Week 4 (9/20-22) CFB Picks and News

RJ Esq

Prick Since 1974
2004-2005
No Records Kept

2005-2006 CFB Record
77-71 (52.04%), +2.2 units

2006-2007 CFB Record
70-48-3 (57.85%), +46.63 units (Behold the power of CTG)

2007-08 CFB Record
17-13, +7.9 units

Bad week last week that could have been a whole lot worse if not for the late adds of tOSU and BC. Finished 5-5, losing the juice of 3.25 units (losing both -120 picks).

Picks
OU -20 (-110)
Tulsa +23.5 (+110)
WVU -26' (-110) (hedged off after realizing I was reading wrong price)
Oregon -16' (-110)
Penn St -3 (-110)
Purdue -13 (-110)
FAU -6 (-110)
Cal -16 (-110)
Cal -13' (-110)
OU/Tulsa 1Q Over 14 ($250 -125)
Wisky -7 (-104)
TTech -6 (-102)--Not added yet but will be
Houston -6' (-110)
USF -12' (-110)
 
Last edited:
Who is the quarterback?

Posted by [URL="http://blog.al.com/trackingtigersabout.html"]Phillip Marshall, The Huntsville Times[/URL] September 15, 2007 10:20 PM

In the aftermath of Saturday's stunning 19-14 loss to Mississippi State, questions abound about Auburn football.
One that must be answered in the next few days is who is going to start at quarterback and who is going to play.
Brandon Cox left the game against Mississippi State after throwing interceptions on Auburn's first two possessions. Freshman Kodi Burns did some good things, lots of good things, but he also played like a freshman at times. Cox returned and led the Tigers to the MSU 9-yard line but couldn't close the deal. Blake Field, listed as the backup, didn't play at all.
So who will start against New Mexico State? Will both play?
"We just have to look at the tape and decide where we want to go and what we want to do," offensive coordinator Al Borges said. "Kodi came in and did a nice job of energizing us. Brandon took us down the field at the end when we needed him to. It's something we've got to evaluate and make a decision on."
My guess: Cox will start, but Burns will get significant playing time. Unless something should happen to Cox, it seems Field is the odd man out.
 
Benched Notre Dame QB Finds Asylum In MAC

By Matt Sussman | September 15, 2007
demetriusjones.jpg
Say what you will about the unrealistic expectations and overrated nature of the team. Notre Dame has one of the most classic uniforms in college football. Solid navy jersey. Solid gold helmet. No name on the back. This is a sharp contrast from Northern Illinois’ jerseys. Red and black is not a good color combination. Red and black are opposing forces in checkers. Never should they be the two lone colors in a scheme, for they represent internal strife.
But Demetrius Jones is apparently fine with making the switch.
After being named the season starter for the Fighting Irish, Jones didn’t even make it three games on the roster. On Friday we learned that Jones didn’t make the trip with the team to Ann Arbor for their game in Michigan, and nobody said why. This morning, Sunday Morning Quarterback was one of the first places to notice that Jones was already listed in the NIU student directory. ESPN followed suit with the confirmation.
Basically Jones is trading one rebuilding 0-3 team for another. NIU just lost to Eastern Michigan (an upset that I called … count it) while UND laid a golden egg against Michigan, which even Veruca Salt wanted no part of. And if he is eligible for the team next year (hey, don’t players have to sit out a year?) he’ll compete with the extremely accurate Dan Nicholson, who will be a senior next year.
Hey, I’m not entirely sure Jones is better than Nicholson. Nicholson might win that competition. And if Jones fails to land the starting job at Northern Illinois, this will say two things:
• Jones might want to glance at some Division II school brochures.
• Based on the talent pool at quarterback, Notre Dame should just try to run the ball every down.
 
Nobody Happy After Pitt-Michigan State

Posted Sep 15th 2007 5:25PM by Charles Rich
Filed under: Michigan State Football, Pittsburgh Football, Big 10, Big East
lmccoy1.jpg
You know, if this was a scheduled basketball game, it would have been a much more exciting match-up. Michigan State ultimately won the game 17-13, so the Spartan fans can be in a slightly better mood, but it shouldn't be with great enthusiasm.

The Spartans scored only 10 offensive points. All of the points came on turnovers (one taken in for a TD on an interception). Last year, the Spartan offense decimated Pitt for 38 points and over 500 total yards. The running game went for over 300 yards. This year, despite having the same running backs and 4 of the 5 starting O-linemen back, the running game only got 144 total yards. This despite new coach Mark Dantonio's emphasis on a traditional running game.

The Michigan State defense can be somewhat happy that they held Pitt to only 13 points and not even 100 yards passing. The problem is they allowed over 200 yards rushing, even as they knew Pitt was going to keep running the ball.

The worst thing for Michigan State and their fans, as the game wore on, there was less discipline and more sloppy play and penalties by the Spartans. As if the team started reverting to their default style as the game continued and stayed close. In the first two games the Spartans had only 7 penalties. This game, they had 11 penalties for 125 yards and 8 of them came in the second half.

As for Pitt...
The good news, was that Freshman RB LeSean McCoy proved that he is better than advertised with 172 rushing yards on 25 carries in his first start. The problem, was that he was the sum of the Pitt offense. Redshirt freshman QB Kevan Smith was absolutely overwhelmed in his first road start. His passes, decision making and confidence was non-existent.

How bad? Well, for most of the second half, McCoy was lining up for direct snaps and Smith was lined up on the outside. It was, according to the ESPN booth, Pitt's "Arkansas package." Apparently, the Pitt coaches had an idea of how special a player they had in McCoy and went down to Arkansas to pick Houston Nutt's brain on how they used Darren McFadden. (In something totally unrelated, I guess, Arkansas just hired away Pitt's AD.) McCoy never passed. He either ran or handed off on a sweep or end-around to T.J. Porter. The only reason Smith was actually in the game was to read the play signals for the plays.

Despite the lack of a QB Pitt had a chance because the defense played very well (and MSU committed key boneheaded penalties to kill drives).
 
Auburn Officially Irrelevant in 2007

Posted Sep 15th 2007 3:48PM by Brian Grummell
Filed under: Auburn Football, SEC, The Word, Mississippi State Football
tommy-tuberville-425.jpg

Sure, the Tigers can be spoilers this year, but they have no role in the national discussion this season having lost to Mississippi State 19-14 at home today. Mississippi State is awful and playing a freshman quarterback who is at present worse than the terrible Michael Henig.

Granted, Auburn benched starter Brandon Cox in favor of true freshman Kodi Burns. They lost at home to a bad team, though. This comes a week after losing at home to a good not great South Florida. That came a week after nearly losing to middling Kansas State, again at home. Imagine if they had played those games on the road? Yikes.

I'm certain Auburn will improve, but their national role is over for 2007.

The worst part of this for Auburn is that they had a chance to win this thing. With first and goal from the nine trailing 19-14, Auburn failed to get a touchdown, sealing its fate.
 
Replay Officials Rob Temple of Victory

Posted Sep 15th 2007 3:31PM by Brian Grummell
Filed under: Big East, MAC, NCAA FB Scandal, The Word, Connecticut Football, Temple Football
prison-bars-240.jpg
Hapless Temple found itself in a real ball game today against Connecticut.

With fourth and goal with less than a minute left trailing UCONN 22-17, Temple ran a reverse pass. The ball was lofted to the back of the end zone, tipped, and then caught by a Temple receiver. Update: Video below.

On-field officials ruled the receiver was out of bounds when he caught the ball. After watching several replays, it is abundantly clear to me that he 1)had possession of the ball and 2)got his left foot in-bounds while in possession of the ball.

That play's a touchdown. Period.

The replay crew disagreed and stuck with the on-field call. This is a travesty. This is a sham. This is a mockery. It's a traveshamockery and I'm embarrassed with the game's replay crew. Temple was robbed of a rare victory and I hope they raise a fit (in a professional manner, of course)with the Big East officials tomorrow.

They were robbed of a touchdown that would have all but won the game for them. They deserved that win but it goes down in the record books as a loss. How sad.


<OBJECT height=350 width=425>

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hG8Foe1-HoE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></OBJECT>
</P>
 
New Era at Auburn? Brandon Cox Pulled

Posted Sep 15th 2007 1:19PM by Brian Grummell
Filed under: Auburn Football, SEC, NCAA FB Injuries, Breaking News, The Word, Mississippi State Football
brandon-cox-face-240.jpg
After two sluggish games and a first-quarter interception that was returned for a touchdown, Auburn quarterback Brandon Cox has been benched.

His replacement: true frosh Kodi Burns who Auburn darn near stole from Arkansas. Burns provides mobility and a more powerful arm, but he's also a freshman and proved it by fumbling the ball deep in Bulldog territory for Auburn's third turnover of the first quarter.

Mississippi State is having quarterback issues of its own, as starter Michael Henig is done for the day with a hand injury. Two true frosh quarterbacks are now competing in this game. How about them apples Jimmy Clausen/Ryan Mallett?
 
Not an excuse for an awful performance, but I only heard about this until after the game:

For Horns, the road went on forever

Saturday, September 15, 2007, 09:44 AM
The Longhorns’ first road trip didn’t exactly go as planned Friday. First, the team’s charter flight was a couple of hours late leaving Austin because of mechanical problems. Once arriving in not-always sunny Orlando, the team was stuck again when one its buses broke down.
As a result, the team got only a brief glimpse inside Central Florida University’s new stadium rather than the full walk-through that was planned.
Of course, the Knights aren’t much more familiar with their new settings, either. Today’s game will be the first in Bright House Networks Stadium.
 
Cowboys' blowout loss nothing but embarrassing

By Berry Tramel
The Oklahoman
TROY, Ala. — Mike Gundy's Cowboys went to Georgia two weeks ago and showed, in the words of their own coach, that they weren't ready for the big time.

Friday night, in Wiregrass Country, Gundy's Cowboys showed they're not ready for the small time, either.
The Troy Trojans, pride of the Sun Belt Conference, pinned a 41-23 loss on Oklahoma State in a college football clunker at Movie Gallery Stadium.
Embarrassing. Totally embarrassing. Embarrassing performance, embarrassing result.
It's no high crime to lose at Troy; the Trojans are a gutty little team with an innovative offense, a fair share of athletes, good facilities and in a football-rich region, with plenty of leftovers for the lower class of Division I-A.
But it's a high crime to be non-competitive. A high crime to get blown out. A high crime to seemingly be unprepared for a team you knew would be hungry to ambush the rare BCS-league foe brave enough to find its way south of Montgomery.
This game was not as close as the score indicated. Troy made three scoreless journeys inside the OSU 20-yard line and another inside the 30.
OSU's only first-half touchdown came courtesy of Troy's bonehead fake punt, setting up a 26-yard drive, and its first second-half TD was set up by a blocked punt.
This game can't be laid at the feet of Bobby Reid. The benched veteran quarterback had no hand in this debacle, after a week in which his coaches played games on who would quarterback, a bit of subterfuge that apparently didn't faze the Trojans.
As detectives surmised, Zac Robinson went the whole way at quarterback and played neither well nor poorly. Just sort of played and didn't make the case, perhaps expected by the coaching staff, that he should lead this team.
Robinson committed three turnovers but also didn't get a lot of help; receivers Adarius Bowman and Dez Bryant both dropped long passes, and offensive coordinator Larry Fedora abandoned the run too early, when this still was a game. Who should start next Saturday against Texas Tech? That's becoming the least of OSU's dilemmas. Reid wouldn't have made a difference
 
NCAA alleges violations in Lobos football program

Tribune staff
Originally published 02:44 p.m., September 14, 2007
Updated 03:52 p.m., September 14, 2007


NCAA Notice of Allegations

Read the NCAA Notice of Allegations sent to the president of the University of New Mexico.


The NCAA alleges members of the University of New Mexico's football coaching staff might have committed serious violations in 2004 and 2005 in an attempt to help players obtain fraudulent course credit from another school in order to be eligible for the Lobos.
UNM held a news conference today to announce that it had received official notification of the allegations from the NCAA, the body that oversees intercollegiate athletics.
The university said the allegations involve three members of the football staff - two of whom are no longer with the program.
According to the notice of allegations, which redacted individual coaches' and players' names, coaches are alleged to have:
Provided improper benefits to four prospective players and one athlete already in school by arranging for them to enroll in and receive "improper" course credit from Fresno Pacific University in Fresno, Calif.
Lied about involvement in a scheme to register players at Fresno Pacific and offer to pay for the courses.
Provided misleading information to UNM and the NCAA enforcement staff about the connection to Fresno Pacific.
Spoke to a witness about the investigation and "provided false and misleading" information to the enforcement staff and UNM.
Two of the five players involved competed for the Lobos. No current players are involved in the allegations.
UNM pointed out that the NCAA does not accuse the program of lacking institutional control - a critical matter - and did not target head coach Rocky Long.
However, the notice of allegations painstakingly details a scheme in which coaches used their contacts with an instructor at Fresno Pacific to enroll players in courses that they passed without having done any work.
The NCAA also alleges:
Some Lobos coaches offered to assist in paying for courses at Fresno Pacific.
A coach provided his university-issued telephone number as the phone number for a player enrolling in correspondence courses at Fresno Pacific.
Athletes told investigators that a coach said they would receive credit for a Fresno Pacific course without having to complete any work.
A coach denied "he had registered or had any knowledge of other coaches registering prospective student-athletes in Fresno Pacific correspondence courses when, in fact, the coach had registered or assisted . . . them in their Fresno Pacific courses."
A UNM coach told enforcement investigators that he had never communicated with Fresno Pacific instructors when, in fact, he had placed at least 17 calls to instructor Fern Zahlen between February 2004 and January 2006.
Zahlen, a course instructor at Fresno Pacific, appears to be a key player in the investigation. Her name appears throughout the allegations as a contact person at the California school.
UNM Athletics Director Paul Krebs said he was made aware of the alleged violations in the summer of 2006, not long after taking the Lobos job.
"As serious as NCAA allegations are - and this certainly is serious - I think it's important to understand that it's been the individual conduct that's been cited," Krebs said. "There have been no allegations leveled at the university. No allegations of lack of institutional control."
UNM plans to respond to the allegations in writing by Dec. 7. After that, the university will have a hearing before the NCAA Infractions Committee in the spring of 2008.
"We've done, I believe, everything in our power to fully cooperate with the NCAA," Krebs said, later noting, "Intentional violations of NCAA rules is simply something that no athletic program can tolerate."
UNM has retained outside counsel to help in the investigation.
The Lobos were en route to Tucson for a game Saturday night at Arizona. Long was unavailable for comment.
"You all know Rocky in this room," Krebs said at the Friday news conference. "Nobody loves this university more. I'm convinced that he would never, ever do anything intentionally to hurt this university."
 
Guerrero Grades: Utah
By BruinCore Section: Diaries
Posted on Sun Sep 16, 2007 at 10:32:06 AM EDT
</I>


Bumped. GO BRUINS -N

cross-posted from DumpDorrell.com
This may be a pointless exercise from here on out, but we will stick with it because we must be relentless until the outcome (Dorrell is fired) is secure. For those who are new to DD or are coming back after a hiatus, we have been using Dan Guerrero's own words to assess Dorrell's performance during the season. Here is what Guerrero said he expects this season:
"The important thing this year," Guerrero said, "is that we don't beat ourselves, that we play with consistency, that we're an excellent second half team and that we improve as the year progresses."


As we posted last week and will continue to do throughout the season, here is our assessment of Karl Dorrell's performance yesterday against Utah with Guerrero's clear points of analysis in mind (obviously this won't be surprising):

  1. We don't beat ourselves. Grade: F. 5 Turnovers, 10 penalties, 5 sacks, unprepared, unfocused, outschemed, outcoached, outgamed. Self-mutilation.
  2. Play with consistency. Grade F. There was consistency today. We are sure Dan Guerrero did not have this type of consistency in mind when he spoke about needing it. There was only 1 drive and play that looked good ... the long pass to Marcus Everett in the 3rd quarter that could have made a 17-6 game closer. But the fumble touchback killed any hope that was left at that point. We played consistently and thoroughly badly throughout the game so the obvious grade is an F here.
  3. Excellent 2nd half team. Grade F -. We are breaking convention and assigning the minus grade here to Dorrell. What the heck did he say during halftime to bring our senior-heavy experience-rich team down??!! What de-motivational speech did he give??? Outscored 27-0 in the second half by an 0-2 MWC team reeling from key player losses, playing with the backup QB is a break in convention that deserves the F-.
  4. Improve as year progresses. Grade F-. While we are using it ... F- again. Our #11 ranking we knew was a joke (look at our BlogPoll ballot). Dorrell has never EARNED anything but that SuC win. That is it. The rest of his victories any one of us could have gotten using sheer talent alone. He was OUTCOACHED period!! What team, what coach, is going to lose to Dorrell now?? All the game film out there this year already, even our Stanford win, amounts to about as easy a recipe as there is in college football to beat a BCS conference team. What coach loses sleep when he has to meet Karl Dorrell for their next game??
 
Top 10 Teams Against the Line (L3Gs)
1. LSU (120.33)
2. Cincy (119)
3. Oklahoma (114.33)
4. Oregon (112.67)
5. Florida (108.5)
6. WVU (107)
7. Kansas (106)
8. Purdue (105.5)
9. Texas Tech (105)
10. Kentucky (99)
10. USC (99)

Worst 10 Teams Against the Line (L3Gs)
1. Tulane (46)
2. North Texas (50)
3. Rice (51.5)
4. Syracuse (52.33)
5. SMU (53)
6. Temple (55)
7. SJSU (56.67)
8. Toledo (59)
9. Utah St (60.67)
10. Northern Illinois (61)
 
USA Today Top 25 Coaches’ Poll - 9/16/07

by Brian Sakowski @ 1:49 pm. Filed under College Football News
<!-- meta -->
Rank Team (first-place votes) Record Points Last week
1. Southern California (44) 2-0
2. LSU (8) 3-0 1,
3. Florida (7) 3-0
4. Oklahoma (1) 3-0
5. West Virginia 3-0
6. Texas 3-0
7. Wisconsin 3-0
8. California 3-0
9. Ohio State 3-0
10. Penn State 3-0
11. Rutgers 3-0
12. Boston College 3-0
13. Oregon 3-0
14. (tie) South Carolina 3-0
14. (tie) Clemson 3-0
16. Texas A&M 3-0
17. Virginia Tech 2-1
18. Hawaii 3-0
19. Louisville 2-1
20. Alabama 3-0
21. Georgia 2-1
22. Nebraska 2-1
23. Kentucky 3-0
24. South Florida 2-0
25. Missouri 3-0
Dropped out
Dropped out: No. 11 UCLA (2-1, lost to Utah 44-6), No. 15 Georgia Tech (2-1, lost to then-No. 19 Boston College 24-10), No. 16 Arkansas (1-1, lost to then-unranked Alabama 41-38), No. 24 Tennessee (1-2, lost to No. 3 Florida 59-20).
Others receiving votes
Others receiving votes: Arkansas 143; Georgia Tech 143; Texas Tech 142; UCLA 122; Arizona State 67; Purdue 40; Michigan State 21; Cincinnati 20; Boise State 14; Florida State 7; Air Force 6; Tennessee 4; Washington 4.
 
Sunday Morning Quarterback
By SMQ
Posted on Sun Sep 16, 2007 at 01:42:57 PM EDT
</I>


Real quickly:
<TABLE cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=3><TBODY><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #e6e3a3"><TD align=middle>Time</TD><TD align=middle>Plays</TD><TD align=middle>Yards</TD><TD align=middle>1st Downs</TD><TD align=middle>Result</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>1:22</TD><TD align=middle>3</TD><TD align=middle>-13</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD><TD align=middle>Punt</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>0:42</TD><TD align=middle>2</TD><TD align=middle>-14</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD><TD align=middle>Fumble</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>3:17</TD><TD align=middle>6</TD><TD align=middle>-5</TD><TD align=middle>1</TD><TD align=middle>Punt</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>1:37</TD><TD align=middle>4</TD><TD align=middle>13</TD><TD align=middle>1</TD><TD align=middle>Fumble</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>1:34</TD><TD align=middle>4</TD><TD align=middle>9</TD><TD align=middle>1</TD><TD align=middle>Interception</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>3:10</TD><TD align=middle>7</TD><TD align=middle>5</TD><TD align=middle>2</TD><TD align=middle>Punt</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>2:13</TD><TD align=middle>3</TD><TD align=middle>9</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD><TD align=middle>Punt</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>0:25</TD><TD align=middle>2</TD><TD align=middle>2</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD><TD align=middle>End of Half</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>4:21</TD><TD align=middle>6</TD><TD align=middle>11</TD><TD align=middle>1</TD><TD align=middle>Punt</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>1:41</TD><TD align=middle>5</TD><TD align=middle>12</TD><TD align=middle>1</TD><TD align=middle>Punt</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>1:15</TD><TD align=middle>3</TD><TD align=middle>-2</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD><TD align=middle>Punt</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=middle>0:35</TD><TD align=middle>0</TD><TD align=middle>19</TD><TD align=middle>1</TD><TD align=middle>Interception</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>2:39</TD><TD align=middle>6</TD><TD align=middle>38</TD><TD align=middle>2</TD><TD align=middle>End of Game</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I'm not a Notre Dame hater - in an ND-centric publication I contributed to this offseason, I was described succinctly as the only American football fan who is completely neutral toward the Irish. And it's true.
But that, that that you see immediately above? That is against a defense that yielded 34 points to I-AA and 39 points to a team that could have scored 70 if it had any inclination to the last two weeks. Pardon me, but freshman quarterback or not, new line starters or not, inexperience, good competition, whatever - that is pathetic. In three games, Notre Dame has amassed -6 yards rushing. Completely pathetic.
Onwards...
SMQ WATCHED...
...with various degrees of vigilance... ALABAMA 41 • ARKANSAS 38
- - -
Mike Patrick's closing spiel concerned Alabama "waking up the echoes," but I don't know what Alabama victory in the past this one was supposed to echo. Never in Crimson Tide history has a team had an identity as anything but a fundamentally sound, trench-tough, run-and-defense-centered team, but Saturday was the exact opposite of that. `Bama had 327 on 45 passes, well over half its total snaps, while yielding 301 on the ground to the unstoppable force that is the Arkansas running game. Terry Grant was effective, especially early on, but by the time the Razorbacks went up for the first time midway through the fourth quarter, the physical dominance that has always been the catalyst of Alabama's success had been thoroughly ceded. There was no real passing threat, and they didn't need one: Arkansas was physically dominating and Saban's defensive ninjas couldn't do anything about it.

78e9e48a_560f_4ec4_a6a7_e367059a53cf.jpg

The man of the hour, but the same defense has to play Georgia next week...
- - -

At that point, Arkansas had scored four touchdowns in a twelve-minute span over the end of the third and first half of the fourth quarters, and it was John Parker Wilson's game to win or lose. I think this is the story for Alabama: taken with Major Applewhite's successful aggression in the first quarter, and Wilson's cool response on Alabama's final two drives, the Tide may well have morphed out of necessity into a passing team.

And the closing drive really was Wilson's finest hour, because Arkansas wasn't in a prevent-you-from-winning umbrella at any point, even after the switch to the zone had stopped the precise dicing Wilson and D.J. Hall administered against man coverage early in the game. Reggie Herring walked his corners up in the receivers' faces throughout the final minutes, brought the heat to Wilson off the edge, and Wilson made the quick, accurate decisions you'd expect of a second-year starter. Earlier, he'd thrown two potentially debilitating picks, one at the start of the fourth quarter that had definitively turned the momentum in Arkansas' favor by setting up the tying touchdown, but moving for the winning touchdown, Wilson completed eight of ten and drew twp flags for pass interference, a near-perfect finish when his team had no other options.
• Houston Nutt had better have a good explanation for sitting Darren McFadden on Arkansas' last real possession, when it relied on third-stringer Michael Smith to run out the clock. Smith was good for one first down, a really impressive run on 3rd-and-4 that bought the Razorbacks, total, 28 seconds between two timeouts and an incomplete pass and their next punt. McFadden never put on his helmet, and Felix Jones, who started the drive, watched Smith finish with a loss of two and a run for no gain after making the lone first down.
• Damn it, ESPN, damn it to hell: next time your network is broadcasting a pivotal game between two very serious, undefeated programs in the SEC, and that game is tied in the fourth quarter, do not rely on a member of the U.S. women's soccer team in freaking China to bring your attention back to said game, the one you force your announcers to momentarily pretend is not unfolding in front of their faces. I may not have the means to start a boycott that anyone will notice, but to whatever extent possible, the next time something like this happens, there will be ramifications for advertisers. Somehow, even if it's only personal, symbolic vengeance. I understand the network is trying to cross-promote the stupid World Cup - the one that virtually no person in America, especially an SEC football fan, has the slightest sliver of interest in - but there is no excuse for that worthless interview at that point in a tense game. Shame.
FLORIDA 59 • TENNESSEE 20
- - -
The Vols' complete lack of defensive prowess was expected, but not to such an absurd extent as that. After a slow start, Tebow really is a force of nature: 14 of 19, 299 yards, two laser-guided deep touchdowns. The bullet third down throw he made en route to a key touchdown in the second quarter, while falling down, with no base from which to propel or guide the ball, was unreal. The one mistake he made, that briefly gave Tennessee some hope in the third, wasn't even his fault: Riley Cooper bailed on the square-in, giving Eric Berry an easy pick.
That's the only ***** I see in Florida's offense. Friday, I vowed to keep an eye on the Gators' offensive creativity, which was overrated for the better part of Urban Meyers' first two seasons but started to show in the stretch run to last year's championship. The versatility was blatantly obvious to a blind man Saturday: with Tebow, the defense has no choice but to respect the middle, even if - especially if - the rest of the speed players are spread out all over the place; his presence alone gives UF a power running game, essentially an extra player in the backfield when a simple hesitation, one little step forward, suffices for play-action without sacrificing the running back in the fake. You hear this rhetoric all the time, but with Tebow's arm, bullish running mentality and stockpiles of speed all around him, this offense as much as any I can remember really does force defenses to cover the entire field. This is a luxury very few quarterbacks can provide, and, when it comes to using Percy Harvin as the anti-Tebow dagger in the running game, very few receivers, too. He and Tebow combined for 136 yards rushing on 27 carries, and they're both just sophomores. • I do think we learned a little less about the Gator defense, which played well - only 13 points allowed, and under 300 yards - but for the most part faced a predictable Tennessee offense forced to throw early on. The Vol offensive line had no push whatsoever, but this isn't surprising given Tennessee's ongoing struggles up front, and a team that can manage to make some gains on the line of scrimmage (maybe LSU?) will present far greater challenges. Man, those kids still look really good over there, though.

023700dc_4701_4e6b_8d01_8f82dd261633.jpg

The nightmare descends with a smile...
- - -

• Good insight by Gary Danielson: Erik Ainge caused Arian foster's killer fumble in the third quarter by trying to hand the ball backwards, as a lefty, because of the injury to his right pinky. This was a critical momentum play, after Berry's interception made it a one-score game and the defense had responded with a stop, and Dustin Doe's touchdown return opened the floodgates. There's no way Ainge can go on claiming the pinky isn't affecting him when he's attempting backward, extremely fundamentally un-sound handoffs that lead directly to opponent touchdowns.

MICHIGAN STATE 17 • PITTSBURGH 13
- - -
It was funny, in the post-game, when Mark Dantonio was asked about the "turning point" in the Spartans' win. "I don't know," he said, "was there a turning point? I thought we just kinda hung on there."
He was right in the sense that MSU never relinquished its lead, but if there was a late moment that turned the game, it was probably a holding call on Pittsburgh with about eight minutes to play. Down 14-13, the Panthers had just held Michigan State in a goal-to-go situation - on a terrible, predictable third down flood call by MSU that put too many receivers in too small a space in that part of the field, and wasn't blocked to begin with - then blocked the subsequent field goal attempt and quickly moved into scoring position by running revelatory tailback LeSean McCoy from the shotgun in Wildcat-esque fashion - McCoy and receiver T.J. Porter, on a 31-yard speed sweep that added a 15-yard facemask penalty, picked up 57 yards on three plays, down to the MSU eight. On first down there, though, Pitt was hit with a 15-yard facemask of its own, and the doom of a 1st-and-25 situation with Kevan Smith at quarterback was obvious. Smith threw an incomplete pass under pressure that should have been intercepted, and the Panthers conceded a potential go-ahead touchdown by running McCoy on second and third-and-long. As ever, overall penalties do not matter - Michigan State was penalized in this one eleven times for 125 yards - but situational penalties, if your offense is one-dimensional and bound to staying in front of down-and-distance, do.
• As mentioned, Pitt has serious quarterback issues, so much so that, when it got the ball back on its own 31, down 17-13 with 2:54 remaining and no timeouts, I wrote: "Can't throw well enough to move for a TD." As it turned out, I was wrong: Smith completed a well-conceived 19-yard pass Darrell Strong and then, improbably, a 26-yard completion to Marcel Pestano on fourth-and-17 as he was falling over two MSU linemen at his feet. Instead, the Panthers couldn't block - Smith was in 4th-and-17 because Jonal Saint-Dic had abused Pitt's right tackle on consecutive plays, causing a fumble on second down and forcing Smith into another loss on third. After the redshirt freshman made his best throw of the day on the fourth down conversion, all hope for anything but a hail mary was lost when Kaleb Thornhill sacked Smith again back at the MSU 40. The hail mary didn't work.
• Pittsburgh has ostensibly found the running back it's been missing in Dave Wannstedt's tenure - and brother, do they need him - but Michigan State couldn't have made the 64-yard touchdown run McCoy broke in the first quarter any easier. The Panthers faked a run right with McCoy while bring a split end around for the now-standard fake reverse action to the left, then running a counter to McCoy back to the left. It's a well-conceived play, and one MSU was determined to see go the distance - the linebackers bit hard on the initial fake to McCoy, easily getting caught in the wash, while the playside end flew upfield to handle the reverse, leaving a massive hole for McCoy to accelerate through to the secondary. No one laid a hand on him, or came close, really.
It should be noted that this is just about all Pitt accomplished offensively in the first half - the Panthers punted four times and Smith threw two interceptions, one returned for a touchdown.
• The numbers don't completely bear this out - MSU ran for 144 yards on just 2.8 per carry- but my sense was that the Spartans could pound Pitt's defensive line into submission if they commited to the run. But they didn't, really, although Javon Ringer (92 yards on 4.6 per carry) and genocide-surviving short-yardage mauler Jehuu Caulcrick (71 on 3.4) wound up with 41 carries between them. When the Spartans handed off, they were largely effective. When they passed, Brian Hoyer was largely sacked - six times, not accounting for hurries. The Panthers' smaller quicker line missed starting tackle Gus Mustakas against the run, but MSU didn't commit to exploiting that advantage up front. Glimpses
- - -
• It was inevitable that Louisville's defense was going to cost the Cardinals a game, but did it have to be as blatantly pathetic as that? Bill Curry is disgusted by a lot of things, way too many things - it's like crying wolf, really - but his bafflement over how the Cardinal secondary lets a man run completely free down the sideline with a two-point lead in the final minute is seconded. What happened? What could have possibly happened, other than sheer indifference, that allows highly-trained athletes to give themselves up so freely to defeat?

0ace5851_4230_4177_8237_a7b964d3e1c7.jpg

Doesn't know what happened to Louisville's coverage, either.
- - -
• Texas should be rolling, but again it struggles with a very beatable team for the third consecutive week. The second half success against TCU does not appear to have affected a significant turnaround. Also: Mack Brown's teeth are really yellow.

• Matt Ryan: 30-44 for 435 and no picks with no supporting running game against Jon Tenuta's swarming, quarterback-mauling bandits? Let us agree that you are for real, sir. Oh yeah, and the BC defense: held Tashard Choice to 31 on 15 carries, putting the game on inexperienced Taylor Bennett. That helps.
Boston College ravaged its three-game opening conference run and now has a stretch against Army, UMass, Bowling Green and Notre Dame. The Eagles visit Virginia Tech in late October, probably 7-0 and probably ranked in the top ten for the first time since...when? Flutie? Longer?
• Washington had all the momentum on Ohio State after scoring seconds before halftime, going up 7-3, then taking the opening possesion of the second half into field goal range to go up a full touchdown. OSU proceeded to block the kick, immediately launch a bomb to Brian Robiskie to regain the lead, force a fumble on the ensuing kickoff, and ride Beanie Wells over the shattered psyche of everyone in Husky Stadium. The air went out of that place in a hurry, and maybe Washington's season - U-Dub has consecutive games with UCLA and USC to salvage its confidence.
• I have very little to take away from USC's ass-kicking night in Lincoln other than "OMG dominance!!," since I turned at halftime to drama on the higher channels and didn't come back, but what was the call on Rey Maulauga on the Nebraska field goal attempt on 4th-and-2 in the first quarter, which set up an early tying touchdown? "Disconcerting"? Unless that's code for calling out the snap count - usually identified by officials as "calling out the snap count" - I have no idea what happened in that potentially crucial situation. Sketchy.
And John David Booty didn't look very much like a candidate for the Trophy Which Must Not Be Named, did he? Though Stafon Johnson and every other Trojan back certainly did behind that offensive line. OMG dominance!!
Upwards...
Shocked. Shocked!
Attempting to explain upsets and other nonsense
- - -
On the Saturday Michigan started to shrug the gorilla from its back, three of its conference comrades took stunning nose dives:
• Minnesota officially hit rock bottom Saturday at Florida Atlantic, not only turning the ball over four times in five possessions in the first half - the Gophers had seven giveaways for the game - but also allowing touchdown drives of 69, 80, 99, 61 and 43 yards for a neat, damning 35-14 hole after just two quarters. Again, to Florida Atlantic. Minnesota came flying back with four scoring drives in the second half, but threw an interception on its last gasp drive in the final minute and lost 42-39. To Florida Atlantic.
The Owls emerged from the smoking debris of the Gopher defense with 580 yards total offense, 463 passing, and no turnovers. Three games into the Tim Brewster administration, Minnesota is 1-2 and allowing more than 550 yards per game to FAU, Bowling Green and Miami, Ohio.
• Iowa State was neck-and-neck with Syracuse and Stanford for the title of "Worst Major Conference Program" after relatively bad losses to Kent State and I-AA Northern Iowa, and so of course completely stifled undefeated Iowa Saturday in a 15-13 upset. Hey, anything can happen in these rivalry games! And almost did: the Cyclones' go-ahead field goal went through with one second on the clock, and ISU proceeded to give up a 65-yard return with no time on the clock on the ensuing kickoff. They finally brought down Derrell Johnson-Koulianos at the twenty-five.
• Northwestern moved the ball as expected against completely hapless Duke - the Wildcats had 508 total yards and six drives of 58 yards or longer - and completely shut down the Devil offense after three long, surprising touchdown drives in the first half. But this one is explainable: Northwestern threw two interceptions and turned the ball over on downs after marches of 67, 61, 79 and 58 yards, the latter a final flame-out in a goal-to-go situation for the tying/winning touchdown. And thus the Devils' epic losing streak ends at 25 games against I-A opponents.
There's nothing that shocking about Utah beating UCLA, in general, but there is only one explanation for the team that was blown out by Oregon State and downed by Air Force in its first two games to utterly destroy a top 15 team by 38 points: turnovers. Five, to be exact. The Bruins and Utes were virtually dead even in total yardage - Utah had 386, UCLA 373 - but the Utes' Brett Ratliff had three touchdowns and no interceptions, where Ben Olson threw three interceptions and no touchdowns. The end result of that is 44-6.
• In one sense, Auburn's self-destruction vindicates my skepticism about the Tigers' in the preseason:
  • Al Borges typically does a good job, but the entire operation broke down with Kenny Irons' ankle injury early in the year, and Brandon Cox never found a rhythm. God, he never had time - against decent defenses, Washington State sacked Cox four times, LSU four times, South Carolina three, Arkansas six, Florida five, Georgia four, Alabama two and Nebraska five in the bowl game; that's four sacks a game against everybody's who's not Arkansas State, Tulane and Buffalo. And on top of that debacle of protection, four members of this year's line will be new. These are dark times.
    - - -
But even that cynicism didn't descend to the level of losing to Mississppi State when the Bulldogs' quarterbacks combined to complete 5 of 18 passes for 41 yards. Again, to intentionally repeat the repetitive beat of repetition: it's all about turnovers. Auburn outgained MSU by 110 ten yards, but the Tigers had five giveaways, the Bulldogs only one. And so Mississippi State is 2-1, and Auburn is 1-2. • Guess what was behind Oklahoma State's 41-23 loss to Troy Friday night? Well, horrible defense, yes - the Trojans racked up 562 yards - but also, turnovers! OSU could not stop Troy at all, which is kind of shocking in the sense that the talent differential should allow the Cowboys to hold a Sun Belt offense (even a very good offense, by SBC standards) to 400 at most, right? So a lot of guilt falls on the OK State defense, and credit to the Troy O, etc. But it's a different game, too, if the OSU offense doesn't turn the ball over five times or fail to score on drives of 77, 43 and 63 yards and another that began on the Troy 21 in the first half.
8a6ea488_a1b5_4a19_86af_5a1772e9d261.jpg

The house of turnovers fell on the wicked witch of defeat!
- - -

Conceit...
SMQ was right about: Friday's picks went 12-4 straight-up, but I'm most proud by far of the upset pick of New Mexico at ten-point favorite Arizona:
  • UNM's Rodney Ferguson has been a workhorse and is on pace to run for 1,500 yards, which doesn't exactly count as exploiting a weakness, since UA's held up okay against lesser backs early on, but it should be effective in keeping the ball out of the hands of Willie Tuitama, if he's going to do much with it when gets it, anyway. Competent Mountain West teams - which should include the Lobos - have matched up well with the Pac Ten the last couple years; Mike Stoops, specifically, is 1-3 against the MWC in his tenure, the struggles stemming in every case from the Wildcats' ongoing inability to score...
    [...]
    New Mexico 23 • Arizona 18
Tuitama threw for a career-high 446 yards in his first real display of the promised passing fireworks, but Ferguson ran for 94 yards and the Lobos had a seven-minute time of possession advantage in a 29-27 win.
Elsewhere, I projected a final score of Boise State 24, Wyoming 14. Actual final score: Boise State 27, Wyoming 14. Boston College scored 24 points, as expected, though the Eagles held Georgia Tech to just ten, half the total I predicted.
...and Contrition...
SMQ was wrong about: The "visibly sinking ship" of Iowa State and Utah are addressed above with appropriate levels of incredulity as evidence of my pre-weekend opinion on those teams. Elsewhere, I cautioned against panic concerning Louisville's defense when in fact panic was a completely justified, accurate response to the Cardinals' defensive meltdown against Middle Tennessee. I was right about Oregon winning straight up over Fresno State, but you would have lost money if you'd bet on my advice to take the Bulldogs against the 17-point spread; Oregon won by a helthy 31 points. Luckily nobody would put money on anything I said, right? Right? The Crunch
Interesting and Not Necessarily Relevant Stats
- - -
Malzahnification: BYU and Tulsa combined for 44 points in the second quarter alone, and for 1,300 total yards and 59 first downs in the game. The Cougars got off 94 snaps for 694 yards, but gave the ball away four times and lost, 55-47 ... Indiana quarterback Kellen Lewis had 199 yards rushing on 11 yards per carry in the Hoosiers' win over Akron ... Virginia out-possessed North Carolina almost two-to-one, 39:14 to 20:46, but only won on a failed two-point conversion by UNC with 1:57 left in the fourth quarter ... Illinois had three different players over 90 yards rushing against Syracuse, all of them on more than seven yards per carry. The Illini also matched its win total in each of Ron Zook's first two seasons ... Cincinnati's turnover parade continued: the Bearcats collected four takeaways from Miami, Ohio, in a 47-10 rout ... Purdue had five possessions for 295 yards and four touchdowns in the first quarter against Central Michigan. That's 10.5 yards per play ... Furman outgained Clemson and held C.J. Spiller to -1 yard rushing in a four-touchdown loss ... Tyrod Taylor threw for 287 yards in his first start, but zero touchdowns or interceptions against Ohio U. of Ohio ... Wake Forest won 21-10 despite a meager 213 yards total offense against Army. The Deacons scored touchdowns on punt and interception returns in the first half ... Navy had an incredible 521 yards rushing on eight yards per carry against Ball State, and lost in overtime ... A week after gaining more than 550 yards at Louisville, Middle Tennessee was outgained 505-90 in a shutout loss at LSU ... Colt Brennan held under 300 yards! Brennan went 26-32 for 298 and two touchdowns (no picks) in Hawaii's 42-14 win at UNLV ... Wow: perpetually awful Stanford gained 506 yards in a shutout win over San Jose State, a team that ran 342 against the Cardinal last year. Stanford backup running back Toby Gerhart gained 140 yards on 11.7 per carry.
 
Team Grades: Week 3


<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD>With another great week in the books, who passed and failed this weeks' test?


A+:

Troy-After a 41-23 pounding of over hyped Oklahoma State, the Trojans should be well on their way to a Sun Belt title. They did play great for themselves and knocked out a good Big 12 South team. They racked up 562 yards of offense.

Cincinnati-Now becoming a mainstay in the A range, the Bearcats ended last week with yet another dominating performance. They defeated Miami OH 47-10 with 438 yards offensively.

Purdue-I'm usually a Boilermaker skeptic whenever any unnecessary hype gets put on their shoulders (which hasn't happened this year). I love what I'm seeing from Purdue. I love the offense and, more importantly, the defense has stepped it up. Last year, they let Miami OH and Ball State score on them and they also had Indiana State (INDIANA STATE) score 35 points. Curtis Painter had a huge day.

USC-There we go! That's what we're looking for out of USC. The Trojans only won by 18 which doesn't look like a full-scale blowout, but they had their way with Nebraska. Most of those scores came late in the game.

Duke-Hey, give these guys an A+. If you haven't heard, they snapped their 22-game losing streak to, whom else, a Big 10 team in Northwestern. They played pretty well too.

Kansas State-They were only playing Missouri State, but Missouri State has a good offense. They couldn't even hit the 200 yard mark against Ron Prince's defense. Kudos to K-State on the 61-10 victory.

Utah-The Utes closed out their game against UCLA scoring 37 consecutive points. The Bruins gave them 5 turnovers and they never missed an opportunity to win. The stats are pretty close, but the Bruins never capitalized at all and Utah did every time. It came down to execution. I had Utah winning this game before the season started, but after their play due to injuries, I backed off this even being fathomable. This is probably the stunner of the week, but I can't say it enough, UCLA was the most overrated team in the country this year. They will never even see the light of cracking the top 10 this year again.

Nevada-After a slow start to begin the game against Nicholls State, they turned up the heat outscoring them 51-7 after opening the game 10-0 in favor of the Colonels. From what I saw, Nevada was a bit confused by their option game at first but they shut them down afterwards. Nicholls State tried one pass all game (incomplete).

Oklahoma-Yeah, they're playing Utah State...But is this offense unbelievable? Another 600 yard day in the books. Bradford was excellent but he (gasp!) threw an INT! No way. They're in trouble now.

Florida-They thumped Tennessee by 39 points in their 59-20 victory. Who said the Gator defense couldn't play? They kept Tennessee below 300 yards, even in comeback mode. The offense racked up 550+.

Rutgers-The Scarlet Knights only led the Spartans of Norfolk State 3-0 heading into the 2nd quarter. But they did head into halftime up 45-0. I think Ray Rice could've been better against a team like NSU, but I'm sure the fans'll take it. Schiano was criticized by Spartan QB, Casey Hansen for not playing "sportsmanlike" after calling timeouts near the end of the 1st half. You could make a case, but I think the first half is fair game. During a second half of a blowout, you should just keep the ball on the ground and put your 3rd stringers in which is pretty much what happened.


A:

Texas Tech-They beat up pretty good on Rice. Graham Harrell lit them up for 6 TDs. Rice's defense is horrible, but give some credit to Texas Tech's offense. They probably have the best offensive team in the nation. Even so, it's kind of hard to tell by playing SMU, UTEP, and Rice.

Arkansas State-These guys are for real. They sprang upon SMU early for a 21-0 lead after one. They let SMU creep back into it, but the nail in the coffin came in the 4th quarter. They killed SMU with balance in this game. 13 penalties though keeps them from getting an A+.

Missouri-You almost have to feel sorry for Western Michigan's defense. They were supposed to have a pretty good one, but they have one of the worst statistical ones after facing West Virginia, Indiana, and Missouri. The Tigers wound up with 619 yards of offense. People, please, start using "Heisman" and "Chase Daniel" together more often. They are one weird team though. They start by getting a huge lead and then they hit the snooze button for about a quarter. This allowed Illinois, Ole Miss, and Western to get back into the game. This is a disturbing trend that won't work against the likes of Texas Tech or Nebraska.

Florida Atlantic-Does this show how good FAU is or how horrible Minnesota is? Like most of the wishy-washy analysts that never give you anything concrete say, it's a little bit of both. Now, the game wasn't on TV so I couldn't see it (ESPN360), but the Gophers didn't secure the football and that's where this game was lost. Even so, Rusty Smith had a monster day eating the putrid Gopher secondary alive for 463 yards! They also had 117 yards on the ground. This should make for a good Sun Belt race with Troy, FAU, and Arkansas State looking solid at times.

UCF-What a shame. Maybe it was just me, but did anyone else notice that the Texas defender was OUT OF BOUNDS when he "recovered" the fumble from Kyle Israel? It's a shame, because we'll never know what could've happened if UCF responded on that drive. They battled Texas down to the wire with a 35-32 loss, but they couldn't recover the onside kick. UCF is one of the best non-BCS teams out there this season as evidenced by their win over NC State.

Eastern Michigan-Even though Northern Illinois is a very bad team this year, EMU's offense finally got going, which is a promising sign. They out gained Northern Illinois which is pretty impressive considering the dilapidated situation that is Eastern Michigan football. Looks like they'll win two games this year instead of one!

Oregon-The Ducks were awesome, but I saw Fresno State shooting themselves in the foot far too often.

LSU-The Tigers didn't dominate this game as badly as they could have, but anytime you out gain a team 505-90, you're doing something right. Ryan Perrilloux filled in admirably for the injured Flynn and they're going to trust the what-was-a-potential-4-time-Heisman-winner's arm.

Boston College-The Eagles were amazing with a thorough beating of Georgia Tech. The Eagles racked up the yardage compiling 527 of them with 435 of them through the air against Georgia Tech's defense. Very impressive day at the office.

West Virginia-The Mountaineers ran all over Maryland on Thursday. Noel Devine was awesome with 136 yards on 5 carries. Maryland hung with them for a while before the West Virginia running game got rolling. West Virginia finally had a good day on defense.

Air Force-The Falcons didn't look all that great, but I will say that they closed the night on a roll outscoring TCU 20-7. TCU missed a FG and couldn't score in OT. Air Force should be in for a nice season.



A-:

Temple-B.S. If anybody saw the end of this game, they'd be mad as well. The Owls hung in there with heavily favored UConn. This is also coming off of a 42-7 drubbing from Buffalo. As expected, we're going to get these erratic performance all year long due to their extreme youth. But back to that TOUCHDOWN, the Temple WR went up and re-tapped, if you will, his left foot. He was clearly in the endzone. I can understand how the official missed the call on the field because he was so close, but after reviewing it, the ruling should have never stood. The tragic irony of it all? Temple lost the game by 5 points. If it's ruled a TD, pretty much game over. I think there was fewer than 40 seconds on the clock at the time. And it took a gutsy call from Al Golden to do it with the WR reverse pass. What a shame.

Mississippi State-They played okay, but Auburn's great defense shut them down. Of course, the difference, again, was Auburn turnovers. One of the five turnovers went back for a Derek Pegues TD. That's where this game was lost..........again. Auburn is a horrible offensive football team. Regardless, they beat a superior team which gives them an A-.

Iowa State-They defeated their main rival Iowa on a last-second FG. And Culbertson beat the Hawkeyes with his legs, 5 times to be exact. After ISU opened up the game 12-0, you knew Iowa was going to win when they scored 13 points in a row. However, the Cyclones came out on top and this was no fluke. Iowa got outplayed.

Ohio State-These guys took on a solid Washington club and beat them into submission starting in the 2nd half. They forced Locker to toss 3 picks, the turning point of the game also came by way of INT when Locker tried a horrible shovel pass that got intercepted in the redzone. At least they weren't sleepwalking like they were against Youngstown State and Akron.

Ball State-Even though they gave up 521 yards on the ground, Ball State's offense responded in awesome fashion. They pretty much blew Navy away running with the football. Nate Davis also had a nice game and the Cardinals are off to a fast 2-1 start.

Michigan-This is the Michigan football team we're used to seeing. Grind it out on the ground and play great defense. Mallett didn't look good (especially when the unathletic lug tried to catch a WR pass lol), but he did what he had to do as a true freshman. Although I will say they can't beat Penn State playing like they did this week.

Clemson-Cullen Harper is bound to have a great season. He lit up the Purple Paladin secondary with a 16-19 completion rate and 266 yards passing. Also, he tossed 3 TDs. The Clemson ground game never really got going with only 60 yards rushing. They let the Furman offense do waaaaaaaaaay too much.

Kansas-Also starting to find themselves in this spot every week, the Jayhawks of Kansas demolished another MAC West foe in Toledo. Reesing had a nice game even though is completion percentage wasn't all that high. The running game got going for Kansas and that was the difference in the ballgame.

Stanford-The Cardinal rolled on through which, I think is safe to say, a horrible San Jose State team. They dominated big-time with a 343 yard differential. Stanford isn't a horrible team this year, we'll give them that.

Kentucky-While we probably expected a few more points, it was a great shootout. The Wildcats came to play and the homefield advantage pushed them through, upsetting Louisville in Lexington. Andre Woodson hit a Steve Johnson right after an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty pushed the Wildcats back 15 yards. Impressive team, Kentucky is.


B+:

Army-Give the Black Knights some credit for sticking with Wake Forest for a while. Believe it or not, Army did out gain Wake.

Tulsa-They won the game, but they didn't do it with any kind of defense. The offense was spectacular in this game. 454 yards passing came from Paul Smith who, obviously, had a huge day. I give them a B+ for their offensive performance. Their defense didn't do too much because.....

BYU-The Cougars had 694 yards of offense! Wow. Even so, I give both Tulsa and BYU B+'s because of how well the offense slugged it out. For those of you who love shootouts, be mad at yourself for missing this 55-47 win for the Golden Hurricane.

Alabama-Wow. That was a gutsy win for the Crimson Tide. My family is from Arkansas so I'm a semi-Arkansas fan and watching it hurt a little bit. But I couldn't help but be impressed from what Nick Saban's bunch did last night.

Arkansas-Even though they blew it at the end with horrible coverage and two pass interference calls, the Hogs played Bama to a draw. Arkansas had 450 yards to Alabama's 450 yards. Alabama had 2 more first downs than Arkansas did. Each team had the same amount of penalties (although Alabama had more yards tacked on). They were each 7-16 on 3rd downs. TOP was won by Alabama by about 2 minutes. It was a very evenly-matched game and being on the road kept Arkansas from winning the game.

Texas A&M-I guess I have to give the Aggies a B+ for winning by 40 points, but that defense is bad. UL Monroe has a good offense........for a Sun Belt team! Come on, they gave up 215 yards on the ground against Calvin Dawson and Kinsmon Lancaster. Even though he is a great back and even though UL Monroe has the best line in the Sun Belt, A&M shouldn't be pushed around like that. They did get 547 yard of offense though.

Cal-They dominated Louisiana Tech, but they didn't really.........dominate them. If you catch my drift. Louisiana Tech should've been put away faster and easier than they were. It was 28-12 in the 3rd quarter. Maybe the Bulldogs just carried some momentum from the Hawaii game, I don't know.

Louisiana Tech-Give the Bulldogs some credit as well. They came into Berkely, no, not just to view Hippies in the Oak Trees, but they came into play. So far, it looks like Derek Dooley might have something brewing in Ruston. It'll take a while until they play for a bowl game, but he's setting the foundation for some good things (although Jack Bicknell's firing was uncalled for!).

Illinois-Part of their 41-10 win over Syracuse was due to the Orange being downright horrible, but the Illini played pretty well and did what they had to do. Juice made some throws (for once). Tell you what, his ability to complete passes has improved.

Indiana-It took the Hoosiers a little while, but they did finally put Akron away. Kellen Lewis had a big day. He was also the team's leading rusher. This is the best QB that nobody outside Big 10 country has paid any attention to. Their defense wasn't even close to doing well yesterday.

Hawaii-Just another day at the office for Hawaii. Although Colt Brennan probably just lost the Heisman. He needed a huge day against UNLV and he didn't get it. Of course he was playing with a bum ankle, but the Heisman voters don't really pay attention to that stuff. He really does need to turn it up a notch if he is to be a legit Heisman candidate.

Oregon State-Like A&M, they need at least a B+ for winning by 51 points. But what the box score doesn't tell you is that Yvenson Bernard couldn't get going at all. ISU is not a team that should be defending Bernard with ease. Oregon State let the Bengals get 335 yards of offense. The Beavers ran up and down the field on ISU, but Bernard getting stuffed troubles me a little bit.


B:

Houston-The Cougars weren't spectacular, but they got the job done against a sub-par team in Tulane. They did have a 34-3 lead at one point and they won the game 34-10. Case Keenum looks like the guy in charge and he had a solid outing.

Vanderbilt-They beat an average Ole Miss team by 14 in what was a pretty well-played football game. Jackson-Garrison of Vandy ran for 3 TDs and 119 yards on 23 touches. Earl Bennett amassed 50% of Chris Nickson's passing yards. Just a good day for the Commodores.

Memphis-They coasted on past Jacksonville State with a 35-14 win. They had another big day from Martin Hankins but the defense gave up 392 yards, which isn't very promising. This game also had the first female official at the FBS level.

Arizona State-It was a game that you just shrug your shoulders and say, "eh, it was solid." Arizona State is off to a fast start this year sitting at 3-0. They've got a big game next week against Oregon State.

Washington State-The Cougars had a battle on their hands against the Idaho Vandals but they pulled away late. It wasn't anything to brag about, but they got the job done and they're 4 wins away from bowling. Alex Brink had another day at the office.

NC State-These guys got out gained by Wofford, but they get a B for finally getting off of the schneid. Andre Brown had a big day.

Boise State-The Broncos played pretty well and Taylor Tharp didn't lose the game, which a good sign for Boise. Ian Johnson didn't get much going against a tough Wyoming defense. Overall, it was a nice game.

Louisville-The defense shaped up a little bit against Kentucky. The offense didn't play up to their potential. It was a thrilling football game, but again, a missed defensive assignment cost them the W. On the last play, somebody missed their guy and that was the difference.

Southern Miss-The Golden Eagles traded quarters of dominance as they outscored ECU 28-0 in the 2nd and 4th quarters while ECU outscored Southern Miss 21-0 in the 3rd. Jeremy Young ran for 1 yard and a TD giving the Golden Eagles a win in a solid performance.


B-:

New Mexico-They came into Tuscon and defeated Arizona (which should be a common thing this season). The passing game finally came through and, thankfully, they've improved from their opener against UTEP which was a hideous performance.

Arizona-Yeah, I know they lost to New Mexico, but they came back and they played hard in this game. Remember, this grading scale all depends on how teams perform due to expectations and their effort given. Losing the game wasn't a big surprise, even though they did play under their ability. They did give some effort and I saw a team that was really trying to win. The bottom line is that they just need to do the little things better. They're 0-2 vs. the MWC this season.

Virginia Tech-The game wasn't as close as the score indicated, but VT had a tough time putting Ohio away. They turned the ball over twice and Ohio didn't at all which was probably the difference there. Tyrod Taylor had a decent game but Ohio is no ACC defense. Let's keep that in mind.

Ohio-They played decently enough and they hung in there against the Hokies.

Michigan State-Boy, this was the game of missed opportunities. Pitt didn't look that great and Michigan State took advantage of their mistakes. Like I said though, they had some opportunities and they didn't execute.

Akron-I thought Akron played pretty well for themselves. It took Indiana a while to get this pesky team out of the way, but you have to give the Zips some credit.

Virginia-The Cavs finally got some running game going with Cedric Peerman. This was an evenly-played game, but it was nice to see Al Groh's bunch play with a wee bit of enthusiasm.

Kent State-It took the Golden Flashes as while, but they got it going with a 38-7 win over the Hornets of Delaware State. It was only 7-0 at halftime, but Julian Edleman got going and so did Eugene Jarvis. They turned the ball over 4 times, but the defense played well.

New Mexico State-UTEP isn't a very good football team, so this doesn't come off as a surprise at all. Chase Holbrook lit up the Miner secondary. The defense played well enough to give their offense a shot at winning the game. New Mexico State just needs to cash in those yards for more points next time though.

ECU-They played Southern Miss really tight, and that game could've gone either way. It was a solid game from the Pirates.


C+:

Florida State-Ouch. They were 1-13 on 3rd downs! They had the same issue with Clemson. Jimbo Fisher is ticked off and understandably so. FSU's offense is horrible and it all starts with the offensive line. Drew Weatherford is good enough to compete for an ACC title but if you can't block for him, your offense is one-tier better than Notre Dame's.

Nebraska-Can't really blame the Cornhuskers with this one. USC is obviously one of the best teams in the nation, but you'd hope they could hang around a little bit longer. The total yardage wasn't that much different between the two, but USC was up 42-10 at one point.

UTEP-The Miners played New Mexico State pretty tight for most of the game but the couldn't respond to the Holbrook TD pass in the 4th quarter. The Aggies took the lead and UTEP just could've played better than they did.

Pitt-MSU beat Pittsburgh with balance, but the Panthers couldn't get anything going with the passing game. Bill Stull is out and Kevan Smith stepped in and didn't produce. Although to be fair, his WRs didn't help all that much. Rashad Duncan made a lasting impression on me.

Western Kentucky-Not sure if coach Elson smashed the EKU helmet with a hammer or not, but Western Kentucky followed up their demolition of West Virginia Tech with a nice win over the Colonels. Down 3-0 at the half, the Hilltoppers took control of the game and scored 26 points to close it out.

North Carolina-The Tar Heels had almost 400 yards of offense, so whatever Butch Davis is doing is working.

Miami-The Hurricane offense moved the ball but with a degree of ineptitude. Kyle Wright tossed 3 picks and obviously have no answer at QB. The game wasn't really as close as the 23-9 win says it was. The vaunted Hurricane D gave up 264 yards to FIU.

Texas-The Longhorns were average out there yesterday and even though UCF played pretty well, Texas again had some problems putting them away. The fumble recovery never really happened but it took another onside kick recovery to win the game. They need to shape up.

Washington-The Huskies ran into a pretty good Ohio State team, but I was thinking they could put up more of a fight. They turned the ball over 4 times compared to Ohio State's goose egg in that department. I don't think they played up to their potential.

Tennessee-Tennessee figured to put some points on the board against a weakened Florida defense, but that just wasn't the case. They got smoked 59-20 which is a rather disappointing day. But Florida's really good and Tennessee is a bit down this year, so I'll cut them some slack. They couldn't run the ball at all.

Maryland-The Terps got thoroughly dominated, but can you blame them? I was actually pretty impressed with Maryland early on but they just didn't have enough in the tank to beat West Virginia.

Wyoming-It's always tough to beat Boise State on their blue turf, but I don't think they played as well as they could have. They tacked on a late TD and lost 24-14. Taylor Tharp is really bad and I'm surprised that the Wyoming defense didn't make Boise pay for their QB issues. They did a nice job in stopping Ian Johnson though.

San Diego State-Hey, Chuck Long is making some strides at SDSU. Of course Arizona State let up on them a little bit, but if this were last year's team, they'd be smoked about 50-7. Give them some credit, they could find some upsets this year in MWC play.


C:

TCU-Wow. What a disappointment. Is Aaron Brown really that crucial to the team? They did gain over 400 yards, the run defense just didn't come through when the team needed them.

Iowa-Come on. These guys just lost to a team that fell to Kent State and Northern Iowa at Jack Trice Stadium. Strange things happen in rivalry games. They gained 233 yards of offense.

Colorado-Face it, the only reason this game was close was because of FSU's offensive ineptitude. Colorado is a bit inept itself on offense, but I do like Cody Hawkins. He just doesn't have a lot of help around him.

Fresno State-The Bulldogs were a bit disappointing yesterday. After taking on the Aggies and the 12th Man, taking them to triple OT, they got smashed by Oregon. I'm starting to think that last week was a fluke and we're going to be looking at a 5-7 or 6-6 Fresno State team.

Idaho-These guys did some good things against Washington State and they were hanging around for a little while. Nathan Enderle did make some good throws, it seems, but he also misfired 4 times. So far, Idaho has found some things they can build on which is important in Akey's first season.

Navy-The Middies have been one of the more disappointing teams of the season. They were expected to truly be one of the best Navy teams in the Paul Johnson era, but they just don't seem to have "it". Hey, they did get 521 yards on the ground though.

Ole Miss-The Rebels didn't look too sharp against Vandy. The stats don't show that they messed up significantly, they just aren't a good team. But they did give Vanderbilt a run for their money which was expected, so they get a C this week. They had 54 yards rushing.


C-:

Central Michigan-By far, the most disappointing team maybe outside of Michigan. Central last year stood up to Boston College and Kentucky but this year, they got shredded to pieces by Kansas and Purdue. Brian Kelly is probably shaking his head thinking, "Man, I don't think Jones knows what he's doing." That's what I'm doing right now as a Chippewa fan. If Kelly were here, those games would've been much closer. They're a better team than that; Jones has really let the Chippewa faithful down.

Minnesota-I know what you're thinking, "but they lost to Florida Atlantic!" First off, FAU is a solid team (even though that's no excuse for Minnesota). Secondly, keep in mind, a team's effort is a part of this grading scale. Minnesota battled back. They were down 35-14 at halftime. They did this against Bowling Green as well. The game wasn't televised so I don't know what the Minnesota players' attitudes were, but I don't think this team quits and I also think they have a mental blockage of the fact that they're a bad team. They are resilient, but they're bad. Which is the bottom line I guess, but if Brewster can keep this loss from taking the team in the wrong direction, he's doing his job.

Georgia Tech-The Yellow Jackets lost to a dang good football team in Boston College, but I was disappointed by their performance. They're too good to get run over like that offensively. The Yellow Jackets had a bad defensive game. Boston College doesn't have great WRs, but the secondary made it look like the opposite. Tashard Choice was stuffed continually. Maybe I'm being too harsh, but I think they could've played much, much better.

Wake Forest-I think I'm being generous here. Army is one of the worst teams in the FBS and they got out gained. Wake outplayed them a little bit, but the Knights were always within striking distance.

South Carolina-They did beat South Carolina State by 35, but not after 6 turnovers. 3 of those came from Blake Mitchell. They had the same problem in week 1 against UL Lafayette. They seem so lacksidasical against inferior opponents. It wasn't a great performance.


D+:

UConn-The Huskies barely outplayed Temple and got lucky near the end. They need to come out at full force next week against Akron or they'll lose. Akron is better than Temple. Ultimately, it was a sad game for UConn.

Syracuse-The Orange are just really, really bad. Illinois dominated this game from start to finish.

Miami OH-The Redhawks were out gained by 115 yards and they turned the ball over 4 times. Daniel Radabaugh played decent but they are a team decimated by injuries.

Auburn-Brandon Cox got yanked and it still didn't work. Auburn has its work cut out for them. The offense is horrible but give credit to the Tiger defense. They are a special unit; they have no offense whatsoever to work with. They held Mississippi State to 41 yards passing and they still lost.

Northern Illinois-Novak's club has some issues. They were outclassed by Eastern Michigan.

Western Michigan-My personal disappointment of the year (outside of CMU and Michigan). The Broncos have not only lost to Indiana, West Virginia, and Missouri, they were hardly competitive at all. Cubit's got some work to do. Although Tim Hiller threw for 240 yards so I guess that's sort of promising.

UL Monroe-They got blown out by Texas A&M, but the offense was a major plus. Calvin Dawson had a huge day on the ground running for 126 yards on 20 touches.


D:

Tulane-Easy, they got beat up by Houston in a simple win for the Cougs.

Utah State-They were actually pretty competitive at first, but it didn't take long for Oklahoma to take complete control of this game and win 54-3. It's not much of a surprise, but Utah State, with the way they've played against UNLV and Wyoming, could've played it closer. But I guess that's what happens when you're playing one of the best teams in the nation.

Middle Tennessee-Ditto everything about Utah State.

Rice-Yet another trip to the bottom of the Team Grades segment. The Owls have no defense at all. But the offense wasn't bad yesterday with 311 yards.

Florida International-Horrible yet again, but Miami just didn't really care about this game. They knew they were going to win the game when they stepped out onto the field.

Marshall-Any time you lose to an FCS team, you'll find yourself in this range. But instead of getting a D-, I'm going to give Marshall a D for this reason: They came back. It was almost a huge comeback victory because the Thundering Herd headed into halftime down 24-0. They scored 35 points in the 2nd half, but it came to no avail.


D-:

UCLA-Wow, did they play horrible or what? They gave Utah the ball 5 times.

UL Lafayette-It was pretty amazing that they lost to McNeese State by so much. The Cowboys have some defenders that were really effective against the Ragin' Cajun ground game. It also doesn't help that Michael Desormeaux threw 4 picks.

UAB-...............One touchdown against Alcorn State????

SMU-My pick to win the C-USA West? Oh well, forget about it. They have one of the worst defenses at the FBS level. Arkansas State had 516 yards of total offense. Phil Bennett will be gone after this year.

Toledo-Man, these guys are bad.

Northwestern-It's never a good day when you lose to Duke, let's just leave it at that.

San Jose State-Terrible.

Wisconsin-The Badgers should not be struggling with The Citadel. Plain and simple.

Penn State-The Nittany Lions should not be struggling with Buffalo. Plain and simple.

Oklahoma State-The Cowboys should not be struggling with Troy (even though they're pretty good). Plain and simple.

Notre Dame-Wow. Their offensive ability rivals that of Temple's.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
AP Top 25 Poll - 9/16/07

by Brian Sakowski @ 12:47 pm. Filed under College Football News
<!-- meta -->
RANK
1 Southern Cal (46) 2-0
2 LSU (19) 3-0
3 Florida 3-0
4 Oklahoma 3-0
5 West Virginia 3-0
6 California 3-0
7 Texas 3-0
8 Ohio St. 3-0
9 Wisconsin 3-0
10 Penn St. 3-0
11 Rutgers 3-0
12 South Carolina 3-0
13 Oregon 3-0
14 Boston College 3-0
15 Clemson 3-0
16 Alabama 3-0
17 Virginia Tech 2-1
18 Louisville 2-1
19 Hawaii 3-0
20 Texas A&M 3-0
21 Kentucky 3-0
22 Georgia 2-1
23 South Florida 2-0
24 Nebraska 2-1
25 Missouri 3-0
Others receiving votes: Arkansas 179, Georgia Tech 128, Arizona St. 69, Cincinnati 53, UCLA 41, Texas Tech 16, Air Force 8, Purdue 6, Appalachian St. 5, Florida St. 5, Washington 2, Kansas 1, Michigan St. 1, Tulsa 1.
First-place votes in parentheses
 
<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD class=storytitle colSpan=3>Who's Hot & Who's Not - Sept. 16 </TD></TR><TR><TD class=primaryimage vAlign=top>
475145.jpg

Texas Tech WR Michael Crabtree
</TD><TD noWrap width=3></TD><TD vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=4 width="60%" bgColor=#f5f5f5 border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD vAlign=center noWrap>By Pete Fiutak
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Sep 16, 2007
</TD><TD noWrap>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

The hot and not aspects of the college football world this week.
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3>

[SIZE=-1]Past Hot and Not: [/SIZE]Week 1 | Week 2

Who’s Hot …
Texas Tech WR Michael CrabtreeThe redshirt freshman was considered to be the most talented receiver prospect Texas Tech has had under head coach Mike Leach. He's certainly playing like it so far, leading the nation with 38 catches for 538 yards and eight touchdowns. He caught 12 passes for 106 yards and three scores against SMU, 15 for 188 and two touchdowns against UTEP, and 11 for 244 and three scores in this week's win over Rice. Actually, Crabtree is tied for the lead in receptions with ...
Western Michigan WR Jamarko SimmonsThe junior has caught 38 passes for 400 yards and three scores, with 14 grabs for 144 yards and two scores against West Virginia, 14 catches for 158 yards and a score against Indiana, and this week, in a loss to Missouri, ten grabs for 98 yards. If you go back to the regular season finale of last year, when he closed the season catching 13 passes for 172 yards and a score, Simmons has made a whopping 51 catches in his last four games. Central Connecticut State is up next.

Kansas offense
Oklahoma, Florida, Louisville ... Kansas?! Yes, Kansas is among the nation leaders in scoring offense. No, the football team isn't outscoring the hoops team that averaged 78.4 points per game, but after scoring 45 on Toledo, KU is still averaging 53 points per game. How dominant has KU been in its first three games against Central Michigan, SE Louisiana and Toledo? 159 to 20. Florida International is up next before the Big 12 opener at Kansas State.

Cincinnati's defense at forcing mistakes
Florida Atlantic is second in the nation with 13 takeaways in three games. Boston College is third with 11. Leading the way is Cincinnati with a whopping 17 forced turnovers in the first three games with11 interceptions, two more than anyone else, and six recovered fumbles. SE Missouri State lost it five times, with four fumbles, in week one, Oregon State lost it seven times, with six interceptions, in week two, and last week, Miami University turned it over four times in a 47-10 UC win. Marshall is up next.

Missouri in the first half

The explosive Tiger offense has been unbelievable out of the locker room outscoring Illinois 23-6 in the first half (and getting up 37-13 in the early second half), Ole Miss 28-7 in the first half, and Western Michigan 31-3 in the first half last week. However, the Tigers are struggling with their halftime adjustments ...
Who’s Not …[FONT=verdana, arial,
sans serif]
Missouri in the second half[/FONT]The Tigers might have gotten out to a 37-13 lead against Illinois in the opening week, but thy were outscored 21-3 over the final 21 minutes. Against Ole Miss, they were up 35-7, but were outscored 18-3 over the final 27 minutes and had to hang on. Last week against Western Michigan, they were up 31-3 at halftime, but were outscored 21-7 over the first 16 minutes of the second half to make it close for a while. Next up is Illinois State.
Mississippi State passing
The Bulldogs are 2-1 despite being dead last in the nation in passing efficiency. MSU quarterbacks have completed 39 of 82 passes for 400 yards with one touchdown and seven interceptions. Six interceptions in the opener against LSU was a problem, but last week's win over Auburn had some even uglier quarterback play, with Michael Henig, Wesley Carroll, and Josh Riddell combining to complete five of 18 passes for 41 yards. However, there weren't any interceptions, while Auburn's quarterbacks threw three picks. Up next is Gardner-Webb, who's 22nd among FCS teams in pass efficiency defense.

Notre Dame offense
Yeah, it's piling on, but the futility is too impressive not to note. Notre Dame is averaging 4.33 points per game, last in the nation, 115 yards per game, last in the nation, -4.67 rushing yards per game, last in the nation, 119.67 passing yards per game, last in the nation, and has allowed 27 sacks, last in the nation. Of course, most famously, the Irish are 0-for-13 on scoring touchdowns on offensive possessions. Up next is Michigan State, who's 21st in the nation in total defense and 19th in scoring D.
Minnesota pass defense ... againThe Gophers secondary was here in week 1 after allowing 1,839 passing yards, an average of 367.8 yards per game, over a five-game span. After three games this year, Minnesota is allowing 431 passing yards per game, and has allowed 389 yards per game over the last eight. Only SMU's secondary has been worse so far this season, but it had to play Texas Tech and the new North Texas pass-only attack. The Gophers had to have played Hawaii and Louisville over the last two weeks, right? Not quite. Miami University threw for 418 yards and three touchdowns, while Florida Atlantic, yes, that Florida Atlantic, got 463 yards and five touchdowns out of Rusty Smith last week. If you thought things were bad before, wait until this week when Purdue, and a passing attack that averages 320 yards per game, comes to the Dome.

Kansas State penalties
The Wildcats are sinning at an alarming rate. Second in the nation in most penalties per game is Western Michigan, getting flagged 12 times a week. Second in the nation in penalty yards per game is Texas Tech, losing 107 per outing. Kansas State is taking it to another level, getting flagged 41 times so far, an average of 13.67 per game, for 133 yards.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Postgame React

by HornsFan Sun Sep 16, 2007 at 12:44:42 PM EDT

Before we dive into the report cards, let's get the overview out of the way.
The outcome was: Merely acceptable. This was an ugly game to watch and far too close for comfort. If this level of play is the baseline for the team, there are losses on the schedule ahead.
The Offensive MVP was: Ryan Bailey? I dunno. This should be Jamaal Charles' award, but the two fumbles were killers. McCoy was pretty good, but not outstanding. I need to rewatch this game to comment further on his play.
The Defensive MVP was: Marcus Griffin. Nine tackles, a forced fumble, and a fumble recovery. He was pretty good yesterday.
The offensive Offensive Player Of The Week was: The offensive line? I'll have to rewatch the game before commenting on individuals, but it wasn't a good afternoon for the line.
The offensive Defensive Player Of The Week was: Robert Killebrew. It is unfathomable that he's still playing as much as he is. If you want to make him feel special, Mack, have him cook the team's pregame meal. Then make sure he stays in the locker room to do the dishes.
John Chiles Watch: 0 plays. Again. Are we redshirting him? What's the latest on Sherrod Harris? Is there a plan here at all?
Vondrell McGee Watch: 1 carry, 1 yard. Charles' hasn't exactly needed the help, but it'd be nice to see what McGee could do. Maybe he's not blocking very well or something. I'm trying to figure this out.
Oklahoma Fear Factor: 10 out of 10. We've officially hit the top of the meter. 5 is the baseline. +1 for Sam Bradford isn't slowing down. +1 for rushing plays at Robert Killebrew. +1 for Brandon Foster will have to (attempt to) cover somebody. +1 for the offensive line looking average. +1 for Mack Brown seems hell bent on learning lessons the hard way this season. 10!
Heading into next week I feel: Disappointed. Rice is a functional DNP, which means whatever progress we make won't mean anything. Maybe, though, we'll get to see some young players. Right? Maybe?
 
McFadden Left Bama Game With Concussion

Jump to Comments From Whole Hog Sports
McFadden rushed a careerhigh 33 times for 195 yards and 2 touchdowns, but was on the sideline, helmet off, for the Razorbacks final two drives after being knocked out of the game with what Coach Houston Nutt called a slight concussion.
“You know I’d have him in there if I could,” Nutt said. “The doctors didn’t think it would be very wise to put him out there when he has a concussion like that.”
 
Adding:

FAU -6 (-110)

I made the line -11 and wasn't even looking at it until I saw CB on it. And when CB tells you to play a Sun Belt game, you should look at it. Tailing on this one.
 
Adding:

Cal -16 (-110)

Made the line in this one -19, so under 17 has value to me but not a lot. Then add in this little nugget: Zona knocked Cal out of BCS contention last year beating them at home 24-20. Cal will want revenge since the one thing that Cal has wanted but hasn't been able to get yet is a BCS berth (preferably the Rose Bowl; remember how much they hate Texas). If they had beaten Zona, they would've won the Pac 10 and played in the Rose Bowl.

Add in that Zona is 0-6 in their first Pac-10 road trip and Cal is 9-3 ATS against Zona since 1993 and this is a much stronger play.
 
RJ,

I am on two with you and will be against on one(WVU) once it goes back up with public movement(hopefully). Also, I am trying to get on AIM right now but there is something wrong with it. Working on it so thats why there has been a delay.
 
<TABLE id=HB_Mail_Container height="100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0 UNSELECTABLE="on"><TBODY><TR height="100%" width="100%" UNSELECTABLE="on"><TD id=HB_Focus_Element vAlign=top width="100%" background="" height=250 UNSELECTABLE="off">Great reads rj... may join you on purdue and cal
</TD></TR><TR UNSELECTABLE="on" hb_tag="1"><TD style="FONT-SIZE: 1pt" height=1 UNSELECTABLE="on">
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
RJ,

I am on two with you and will be against on one(WVU) once it goes back up with public movement(hopefully). Also, I am trying to get on AIM right now but there is something wrong with it. Working on it so thats why there has been a delay.

No worries. I passed out after dinner so no big deal.

I'm actually not on WVU. I hedged of it immediately. I had WVU on the shopping list at -21 or better and just above it was BC -28 or better. I say WVU and -28 so I hit -26'. I hedged immediately after discovering my mistake.
 
There just aren't words when your swim team is this good looking. A number of these girls could pass for models:

ttu_swimteam.jpg
 
THE WAGER: FULFILLED

The Curious Index will be along in a minute. However, rent’s due, and someone’s check most definitely did not bounce. Holly, valiant Vol fan and sports bloggette from Ladies… and Snarkastic made a bet with us: if Florida won their matchup against Tennessee, then she would have to write a certain phrase on her boobs for our perusal and the rest of the universe’s, as well. If Florida lost to Tennessee, we would have had to sing Rocky Top and record it for posterity’s sake.
(This may sound lopsided. However, we hate Rocky Top like nothing else. Seriously. We might rather voluntarily dive into an Olympic pool filled with sulfuric acid than sing the song.)
This happened on Saturday, among other events:
72b7bfb3-f612-4593-8f72-38f7d04ec07e.jpg

RHINO RHINO RHINO!!!
…meaning Holly had to pay up. And being the honorable, courageous fan she is, she paid up. Given that Tennessee has given up over 40 points to two opponents already this season, she’ll need all the courage she can muster. And a shirt, evidently
Click the jump to see the fine artwork of victory drawn onto her rack. Salut! to Holly.

1396283571_b327e87c4b.jpg
 
This Week's Vegas Oddsmakers' Top 25

</MTWEBLOGPOSTIFSHOW>Fans of lightly regarded teams who keep sending me hate mail, I don't make these rankings. These are the ineffable wisdom of Nevada Oddsmakers, through the fingers of Las Vegas Sports Consultants. Don't hate the punter, hate the Gambling Industry.
Biggest frauds, according to Vegas: Louisville is ranked 11 spots too high by the AP. Clemson is ranked 10 spots too high. Texas A&M is ranked nine spots too high. Kentucky is ranked eight spots too high. Virginia Tech is ranked five spots too high.
Biggest sleepers, according to Vegas: Florida State is ranked 14 spots too low by the AP. Arizona State is ranked 13 spots too low. Missouri is ranked 10 spots too low. Arkansas is ranked eight spots too low. Nebraska is ranked seven spots too low. UCLA and Georgia Tech, coming off disastrous performances that swayed weak-minded AP voters, are ranked six spots too low.
Vegas looked smart when: Florida State, snubbed by the AP but beloved by Vegas, got a fairly nice road win at Colorado. Clemson, which Vegas has been cool on, struggled with a I-AA Football League Championship club. Vegas darling Missouri won handily, as did Vegas darling Arizona State. Again, Wisconsin struggled against a team Wisconsin should not struggle against.
Vegas looked dumb when: Vegas fave Nebraska didn't do much with Southern Cal; heck with that, Vegas says, we still love Nebraska. Vegas fave Georgia Tech (11th last week) didn't do much with BC. Vegas faves Miami and BYU both looked bad; both dropped out of Vegas's rankings this week.
Games to watch: Unimpressed-by-Vegas Clemson is at N.C. State; expect a smaller-than-expected line. Impressed-by-Vegas Arizona State hosts Oregon State; expect a larger-than-expected line. Washington is at UCLA; Vegas expects a nice UCLA rebound.
(On the week's actual big games--LSU/South Carolina and 'Bama/Georgia--Vegas and the AP are mostly agreed.)
Numbers after the jump. AP rankings in parentheses.
1. Southern Cal (1)
2. LSU (2)
3. Oklahoma (4)
4. West Virginia (5)
5. Florida (3)
6. Texas (7)
7. Penn State (10)
8. Ohio State (8)
9. Oregon (13)
10. California (6)
11. Wisconsin (9)
12. South Carolina (12)
13. Boston College (14)
14. Rutgers (11)
15t. Missouri (25)
15t. Arizona State (28)
17. Nebraska (24)
18. Arkansas (26)
19. Alabama (16)
20. Florida State (34t)
21. Georgia Tech (27)
22. Virginia Tech (17)
23. Hawaii (19)
24. UCLA (30)
25t. Georgia (22)
25t. South Florida (23)
25t. Clemson (15)
28. Purdue (33)
29t. Louisville (18)
29t. Texas A&M (20)
29t. Kentucky (21)
 
Johnny Sears off the team?



Hate to spread rumors if they're unfounded, but the word on the street is that Johnny Sears has been removed from the Michigan football team.

Sears, a (really bad) redshirt sophomore corner, did not play against Notre Dame.
 
This is such bullshit:

Mack: Still trying to get Chiles in a game

Monday, September 17, 2007, 11:08 AM
Mack Brown is still trying to get some experience for a backup quarterback. With Sherrod Harris still sidelined, freshman John Chiles is No. 2 on depth chart, but he’s yet to play in a college game.
“We would like to use more players on offense,” Brown said.
When asked whether Harris or Chiles would be the first to see action if this week’s game turns into a blowout, Brown snapped with a smile, “Next question!”
Then he added, “We do want to play John Chiles in a ballgame. We tried again on Saturday. The games are too close.”

---------------------

Either Mack is telling the truth here or, another thought, he is saving Chiles and Chiles' formations for OU.
 
Mack: Send in the cavalry

Monday, September 17, 2007, 11:06 AM
Mack Brown on Monday welcomed back Billy Pittman, Sergio Kindle and Henry Melton from three-game suspensions. He didn’t specify how the three would be incorporated into the lineup, but he made it clear that he’s glad they’re back.
“They’ve handled it really well,” Brown said. “They’ve practiced well. They’re excited to be back, and we need it. We’ve had a lot injuries.”
On the team’s depth chart released Monday, Pittman is listed along with Jordan Shipley as the No. 2 flanker. Nate Jones remains the starter.
Kindle is listed as No. 2 strongside linebacker along with Dustin Earnest. Robert Killebrew is the starter there. Brown said that Kindle’s return to the linebacking corps may allow coaches to rotate entire units of linebackers.
Melton is listed as a third-team defensive end behind Aaron Lewis and Lamarr Houston.
“The cavalry’s coming, so we’ve just to hang in there,” Brown said.
 
Monday Fun Facts



While it is absolutely true that Notre Dame is 0-3, maybe they have good reason to be in this situation. I mean, they did lose a lot after 2006...They even lost their Heisman Hopeful 4-year starting quarterback. So should we give them a break? I don't think so, & here's why:

In 2006, UND graduated or sent to the pros:
4 defensive starters
7 offensive starters
-The are currently 113th (http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt07.htm) and are 0-3
-They have the LAST RANKED offense in the nation.

In 2006, Ohio State graduated or sent to the pros:
7 defensive starters
7 offensive starters (1 Heisman hopeful, 1 Heisman winner)
They are 9th (over-rated) & 3-0

In 2006, Oklahoma graduated or sent to the pros:
4 offensive starters (1 3-time Heisman hopeful)
6 defensive starters
They are currently 4th & ranked 3-0

In 2006, Florida graduated or sent to the pros:
7 defensive starters
9 defensive starters
They are currently ranked 3rd and are 3-0

Other Notes

-Purdue is 25th, according to the Sagarin Ratings System (and receiving 40 votes in the USA Today Poll)
-IU is 51st
-UM is now 58th following their crushing of UND
 
EDSBS LABS PRESENTS: FOOTBALL EPIDEMIOLOGY.

Transitive Property Football Herpes is no laughing matter, citizen. It does not sleep. It comes in the guise of a friend and leaves you burning in places you never imagine could burn. And it’s spreading, citizen, like a wildfire across these beautiful gridirons of our nation.
The good news is that, with proper protection, it’s preventable. And we at EDSBS Labs (”Bringing You The Future, One Past At A Time!”) have identified the index case, method of transmission, and its chief wellsprings. Remember, these three steps will help those seeking to avoid catching “the Spanish Friend” from football encounters:
1. Use protection. Max protection, if necessary.
2. The best defense is a good offense! A spread offense with a mobile quarterback, if at all possible.
3. Wash hands immediately after contact. Hand sanitizers are not enough–a full washing of the hands can do more to prevent infection than almost anything. Sing Yankee Doodle while washing with warm water and soap–this is more than enough time to kill 99.99% of germs, and is an easy way to safely interact with carriers.
4. Beat them in football games.
1397049907_110637eeeb.jpg

Vigilance, citizen! Good health is just a good offensive line away. Recruit, wash, and spread your way to a transitive football herpes-free life! Only together can we tackle this problem together.
 
Profiles in Disillusion
By SMQ
Posted on Mon Sep 17, 2007 at 01:06:31 PM EDT
</I>


Conquered favorites and other notables picking up the pieces of shattered ambition this week:
If anything goes really good, then the players did it. If anything goes semi-good, then we did it. If anything goes really bad, then the refs did it: Is Houston Nutt's sleep-deprived gut filling with the acid of regret after his decision to run Michael Smith on the Razorbacks' potentially game-icing drive against Alabama instead of Darren McFadden or Felix Jones, or calling an incomplete pass on 3rd-and-11 with 2:31 to play and Alabama out of timeouts, or staying in a tight man-to-man on the winning/losing drive even after John Parker Wilson had efficiently passed the Tide into a zone-friendly situation inside the ten? He is not.
Nutt is, however, not feeling so well re: some specific officiating on that drive:
  • Officiating questioned after loss Arkansas Coach Houston Nutt still looked and sounded ill Sunday regarding some of the officiating decisions in the waning seconds of the 16 thranked Razorbacks' 41-38 loss at Alabama on Saturday.
    Of particular interest to Nutt: a pass interference call on Kevin Woods on a thirdand-9 snap from the Arkansas 28 with 33 seconds remaining; and a stoppage of play with 21 seconds left to measure a 9-yard gain to the Razorbacks' 4-yard line on the next snap.
    Alabama had no timeouts remaining on the second of those plays and would have been in scramble mode trying to get lined up to spike the ball or attempt a second-and-1 had the officiating crew, headed by Penn Wagers, not stopped the clock.
    After the delay for the measurement, which was a full yard short, Alabama was lined up and ready to snap with 21 seconds left.
    Nutt winced when asked about the late-game calls at his Sunday press conference.
    "Wow, you really are trying to entice me right there," Nutt said. "That was bad. You don't make that [pass interference ] call." Nutt said he would bring those two plays up with the SEC office today, adding the stoppage of play was particularly peculiar. "I've never witnessed that before," he said. "I've never seen that before."

    - - -
Nutt has been a head coach for 15 seasons and spent most of his life around football, so to suggest he's never seen the clock stopped to measure for a first down is, ah, hyperbole, at best. And though I sympathize with his frustration, watching the game from a neutral disposition Saturday, I agreed with both calls in question, to the extent it would occur to me to "agree" with measuring on a play close to the sticks to begin with. If anything, Arkansas got away with at least one more egregious pass interference call on a short toss over the middle earlier in the drive.

a_turley_i.jpg

Kyle Turley sees no reason Ernest Mitchell should be suspended for a little helmet swining. The freakin' Man, man. Let us play the game!
- - -

In the air: the status of Ernest Mitchell for Saturday against Kentucky. A very frustrated, pancaked Mitchell was flagged and ejected for ripping off Justin Britt's helmet in the fourth quarter and hitting Britt in the face with it, right under an official's nose. Nutt is discussing a suspension with his staff, since there is no automatic justice from the SEC, but Mike Slive might exercise some form of executive privilege, anyway.

And I Thought They Just Sorta Showed Up at the Stadium: UCLA had a terrible week of practice, which may or may not mean anything at all - any honest coach will admit that the ups-and-downs of practice (as opposed to just being terrible all the time) and pretty much any other fluctuating intangible are poor predictors of future performance, and occasionally, briefly, they all sometimes must question whether practice is really even all that worth it. Saturday's humiliating 44-6 loss at Utah was such a moment for Karl Dorrell:
  • During practice leading up to the game, UCLA receivers were dropping footballs as if they'd been dipped in butter, Ben Olson looked like the star of a Quarterbacks Throwing Wild tape, and special-teams workouts brought drill-sergeant-like barking from assistant coaches.
    [...]
    Nothing made the Bruins' poor week of practice clearer than the Utes' gadget play in the second quarter. Facing a fourth and three at the Bruins' 34-yard line, Utah lined up for a field-goal attempt, but holder Bradon Godfrey ran up the middle for a five-yard gain.
    The Utes then went in for a touchdown that gave them a 14-6 lead at halftime. The punch line? The Bruins worked all week in practice on stopping that very same fake field-goal play.

    - - -
The score can be bad enough to completely derail a promising season, the foreshadowing from the practice field can help explain it, but good lord, the anecdotes are just a sucker punch:
  • What if the final score were 44-6, Utah, and after the game, on the field, Utes running back Darrell Mack said of the Bruins: "That last touchdown drive they came out on the field and they were whining and crying. And we just kept driving the ball down the field. They lost their composure. They had to be thinking they were going to win the game going in. That's the wrong thing to think about us. . . . That's an overrated team."
    - - -
2003213562.jpg

You'll get 'em next time, big guy.
- - -

Maybe, maybe if Marcus Everett hadn't lunged for the goalline in the third quarter, Bruce Davis wouldn't have "the most sickening feeling" of his young life. But he did, and Utah turned the resulting momentum into 27 unanswered points, and now a historically fragile Bruin team has to rebound to earn its stripes all over again.

(Under a new coach, naturally, if Bruins Nation has any say. Of course, if BN did have any say, Dorrell's head would be a relic on Nestor's mantel, so take the heated launch of "Dump Dorrell 3.0" for what it's worth.)
Mind the Gap: There are pages' worth of fallout from Tennessee's unmitigated (and cheesecake-facilitating) shellacking at Florida, the worst loss of Phil Fulmer's tenure, but only one delivers the wide-eyed, fundamental, is-this-who-we-are-now? despair we're looking for:
  • Florida's rout wasn't all about how fast you play. It's also about how fast you get ready to play.
    The recruiting services might tell you Florida coach Urban Meyer has out-recruited every school in the country outside of Southern Cal the last two years. Based on the apparent talent in Florida's freshman and sophomore classes, I wouldn't argue.
    But is it 39 points better than Tennessee?
    Meyer and his staff don't just recruit at a fast-break pace. They develop players at the same speed.
    It's as though Meyer assumes his recruits will play as true freshmen. They don't have to prove they can play. They have to prove they can't play.
    The proving begins in January for a number of those freshmen, because the Gators encourage early enrollees. That enables them to put recruits through a demanding off-season conditioning program.
    [...]
    ...Meyer and his staff are developing more young players faster. And coach Nick Saban will do the same thing at Alabama. You can count on it.
    Since UT coach Phillip Fulmer routinely recruits top-10 classes, player-development often has been cited as a shortcoming when UT falters. The shortcoming is magnified when contrasted to Meyer's success at Florida.
    This much was obvious going into the 2007 season: UT needed more playmakers. And it needed them fast, because the Vols would play two nationally ranked teams in the first three games.
    So the Vols went out and supposedly signed one of the top groups of receivers in the country. One of those highly touted wide receivers, Brent Vinson, had a chance to demonstrate his talent on a reverse against the Gators. He lost 9 yards.
    Minus-9 yards: That's how much UT's freshman wide receivers contributed against Florida.
    [...]
    Fulmer has had a good run at UT. But what was good in the 1990s isn't good enough for the new millennium if you want to win a conference championship.
    The competition has picked up the tempo. It's up to Fulmer to do the same. Fast.

    - - -
The comments section that story is 62 strong with message board-worthy invective - "EVERYONE SHOULD START BOYCOTTING HOME GAMES AND SHOW THE UNIVERSITY THAT THIS IS SERIOUS!!!! YOU HAVE TO HIT THEM IN THE POCKETS TO GET THEIR ATTENTION!!!! HOW DO U THINK THEY WILL REACT WHEN THEIR IS ONLY 10,000 OR SO FANS????" - not a single one of them attempting to defend Phil Fulmer. He has games with Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and Arkansas left to seal his fate.
Give Us the Freshman!: The Alabama papers tend to have the same ideas about Auburn on a regular basis - not that hitting on a firm storyline is much of a challenge with this team after two straight home upsets:
au_msu11.jpg

Hey, this kid's a step up!
- - -

If the last story doesn't necessarily seem to focus on the quarterbacks from the headline, it goes more in-depth as the others:
  • A morose Brandon Cox finally cracked a smile when told about Auburn head coach Tommy Tuberville's theory that perhaps the fans were booing the coaching staff, not the quarterback, on Saturday.
    "They weren't booing the coaches. They were booing me," Cox said matter-of-factly.
    Looking tired and downcast, the sixth-year senior faced questions on Sunday that he never expected to be answering in Week 4 of his final college season. But after three weeks of dreadful offensive performances, Auburn is 1-2, Cox is fighting a true freshman for his job and the Tigers' season could be on the brink.
    [...]
    oaches were tight-lipped about the quarterback situation Sunday, although it seems likely that both Cox and Kodi Burns will play this weekend against New Mexico State (2-1).
    Cox threw two interceptions in his first two passing plays Saturday. He returned in the fourth quarter to lead the Tigers on a potential game-winning drive that stalled on the 9-yard line.
    In between, Burns offered a new wrinkle to Auburn's offense, running draws and options and moving around the pocket with more speed than Cox. He also threw an interception and lost a fumble.
    Fans clearly expressed their preference, chanting Burns' name and cheering his every move, while roundly booing Cox. "I was bothered (by the booing)," Tuberville said. "I was hoping they were booing me. I don't think they'd be booing Brandon. That's the way we took it and that's the way it should be. If you're going to boo, boo the coaches because we get paid to do this. The players don't. They work awfully hard to do what they do."

    - - -
The upshot: both Burns and Cox will probably play. The downshot: both Burns and Cox will probably play. Auburn still has five very losable games - at Florida, at Arkansas, at LSU, at Georgia and Alabama - of which it will have to win at least one to make a bowl game, assuming (dangerously) the Tigers take care of New Mexico State, Vanderbilt, Ole Miss and Tennessee Tech. Tuberville was 5-6 his first season, 1999, and hasn't won fewer than seven games since. Right now, this looks like his worst team.
And of course... I think I'm going to be done with Notre Dame soon enough, because the Irish are playing like Temple and there's only so many ways to say "they suck," but Jeff Carroll seriously takes it to Herr Weis in the South Bend Tribune:
  • After the latest debacle, Saturday's 38-0 loss against a previously dead-in-the-water Michigan team, Weis announced that his team would be re-starting training camp, effective immediately.
    "We will not be watching tapes," Weis said. "We will not be having meetings tomorrow. We will be practicing."
    About time.
    After showing so much promise as a head coach in his first two seasons in South Bend, Weis bungled this campaign from the outset, something he seemed to be tacitly admitting on Saturday afternoon. It doesn't mean he can't be a good coach. It means he pathologically won't let himself be.
    [...]
    A week ago, Michigan running back Mike Hart, he of the 187 yards against the Irish, stepped to the postgame podium and guaranteed victory. His leadership paid off on Saturday. A team that had no objective grounds to believe in itself clearly did. You don't scheme those kind of intangibles.
    Notre Dame, on the other hand, suffers from a leadership void. Not because there aren't capable leaders on the roster. But because Weis won't let them fill the role. He's the leader.
    Weis sabotaged this season when he installed that gimmick offense for the opener. What that did, beyond chasing unloved Demetrius Jones to DeKalb, Ill., was rob valuable learning time from new starters who should have been absorbing the fundamentals of running Notre Dame's real offense. He essentially flushed preseason practices down the drain, never to be recovered. Since then, the inexperienced offense has been scrambling to get up to speed, and it may never, at least not this season. But, again, that's a symptom, not the underlying problem. The main malady is that Weis thinks that because he can process complex schemes, his players can do the same in 20 hours a week.

    - - -
Carroll thinks any "fire Weis" chatter is premature, but he's very specific in his criticism of Weis' stubborn hubris (Hansen's word): receiving the kickoff with the worst offense in America, destined to blow early momentum (which it did, by losing 13 yards, actually the best of its first five possessions); sticking with oft-abused senior corner Ambrose Wooden ahead of sophomore Raeshon McNeil; holding out the only possible hope of the offensive line, Sam Young, at right tackle instead of left until Saturday; continuing to rotate Travis Thomas among the running backs, etc. The changes appear to be coming, but it's two months, three embarrassing blowout losses and two lost quarterbacks too late to save 2007.

doc46edde69ebf11078099034.jpg

Stafon Johnson has heard rumors of the existence of Nebraska's defense, but he'd like some evidence first.
- - -

Elsewhere in despair...

Minnesota is 1-2 because its secondary has been mercilessly torched by two MAC teams and another from the Sun Belt. Now the Gophers' season really begins against Purdue, which averages 50 points per game and had 300 yards in the first quarter Saturday against Central Michigan.
Louisville is "genuinely mad" its mythical championship ambitions were dashed against Kentucky, but champions typically, you know, cover people running wide open down the sideline for the winning touchdown.
I don't know if Nebraska needed more tenacity on defense or just a storm shelter to crawl into and hide against USC, but either way, Saturday's demolition looks even worse on tape.
Ah...the blazing offense, the ACC title, the darkhorse candidate for the Trophy Which Must Not Be Named, all ridiculous pipe dreams for Georgia Tech in light of the Jackets' manhandling by Boston College. Tashard Choice finished with 31 yards and a strained hamstring for his trouble. Every year it's the same way with Iowa State: Iowa's the favorite, but "they come out better against us than what they look like on film," says the Hawkeyes' imperially-named Mike Klinkenborg. Kirk Ferentz makes millions but falls to 3-6 in the Cy-Hawk series.
 
Texas Longhorns Report Card: Defense vs UCF

by HornsFan Mon Sep 17, 2007 at 06:45:17 PM EDT

You ready for this? It wasn't particularly pretty, so I hope you're not expecting a string of pats on the butt. Some of these kids deserve 'em. Some do not. It's hard to give the coaches anything but a knowing glare.
Defensive Line
Man those top three tackles are something special. Okam, Lokey, and Miller took turns blowing up the middle of Central Florida's line, routinely beating any attempts at single-blocks and often commanding two.
Our defensive ends are looking solid themselves, but they're hamstrung by having to babysit for our subpar linebackers. Seriously, our ends practically sit there on some plays for fear that the OLBs won't be able to do their jobs. It's a game of wait and see, instead of get up the field to disrupt the plays early.
Unless and until the linebacking situation changes and/or improves, this unit's strength is being wasted. No fault of their own, of course.
<INS>GRADE: A</INS>
Linebackers
What can we say that hasn't been said already? I honestly don't have to keep going over this, so let's just do the short version.
Jared Norton made three straight tackles in this game, and promptly disappeared. Muckelroy picked up a late hit foul and disappeared. (Funny, that's never kept Killebrew off the field.)
Instead, we're stuck with the three blind mice. With bad results again. Either this situation changes, or Texas continues to struggle. It really is that simple.
<INS>GRADE: F</INS>
DEFENSIVE BACKS
Can we give a hat tip to Ryan Palmer? No, I'm being serious - he's playing good football. Like, really. He's been solid. Especially last Saturday, and though he's still not the world's greatest cornerback, I've got nothing negative to say about his play at all. To the contrary, he was out there making plays on the ball and tackling like a beast. I loved it.
The same cannot be said for Brandon Foster who, despite his interception returned for a touchdown, had a miserable game. That he was named the Big 12 defensive player of the week is comical. I'm sure the kid has a ton of spunk and heart and drive and all that jazz, but he's not very good at playing cornerback. I shudder with fear thinking about him on Malcolm Kelly.
The safeties were pretty strong on Saturday, though Jackson still falls asleep on his coverage responsibilities too often. He's out of place on too many plays, and though he's getting a bit better as the season goes on, this looks to me like another case of the rule, rather than an exception: fifth year seniors aren't suddenly great players. He'll do for now, but he's occupying the spot Robert Joseph should be manning.
The unit hasn't been a problem yet this year, but we have to note that we've faced three pitiful passing games. That won't always be the case.
<INS>GRADE: B</INS>
Defensive Coaching
I remember talking to Duane Akina this summer and listening to him talk to me about the various ways that "pressure could hurt" the opposing offense. He made sure to emphasize that the "illusion of pressure" was as valuable as a blitz itself.
What do you think happened between then and now?
Who knows, but Coach Akina has yet to meet a blitz he doesn't like. Moreover, when it looks like Texas is about to blitz? They are! The only illusion is that this kind of possessed blitzing is sustainable over the course of a season. Opposing offensive coordinators across the Big 12 will lick their chops when they watch game film of this scheme. I shudder to think how many touchdowns Quentin Griffin would score against this particular strategy.
It'd be nice if someone kindly showed Coach Akina a tape of Carl Reese's last year at Texas, when the wheels officially came off. Unfortunately, Akina's taken Chizik's weakness ("No blitz, ever. Period. Hold your ground, sailors. The ship won't sink!") and taken it to the other extreme ("The ship is sinking! Everybody run!")
Find the middle gournd, Duane.
<INS>GRADE: D</INS>
 
<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD class=storytitle colSpan=3>Monday Morning Quarterback </TD></TR><TR><TD class=primaryimage vAlign=top>

</TD><TD noWrap width=3></TD><TD vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=4 width="60%" bgColor=#f5f5f5 border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD vAlign=center noWrap>By Matt Zemek
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Sep 17, 2007
</TD><TD noWrap>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Another season brings lessons in strategy that still haven't been learned by FBS (Division I-A) head coaches. Tisk, tisk.
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3>

ByMatthew Zemek

Mr. Zemek's e-mail: mzemek@hotmail.com

If you remember last year's Georgia Tech-Virginia Tech game, you would know that Frank Beamer, down by eleven points in the final minute, stubbornly chased a touchdown when, of course, his team trailed by two possessions. We established here at MMQ that if you're down by a touchdown (with or without a two-point conversion) and a field goal, you kick the field goal when you're in field goal range and the clock is under 40 seconds, 35 at the absolute minimum.

It's quite apparent, then, that Colorado head coach Dan Hawkins did not read this column last season.

Colorado trailed Florida State by a score of 16-6 in the final minute late Saturday night (early Sunday in the East), when the Buffs threw a medium-deep pass to get into comfortable field-goal range (the Seminole 18, specifically) with 20 seconds left. But Hawkins, like so many men before him (this includes esteemed company, it should be said: one will recall that Mike Holmgren of the Seattle Seahawks chased a touchdown to the bitter end in Super Bowl XL, with failure predictably emerging from his futile pursuit), continued to try for the touchdown. Ironically but not surprisingly, the Buffs didn't even get the cosmetic seven points.

Why is this so hard for coaches--millionaires in many cases, especially when you include all the perks of the job in addition to base salary and other financial carrots--to ever understand? Two scores means two scores. If you get one score with 5 seconds left, you can't get a second score. This oversight on Hawkins' part is particularly painful because his kickoff man executed a perfect onside kick with 3:39 left. FSU recovered it, but the flight of the ball was exactly how a coach would draw it up on the blackboard. Had the Buffs gained a field goal with roughly 16 seconds left and then recovered an onside kick, they would have had 12 or 13 seconds at their own 40-45. This means they either would have had two Hail Mary attempts, or perhaps one shot from the Florida State 35. But when Hawkins just kept pursuing that first score (the touchdown that never came), his team's chances vanished. If you play to win, you sometimes have to do some counterintuitive things, and this is what so many coaches simply cannot manage to do. It's quite staggering, especially when history repeats itself year after year.

Next up for examination is the end of the Arkansas-Alabama game.While Razorback head coach Houston Nutt didn't do a poor job in the final minutes, he--like countless coaches before him--does need to devote specific attention to one underappreciated aspect of late-game strategy when protecting a one-possession lead and trying to run out the clock. The game from 2006 that paralleled Hogs-Tide was the UCLA-Notre Dame game in South Bend. Karl Dorrell--in the final minutes--chose to drain timeouts and basically not make a vigorous attempt to claim a final first down. On Saturday night in Tuscaloosa, Nutt chose to do the same at a time when Darren McFadden was suffering from cramps. This is a perfectly understandable and legitimate strategy, so Nutt shouldn't come in for too much criticism. But when Nutt encounters this situation in the future, he--along with other coaches in similar spots--need to make sure their (perhaps unsteady) quarterbacks are better prepared.

Nutt did what he did (and it was the same for Dorrell last year in South Bend) because he didn't have complete trust in his quarterback. If a coach does have complete and unconditional trust in his signal caller, he will call a pass play on first down to get six yards and put the defense in a bind. That, after all, is how you should almost always go about the process of getting a final first down to seal a victory in a clock-draining situation. (The exceptions would be at Florida, USC and Oklahoma, where stud offensive lines or running quarterbacks can do special things without having to pass.) But with Casey Dick under center, Nutt rightly shied away from giving his quarterback the keys to the Ferrari, no questions asked. The Arkansas coach followed a wise and logical course of action by keeping the ball on the ground on first and second down, and then trying for the first down on third and long.

Here, though, is where Nutt and his brother coaches need to improve in the future: when you don't trust your quarterback (often out of necessity; that's not a football sin by any means), a third-down pass needs to be a very conditional venture. In the Alabama game Saturday night, Casey Dick had no one open on his third-and-long pass attempt. Yet, the quarterback (showing why his coach doesn't trust him unconditionally) threw the pass anyway. Predictably, it hit the ground and stopped the clock. The moral of the story is simple and recognizable enough: if a third-down pass isn't open, you tuck the ball in, get what few yards you can, and go down in bounds. If the pass is open, then throw the darn thing, but if not, you need to do the next best thing and drain either 40 more seconds or an opponent's final timeout (in this case, Bama had no timeouts, so a 40-second runoff was denied the Hogs when Dick threw his ill-advised pass).

An interesting dilemma emerged for BYU coach Bronco Mendenhall in the final two and a half minutes of his team's loss at Tulsa Saturday night.

See what you think about this situation--it's a rare one that doesn't crop up all that often. BYU trailed by eight (55-47) and had a couple of timeouts remaining with roughly 2:20 left in the fourth quarter. The Cougars faced a 4th and 20, but they had the ball in comfortable field goal range at the Tulsa 22 (which translates into a 39-yard field goal, a kick that promises a reasonably high percentage). What do you do? Go for the touchdown because you're already pretty close to begin with, and because you won't get many more chances? Or do you kick the field goal to trail by five, knowing that you can get one stop, save clock by burning your remaining timeouts, and not have to sweat out a two-point try?

That's a very tough call for any coach, and the MMQ won't presume to definitively know which choice is better. One certainly can't fault Mendenhall for chasing the brass ring and trying to get the tying touchdown when the opportunity presented itself. However, with that said, it's important to pay attention to the details in each situation, and in this particular instance, it's worth pointing out that it was a 4th and 20, not 4th and 7. The field goal was a 39-yarder, not a 49-yarder or 29-yarder. These two details should go a long way toward determining a coach's decision in this kind of moment. The shorter the distance on fourth down, the more a coach should chase the first down and/or touchdown. The longer the field goal, the more a coach should go for the first down. Mendenhall was in a bind here because he had a long distance to go for the first down, and because the field goal--while under 40 yards--was not a chip shot. If BYU faced 4th and goal from the 17, a field goal would have been a wiser choice. If, on the other hand, BYU stared down a 4th and 7 from the 25, the first down would be a much more appropriate option. At any rate, it was a fascinating little scenario in Oklahoma, and the MMQ would gladly welcome feedback on this unique topic. Strategies in eight-point games (as opposed to nine-point games or six-point games) typically pose the toughest choices to head coaches. Seven-point-game strategies are nearly as difficult. Keep paying attention throughout the season to take notes on late-game scenarios involving eight-point and seven-point leads, or the point spreads (higher or lower) that can lead to eight- or seven-point margins.

Quick hitters in the world of play calling and strategy from the past weekend:

Ty Willingham of Washington punted inside his own 30 on 4th and 4... with under 5:30 left in a game his team trailed by two possessions. Again, when you're losing by a couple possessions, normal rules of football no longer apply...

Not that it helped their teams in the long run, but Phil Fulmer and Charlie Weis made fourth-down gambles in the first halves of their teams' games. Bill Callahan of Nebraska, on the other hand, kicked a field goal inside the 5 (but got a reprieve when a rare "disconcerting" penalty was called against USC). You need touchdowns to win big games in which you find yourself generally outgunned. Kudos to coaches who realized this, demerits to those who didn't.

You're Chan Gailey of Georgia Tech. You're down 14 to a Boston College team with an offense clearly good enough to tack on at least a field goal in the final 10:33 of regulation. Yet, you kick a 32-yard field goal (meaning you were at the BC 15) to get within eleven points. And that move accomplished... what?

Al Borges, Jason Campbell is no longer your quarterback at Auburn. One really good year can only buy you so much political capital and job security.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD class=storytitle colSpan=3>Weekly Affirmation </TD></TR><TR><TD class=primaryimage vAlign=top>

</TD><TD noWrap width=3></TD><TD vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=4 width="60%" bgColor=#f5f5f5 border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD vAlign=center noWrap>By Matt Zemek
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Sep 17, 2007
</TD><TD noWrap>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Logic chains return this week, along with other popular forms of early-season team-based analysis.
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3>

ByMatthew Zemek

Mr. Zemek's e-mail: mzemek@hotmail.com

Short-Form Weekly Affirmation: Fast Track Gold Club

You know them, you love them, and while they're not supposed to indicate the actual quality of FBS schools, they're fun to think about at this early stage in a college football season: logic chains. We trot out the year's first four chains right now:

Logic Chain No. 1: Florida St. beat Colorado who beat Colorado State, who barely lost to California.

Logic Chain No. 2: Kansas State lost at Auburn. South Florida won at Auburn in overtime. Mississippi State won at Auburn in regulation.

Logic Chain No. 3: Texas beat Arkansas State by eight. Arkansas State beat SMU by 17. SMU beat North Texas by 14. North Texas lost to Oklahoma by 69.

Logic Chain No. 4: Cincinnati crushed Oregon State who beat Utah who dismantled UCLA who beat BYU.

Beyond logic chains, there are some not-so-entertaining but certainly more informative (and cautious) statements that can be made about the comparative strength of college football teams at this early point in the 2007 campaign.

For one thing, Troy's win over Oklahoma State makes a lot of sense, in that it makes Georgia's win over Oklahoma State seem a lot less impressive. In light of that development, Georgia's loss to South Carolina becomes easier to understand.

Virginia Tech had an emotional season opener when analysis was, frankly, both inappropriate and pointless. But now, after the Hokies struggled mightily against Ohio, it's pretty safe to say that Virginia Tech's just not that good. Keep this in mind when evaluating LSU (albeit in a very tentative way).

After BYU lost to Tulsa on Saturday, Arizona's loss to the Cougars in week one seems even worse than it did at the time. Guess what? Arizona lost at home to New Mexico (who lost to a not-very-good UTEP club in week one) late Saturday night. Mike Stoops is officially on the hot seat in Tucson (and unlike Lloyd Carr, he actually deserves his flaming chair).

In another one of those games that garners little to no publicity or media coverage on a college football Saturday, Wake Forest--with the same personnel that almost beat Nebraska a week earlier--played horribly in an ugly 21-10 win over Army that was fueled by a punt return and an 84-yard pick-six. Army played the Deacs on even terms for 60 minutes. That should make you realize how suspect Nebraska was. Accordingly, you shouldn't think that USC destroyed the best thing since sliced bread over the weekend. Yes, scoring a blowout in a night game in Lincoln demands a ton of respect (as does USC's mere decision to play a home-and-home with the Huskers; say what you want about USC: they don't shy away from playing big games in Los Angeles). However, Nebraska wasn't exactly setting the world on fire heading into its encounter with the Trojan Empire of College Football.

Navy lost to Ball State at home on Saturday. This shouldn't make Rutgers partisans panic, but it should make Scarlet Knight fans just a bit more sober in assessing their team to this point.

Central Florida gave Texas a good scrap on Saturday. This means that Tom O'Brien and the boys at N.C. State shouldn't feel all that bad about losing a two-point decision to George O'Leary's team.

Other quick hitters from the weekend:

Ohio State-Washington and Florida State-Colorado offered two more classic examples of how the "tweener zone" (midfield to the opponent's 35) and "blue zone" (an opponent's 35 to 20, just outside the red zone) can substantially affect the outcome of a college football game.

Duke snapped its 22-game losing streak with a narrow win at Northwestern that wasn't decided until the final seconds. Congratulations to the young men from Durham, not only for winning a game, but for putting in the effort needed to attain the victory. The hardest part of losing is not so much the result itself, but the discouraging realization that a lot of sweat went into a loss. The persistence needed to push onward only increases with each defeat, and so it's a great credit to the Blue Devils that they could dig deep and surmount the mental obstacles that accompany a particularly long walk through the football wilderness.

In another off-the-radar game that ended late Saturday night (in the West; early Sunday in the East), Stanford blanked San Jose State, 37-0. No, the Cardinal and new coach Jim Harbaugh aren't about to storm the palace gate in the Pac-10 (UCLA beat them, albeit not too decisively, in week one). However, it's worth noting that San Jose State made and won a bowl game last year, with a victory over Stanford fueling the Spartans' resurgence. Losing to UC-Davis in 2005 and then San Jose State in 2006 will take the shine off a power-conference program in very short order. The fact that Stanford could so soundly defeat San Jose State speaks to some discernible improvements in Palo Alto. Maybe Bill Walsh's talks with Harbaugh--conducted continuously before the Bay Area legend died over the summer at age 75--are proving to be fruitful.

Hard to believe, but true: if Air Force beats BYU this Saturday, the Falcons, under a coach not named Fisher DeBerry (the name's Calhoun--Troy Calhoun), could have the Mountain West Conference championship locked up... or at least, as close to locked up as possible. Air Force has already beaten the league's other prominent ballclubs, Utah and TCU. A win over BYU would give the Academy all three tiebreakers and a 3-0 league record. That would be very hard for any other team in the MWC to overcome.

Now, the questions section of the Weekly Affirmation:

Just asking, part one: who is the best offensive coordinator in college football at the present moment? Not over the past three years, but right now? In my view, it's someone who, at this point last season, was feeling a lot of heat. Can you name the guy?

Just asking, part two: would Glen Mason have Minnesota at 1-2 right now?

How the heck has Kirk Ferentz faded into such obscurity (or mediocrity, or both)?

USC's O-line or Florida's skill people?

Matt Flynn or Sam Bradford?

How did Kentucky enter the Louisville game unranked?

Do you know who Vincent Joseph is?

Do you know who Kevin Everett is?

Do you know how violent football is?

Did you need to be reminded how violent football is?

Be honest: even if you're a UCLA alum, a resident of Omaha, or a fan of LSU/Florida/Oklahoma, did you really think that was a good "disconcerting" call against USC in the first quarter against Nebraska?

Is "disconcerting" ever a good call?

If "disconcerting" is a good call, then what should have been done to the Louisville defender who kept a Kentucky ballcarrier trapped for several seconds in the final minute of Saturday's nailbiter in Lexington?

And here's perhaps the biggest question of all from a football-only standpoint: should replay review apply to pass interference calls in the final two minutes of a game, starting next season?

Long-Form Weekly Affirmation: Premium Members

This week's essay concerns a topic that can never be talked about too often in football circles: the limits of a coach's ability to affect the outcome of a college contest, for better or worse.

Don't get the wrong idea: having the right man in the right place at the right time makes all the difference in the world over the long haul. With that said, however, the trap that emotionally ambushes people in the college sports world (hoops as well as football) is the fallacious idea that a miracle worker can be found at every program. The grand--and usually false--seduction in college football is the notion that there's a messiah for every school.

"If Gary Barnett could take Northwestern to the Rose Bowl, then all other academic schools could climb the heights." This was one of the major siren songs of the coach-hiring (and firing) business within the last ten years. But now, with the benefit of hindsight, one can see that the tenures of men such as Ty Willingham (Stanford), Woody Widenhofer (Vanderbilt) and Fred Goldsmith (Duke) are only getting better as they recede even farther into the history books. One can see that dozens of programs, at their own levels of struggle (they do vary in terms of standards), have a hard time attaining a higher plateau and staying there. Examples of these programs (we'll provide 24, to ensure that the term "dozens" posesses some legitimacy and heft) are as follows: Virginia, Michigan State, Oklahoma State, Army, North Carolina, Arizona State, Indiana, Minnesota, Texas A&M, Syracuse, Ole Miss, Pittsburgh, Mississippi State, Arizona, Georgia Tech, Illinois, Purdue, Baylor, Missouri, South Carolina, Washington State, Alabama, Clemson, and Kansas. If one felt it was necessary to use more rigid definitions or interpretations of what it meant to "attain a higher level and stay there," a few dozen more schools would enter the list.

(Example: Penn State has been a top-shelf program over the long run of history, but if one wanted to view a program's status through the narrow lens of the past seven years, one could then say that even Penn State has failed to "attain a higher level and stay there." I wouldn't count Penn State as a program that's had trouble staying on top; the point is that if another person wanted to be very demanding in the application of his/her standards, s/he could rationalize such an argument. Therefore, it's entirely reasonable--albeit somewhat controversial--to think that at least half of all college football programs, probably more, have a hard time sustaining improvements over extended periods.)

You should be able to identify a larger pattern at this point: it's not exactly easy to have one sensational season in the college football industry, but the truly rare goal for college football coaches is, indeed, to "attain a higher level and stay there," to have respectable seasons that meet a program's standards over long periods of time without any substantial interruptions. This is where athletic directors get cranky and fan bases become impatient. As much as the people of each and every FBS institution want their own school to be the dominant one, the team that is feared on an annual basis, the cold and unsatisfying reality is that only a select few schools occupy the highest and most entrenched places in college football's pecking order. And even then, there will be the inevitable blips:

USC under Paul Hackett. Oklahoma under Gary Gibbs and John Blake. Georgia under Ray Goff. Notre Dame under Gerry Faust. Florida State and Penn State in a few of the past several seasons. Miami in the past two-plus years. Texas for stretches in the 1980s and 90s. Nebraska in recent years. Florida under Ron Zook.

The above programs will never stay too far down for too long. The tradition, resources and local emotional investments are all too great. But those are the exceptions in the college football world, 10 schools out of 120. (Michigan and Ohio State, while having the occasional 7-5 or 6-5 season, have managed to string together successful series of new coaches and have continued to make bowl games every year; in that respect, they don't belong in the above list of schools. John Cooper didn't beat "The School Up North," for example, but only an idiot would say that he wasn't an accomplished coach. Was he weak on gamedays against equally talented opposition? Of course. But he won stacks of games, including a Rose Bowl and a Sugar Bowl. That's not a failed tenure. Less than what it could have been? Sure. But not defined by failure. Nine- and ten-win seasons are not failures, as much as some fans might argue to the contrary.)

For 108 FBS schools (maybe 105 if you wanted to consider a few other schools as established long-term powers in the sport), it's a life of peaks and valleys, ups and downs, the best of times and the worst of times. Legendary quarterbacks leave after four years, believe it or not. Revered running backs also have a limit on their shelf life. Great defensive lines might be incarnated for only one or two seasons. Then they go.

The 1972 USC Trojans didn't get to have several seasons together, like the 1970s Pittsburgh Steelers did. The 1995 Nebraska team didn't get to play into the 21st century. Vince Young no longer plays for Texas. The poignant beauty of college football lies in the fact that that you rarely, if ever, get the chance to do it all over again with an intact roster, the same collection of battle-tested legends who won a championship the year before. The programs that never have a losing season are rare; the schools that never dip below eight wins in the occasional year are rarer still. Everyone might believe that "it can happen here," but the odds are stacked on the losing side of the divide. The annual winners are the marked exceptions, and hardly the rule. This is an inherent part of collegiate athletics.

This leads us to a sober analysis of coaches and the limitations on their ability to affect individual games and seasons. A few games from this past Saturday made the point all too clear.

Over the course of a decade (or close to it), Jim Tressel and Nick Saban have elevated themselves above Ty Willingham and Mike Shula. No one would dispute that the coaches of the 2002 and 2003 national champions are objectively better than the current Washington boss and the former Alabama skipper. But with that said, there are limits to what coaches can or can't do. And with Lloyd Carr being crucified for one bad season in Ann Arbor, it's worth showing that "one bad season" should never, ever be used to somehow prove that a coach has conclusively and irretrievably lost the ability to perform his job at a high level.

In one season, the minds of previously proven players can go haywire. (Look at Chad Henne, a two-time Rose Bowl quarterback.) Similarly, the minds of previously shaky players can (and often will) remain fragile even when the newer, more proven coaches come aboard. John Parker Wilson still had that deer-in-the-headlights look in the fourth quarter of the Alabama-Arkansas game. With better officiating, Wilson would have had to convert a 4th and 8 on his final drive. And even when given a reprieve, Wilson floated a prayer into the end zone with eight seconds left. The fact that the ball was caught for a touchdown had nothing to do with the quality of Wilson's performance. Alabama's near-loss against Arkansas could easily have been envisioned under Mike Shula. The only problem was, however, that the narrow escape--after a meltdown of considerable proportions--occurred under Saban, the man viewed as the savior for all things pertaining to Alabama football.

Yes, there was nothing alarmingly bad about Saban's coaching on Saturday against Arkansas--but that's precisely the point. Mike Shula got scapegoated for every close loss and every single thing that went wrong in Tuscaloosa. Had the Tide lost this past Saturday to the Hogs, what would the home folks have said about Saban? Would Bama fans have looked for missteps from Saban that didn't actually exist? Would they have blamed everything on Wilson and exempted Saban from particularly withering scrutiny? The point is that, to this point in the 2007 season, not too much is different from 2006 under Shula. John Parker Wilson is still an immature quarterback. Alabama is still roughly even with Arkansas--the two teams went into overtime last season (and that was in Fayetteville). The difference between one year and the next is that in 2006, Leigh Tiffin choked. In 2007, Bama actually saw the ball (and the yellow handkerchief) fall in its favor.

Nick Saban didn't become a bad coach in the fourth quarter against Arkansas. Equally so, Saban didn't become a genius when the Tide won with eight seconds left. Just the same, though, Mike Shula--who took over a program in ruins and built it back to respectability before losing a senior leader at quarterback (Brodie Croyle)--didn't see 100 points fall off his football IQ last year. He had a poor-to-mediocre quarterback to deal with. That same quarterback isn't all that much better this season. It's so hard for fans to accept--at least when individual games and seasons are concerned--but it's undeniably true: sometimes, it's all about luck, and little else. The coach-as-messiah drumbeat gets old and stale very quickly when a single bad bounce or a rookie mistake decides a ballgame. It's intellectually dishonest to insist that coaching decided the Alabama-Arkansas shootout on Saturday night.

The same thing would apply to Saturday's contest between Ohio State and Washington.

Sure, Jim Tressel has more street cred than Ty Willingham. However, the two coaches didn't decide this past weekend's game in Seattle. Husky turnovers did. Ty Willingham looked like a pretty darn good coach when his team was driving in the third quarter and leading by four points. Jake Locker looked like a solid quarterback who was going to lead his teammates to more clutch scores. But then the Buckeyes blocked a field goal, hit one big pass play, recovered a fumble on a kickoff, and then intercepted Locker inside the Buckeye 30. Willingham didn't cease to be a good coach when OSU's James Laurinaitis made a tremendous catch of a shovel pass he managed to anticipate and deflect. Similarly, Jim Tressel wasn't a bad coach before his Buckeyes found the spark they needed to come from behind. It's completely absurd to say that coaching, more than a few key mistakes from young football players thrust into an intense and raucous environment, made the difference in the Buckeyes' victory over the Huskies. If players were robots who could be remote controlled by their coaches, then perhaps mistakes would automatically reflect on the coaches themselves. But since players are flesh-and-blood beings who are still, in the long run of things, quite young and impressionable, it's just a fact of college football life that players such as Jake Locker will make mistakes as they learn the ropes and take their lumps in the early stages of their careers.

It all adds up to one simple conclusion: as valuable as coaches in fact are, they control far less than you might think in the world of college football. The more fans (and some athletic directors with itchy trigger fingers) realize this, the better the sport will be--ethically, emotionally, morally, socially, politically, and--most important of all--financially. A little perspective can go a long way toward slowing down the corrosive patterns that are making the college football industry much more bloated and wasteful than it ever should be.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Texas Longhorns Report Card: Offense vs UCF

by HornsFan Mon Sep 17, 2007 at 09:16:25 PM EDT

Onward with the offense...
Quarterback
The good? Colt hit 32 of 47 passes. That ain't half bad.
The bad? He only had 259 yards. That's about 8 yards a completion, which is... not good. And gets at the crux of the problem right now. We've got no vertical passing game because teams are sitting two safeties deep. And why are they sitting two safeties deep? Because there's no need to bring anyone up for run support.
We've hit a crossroads of sorts with McCoy. Greg Davis and Colt McCoy were able to surprise people a little bit last season as teams dared the redshirt freshman to beat them. Now? Teams have figured out that our running game is manageable without safety help, that there's no penalty for dropping two safeties into coverage, and that giving the Longhorns the underneath stuff isn't terribly painful. Certainly not when we can't execute in the red zone.
So where do we go from here? It's a tough question, really. Either McCoy has to be asked to provide a credible running threat or we need to consider moving McCoy under center and revamping the offensive system altogether. This hybrid, which worked pretty well last year when teams weren't keyed on taking away our vertical passing game, has run its course. Something has to give.
McCoy himself is trapped a little bit here. The system itself will need to evolve or McCoy's going to be facing an uphill battle most of the season. If Greg Davis' biggest critics ever had a year to point and yell, "SEE!", so far- this is it. Davis will have to make some fundamental adjustments (and soon) to successfully quell those concerns.
How to grade McCoy, then? He was merely solid. Neither great nor bad. That, of course, won't win any championships. Let's just hope, for now, that Davis gives McCoy a better opportunity to succeed.
<INS>GRADE: B-</INS>
Running Back
My goodness Jamaal Charles is good. He's running with an intensity and purpose that's simply blown my mind this year. Unfortunately, he put the ball on the ground twice on Saturday. For now, let's just note that he picked up 7 yards per carry because he's breaking 3-4 big runs a game this year. To this point, he's the team MVP.
Those who want to see Ogbonnaya carry the ball more, let me just note that he's got to be used situationally. Chris is a good bit bigger than I remember him being a year ago (could just be bad memory on my part) and is useful more in a blocking, H-back type role.
There's simply nothing to dislike about this unit right now, especially if those fumbles were an aberration. They catch passes, they run well, they block well. This ain't the problem.
<INS>GRADE: B</INS>
Wide Receivers
Somehow, Quan Cosby caught 10 footballs for 67 yards. That's pretty tough to do, boys and girls, and is a reflection of just how silly our offensive scheming has become. Anyone who's read this site since the beginning knows that I hate to be excessively negative, but there's just not much good stuff to pin up on the bulletin board right now.
This receiving corps - even short-manned - is outstanding. But we're just dinking and dunking our way down the field, scaring nobody (except our own fans). The passing game can't get vertical because the safeties don't have to help with the run. The run can't get going because we're running out of the shotgun with a quarterback who doesn't count as a threat to keep the ball. What's left? Bubble screens. Quick throws to the wide receivers. It is a poor man's version of the Texas Tech spread attack.
Once again, this ain't a personnel or performance problem.
<INS>GRADE: B+</INS>
Offensive Line
Let's face it: we knew this was a huge question mark heading into the year, and we've not seen anything yet to make us feel better. Central Florida's best unit was its mammoth defensive line, and it showed. Dallas Griffin was swallowed whole on more than a couple plays. Charlie Tanner is not an answer at guard. Tony Hills does well with pass protection, but has never blocked well in the running game. Chris Hall at tackle is a band aid. Only Cedric Dockery represents the burnt orange and white in a way that we're used to seeing from our linemen.
So... now what?
I have no idea. True freshmen are very rarely the answer on the offensive line. It's looking like a patchwork unit from here on out. And it may not be fair to call this a quesiton mark any more. I think filing it as a team weakness is more appropriate. The only real question is: when Texas loses, will the coaches just start developing the real horses?
<INS>GRADE: C-</INS>
Offensive Coaching
Honestly, I think I've covered most of this already. Davis has some real work to do, and though the offense is a far cry from "broken," we're not yet at a point where we can expect this unit to win us games against elite competition. And that, of course, is the only goal.
So let's just leave it at that and hope, pray, and beg for Davis to use the final out of conference scrimmage as a chance to rethink how he wants to score points with these players.
<INS>GRADE: D</INS>
 
Money Making Monday: Week 4



So far, I'm making money, but it's a slow grind. There will certainly be a week where I make a big splash. Still, I'm up so far.

YTD: 19-16 +1.4u


Kentucky +7 @ Arkansas

Kentucky will be able to throw all over the Razorbacks, and the Hogs will run all over the Cats. The O/U is out yet, but when it is, I'm hitting the over. Arkansas's defense isn't any better than Louisville's, and while their offense as a whole isn't as good as the Cards', their run game is out of this world. I think Kentucky with a senior QB can go into Fayetteville and not get rattled. A touchdown is a big gap when I think the visiting Wildcats could win outright.
Georgia Tech -3 @ Virginia
Tashard Choice might be out for this game, but I still love the number. Virginia is a wretched team with a wretched offense. They only scored 22 on a bad North Carolina defense, and this Ramblin Wreck defense is for real. Honestly, if Georgia Tech only scores 14 points, they should cover. GT allowed over 400 yards passing to Boston College, but BC has one of the best QBs in the country with a dynamic offense. BC still only scored 24. I like the under in this game, whenever it comes out.
Connecticut @ Pittsburgh -7
This has moved to 8.5, so I feel good about the bet. Pitt's defense has looked really good so far, which is something they didn't have last season. Connecticut barely beat Temple, and we saw with Navy that if you struggle with Temple, you end up being pretty average. UConn loves to run the ball, and Pitt held a very good running Spartan team to 2.8 yards per carry. Hell, UConn ran for only 3.2 ypc against Temple. Blowout alert.​

San Jose State +1 @ Utah State
This has gone to +3.5, so I'm not feeling too confident. I guess I'm expecting SJSU to play like they did last season. Utah State is awful, but not as awful as I anticipated. Still, this is essentially a pick at the number I got, and I think SJSU is good enough to win 6/10 times. Isn't it weird to have a write up on a game like this?​

Purdue -11.5 @ Minnesota

This moved to -14 within minutes, so I feel damn good about my number. Minnesota is absolutely awful defensively, and Purdue will put up 45+, maybe even 60. Whatever the O/U is, I'll be inclined to get the over. The Gophers are awful - gave up 42 to FAU! Jesus, they have given up OVER 30 points to every team they played - FAU, Miami (OH), and Bowling Green. Two MAC teams and a Sun Belt team. Ouch.​

Arizona @ California -17

Revenge game for the Bears, and we saw what they did in the revenge game with Tennessee. Arizona was JUST beaten by New Mexico 29-27 on Saturday. Cal's offense, obviously, is on another level or 8 than UNM. Arizona's offense is still bad, but now inconsistently bad. Cal's defense is definitely a question, but I don't see them, with all the incentive to beat the hell out of Arizona, letting up. Arizona won on a fluke last year, and cost Cal the Pac 10 title. Cal rolls, I think.​

Duke @ Navy -10

I've been bitten betting on Navy so far, but this one seems like a good bet. Duke was completely demolished by UConn on September 1st, and UConn is the only team that runs close to as much as Navy. Navy's offense is a lot better than UConn's, so I ecpect Navy to rack up the rushing yards and keep the already awful Duke offense on the sideline. Yes, Duke won a game, but 10 points? C'mon!​
 
God I want 35 in this one. This article is right on:

Longhorns need to take it out on Rice

With Sooners looming large, blowout of Owls is mandatory.

<SCRIPT src="http://alt.coxnewsweb.com/cnishared/js/NewsworthyAudioC2L.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://alt.coxnewsweb.com/cnishared/newsworthy/statesman/sports/stories/longhorns/09/18/statesman_sports_stories_longhorns_09_18_0918golden.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>Tuesday, September 18, 2007
The Rice Owls are the worst team in Division I-A college football.
Take that for gospel if you believe Jeff Sagarin's NCAA football ratings, which rank 242 schools from Maine to California, from Florida to Washington, and all points in between, along with the grass skirts in Hawaii and the ice fishermen in Alaska.
Texas is not the worst team in Division I-A but if you read the message boards and have access to Statesman e-mail, you would think the Longhorns were 0-3, not the 3-0 mark they are taking into what I'm calling a statement game this weekend.
Texas' 35-32 Escape from Space Mountain Saturday has some members of the Longhorn Nation in panic mode, not because Mack Brown's two-point conversion chart may have come from a shady used car salesman in a loud plaid coat, but because two of the alleged easiest games on the schedule — Arkansas State and Central Florida — were won by a combined 11 points.
The easiest, a 34-14 win over a ranked Texas Christian, only came after a 10-0 deficit. It brought some early relief until the Horned Frogs lost 20-17 at unranked Air Force last week. Sounds like we need to raise it to a burnt orange alert, or worse, a crimson alert.
Speaking of crimson, here's what's really bothering you UT fans. You take a peek up north and that group in Norman is putting the kind of hurt on the opposition that conjures up memories of the 2005 UT group that averaged 50 points per game en route to a national title. The Sooners have put up 61.3 points per game in blowouts over North Texas, Miami, and Utah State. Sure, Miami isn't the Jimmy Johnson Miami, but the Sooners worked them 51-13 nonetheless, like fans hoped Texas would work the Frogs the same day.
The Longhorns aren't ready to talk about the Oct. 6 meeting in Dallas, since there are games against Rice and Kansas State coming up, but don't get it twisted — they're thinking about that game today. Who wouldn't be? The Sooners are the clear favorite to win the Big 12 and the seventh-ranked Horns are in the rear view, racing to keep up with the OU pace.
"It's been a team that's trying too hard because they haven't had a blowout yet,'' Brown said Monday. "Because 34-14 in the fourth quarter ain't a blowout around here.''
But 66-0 is. That's the score that needs to be showing on Godzillatron when the Longhorns leave Royal-Memorial Stadium on Saturday. Score in pregame warmups if you have to. Run Jamaal Charles 30 times for 285 yards and four touchdowns. Have Colt McCoy throw 30 times for 325 yards and four touchdowns. Pound Rice like a No. 7 nationally ranked team should. Put the strap across K-State's back next week to erase that 45-42 debacle in the Little Apple last year. Show your fans, and more important, the No. 4 Sooners, that the four spots separating the two schools in the AP poll can easily be flip-flopped with a third straight win over Stoops.
A blowout is mandatory when you consider Rice's No. 181 ranking on Sagarin's list. So how can Rice be 181 when there are only 119 schools playing football in Division I-A? Good question. Well, Mr. Sagarin includes teams in Division I-AA on his list. Thirty four are ranked ahead of the Owls.
Take a look at the murderer's row of teams that could kick Rice's butt, assuming Sagarin knows his stuff: Hampton, Eastern Kentucky, Central Arkansas, Drake, and the 180th ranked Albany Great Danes, who just lost a 13-11 thriller to Colgate Saturday. Colgate, by the way, is ranked 22 spots ahead of the Owls, and last I checked, Mark van Eeghen has long since left the program.
A blowout is mandatory over Rice. Why? Remember I-AA champion Appalachian State's upset win over No. 5 Michigan in the season opener? Of the other 118 schools in I-A, only one, just one, lost to a I-AA school. I'll give you one guess.
Yep, the Rice Owls lost 16-14 to Nicholls State on a blocked punt that rolled out of the end zone for a safety.
The UT players won't say it, but a three-touchdown win over Rice will be unacceptable. Safety Marcus Griffin says this team isn't as complacent as some have been saying. He insists that improving each game is the primary goal next to winning.
Agreed. Here's the issue. We already know this team will win Saturday.
The question is, will the Sooners notice?
 
Nice lookin card RJ!

With you on OU, Penn St, and Oregon.

Want to pull the trigger on Cal, but Arizona's passing attack does worry me a bit. The Golden Bears defense has given up an average of 24 points/game, while the offense has averaged 40. If Tuitama has some kind of success, 17 points could be tough for the Golden Bears to cover.

Again, it's Cal or a no-play for me. I need to see a little more from the Cal defense before I can have faith in them.

:cheers:
 
Def still looking at navy....

I looked hard at this, but that Navy D is just too shaky for my taste. I will be looking at the Navy TT though. They put up 38 at Duke last year (despite losing 3 fumbles) with basically the same offense. They had like 430 yards rushing on 70 carries. They passed 4 times.
 
If there ever was such a thing as a terrible spot for duke , this is it. they just beat NW to end the nations longest losing streak and now immediately hit the road again to play a Navy team that gave their last home game away to Ball State. Navy needs the win and given the way they lost to Ball State at the end, I think they lay it to duke. 521 yards rushing vs ball state. 361 yards rushing vs temple and most impressive is 254 yards rushing vs rutgers. duke will not under any circumstance be able to stop navy from scoring. so then you have to ask can duke score enough on bad navy Defense to keep this within the number .... history says no. they put up 20 vs NW on some decent drives. they had 14 vs defensive juggernaut connecticut but 7 of those points came on a kick off return for a td. they scored 13 points vs Virginia. 2 points of which were scored on a snap over the punters head and their other two scores started on drives from the virginia 17 ( td +2pt conv) and 19 ( field goal ) yard lines. duke gave up 4.1 yards/carry , 3.9 yards/carry and 4.1 yards/carry in their first three games to connecticut, Virginia and NW. How in the world will they stop navy from jamming it down their throats ?
Navy should be hungry .... they let the ball state game slip away and in reality they had a decent chance to beat rutgers had it not been for some end zone interceptions. When you are hungry ..... it's nice to see some blue devil meat on the dinner table.
 
I looked hard at this, but that Navy D is just too shaky for my taste. I will be looking at the Navy TT though. They put up 38 at Duke last year (despite losing 3 fumbles) with basically the same offense. They had like 430 yards rushing on 70 carries. They passed 4 times.

Interesting thought
 
Charlie Weiss Looks Like Sloth
Monday September 17th 2007, 9:36 am
Filed under: Football
About 6 or 7 years ago, when Notre Dame was coming back into the limelight, I remember an ESPN personality saying "Life is just so much more fun when Notre Dame is good again." I like to think "Life is so much funnier when Notre Dame is bad."
After three games, the Irish have not scored one offensive touchdown. Last year, I remember seeing Weiss on the podium after the Michigan game, marinating in his own farts and absolutely loving it, the cockiest guy in the world. Now, well, given his fat contract that Notre Dame retardedly and arbitrarily gave him, he probably doesn’t care as much as Willingham did, who was in his shoes a few years before.
But I have to give props to Weiss for such a true talent. Not many people can make the switch from movie star (Goonies) to college football coach, in just two decades.
Honestly, I don’t think anyone will be able to convince me that the above picture has two different people in it. With the exception of some minor facial reconstructions, they are identical. Sloth for life!
 
Is Charlie Weis Just The Wizard of Oz In A Fat Suit?




Because Fornelli was at his sister's wedding yesterday afternoon, I felt compelled to do something I rarely ever do, watch an Irish football game from start to finish.

Here's what I came away with:
  1. Demetrius Jones knew what he was doing getting the hell out of Notre Dame.
  2. Charlie Weis is incompetent.
Watching the game just took my breath away. Mangled plays that high school players would know better than to try. Snaps sailing over the head of the quarterback. So many fumbles, baubles and missed tackles that when one of the announcers mentioned Weis' passion is special needs kids, I began to wonder if he hadn't loaded the offensive line with them.

This is the post-Brady Quinn era team he puts together?

I can hear Weis' defenders: "But he's had to replace all the key offensive positions."

So what? He's been at Notre Dame for three years. Three years to recruit and train in anticipation of this very season. Three years to create a team in his own image and he puts together an offensive line a Pop Warner team could pick apart?

Oh my God, maybe he has created a team in his own image.

I don't care how many players you lose, this is a top program; your kids should be able to execute the basics. And spectators should be able to witness a whisper of potential, a moment where you sit back and say, "Okay, I see why Weis recruited him."

For me, anyway, there wasn't one of those moments to be had.

But beyond yesterday's joke of a game, two things bother me even more.

First, the way Weis handled the whole quarterback situation. What he did to Demetrius Jones was unfathomable, pulling his starting quarterback out of the first game of the season before the end of the first half.

Think about it. You've had seven months - an entire off-season - to put your team and strategy together and in the span of less than 30 minutes, you change your mind. I mean, I'm more decisive about what dress I'm wearing to a party than Weis is about the lynch pin of his offense?

(And while we're talking about Jones, let's consider the kind of relationship Weis must have fostered with his young charge that in just three weeks he went from starting quarterback at Notre Dame to a student at a Northern Illinois. What the hell is that about? What coach worth his salt would let a situation devolve to that point?)

Second, in an
ESPN article today with the incredible title, "Notre Dame Decides to Start Season Over," Weis is quoted as saying:

"We are going back to our first day of installation of training camp. That's what we're putting in [Sunday], just as if it were the first day of training camp. And everything is even steven, like it's the first day out there and everything's up for grabs."
Earth to Coach Weis: this isn't a Sunday morning golf game. You don't get a mulligan here. It's too friggin' late to go back to the first day of training camp. And besides, given what we've seen over the last three weeks, your training camp must have sucked. Why on earth would you do it again?

No wonder this guy is so bad at losing weight. He probably starts every morning with egg whites, then by the end of the day he's inhaling cartons of Twinkies washed down with a few dozen Yoo Hoo's, then he wakes up the next morning chirping, "Hey, it's a new day! Pass the egg whites!"

Seriously, someone tell me why this guy is so revered.

Cuz he coordinated the Patriots offense under Bill Belichick? Belichick hasn't exactly suffered with Weis' departure. (All he had to do was buy a new camera.)

Because he helped Tom Brady develop as quarterback? Taking credit for Tom Brady's development is like Eileen Ford taking credit for making Giselle Bundchen pretty.

For the sake of all the Irish fans out there, I sure hope I'm wrong, but I don't think Charlie Weis is anywhere close to being the genius you all think he is.
In fact, I'm guessing that within a couple years, he'll be packing his bags and disappearing into the night, muttering, "Pay no attention to the man behind the very big curtain."
 
Back
Top