deserved. DQ or not apparently is at the discretion of Augusta's committee, so be it.
He'll either shoot 31 or 37 on the front, depending on how Voss was last night.
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
officials reviewd, made a decision... scorecard was signed off of that decision... no DQ, but penalty which should have been assesed at time...
time to golf
time to golf
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
gonna go 65-66
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
lots of red numbers so far this morning...
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
Clarke on fire
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
needs bubba hoiver
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
he also played a drop 2.2 yards back...
Alan Tongue
Pretty much a regular
No, he's unlucky.
Every Tiger shot gets broadcast, so if this happens to him it will be picked up. If this was 95% of the other players in the tournament that get a handful of shots shown then this wouldn't be an issue because the whole series of events wouldn't have been shown. It means that decisions based on TV broadcasts are not a level playing field
He is also judged on this because he is Tiger Woods, a polarising figure. If this happened to marc Leishman most peoples opinion would change.
Finally, nobody has mentioned that a result could be changed because a viewer called in and pointed out what happened. That is the biggest issue here. So, every other sport we accept the ruling on the field but not in golf? What happens next, the Superbowl gets changed after full time because a viewer calls in and says the refs got a call wrong? The narcy viwers need to shut the fuck up and get a life
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
rory +4 today
crawdads
Fairway to Heaven
KJ
Bump. Set. Shuma!
i am on board law with that wager. gl to us.
also:
stricker -115 v fowler
olesen -130 v castano
kuchar -115 v sned
cabrera -140 v leishman
more on day than anything as i love the fade adam scott angle. also would make cabrera a bit higher but playing all for the same. day over scott is a good looking bet imo
also:
stricker -115 v fowler
olesen -130 v castano
kuchar -115 v sned
cabrera -140 v leishman
more on day than anything as i love the fade adam scott angle. also would make cabrera a bit higher but playing all for the same. day over scott is a good looking bet imo
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
took rory over phil today... rory has had solid final rounds no matter the position when he's played in them...
gonna let my day group play go as the day vs scott wager...
Gl today
gonna let my day group play go as the day vs scott wager...
Gl today
Santacapper
Pretty much a regular
sneds last final pairing at augusta was a 77
