It may need its own thread but the situation at Michigan is alarming.As in most years, covid aside, neither MSU or UofM are in contention for anything and the emphasis to beat one another in what is IMO the best interstate rivalry game leads to both teams embarassing said state the following week. Also Don Brown may need to rethink his career.
It was a letdown. I don't think I've seen one this easy to predict since the LSU - Ole Miss game back in '97A reminder about let downs and flat spots...
Michigan State just bad or they a little flat off the Michigan win?
SEC wouldn't let Alabama hire Freeze a couple of years ago, wonder if they will change their minds? Could see SC, Tenn, and possibly AU interested. Wonder if Michigan would give Fickell a call, or would he even it entertain it as a Buckeye?Cinci coach gotta be leading the clubhouse for a big job
Hugh Freeze right there too
My sour grapes post today:There is no rhyme or reason to some of the arbitrary conversion decisions which are made by these coaches who don't follow any kind of numerical rationale but yet just make whimsical decisions (i.e. Penn St Coach Franklin down 35-7 scores and goes for two to make it 20 vs. 21 deficit). And yes he did it again on the next score and failed. The reason I bring it up is it seems like it happens all the time, some of these morons will leave themselves on 9 or 12 without blinking.
I noticed the same thing and it seems like it's more scatterbrain this year than ever. I wasn't surprised that years ago coaches just made up a card that said what to do with zero consideration of time left, how the teams are playing, just blindly do what the card said.There is no rhyme or reason to some of the arbitrary conversion decisions which are made by these coaches
Don't think Fickell would go there for 10 millionSEC wouldn't let Alabama hire Freeze a couple of years ago, wonder if they will change their minds? Could see SC, Tenn, and possibly AU interested. Wonder if Michigan would give Fickell a call, or would he even it entertain it as a Buckeye?
It certainly was, not to mention they are really bad.It was a letdown. I don't think I've seen one this easy to predict since the LSU - Ole Miss game back in '97
James Franklin once kicked a FG down 38-0 to Michigan to avoid a shutout... He rolls differently.There is no rhyme or reason to some of the arbitrary conversion decisions which are made by these coaches who don't follow any kind of numerical rationale but yet just make whimsical decisions (i.e. Penn St Coach Franklin down 35-7 scores and goes for two to make it 20 vs. 21 deficit). And yes he did it again on the next score and failed. The reason I bring it up is it seems like it happens all the time, some of these morons will leave themselves on 9 or 12 without blinking.
I hate to say it because Fuente is an OU guy, but he set the world record for incompetence in the last 10 seconds of that game (I'm hoping one of the assistants made the calls, but I doubt an assistant did it) and lost the game for his team.
First he decides to pull what has always seemed like a brain lock move to me and call timeout just as the FG kicker tries a FG (It makes no sense to me in any case. At best, the maximum upside is that a kicker has to try again and the downside can be disastrous, but if you just HAVE to do it, it only makes sense if you think the kicker will make it.)
Saturday VT called the timeout on a 59-yard try, 18 yards further than any FG the kicker had ever made. Sure enough, Tech blocked it--a VERY likely outcome on a kick that long--and took it to the house. But wait, doesn't count, kicker gets another try.
But this time Freeze decides to try a hail mary instead. But, for reasons that make zero sense, V Tech backs off and puts all the D backs 25 yards downfield, so Freeze has his QB just take an easy completion to a WR with no one near him--who steps out of bounds after a 10 yard gain or so--and THEN kicks the FG, which the kicker drills.
There is no rhyme or reason to some of the arbitrary conversion decisions which are made by these coaches who don't follow any kind of numerical rationale but yet just make whimsical decisions (i.e. Penn St Coach Franklin down 35-7 scores and goes for two to make it 20 vs. 21 deficit). And yes he did it again on the next score and failed. The reason I bring it up is it seems like it happens all the time, some of these morons will leave themselves on 9 or 12 without blinking.
I noticed the same thing and it seems like it's more scatterbrain this year than ever. I wasn't surprised that years ago coaches just made up a card that said what to do with zero consideration of time left, how the teams are playing, just blindly do what the card said.
But we've had decades of history now, hundreds of thousands of games, we have far more advanced analytics and computers, but coaches seems to have ignored everything we've learned and, if anything, are regressing on when to go for two
Washington State was missing 32 players, including RB Borghi, started a true Fr QB and still far and away looked and played like the better team at Oregon State. Wash St led by as many as 21 points before OSU closed the gap.
Coastal coach as wellCinci coach gotta be leading the clubhouse for a big job
Hugh Freeze right there too
Maybe he went to Bruce Arians school of hard knocks? Bucs did exact same thing Sunday Night.James Franklin once kicked a FG down 38-0 to Michigan to avoid a shutout... He rolls differently.
As I’ve gotten older, it’s definitely hard in the eyes. Especially if I’ve had a few....and they always play late hahaI'm not going to let this go....it's time Boise get rid of that god awful blue field. After 34 years, the novelty has worn off. The novelty wore off many years ago.
It's like the Beth Mowins of football fields. Literally makes it impossible to watch a game. As she's a beating on one's ears, that blue abortion is such a beating on the eyes.
I heard it mentioned on the Andy Staples podcast, but that field either looks way different in HD, or they've changed it. It's borderline unwatchable for me
Felt like I was in Tuscaloosa boomers in the 90sI heard it mentioned on the Andy Staples podcast, but that field either looks way different in HD, or they've changed it. It's borderline unwatchable for me