Post your thoughts!
Best thing to happen to the Raiders was this, he was a 10 milly/yr check collector that could just do what he wantedWithout Gruden = Raiders More 'Long Bombs'
To me it's been that way for 5 years now. Favorites and overs are remarkably cashing, not just now...think they're struggling with lines in a completely different game than it was a decade ago.As a relatively contrarian nfl bettor, these past two weeks have been brutal. Dave Mason of betonline tweeted these were the most profitable two weeks ever for the public. For me personally I probably have to take a break from nfl until things start evening out a little bit and I can rely on some of the mid/low tier teams to play competitively
I could never take a full game under on a Thursday, Sunday or Monday night. Nope, couldn't be me... for a variety of reasons...To me it's been that way for 5 years now. Favorites and overs are remarkably cashing, not just now...think they're struggling with lines in a completely different game than it was a decade ago.
Yeah I agree with you and noticed the same thing. I think it comes down to the way the game is played/officiated now, passing offenses are just so much more valuable now and idk if the books (and my capping) are adjusting enoughTo me it's been that way for 5 years now. Favorites and overs are remarkably cashing, not just now...think they're struggling with lines in a completely different game than it was a decade ago.
At some point it won't be hip to be square but NFL has paid well for those who bet the obvious lately (meaning last few years)Yeah I agree with you and noticed the same thing. I think it comes down to the way the game is played/officiated now, passing offenses are just so much more valuable now and idk if the books (and my capping) are adjusting enough
I have a thought on this, later, remind me.Yeah I agree with you and noticed the same thing. I think it comes down to the way the game is played/officiated now, passing offenses are just so much more valuable now and idk if the books (and my capping) are adjusting enough
As a relatively contrarian nfl bettor, these past two weeks have been brutal. Dave Mason of betonline tweeted these were the most profitable two weeks ever for the public. For me personally I probably have to take a break from nfl until things start evening out a little bit and I can rely on some of the mid/low tier teams to play competitively
A few of these actually seem to be trying to compete...Teams who are unwatchable.
Jacksonville
Miami
Giants
Jets
Detroit
Houston
Atlanta
Really nothing new here but my point is, WhyTF would you put your money on these teams??? They play UGLY football.
I was wrong about AZ…I don’t think I am about CAR being fool’s goldmost high variance teams - browns, panthers, denver. At least from what they were first 3 games. Now I'm going to bet them as average to bad teams.
Patriots seem to be great home dogs and bad favs.
panthers D was great. Absolutely great. And now they are below average. Yes their offense went down the toilet but the D is playing bad and it's fundamental stuff like taking bad angles, running out of gaps, etc. Amazing the drop off.
That browns-chargers game last week had people fooled with people thinking they are such good 2 teams. With everyone on the browns because cardinals run defense and west coast flying east why wasn't everyone on the ravens too ?
I got killed with totals and really don't think they were bad plays even though they all lost. Texans moved the ball really well on the Colts in between the 20s. Were only outgained by 40 yards. David Mills actually throws some good balls. Not sure he's the problem. But this team can't score points. 3 points against the bills and colts. And the colts had given up 25 to everybody.
KC turned it over multiple times inside the 20, and both teams seemed to run alot more than normal when they could pass easily. ..KC defense may be improving some ? Skins offense I think is decent.
Carolina kinda are missing a key guyI was wrong about AZ…I don’t think I am about CAR being fool’s gold
CMC definitely hurts. He seems to get injured a bunch.Carolina kinda are missing a key guy
They're the best team in the NFC South with him
I had them beating TB in the South pre seasonCMC definitely hurts. He seems to get injured a bunch.
I disagree about them being best in the South….outside of ATL, the rest are comparable I think
Yep was shocked how awful their defense was yesterday. You know Dalvin is getting his but in obvious passing situations they got zero pressure on Cousins. That was something I couldn't have accounted for.Yeah, it's hard to assess Carolina without McCaffrey. But that their defensive line seems to have gone from a huge strength to kind of average is a huge problem as long as their offense is down one of the most talented guys in the league.
I learned that the Jets do not in fact lose every Sunday.
I could never take a full game under on a Thursday, Sunday or Monday night. Nope, couldn't be me... for a variety of reasons...
Teams who are unwatchable.
Jacksonville
Miami
Giants
Jets
Detroit
Houston
Atlanta
Really nothing new here but my point is, WhyTF would you put your money on these teams??? They play UGLY football.
not if u like to make money..i can watch them all day.
Very well put. I think football, more than any other (especially NFL), is a game of schemes and gameplans and matchups. Coaches matter more in the NFL than any other sport/league.Something that, I believe, @Capaholic said a couple of weeks ago in this thread has been bouncing around in my big ol’ head and I’ve been trying to find a way to put it into words. I’m not completely sure I’ve done that, but I feel like I have to try.
Basically it was something to the effect of, ‘These threads are fun, but in the end they have very little effect on the next week’s games.’ I’m sure I’m paraphrasing that poorly, but the general point has stuck with me. Less about the thread(s)—be nice to the threads, they’ve never done anything to you—but more about how to approach the NFL from week to week.
Every year, after Week 1, we always say. “Don’t overreact to one week.” Which, of course, everybody does because it’s all the real data we have, etc. And, also of course, the quicker you can get away from that, the better you tend to be able to see the following week.
But the larger point is, I think that applies every week. Or should. Let me back up.
For a long time, I was and have been more of a feel type handicapper. Let me watch a team, let me get a good sense of who they are and where they are and, generally, I can give you a good sense of where they’ll be for their next game. For example, this year, I watched a lot of White Sox baseball and while there were certainly games I was way off on, a good bit of the time I could tell you, ‘Hey, this is the ‘we’re not really trying today’ lineup,’ or ‘Hey, this is a bounce-back spot where you can lay the -1.5,’ etc.
But to do that, you rely on the story a team tells over the course of their season. It’s like poker, tell me how you played the first two streets and I have a much better idea of what you’re going to do on the third.
However, in sports, and I think maybe in football more than anything, there is a danger of getting too attached to the story of a team from one week to the next. This isn’t baseball where, for example, you wouldn’t want to step in front of that Red Sox train right now—or where the Cards had that run of 17 straight at the end of the season. While the events are still correlated in the NFL, there’s very much a hard start and a hard stop to every week.
Point is, what stuck with me and what I think has helped over the course of the last two weeks is to internalize only the things that you think a team will carry with them from this game into the next one, and leave everything else in the week the game was played.
Love how Carson Wentz played against Houston? Fantastic. Does SF have a similar DL to Houston? Is their secondary roughly the same? If so, that may matter. If it isn’t, especially since SF is not only out of the division, but out of the conference, it may not.
What carries over vs. what's a bright shiny object that won't matter a week from now. To me that’s things like turnovers, sacks, sacks allowed, yards per play, things that define them for a season rather than what defined them for a single few hours on one specific Sunday.
All of this may mean nothing to a whole lot of you, which is cool, but for me it’s helped me isolate some things and separate teams from week to week. For example, I’d originally written off Jacksonville right out of the gate. But sure enough, they were on my card on last Sunday. Likewise, I think Denver is going the wrong direction, I was on the Raiders on Sunday, but I’ve already teased the Broncos on Thursday. Anyway, I’m not sure I’d have shifted that fast on teams in the past, and for that I blame @Capaholic. And some of the rest of you. Hope it helps.
Very well put. I think football, more than any other (especially NFL), is a game of schemes and gameplans and matchups. Coaches matter more in the NFL than any other sport/league.
“You’re never as good or as bad as you were last game” is an old saying I’ve heard, I def try to keep in mind for NFL especiallySomething that, I believe, @Capaholic said a couple of weeks ago in this thread has been bouncing around in my big ol’ head and I’ve been trying to find a way to put it into words. I’m not completely sure I’ve done that, but I feel like I have to try.
Basically it was something to the effect of, ‘These threads are fun, but in the end they have very little effect on the next week’s games.’ I’m sure I’m paraphrasing that poorly, but the general point has stuck with me. Less about the thread(s)—be nice to the threads, they’ve never done anything to you—but more about how to approach the NFL from week to week.
Every year, after Week 1, we always say. “Don’t overreact to one week.” Which, of course, everybody does because it’s all the real data we have, etc. And, also of course, the quicker you can get away from that, the better you tend to be able to see the following week.
But the larger point is, I think that applies every week. Or should. Let me back up.
For a long time, I was and have been more of a feel type handicapper. Let me watch a team, let me get a good sense of who they are and where they are and, generally, I can give you a good sense of where they’ll be for their next game. For example, this year, I watched a lot of White Sox baseball and while there were certainly games I was way off on, a good bit of the time I could tell you, ‘Hey, this is the ‘we’re not really trying today’ lineup,’ or ‘Hey, this is a bounce-back spot where you can lay the -1.5,’ etc.
But to do that, you rely on the story a team tells over the course of their season. It’s like poker, tell me how you played the first two streets and I have a much better idea of what you’re going to do on the third.
However, in sports, and I think maybe in football more than anything, there is a danger of getting too attached to the story of a team from one week to the next. This isn’t baseball where, for example, you wouldn’t want to step in front of that Red Sox train right now—or where the Cards had that run of 17 straight at the end of the season. While the events are still correlated in the NFL, there’s very much a hard start and a hard stop to every week.
Point is, what stuck with me and what I think has helped over the course of the last two weeks is to internalize only the things that you think a team will carry with them from this game into the next one, and leave everything else in the week the game was played.
Love how Carson Wentz played against Houston? Fantastic. Does SF have a similar DL to Houston? Is their secondary roughly the same? If so, that may matter. If it isn’t, especially since SF is not only out of the division, but out of the conference, it may not.
What carries over vs. what's a bright shiny object that won't matter a week from now. To me that’s things like turnovers, sacks, sacks allowed, yards per play, things that define them for a season rather than what defined them for a single few hours on one specific Sunday.
All of this may mean nothing to a whole lot of you, which is cool, but for me it’s helped me isolate some things and separate teams from week to week. For example, I’d originally written off Jacksonville right out of the gate. But sure enough, they were on my card on last Sunday. Likewise, I think Denver is going the wrong direction, I was on the Raiders on Sunday, but I’ve already teased the Broncos on Thursday. Anyway, I’m not sure I’d have shifted that fast on teams in the past, and for that I blame @Capaholic. And some of the rest of you. Hope it helps.