Washington 2019 National Championship Futures

raems

Pretty much a regular
Went to Fanduel sportsbook by Giants Stadium expecting to get 20-1 and be happy with it - got there and saw a 50-1 sitting there for some nonsensical reason so took it for what I consider to be a hefty sum. Guessing the odds are out of whack since nobody in the tri-state area bets on CFB futures at these new shops, and those who do all want PSU, Michigan, or the conventional SEC names given that B1G schools are the only prominent programs anybody here actually attends for undergrad and the SEC names + Clemson are the only other household names.

I like the combination of experienced QB with a fully returning offensive line, with a defense that is also returning a fantastic amount of talent. The ASU game last year definitely happened and is not to be completely dismissed, but this team has been as consistent as any in the country under Peterson. Coming off a bowl loss, all this noise about UW's schedule being crap, AND having to do it in SEC country, I think the angle to be focused against Auburn is there. Win that game and you even give yourself wiggle room to lose a bad game in PAC 12 play and still make the playoff. Lose the Auburn game, you're probably going to be favored by more than 1 score in all of your remaining games and have a good shot of winning out:

North Dakota
at Utah
ASU
BYU
at UCLA
at Oregon
Colorado
at Cal
Stanford
Oregon State
at Wazzu

B2B road games only once, no USC game, and Stanford at home. Every player on the D line returns except Vea, and all they have to replace in the back 7 is inside linebacker snaps which are the most replaceable snaps in the sport right now. Losing Hunter Bryant to injury already hurts, but at least they knew they had to deal with it heading into camp rather than mid-season.

Big writeup, but short summary is that if they beat Auburn then you're looking at the team with the cleanest path to the playoff, and even if they lose respectably to Auburn in Atlanta, they'll have a solid opportunity to win out and still make it as a Pac 12 champ with only 1 good looking loss. On paper right now they're no more than a 3-5 point dog against Bama / Clemson / OSU, and were somehow available at 50/1. Anybody living in this area I'd suggest getting to that book before they get a handle on what the hell they're doing with their own lines.

Side note: I think Michigan has a lot of potential to be VERY good this year if they can at least dip one of two feet into the modern offensive era, just don't see any value at all on their futures with the schedule they have to play. Will be taking a weekly approach with them.
 
Yup, yup. That's an incredible number. I thought I was getting great value at 33-1 (played Feb 13th) but damn... You win. Let's go man!
 
They could make it but they'd get throttled in the playoffs.

Pac-12 bowl performances last year wasn't some fluke occurrence.

This. Pac-12 been paper tigers. Can‘t compare with Big Ten. If Big Ten teams wöuld just stop knocking each other out lol
 
They could make it but they'd get throttled in the playoffs.

Pac-12 bowl performances last year wasn't some fluke occurrence.

They hung around just fine against a Penn State team that was close to as good as any. Defense also never got bullied at all against Bama in the semifinal two years ago. If anything I’d be worried about their ability to score points but will worry about that if they make the playoff.

If I have a team in the playoff at 50/1 that means I will have already won, just betting on them not to win the playoff at that point will be an easy hedge that probably will net me out a large profit either way (if I’m so inclined).
 
Have they addressed the wide receiver problem? As much as you can like Browning he was clearly missing someone who could create any space for himself as wide receiver, wr crew lost a big piece after two seasons
 
McClatcher gonna be their gamebreaker. After him going to need some young guys to step up. That’s their perceived weakness overall.
 
When your two toughest games are ooc Auburn and At Utah, you have a shot of making something happen to reach the playoff. It's also possible for things to fall a certain way where you can lose the Auburn game and still run the table and make a playoff.
 
Wish I had your memories, I purge so much info after college football and basketball seasons so as not to let it affect my thinking the next season it's nuts. I can't even remember who won the Natty, I think Georgia lost to either Bama or Clemson. Only bowl games I remotely remember are ISU because I was there, although have an excuse if I didn't remember, and UCF beating someone I believe from the SEC but not sure who...Auburn I believe.

Couldn't tell you one thing about the other bowls.
 
They hung around just fine against a Penn State team that was close to as good as any. Defense also never got bullied at all against Bama in the semifinal two years ago. If anything I’d be worried about their ability to score points but will worry about that if they make the playoff.

If I have a team in the playoff at 50/1 that means I will have already won, just betting on them not to win the playoff at that point will be an easy hedge that probably will net me out a large profit either way (if I’m so inclined).

The final score of that game was a bit misleading. PSU was up 28-7 in the first half and the statistical breakdown shows dominance by PSU aside from losing the turnover battle.

I hear you on the hedge but I just don't see much precedent for putting money down on these long shot title teams from subpar conferences. I wish you the best of luck though.
 
Lol guys this isn’t complicated.

Washington is 15-16/1 at most books now. I found them at 50/1, that’s a wager you took every single time out of principle.

Calling them a “long shot” is just a false statement. They’re prohibitive favorites to win a Power 5 conference.
 
I never said it was 'stupid' just not a bet that I would make.

Your definition of long shot differs from mine. IMO, Wash has a 0% chance of winning the NC this year. To me, that makes them a long shot.

Again, I wish you the best of luck.
 
Good bet. I like it.

Most people don't seem to be aware of it, but Petersen has never been below .500 ATS at Washington and I think this is his best team. He's good SU both home and away. The only two pitfalls I see for him are at Utah and at Cal.

You're in good shape on your bet.

Agree with you on Michigan too. I was shocked to see them open +7 at N Dame because I think they are a national title threat. When I saw that line I had visions of winning a lot of money on them this year as a surprise team, but the line is now where it should be so no surprise with Michigan. Anyone who wants to bet Michigan is going to be giving points every game.
 
Back
Top