Zeke
Big Dick and Average Size Boat
Wanted to throw this out there, see what sticks. I guess for starters I'll assume we're talking 6 or 7 pt teasers on sides, not totals. The obvious strategies, well their obvious....The Wong Teaser taking a 7 pt fave to a pick, crossing key numbers, -9.5 down to -2.5 or getting a team north of 10 or 17.
I wanted to see if anyone has done any digging into the profitability of teasing dogs in games with a low-lined total versus a high-lined total. Perfect example this weekend as there are several 3-pt lines.
1. KC to +10 at NE where the game is hovering a total of 60. They are anticipating a pt/minute or 15/Q.
2. Dal to +10 vs. Jax where the total is 40 where points are expected to be at a premium.
Take HF or the fact that Dallas sucks out of the equation here, these are just examples based on a high total versus low total. Seems reasonable that 6 or 7 pts doesn't mean as much when there are two high powered offenses who can score frequently. But when you have a game that is expected to be around 21-18 and 7 pts could be 1/3 of what the winning team scores, those teaser points look like gold.
Thoughts?
I wanted to see if anyone has done any digging into the profitability of teasing dogs in games with a low-lined total versus a high-lined total. Perfect example this weekend as there are several 3-pt lines.
1. KC to +10 at NE where the game is hovering a total of 60. They are anticipating a pt/minute or 15/Q.
2. Dal to +10 vs. Jax where the total is 40 where points are expected to be at a premium.
Take HF or the fact that Dallas sucks out of the equation here, these are just examples based on a high total versus low total. Seems reasonable that 6 or 7 pts doesn't mean as much when there are two high powered offenses who can score frequently. But when you have a game that is expected to be around 21-18 and 7 pts could be 1/3 of what the winning team scores, those teaser points look like gold.
Thoughts?