Br@ssknux
Pretty much a regular
7-5-1 last week which bring the season total to 86-83 with a few pushes. The dream of a worthwhile betting experience for the year is up in flames, but we'll hope to make some money this week to end on a positive note. Then we transition to the bowls where we spend the next few weeks trying to figure out who's going to actually play vs who feels as though they have a .00001% chance of getting drafted which gives them license to identify themselves as superior to their teammates.
Typically, I start the week with a list of about 22-25 games that I like but need to whittle down to a reasonable number to write up. This week, my initial process identified 37 games, so it's been more difficult that normal, but at least I won't be searching high and wide for games worthy of a write up.
Oh yeah... Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours. I don't mean to get preachy, but it helps me to remember what we have to be thankful for. Seriously. If we stay cognizant of that, our outlook leans positive, and that is what ultimately leads to being happy. We're only on this Earth for a finite amount of time...might as well make the best of it.
Ole Miss ML LOSS
Missouri +3 WIN
Florida State -9.5 LOSS Noles were due for clunker and they delivered.
Clemson -14.5 LOSS See Ya Dabo. SC offense apparently for real. The last 9 weeks were the aberration, not the one week last week.
Rutgers +14.5 LOSS Schiano 2.0 now 8-3 ATS as a conference dog. After that performance today, they can cover 10 more in a row and I'm not interested.
Western Kentucky -7.5 LOSS. Willie Taggart's fireable offense was enough to beat me.
Louisville +3 LOSS I'm convinced Louisville only exists to ruin me.
Duke +3.5 WIn Hey, look at that!
UAB -17.5 LOSS Bill Clark ain't walkin through that door.
Auburn +22 PUSH
UTEP +17.5 WIN
Iowa State +10 LOSS Matt Campbell finally loses as a conference DD dog. I blame the oddsmakers for not setting the line high enough (needed +48)
Texas State +6 LOSS I searched to the ends of the earth (and FBS) for this loser. Maybe next week I'll give you Elon over Furman and they'll fail by 30 pts
Notre Dame +4.5 LOSS ND got bullied by a bunch of ballet dancers.
Pitt -6.5 WIN Narduzzi like clockwork. Miami v FBS like clockwork also.
4-10-1
1. @Ole Miss ML(-125) v Mississippi State: (Thursday) I was surprised to find a money line as low as -125 when most of the lines are hovering around the -2 range for Ole Miss. The line opened higher but has fallen, and I presume the reason for that is the speculation that Lane Kiffin is about to jump ship for Auburn. He's claiming that there's no truth to that rumor, but who would be surprised if he left on Friday morning? I wouldn't, despite my own opinion that I would stick around in Oxford if I was him. Having said all that, even if it's true, I don't necessarily think it will put a damper on the Ole Miss effort in this game. These teams have an intense dislike for each other, and don't need any incentive or pleading or coach intentions to keep them from max effort on Thursday night. There was a pretty widespread sentiment(myself included) that Ole Miss was somewhat fraudulent this year and that certainly has been proven to be the case over the past few weeks, starting with their second half no show in Baton Rouge 4 weekends ago. This week however, I think the matchup sets up well for the Rebels. I really don't find any specific area in which I would give Mississippi State the edge, but I find several areas that i think Ole Miss should be able to have a significant edge over the Bulldogs, most notably in the Ole Miss run offense against the MSU run defense, and on 3rd down on both sides of the ball. Even though Ole Miss was out of the game early last week against Arkansas, they still rushed for over 400 yards(with 2 RBs going over 200 apiece), and MSU is barely among the top 100 in yards per carry against. These rivalry games have been a struggle for Mike Leach, as he dropped 7 of 8 in the Apple Cup and has lost both of the Egg Bowls he's involved with against Kiffin. I typically like backing Leach when he's a dog, but in this case, the spread is so thin, the situation doesn't really line up with a typical underdog scenario. I think the Rebels take this one at home, as it looks like the Bulldog rush d will have all kinds of problems containing Judkins and Evans.
Typically, I start the week with a list of about 22-25 games that I like but need to whittle down to a reasonable number to write up. This week, my initial process identified 37 games, so it's been more difficult that normal, but at least I won't be searching high and wide for games worthy of a write up.
Oh yeah... Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours. I don't mean to get preachy, but it helps me to remember what we have to be thankful for. Seriously. If we stay cognizant of that, our outlook leans positive, and that is what ultimately leads to being happy. We're only on this Earth for a finite amount of time...might as well make the best of it.
Ole Miss ML LOSS
Missouri +3 WIN
Florida State -9.5 LOSS Noles were due for clunker and they delivered.
Clemson -14.5 LOSS See Ya Dabo. SC offense apparently for real. The last 9 weeks were the aberration, not the one week last week.
Rutgers +14.5 LOSS Schiano 2.0 now 8-3 ATS as a conference dog. After that performance today, they can cover 10 more in a row and I'm not interested.
Western Kentucky -7.5 LOSS. Willie Taggart's fireable offense was enough to beat me.
Louisville +3 LOSS I'm convinced Louisville only exists to ruin me.
Duke +3.5 WIn Hey, look at that!
UAB -17.5 LOSS Bill Clark ain't walkin through that door.
Auburn +22 PUSH
UTEP +17.5 WIN
Iowa State +10 LOSS Matt Campbell finally loses as a conference DD dog. I blame the oddsmakers for not setting the line high enough (needed +48)
Texas State +6 LOSS I searched to the ends of the earth (and FBS) for this loser. Maybe next week I'll give you Elon over Furman and they'll fail by 30 pts
Notre Dame +4.5 LOSS ND got bullied by a bunch of ballet dancers.
Pitt -6.5 WIN Narduzzi like clockwork. Miami v FBS like clockwork also.
4-10-1
1. @Ole Miss ML(-125) v Mississippi State: (Thursday) I was surprised to find a money line as low as -125 when most of the lines are hovering around the -2 range for Ole Miss. The line opened higher but has fallen, and I presume the reason for that is the speculation that Lane Kiffin is about to jump ship for Auburn. He's claiming that there's no truth to that rumor, but who would be surprised if he left on Friday morning? I wouldn't, despite my own opinion that I would stick around in Oxford if I was him. Having said all that, even if it's true, I don't necessarily think it will put a damper on the Ole Miss effort in this game. These teams have an intense dislike for each other, and don't need any incentive or pleading or coach intentions to keep them from max effort on Thursday night. There was a pretty widespread sentiment(myself included) that Ole Miss was somewhat fraudulent this year and that certainly has been proven to be the case over the past few weeks, starting with their second half no show in Baton Rouge 4 weekends ago. This week however, I think the matchup sets up well for the Rebels. I really don't find any specific area in which I would give Mississippi State the edge, but I find several areas that i think Ole Miss should be able to have a significant edge over the Bulldogs, most notably in the Ole Miss run offense against the MSU run defense, and on 3rd down on both sides of the ball. Even though Ole Miss was out of the game early last week against Arkansas, they still rushed for over 400 yards(with 2 RBs going over 200 apiece), and MSU is barely among the top 100 in yards per carry against. These rivalry games have been a struggle for Mike Leach, as he dropped 7 of 8 in the Apple Cup and has lost both of the Egg Bowls he's involved with against Kiffin. I typically like backing Leach when he's a dog, but in this case, the spread is so thin, the situation doesn't really line up with a typical underdog scenario. I think the Rebels take this one at home, as it looks like the Bulldog rush d will have all kinds of problems containing Judkins and Evans.
Last edited: