BetCrimes1984
CTG Big Brother
Lets see..
- a team loses game 1 away by 3 goals
- they lose game 2 in OT
- they win game 3 by 1 goal
- they lose game 4 by 1 goal
- they win games 5 & 6, scoring 5 goals both times
- and play a game 7 threatening to win a series from from 1-3 down...
...is this the Bruins vs. the Habs circa 2008? well, yes and no. No, because it also describes perfectly the Habs vs. the Bruins circa 2004 (Habs won game 7 2-0 to complete the comeback).
Cue the twilight zone music.
I have to have a (small) bet on the Boston ml here....
- Their Habs-hoodoo has well and truly been broken (10 goals in 2 games/wins will do that).
- They have equally as good season stats in 1-goal games (both generally and vs all other playoff teams) as the Habs do, which comes into sharp focus relevance wise given a game 7 situation.
- Price's head space as a rookie has to be seen as questionable, making any play on the Habs untenable imo - earlier this season he sucked at home and was stellar on the road, and now the unthinkable stares him squarely in the face (losing from 3-1 up) at home in front of a team who have just popped 10 goals on him in 2 games.
- I always look for a reason why to explain any change arounds in a series, as a basis to believe its really down to the team who has come back (as opposed to being down to the team leading being responsible, in that they gained a series lead so took things easy. When things get tough again, they cease to take it easy and their former dominance usually returns to what it was earlier in the series). Here, it's identifiable as the Bruins coach sitting Phil Kessel for games 2-3-4, and in his returning for games 5 (tied the game at 1-1) & 6 (tied it 1-1, gave them their first lead 4-3) he has 3 goals and has ignited his team. This means Boston simply isnt the same team that Montreal furnished a 3-1 lead over in the first place.
- finally, the 'twilight zone facts' speak to a payback/full-circle situation: Boston suffered this exact fate at the hands of the Habs 4 years ago, and now each team is re-treading in each others footsteps to an insane degree. At these odds why bet against, rather than with, that insanity?
- a team loses game 1 away by 3 goals
- they lose game 2 in OT
- they win game 3 by 1 goal
- they lose game 4 by 1 goal
- they win games 5 & 6, scoring 5 goals both times
- and play a game 7 threatening to win a series from from 1-3 down...
...is this the Bruins vs. the Habs circa 2008? well, yes and no. No, because it also describes perfectly the Habs vs. the Bruins circa 2004 (Habs won game 7 2-0 to complete the comeback).
Cue the twilight zone music.
I have to have a (small) bet on the Boston ml here....
- Their Habs-hoodoo has well and truly been broken (10 goals in 2 games/wins will do that).
- They have equally as good season stats in 1-goal games (both generally and vs all other playoff teams) as the Habs do, which comes into sharp focus relevance wise given a game 7 situation.
- Price's head space as a rookie has to be seen as questionable, making any play on the Habs untenable imo - earlier this season he sucked at home and was stellar on the road, and now the unthinkable stares him squarely in the face (losing from 3-1 up) at home in front of a team who have just popped 10 goals on him in 2 games.
- I always look for a reason why to explain any change arounds in a series, as a basis to believe its really down to the team who has come back (as opposed to being down to the team leading being responsible, in that they gained a series lead so took things easy. When things get tough again, they cease to take it easy and their former dominance usually returns to what it was earlier in the series). Here, it's identifiable as the Bruins coach sitting Phil Kessel for games 2-3-4, and in his returning for games 5 (tied the game at 1-1) & 6 (tied it 1-1, gave them their first lead 4-3) he has 3 goals and has ignited his team. This means Boston simply isnt the same team that Montreal furnished a 3-1 lead over in the first place.
- finally, the 'twilight zone facts' speak to a payback/full-circle situation: Boston suffered this exact fate at the hands of the Habs 4 years ago, and now each team is re-treading in each others footsteps to an insane degree. At these odds why bet against, rather than with, that insanity?