SUNDAY MORNING COFFEE--Week 2 CFB Review and Week 3 Line Predictions

RJ Esq

Prick Since 1974
101 WVU
102 Maryland

103 TCU
104 Air Force

105 Oklahoma St
106 Troy

107 Illinois
108 Syracuse

109 Temple
110 UConn

111 Virginia
112 North Carolina

113 Buffalo
114 Penn State

115 Ole Miss
116 Vanderbilt

117 Mississippi State
118 Auburn

119 Central Michigan
120 Purdue

121 Cincinnati
122 Miami OH

123 Ohio
124 Virginia Tech

125 Iowa
126 Iowa St

127 Toledo
128 Kansas

129 Eastern Michigan
130 No. Illinois

131 Army
132 Wake Forest

133 Tennessee
134 Florida

135 Notre Dame
136 Michigan

137 Utah St
138 Oklahoma

139 Fresno St
140 Oregon

141 Pittsburgh
142 Michigan St

143 Ohio St
144 Washington

145 Texas
146 UCF

147 La Tech
148 Cal

149 UCLA
150 Utah

151 Ball St
152 Navy

153 Akron
154 Indiana

155 USM
156 ECU

157 Western Michigan
158 Mizzou

159 Idaho
160 Washington St

161 Houston
162 Tulane

163 L-Ville
164 Kentucky

165 Arkansas
166 Alabama

167 BC
168 Georgia Tech

169 Duke
170 Northwestern

171 Texas Tech
172 Rice

173 USC
174 Nebraska

175 UTEP
176 New Mexico St

177 Wyoming
178 Boise ST

179 BYU
180 Tulsa

181 Hawaii
182 UNLV

183 Florida St
184 Colorado

185 SDSU
186 Arizona St

187 New Mexico
188 Arizona

189 San Jose St
190 Stanford

191 FIU
192 Miami FL

193 ULM
194 Texas A&M

195 SMU
196 Arkansas St

197 Minnesota
198 FAU
 
Last edited:
Florida spread and Louisville/Kentucky over for sure. They cant set those high enough for me
 
HOU may be a POY if the spread is around -17 to -20 for me. Tulane's D is not nearly as good as the articles I've read have said.
 
Natti
Michigan St
Fresno St
Vandy
North Carolina
and a few totals depending on the number.....
 
I agree on the Louisville/Kentucky Over, as long as it is reasonable (nothing out of the 60's)

Also might be willing to lay huge points with the Sooners at home vs USU, as the way they are playing, laying 40 or whatever the spread might be with em may not be a bad idea.

Others I am interested in lines on include:
UConn at home vs Temple
PSU at home vs Buffalo
MSU at home vs Pitt
NIU at home vs EMU
A&M at home vs ULM
NW at home vs Duke
Purdue at home vs CMU
Indiana at home vs Akron
UNC getting points at home vs UVA
Georgia laying a big number vs WCU
Rutgers laying a big number vs Norfolk State
Texas Tech laying a big number at Rice
Mizzou/WMU Over and also Mizzou minus the points

Will have more thoughts later
 
Leans:

WVU over (all season long)
Uconn
PSU
Purdue
Michigan State
Washington -(i am a huge OSU fan, but boy are they over hyped thisyear)
Northwestern- duke is that bad, there returning starters must be blind.
Alabama- There front 4 are great and will limit mcfadden to a sub par day.
Louisville Over- depending on what the number is, they are over machines
Missouri- Great team this year, still developing an opinion.
UCLA- need to see what the line is, but UCLA is clicking on all cyclinders
Oklahoma- This line should be very rediculous but will need to see what it is.
UNC- They are playing very well this season and butch davis has them competing believe it or not.

BTW RJ, great thread, nothing like finnishing off a great week with starting off a new one.:cheers:
 
101 WVU -19.5
102 Maryland

103 TCU -14 won L2 by 32 ppg
104 Air Force

105 Oklahoma St -10.5
106 Troy

107 Illinois -8.5 9-2 v. cuse
108 Syracuse

109 Temple
110 UConn -9

111 Virginia -7.5
112 North Carolina

113 Buffalo
114 Penn State -37.5

115 Ole Miss
116 Vanderbilt -7 home team has won 5 of L6

117 Mississippi State avg SEC road opener loss by 33 ppg
118 Auburn -9.5

119 Central Michigan
120 Purdue -7.5

121 Cincinnati
122 Miami OH -2.5

123 Ohio
124 Virginia Tech -26

125 Iowa -22
126 Iowa St

127 Toledo
128 Kansas -6

129 Eastern Michigan
130 No. Illinois -8.5

131 Army
132 Wake Forest -23

133 Tennessee
134 Florida -5.5

135 Notre Dame
136 Michigan pkem

137 Utah St
138 Oklahoma -45.5

139 Fresno St
140 Oregon -11 5-0 SU but no win by more than 7+

141 Pittsburgh
142 Michigan St -3.5

143 Ohio St
144 Washington +9

145 Texas -27.5
146 UCF

147 La Tech
148 Cal -33.5

149 UCLA -16.5
150 Utah

151 Ball St
152 Navy -4

153 Akron
154 Indiana -5.5

155 USM -6.5
156 ECU

157 Western Michigan
158 Mizzou -10

159 Idaho
160 Washington St -17.5

161 Houston -7.5 L3 wins by 21 pts+
162 Tulane

163 L-Ville -9.5
164 Kentucky

165 Arkansas
166 Alabama -2

167 BC
168 Georgia Tech -3

169 Duke
170 Northwestern -11.5

171 Texas Tech -25.5
172 Rice

173 USC -9.5
174 Nebraska

175 UTEP avg points scored in L6 games was 65 pts
176 New Mexico St -2

177 Wyoming
178 Boise ST -17.5

179 BYU -15.5
180 Tulsa

181 Hawaii -24.5
182 UNLV home team is 6-2 ;8 of L10 decied by DD

183 Florida St -4
184 Colorado

185 SDSU have lost to ASU on avg of 35-9
186 Arizona St -26.5

187 New Mexico
188 Arizona -5

189 San Jose St
190 Stanford -3

191 FIU
192 Miami FL -19.5

193 ULM
194 Texas A&M -16.5

195 SMU -6
196 Arkansas St

197 Minnesota -8
198 FAU

MTSU
LSU -34 beat SB teams by 42 ppg





Just some early thoughts...Looks as if ASU saved my ass from and ugly day once again hopefully atleast looking to make 3-4 big plays and thats it as this year seems to be not alot of difference between 10-25 and 26-119. Need to pick my spots a little better I can't understand why I am making suck little profit usually these first 5 weeks are a raping of books but not this year. Lets get em this week.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
 
Last edited:
ATS Winners (Ride)

Rutgers 2-0
Oklahoma 2-0
Akron 2-0
Miami OH 2-0
Utah St 2-0
BC 2-0
Iowa 2-0
Penn St 2-0
Kansas St 2-0
Mizzou 2-0
UTEP 2-0
Bowling Green 2-0
Miami OH 2-0
Oregon 2-0
UCLA 2-0
Washington 2-0
LSU 2-0
<O:p</O:p
ATS Losers (Fade)<O:p</O:p
Navy 0-2
Minnesota 0-2
EMU 2-0
FSU 0-2
NC State 0-2
Virginia 0-2
Va Tech 0-2
Syracuse 0-2
SMU 0-2
Notre Dame 0-2
Toledo 0-2
Western Michigan 0-2
Utah 0-2
Auburn 0-2
San Jose St 0-2
 
Yeah, I don't include games against D1-AA on the list. So UM is 0-1 but we all know they're 0-2.

There are a few others on the list that are perfect too, but played a D1-AA team so don't get the perfect 2-0 ranking.

If they are 2-0 after next week, I'll include them.
 
bump :smiley_acbe:


can't wait to see the lines. well, except for ND/UM that is. gawd knows where that gets set now.
 
101 WVU -14.5
102 Maryland

103 TCU -9
104 Air Force

105 Oklahoma St - 14
106 Troy

107 Illinois - 21
108 Syracuse

109 Temple
110 UConn -6

111 Virginia
112 North Carolina - 7

113 Buffalo
114 Penn State -17

115 Ole Miss
116 Vanderbilt -7

117 Mississippi State
118 Auburn -8

119 Central Michigan
120 Purdue -6

121 Cincinnati -7
122 Miami OH

123 Ohio
124 Virginia Tech -9.5

125 Iowa -13.5
126 Iowa St

127 Toledo
128 Kansas -14

129 Eastern Michigan -3
130 No. Illinois

131 Army
132 Wake Forest -17

133 Tennessee
134 Florida -10.5

135 Notre Dame
136 Michigan -??No Henne?? What do you do with this?

137 Utah St
138 Oklahoma -20.5

139 Fresno St
140 Oregon -7

141 Pittsburgh
142 Michigan St -13.5

143 Ohio St -12
144 Washington

145 Texas -12
146 UCF

147 La Tech
148 Cal -13.5

149 UCLA -9
150 Utah

151 Ball St
152 Navy pk

153 Akron
154 Indiana -3

155 USM
156 ECU-7

157 Western Michigan
158 Mizzou -7.5

159 Idaho
160 Washington St -11

161 Houston
162 Tulane No clue.

163 L-Ville -6.5
164 Kentucky over 342

165 Arkansas
166 Alabama -6

167 BC
168 Georgia Tech -6.5

169 Duke
170 Northwestern -14

171 Texas Tech -21
172 Rice

173 USC -3
174 Nebraska

175 UTEP
176 New Mexico St -7

177 Wyoming
178 Boise ST -6

179 BYU
180 Tulsa -3

181 Hawaii -7
182 UNLV

183 Florida St -3
184 Colorado

185 SDSU
186 Arizona St -17

187 New Mexico -3
188 Arizona

189 San Jose St
190 Stanford pk

191 FIU
192 Miami FL -9

193 ULM
194 Texas A&M -10

195 SMU
196 Arkansas St -3.5

197 Minnesota -3
198 FAU[/QUOTE]

Some of these I have no idea about, so I just put the number where I think I might get even action.
 
i noticed my home teams have been hitting higher than away games i play so heres what i got so far let me know your opinions please...

Home Teams I am Leaning @ point spread listed or better not line prediction...

LSU -31
ASU -24
UNLV +17
Boise -21
Mizzou -10
Navy -3
WF -21
Vandy -7
PSU -31
Indiana -3

Same thing for Away Teams....

TT -28
Fresno +DD
TCU -14
WVU -21
 
Initial thoughts on lines that would bring even money on both sides. Just did these off the top of my head so I am sure some of these won't be close at all.

WVU -17.5 at Maryland
TCU -11.5 at Air Force
Okla State -21.5 at FAU
Temple +17.5 at UConn
Pitt +6.5 at MSU
Illinois -16.5 at Syracuse
Cincinnati -3 at Miami Ohio
Buffalo +38 at Penn State
UVA -4 at UNC
CMU +10.5 at Purdue
Citadel +30 at Wisky
Akron +7.5 at Indiana
EMU +7.5 at NIU
Miss State +17.5 at Auburn
Furman +26.5 at Clemson
 
Continued....

WCU +35.5 at Georgia
Minny -10.5 at FAU
Ohio +24.5 at VT
Iowa -24.5 at ISU
WMU +16.5 at Mizzou
EKU -3 at WKU
FIU +21.5 at Miami
Ohio State -13 at Washington
Texas -28 at UCF
Tenn +6.5 at Florida
ND +3.5 at Michigan
Utah State +41.5 at Oklahoma
Army +17.5 at Wake
Norfolk State +48 at Rutgers
Delaware State +21 at Kent
New Hampshire +8.5 at Marshall
Ball State +6.5 at Navy
UCLA -10 at Utah
 
Continued (can you tell I am doing this one page at a time haha)

SMiss -3.5 at ECU
Wofford +8.5 at NCSU
LT +24.5 at Cal
Idaho State +25.5 at Oregon State
Arkansas +3 at Alabama
SMU -3.5 at Arkie State
Toledo +10.5 at Kansas
Miss +6.5 at Vandy
Texas State +35.5 at Baylor
Alcorn State +16.5 at UAB
SCSU +28 at South C.
Fresno +13.5 at Oregon
ULM +31 at A&M
McNeese State +17.5 at ULL
Houston -25.5 at Tulane
Missouri State +35.5 at KSU
Louisville -9.5 at Kentucky
BC -1 at GT
 
Last Page...

Texas Tech -38 at Rice
UTEP +6.5 at NMSU
MTSU +35.5 at LSU
Wyoming +17.5 at Boise
Duke +17.5 at NW
USC -7.5 at Nebraska
Jackson State +17.5 at Memphis
BYU -3 at Tulsa
New Mex +4.5 at Zona
Nicholls State +17.5 at Nevada
Hawaii -24 at UNLV
SDSU +21.5 at ASU
SJSU +6.5 at Stanford
FSU -3.5 at Colorado
Idaho +21.5 at Washington State
 
Ok, I'll give this a shot.

101 WVU -18
102 Maryland

103 TCU -12.5
104 Air Force

105 Oklahoma St -11
106 Troy

107 Illinois -9
108 Syracuse

109 Temple
110 UConn -16

111 Virginia
112 North Carolina PK

113 Buffalo
114 Penn State -35

115 Ole Miss
116 Vanderbilt -8

117 Mississippi State
118 Auburn -15.5

119 Central Michigan
120 Purdue -11.5

121 Cincinnati -4.5
122 Miami OH

123 Ohio
124 Virginia Tech -22

125 Iowa -17
126 Iowa St

127 Toledo
128 Kansas -9.5

129 Eastern Michigan
130 No. Illinois -12

131 Army
132 Wake Forest -21.5

133 Tennessee
134 Florida -8.5

135 Notre Dame
136 Michigan ???

137 Utah St
138 Oklahoma -43

139 Fresno St
140 Oregon -14

141 Pittsburgh
142 Michigan St -8

143 Ohio St -8.5
144 Washington

145 Texas -24
146 UCF

147 La Tech
148 Cal -29.5

149 UCLA -14.5
150 Utah

151 Ball St
152 Navy -7

153 Akron
154 Indiana -7

155 USM -3
156 ECU

157 Western Michigan
158 Mizzou -13.5

159 Idaho
160 Washington St -20

161 Houston -15?
162 Tulane

163 L-Ville -7
164 Kentucky

165 Arkansas
166 Alabama -4

167 BC
168 Georgia Tech -3.5

169 Duke
170 Northwestern -14

171 Texas Tech -27
172 Rice

173 USC -7
174 Nebraska

175 UTEP
176 New Mexico St -6

177 Wyoming
178 Boise ST -10

179 BYU -5
180 Tulsa

181 Hawaii -23.5
182 UNLV

183 Florida St -1
184 Colorado

185 SDSU
186 Arizona St -22.5

187 New Mexico
188 Arizona -4

189 San Jose St
190 Stanford -4.5

191 FIU
192 Miami FL -24

193 ULM
194 Texas A&M -21

195 SMU
196 Arkansas St PK

197 Minnesota -7
198 FAU

Some of these were tough. Any insight appreciated. :cheers:

Edited two of them because they looked way off.
 
your lines are too low IMO redbearde i hope your right though and i'm way off

I'm not very good at line predictions...and some of them I really had to pull out of my ass.

and upon reflection, my 3TDs for Oklahoma is something of a joke......though I think 45 is a little extreme too.

:cheers:
 
Teams I may be looking to bet:

Navy
Michigan St.
FAU
San Jose St. (if price is right and Yonus Davis plays)
 
whats up fellas, hope ya'll killed it yesterday

Not going to pretend to have a feel for all the games, but I will drop some thoughts on a few games


111 Virginia
112 North Carolina

I was UVA believer in the preseason, and I am officially off the bandwagon. This looks like it will be another long year for the Wahoos. I am thinking that Virginia may open anywhere from 3 to 4.5 road favorites, and UNC may be attractive getting points at home vs. a horrendous road team.


133 Tennessee
134 Florida

I think Florida is one of the nation's most overrated teams right now, while UT is getting a little hated on because of a justifiable tough loss to California. I see UF as 7.5-8.5 home favorites and Tennessee to be a terrific underdog.

135 Notre Dame 136 Michigan

These teams are two completely different situations. Nobody is giving Oregon any credit for the game yesterday which is very harmful for perception. I would not trade Oregon's skill players on O with any other team in the country. Its not like they are some I-AA team. Anyways, Michigan should be able to regroup and shut down Notre Dame's pathetic excuse for an offense. They will get it together to score, even without Henne, too many weapons. This line could open anywhere and move anywhere, but I see Michigan opening at about -4, which will be attractive.


143 Ohio St
144 Washington

I see a lot of different projections on this game. It is hard to see TOSU really laying double digits on the road here to what is looking like a very solid Washington team. Do the Buckeyes have enough offense to cover a big spread? I think we see Washington around 9 point underdogs, and a great spot for them to keep cashing.

165 Arkansas
166 Alabama

This game is probably my biggest focus this week. Alabama is underrated, Arkansas is vastly overrated. Bama will probably be around 4 point favorites (should be considered a pick'em on a neutral). They have an excellent defense and should be able to stop the Hogs. Under anything above 40 should be money.

173 USC
174 Nebraska

I really disagree ya'lls projections on this one. No way is USC less than a touchdown favorite here. These guys will show up and the talent edge is huge. USC as a single digit road favorite looks very appealing, especially if it opens around 8 and people jump on the Huskers.
 
Texas Longhorns Game Review: Offensve vs TCU

by HornsFan Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 09:59:06 AM EDT

We'll start the TCU breakdown with a look at the offense.

Quarterbacks
I tend to think the term 'sophomore slump' gets bandied about carelessly as a lazy explanatory phenomena, but at halftime of last night's game? I was positively scared Colt McCoy was mired in one. He bounced back nicely, though, showing us the attributes that made us talk about him as a "gritty winner" before the season began in the first place.

Colt struggled mightily in the first half, but Greg Davis is as much to blame for those struggles as McCoy himself. The first interception - returned for a touchdown - was a matter of our hot reads becoming the most predictable plays in America. If you watch the film, the pass would have been intercepted not only by the DB who actually nabbed it, but also by the DB who was jumping Sweed's route on the sideline. TCU knew that was coming.

Even in the second half, Colt wasn't as accurate as we've come to expect him to be. His receivers made a lot of plays for him on balls that just weren't quite where they needed to be. And yet, we have to note that Colt's peformance in the second half is one of the reasons why we're so high on him. Remember Oklahoma last season, and that third down scramble and throw in the first quarter for a first down? Or Nebraska and his 50 yard pass to Sweed as he was obliterated? Or later in the game when he took us down a short field for a game-winning FG? Or even Texas Tech and that bounceback ability that rescued us from certain loss?
Lesser quarterbacks fold in adversity. McCoy has shown remarkable learning and adjusting ability in his young career so far, a quality that makes Texas dangerous whether they start a game well or not. For last night, Colt gets a passing grade, but not one of his best efforts. What he gets are bonus points for his ability to bounceback and make big plays when he had to, including a throw on the run to Nate Jones which turned the momentum of the game to the 'Horns.

<INS>GRADE: B-</INS>
<INS></INS>
Running Backs
The running game as a whole was much improved this week, though far from an effort you'd try to center your offense around. Jamaal Charles once again turned in a virtuoso performance, proving himself every bit the special runner that we believe he is.

The best adjustment we saw last night was a turn to more quick hitting plays for the tailbacks. Colt McCoy delivered the ball to Charles quickly time after time as Greg Davis got away from the slow developing counters, sweeps, and draws which hamstrung the running back's ability to get moving before the defenders were on top of him.

Elsewhere, Chris Ogbonnaya gave Texas some solid minutes, most notably with his blocking. And, to my delight, Texas turned to Vondrell McGee near the goal line, where he delivered a touchdown. His plow over the right guard was only a one yard score and came a play after he got stuffed over the left guard, but he got the job done in a fiery, inspiring manner. It was good to see.

<INS>GRADE: A-</INS>
<INS></INS>
Wide Receivers
Did you know that Nate Jones is your father? 'Cause he is. The senior continued his breakout season with an 8 catch, 91 yard performance last night, including the momentum-turning touchdown. When we talked in the offseason about why Texas needed to be a pass-first team, it centered around how difficult Texas was going to be to defend with six, seven, eight great receiving options to deal with. Injuries to Billy Pittman and Jordan Shipley have hardly mattered because Texas' depth at the position is so tremendous.

Last night also marked 2007 arrival parties for Quan Cosby and Jermichael Finley, each of whom were better utilized than they had been in week one. Limas Sweed didn't have one of his finest efforts as a Longhorn, but we're not dependent on him like many teams would be. These guys remain the team's greatest strength, and a reason why we've got a chance against anybody. We're still dependent on Colt getting them the ball, but they've proven that if he can, they'll make plays.

<INS>GRADE: A</INS>
<INS></INS>
Offensive Line
On the one hand, Chris Hall and Adam Ulatoski continue to struggle. On the other hand, Dallas Griffin and Tony Hills were fabulous last night. Hills, in particular, had an absolutely outstanding evening, giving McCoy time to make plays by keeping that bulldog Ortiz from being too disruptive. If Mack Brown gives out gameballs, I hope he gives two to Tony Hills.
There's some uncertainty now with Ulatoski falling on his wrist in the second half, and I don't think sliding Chris Hall to right tackle is the answer. Let me rephrase that: I know sliding Chris Hall to right tackle is not the answer. I'd guess - and hope - that the coaches will see this week if Tray Allen's ready to rock and roll. Even money says he's startinng for Texas next week against Rice.

One other point worth mentioning: we've been waiting to see if Cedric Dockery could make it all the way back from his knee injury. Last night, he played big minutes and gave Texas a push in the running game that had been sorely lacking since he went down against OU last year. If Allen is ready to play right tackle and Dockery's back from his injury? That really only leaves left guard as a position that needs to improve.

Overall, you have to give this group a lot of credit. Texas faced the best or second-best defensive line it will see all year and passed the test just fine. The blame for McCoy's mistakes belong to him and Greg Davis, not the offensive line.

The run blocking was good enough, and that's all we really needed to see. They got the push they needed to on short to-go situations, and kept TCU defenders occupied so that JC could get moving. I'm happy with that.

<INS>GRADE: B</INS>
<INS></INS>
Offensive Coaching
I distinctly remember going to my computer during halftime of the Oklahoma game last season and typing something to the effect of, "If we see the same ineptitude and chickenshit conservatism on offense in the second half as we saw in the second quarter of this game, I'll not disagree with anyone who wants to fire Greg Davis."

I more or less said the same thing last night:

I'll never forget at halftime of the OU game last season coming to my keyboard and typing something really, really nasty.

We came out in the 2nd half and responded.

I'll just say this: if there's not a complete 180 for the offense in the second half, you can hand me a pitchfork and look for me at the front of the line.


The offensive gameplan in the first half last night was just that - offensive. The unimaginable was unfolding right in front of our eyes - a shotgun, spread pass attack becoming vanilla... predictable.
We were all thinking it: "Only Greg Davis could take such dynamic weapons and..."

And then, wow, we made adjustments. We started moving Colt out of the pocket. We ran some nifty play action passes. The misdirection pass back to Jermichael Finley was a gorgeous play.

Essentially, we made things far more chaotic for the TCU defense, and they just couldn't keep up. One of the most elementary principles for offensive coordinators to remember is that their biggest advantage is that his players know what's about to unfold and the defenders do not. If you give away that advantage, it really doesn't matter what else you do. Davis finally mixed things up enough that TCU was reacting to us, instead of anticipating what was headed their way. And once you've got them doing that, you've reasserted your primacy and can dictate outcomes.
What's critical now is that this lesson be carried over into Texas' next big games. There are a lot of bright men guiding defenses around the Big 12 who will happily contain a predictable McCoy-based attack. Here's to hoping Davis watches the second half, sees how effective we can be when we're keeping defenders guessing, and stretches the limits of his playbook. He's got a lot of exciting tools at his disposal, after all. So go ahead, Greg: sit down, look at your fun toys, and play with them. I think you'll like what they can do.

<INS>GRADE: C+</INS>
 
With 2 weeks under our belt, some serious adjustments to my PRs have been made, which scares me a bit. Concerned about overreaction.

Some of the top movers (up and down) are OU, LSU, Michigan, ND, Toledo, and UVA.

Also, I'm looking to see if Texas can put together a full 60 minute game against UCF this week. Everyone should know that UCF is off a bye week and is opening their new on-campus stadium that seats nearly 50,000. This game has been sold out for awhile and it will be a rockin' atmosphere as long as UCF is competing in the game. There are alot of Texas fans travelling for this one too.

If Texas can string together 60 minutes of football like they played in the 2H against TCU, it won't be close at all. But besides TCU, this game concerns Texas fans the most out of our first 6 games. Possible let-down spot for Texas, but hopefully Mack will be able to build off that 2nd half. The team did show quite a bit of confidence during that half and the body language finally looked like a Texas football team.
 
I posted this in the CTG Top 10 poll, but there's no comments allowed there so let me comment here instead:

1. LSU
2. USC
3. OU
4. WVU
5. Florida
6. Rutgers
7. Texas
8. Cal
9. Penn State
10. Oregon

USC is only this high really on reputation and expectations. I did not see much at all against Idaho and we will really see how good they are against Nebraska this week.

My national championship matchup right now is LSU v. OU, but that assumes LSU escapes the SEC undefeated. As we all know, no matter how good a team is that SEC schedule can crush all hopes and all teams seem to have a great deal of parity.

I actually made Rutgers my #5 team before making some adjustments. I am very impressed by the speed on both sides of the ball and Teel has improved so much (at least against bad pass defenses of Buffalo and Navy). But due to Big East reputation and conference strengths, I downgraded them.

Cal, Texas, Rutgers, and Florida are all about the same, but I'll give a slight edge to Florida and Rutgers. Texas needs to show me a good 60 minutes of football to climb. Rutgers needs to play a good opponent (although Navy is close). Florida and Cal both have relied on their offense to win games so far and the defenses are suspect. We'll see if Florida's young D can handle Tennessee this week (I think they can).
 
Sunday Morning QB - Hypocricy on Parade


My my my…isn’t this interesting?

These are the days that I love writing about NU fans. Oh sure, watching you implode and lose 70-10 was fun. And yes, Oklahoma State running up and down the field on you last year was mildly amusing as well. But the days where you are at the top of your insecure game are days like today. These are the days that I can’t wait to fire up my PC…grab a cup of coffee, and check out to see just what idiotic sewage drips out of your keyboards.

Let’s start with the positives first shall we?

Mocking your uncreative and extremely predictable attitudes not withstanding, I’m well aware that Nebraska…at one point..was a very good program. I’m vaguely familiar with your National Titles (some of them weren’t even split with other teams), I’ve seen you play in person. I’ve watched highlight shows for years and years. I think it’s safe to say that deep down, I completely respect Nebraska’s standing as a ½ decent football program, that most likely will never sink to the depths of Kansas, San Jose or Florida International. (At least, I don’t THINK you will.)

So fast forward to the comments over yesterday’s game…where you very quickly (and predictably I might add), throw out the fact that I’ve told you for months that Wake is a pretty good team. And yes, I’ll readily admit Wake is a ½ decent team, who has won some big games in the past few years. (OK, last year). I’ll even give you the fact that the game was played on the road….although from the looks of it..that place was not only sold out..but apparently Wake Forest fans don’t really give a shit about their team very much. How do you not sell that out? Perhaps you’re not the draw you think you are? Regardless, what you are doing is choosing to ignore is the WAY you played against that team…pathetically (and unsuccessfully I might add) trying to spin the game is your only hope to save face, within the rapid oncoming realization that you just might not be as good as you thought.

I like how last week you instantly threw at me, “Don’t even think about using Wake’s injured QB as an excuse”. Ummmm….no. Did any of you actually WATCH the game? Do any of you have enough common sense to recognize when a QB sucks? That kid under center for Wake yesterday was horrible. I’m not saying that as the unbiased blogging columnist that I am…I’m saying it because it was true. Is it mildly upsetting to you that Wake outgained you, running the same three plays over and over and over again? Did it cross your mind that BC last week held that team to TWO yards rushing? (For you math majors..that’s 1+1).

That kid at QB COMPLETELY changed the game, and you STILL nearly lost. The best part is, I haven’t even touched on the fact that they dropped a wide-open pass, nor have I mentioned today (yet again) the fact that the refs completely bent them over, on one of the worst non-calls I’ve ever seen to end a game.

Let’s face it: Bashing Gary Pinkel right now isn’t going to make JC Keller hit open receivers. Mocking my creative writing skills isn’t going to make Mo Purify give a shit and actually CATCH a ball that hits him in the hands. Throwing out names to me that would make a 5th grader roll his eyes isn’t going to make your D-line any faster. (They’re very very slow).

I find it more than amusing that you’re throwing out the “A win’s a win” card, when just last week, a vast majority of you mocked teams like Missouri for doing the exact same thing. (twice now). Nothing to me is more hypocritical (and funny) than watching you lecture the rest of us that it’s all about rolling up yards one week..and then doing a 180, and proposing that NONE of that matters. Even worse, you’re touting Wake Forest as the same team that won 10 games last year….which may still be true. However, that Wake forest team is now 0-2, and is being run by a first year QB, who was limited to running draw plays on 3rd and 6 in NU territory.

Look, I understand more than anyone your insatiable need to be recognized for your greatness. TRUST me, I do. But you’ve backed yourself into this corner, and now you have to prepare to deal with the after-effects.

JC isn’t NEARLY as good as you thought
Your O-line looked choppy at times
Your D-line is slow and inconsistent
Your DB’s can’t handle physical receivers
Your special teams play is average at best
Your running game is predictable
You have the 5th best set of WR’s in the conference. (if that)

And what does all this say about your coaching staff? We already know what magic Kevin Cosgrove can run, but when an “Experienced leader” like JC is getting delay of game penalties because he doesn’t know what to do…isn’t that a problem with the coaching staff? Isn’t it an issue with the guy you just gave 1.75million per year to, when you make the IDIOTIC call to go for it on 4th and 2 at the opposing 40? (Especially when the opposing QB has the throwing ability of an 8th grade girl. Granted, the 8th grade girl might have more experience than him).

But don’t worry right? Help is on the way right?

Ummmmm maybe not. Remember when you guys were talking about Blaine Gabbert leading you through a smooth transition next year? Remember when you touted him as a 4 year starter right off the bat? Well, Blaine may not get to start his game next week…and it aint because of injury.

(Link)

Perhaps he would play a bit better if you idiots would stop text messaging him, and filling his head with delusions that NOBODY could possibly live up to. The end of Joe Millionaire was easier to predict than this.

* Speaking of answering questions…I find it pretty funny that some of you..with nothing else left in the cannon apparently, have tried to smack Missouri in defense of your own teams shitty performance? Umm…since when was winning by 13 on the road to an SEC team not good enough? Last time I checked, a double digit win wasn’t anything to be real concerned about. What’s that? 500 yards given up? Ummm..perhaps you might be a bit more worried about your slow-defensive lineman and linebackers trying to chase the big Tiger receivers up and down the field. And for the record, the same QB you guys mock for his youtube antics is 68 for 96 (71%), for 690 yards, 8TD’s and 0 int’s. Does it really matter if the Tigers give up 500 yards if their offense is scoring at will?

The problem there is, in the spread offense, it’s hard to grind the ball out. Plus, if your offense is scoring in 3 minute spurts…isn’t it a bit much to ask your defense to be at the top of their game when you’re up 28 and have to be on the field still for 40 minutes solid?

My biggest worry as a Mizzou fan is that they’ll be looking ahead to OU, because in that environment, with that matchup and seeing how JC handles pressure…might be a long evening for you. I’m sure we might talk about that game here a time or two in the meantime. Either way, if you, as a Husker fan, are not a bit more worried this morning about that matchup, you might want to lay off the meth and come down a bit before you start making idiotic statements like that.

More to come in a few days. I’d add some more, but I have an Elite 11 QB awards ceremony to go to. (I’m being named MVP). Apparently, they give those things away like candy at a parade.

Who knew?

Enjoy USC week. Can’t wait to see you make an idiot out of yourself on Gameday.
 
Week 2 Husker Report Card: Wake Forest

by Husker Mike Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 11:16:56 AM EDT

Well, it's time to break out the Big Red pen again and grade the Huskers' performance yesterday against Wake Forest, as well as the rest of the world of College Football.
Offensive Line: B- Didn't give up a sack yesterday, though they didn't open up holes like they did against Nevada.
Running Backs: C+ Marlon Lucky struggled mightily with inside running, looking very tentative. Once he got outside, he was able to show a burst, such as on his third quarter touchdown run.
Quarterback: D+ Yes, he completed over 50% of his passes and ran a very nice two minute drill. But he repeatedly misfired early and even worse, locked onto his receivers the whole afternoon. His grade drops further when you add in his 2 interceptions and 2 fumbled snaps. Ball security is a key in this offense.
Wide Receivers: B- Maurice Purify joined the Husker Dropsy corps after the criminal justice major served his one-game suspension for his two arrests. Nate Swift and Terrence Nunn made several nice catches.
Defensive Line: C+ Ndamakong Suh was a beast yesterday, but the rest of the d-line was neutralized by Wake's game plan to take the game wide.
Linebackers: B- Steve Octavien had several nice stops, Corey McKeon wiffed on a tackle early, then intercepted Wake on the next play.
Secondary: C Zack Bowman saved the game with a huge interception, but injuries to Cortney Grixby and Tierre Green hurt this unit. Struggled most of the day keeping track of WR Kenneth Moore who ran wild for much of the first three quarters.
Special Teams: C Adi Kunalic made up for an out-of-bounds kickoff with his 75 yard do-over to the goal line. Anthony Blue averted near disaster by fielding a punt after Todd Peterson ran into Nate Swift near the Husker 10.
Coaching: D+ Bill Callahan gets some criticism for emphasizing the passing game with a struggling Keller. Kevin Cosgrove stuck with his 4 man line too much with Wake running wide all day. I would have liked to have seen more of the 3-4 against this group. Callahan was channelling his inner Gary Pinkel by running the same play on 4th and 2 late in the game that he ran on 3rd down.
Overall: C+ It's a win, but plenty of things to work on.
Officials: D- What was up with that chain gang measurement in the first half where they pushed the stick back towards the ball, awarding Wake a first down with the chain hanging loose with lots of slack on it. I still think Moore fumbled the ball before stepping out at the 1, and Wake fans are still screaming for a flag on that 4th down pass at the end of the game.
Elsewhere in College Football:
Michigan: F (Or as the M-Zone puts it, the Team-That-Used-to-Be-Michigan...)
Rest of the Bigger 10: D+ (Sparty, Gophers, Hoosiers, and Buckeyes struggle with MAC teams, Illini struggle with 1-AA team, Badgers come back late against UNLV)
Kansas: A (2nd straight blowout, though against 1-AA)
LSU: A+ (Sorry USC, but LSU is the best in the land right now.)
Oklahoma: A+ (Sorry USC, but the Sooners should pass you up as well...)
Iowa State: F (Maybe they could schedule a game with the Weasels so SOMEONE gets a W...)
 
I Refuse to Implode Over This




Friday night sucked. We can all agree on this. If you were smart, like me, you probably found something fun to do while taping the game at home. This would have saved you a considerable amount of frustration and probably staved off the deducting of several months from your life expectancy. But, more than anything else, it would have given you the opportunity to see this game in perspective, which I think is the most important thing we can take out of Friday night.

Navy did not play well against Rutgers, that is unless you define "playing well" as turning the ball over three times on interceptions, giving up 476 yards of defense, and losing by seventeen points. Other than that, things were peachy. The o-line looked out of sync, tackling was conspicuously absent at times, and Kaipo was less than impressive throwing the football to the guys in the white jerseys. Not only that, our head coach, who many have long viewed as completely infallible, has gone on record of saying that he made a poor play call on a pass that was intercepted in the end zone. I also realize that the Mids lost two of their top defenders on defense early in the game, and turned the ball over in key circumstances. Kaipo-Noa's two interceptions in the endzone may not have cost the game for Navy, but they certainly made the game look a lot more ugly than it would have otherwise been. That's at least six points for Navy had those interception not occurred, and that's not even factoring in the the pick Kaipo threw deep m in his own territory. But as upset I am over Navy's performance Friday night and as disappointed I am for the players and the coaching staff, I realize that Navy lost this game to a legitimate Top 15 team.


There is no denying this. I've gone on record numerous times saying that Rutgers is overrated, a point which I am now retracting. Don't get me wrong, I still absolutely cannot stand their players, coaches, or fans, but I'm no longer letting my emotions cloud my perception of the team's standing in the college football rankings. The simple fact is that Navy fell to a much better team the other night, and had the Midshipmen played as well as they were capable of playing on offense (ie no turnovers) then we would all be gushing over the great effort of the team and how close we are to whatever indefinable quality we subject our expectations to.

I refuse to implode over this loss, and refuse to call the entire outlook of the season into question. We are still only two games in, and after a less than impressive beginning to the season we're about to learn a whole lot about this team. After playing away on Friday nights the past two weeks, the Midshipmen will finally return home for the next three weeks to face Ball State, Duke, and Air Force. While none of these games are" gimmes" they are nevertheless winnable, and will likely determine the course of the rest of the season.

Schiano and the Late Touchdown

I'm sorta torn on how I feel about Schiano going for the late touchdown with about two minutes left. Rutgers was up 34-17 at the time, and any objective individual would have deemed the extra points unnecessary, even with a late Navy touchdown engineered by Jarod Bryant. I don't like Shciano, but my reasons for this are complicated and often politically incorrect, so I won't get into them here. But even considering my intense dislike for the man and his program, I recognize that this is college football, and although it may be classy to take a knee and center the ball, it's not always expected. I think Craig James and Chris Spielman were trying to allude to this in the broadcast, and also mentioned that Schiano was trying to reward Rice. This is the part I have some trouble buying, as Rice was a little hobbled at this point and sticking him in there was just a cheap move to pad his numbers for the Heisman race. If Schiano was so insistent on getting a touchdown, he should of given it to his third string fullback or some such and let a kid who works his ass off in practice get a freaking chance.

Injuries

From what I understand Jeff Deliz and Clint Sovie are both doubtfull for next week. This is going to hit us hard, especially considering how well Jeff was playing against Rutgers before he went down the other night. I like the freshman Wyatt Middleton at safety a lot, but I'm not so sure that Pospisil and Haberer can fill in opposite Irv Spencer. Speaking of Irv, this now becomes his defense with the loss of Deliz and Sovie. Irv is an emotional guy with a lot of ability, and it now falls on his shoulders to make sure the defense can bounce back on the field next week.

Bad Cal

I didn't see this whole game due to some taping difficulties, but the penalty on Reggie Campbell for illegal motion or whatever was one of the dumbest calls I've ever seen. As coach Johnson later said, the referee who made the call had no idea what he was doing, and just panicked because he didn't recognize the formation. It was complete and utter nonsense.

I'll have more up later this evening.
 
Correction to the lines:

Should read "188 Arizona" not ASU. Made the correction in the first post.
 
101 WVU -17
102 Maryland

103 TCU -12
104 Air Force

105 Oklahoma St -14
106 Troy

107 Illinois -14
108 Syracuse

109 Temple
110 UConn -17

111 Virginia
112 North Carolina -4

113 Buffalo
114 Penn State -32

115 Ole Miss
116 Vanderbilt -8

117 Mississippi State
118 Auburn -13

119 Central Michigan
120 Purdue -12

121 Cincinnati -5
122 Miami OH

123 Ohio
124 Virginia Tech -15

125 Iowa -14
126 Iowa St

127 Toledo
128 Kansas -16

129 Eastern Michigan
130 No. Illinois -13

131 Army
132 Wake Forest -26

133 Tennessee
134 Florida -7

135 Notre Dame
136 Michigan -5

137 Utah St
138 Oklahoma -41

139 Fresno St
140 Oregon -10

141 Pittsburgh
142 Michigan St -7

143 Ohio St
144 Washington -1

145 Texas -17
146 UCF

147 La Tech
148 Cal -28

149 UCLA -12
150 Utah

151 Ball St
152 Navy -8

153 Akron
154 Indiana -12

155 USM
156 ECU -4

157 Western Michigan
158 Mizzou -14

159 Idaho
160 Washington St -17

161 Houston -19
162 Tulane

163 L-Ville -5
164 Kentucky

165 Arkansas -2
166 Alabama

167 BC
168 Georgia Tech -3

169 Duke
170 Northwestern -14

171 Texas Tech -21
172 Rice

173 USC -7
174 Nebraska

175 UTEP
176 New Mexico St -2

177 Wyoming
178 Boise ST -14

179 BYU -7
180 Tulsa

181 Hawaii -7
182 UNLV

183 Florida St -1
184 Colorado

185 SDSU
186 Arizona St -29

187 New Mexico
188 Arizona -7

189 San Jose St -3
190 Stanford

191 FIU
192 Miami FL -30

193 ULM
194 Texas A&M -21

195 SMU -4
196 Arkansas St

197 Minnesota -5
198 FAU

199 MTSU
200 LSU -38

----------------

I usually don't make changes to my raw numbers, but this week I did. Here are my raw numbers and changes:

WVU -17 (raw -15)
Illinois -14 (-13)
UConn -17 (-16)
Iowa -14 (-18)
Oregon -10 (-13)
Michigan St -7 (-6)
Cal -28 (-36)
Wash St -17 (-25)
Boise ST -14 (-15)
Texas A&M -21 (-25)
NW -14 (-21)
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
 
My initial early line shopping list:

TTech
BYU
TCU
Houston
Fresno St
Iowa St
WVU
L-ville/UK over (if in 60s, low 70s maybe--both can score and can't defend, but this is a rivalry game)
Florida
UNC (if dog)
Cincy
Michigan St
UConn
PSU
OU
Vandy
ASU

Most of these will have inflated numbers so I'm looking for value. Of all these games, I think the best lines will be found at:

Michigan St
WVU
Fresno St
Houston
BYU
Vandy
Iowa St

I'm looking for Iowa State to be a huge dog in this game. Dog has covered the last whatever and is a consistently good play. Not crazy about how ISU is playing, but Iowa has beaten two not so good teams badly. Will certainly help out with the line.
 
If the lines came out at where I am projecting, here are the leans I would be focused against...

MSU -6.5 vs Pitt (would want 6 or less though)
UNC +4 vs UVA (would want 4.5 or more though)
Purdue -10.5 vs CMU (would want less than 10 though)
Indiana 7.5 vs Akron (6.5 or less better)
Georgia -35.5 vs WCU
Oklahoma -41.5 vs USU

I think the lines are gonna be really tight this week, so would be shocked if I find more than 5-7 plays at the most for week 3.
 
Here are the games I am hoping my lines are off on, as I would lean towards these plays if that is the case...

UCONN - anything under 17 worth a look for me
Illinois - hoping for under 14
Houston - Hoping for under 3 scores
Texas Tech - Hoping for under 4 scores
ASU - Hoping for under 17
UCLA - Hoping for under 10 on the road
 
Sunday Morning Quarterback
By SMQ
Posted on Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 03:32:34 PM EDT
</I>


The outcome was immediately obvious, so I missed the second half of LSU's beatdown of Virginia Tech for more productive pursuits. At some point after I'd stopped watching, I got this text message:
  • I am a better qb than sean glennon. And i am drunk
d1dafae1_7898_43d5_a477_41d251642997.jpg

Glennon: Only wishes he was drunk.
- - -
Since the sender is not, nor ever has been (to my knowledge) a Division I quarterback, or a quarterback of any kind not involving an armchair, that can be racked up as hyperbole. But only to some degree.

Not that Glennon had a chance. Holy god, LSU's defense was hanging all over the poor kid from his first snap to his last, which only seemed like an eternity - it was actually about a quarter and a half, and by the time Tyrod Taylor came off the bench for his turn in the role of punching bag LSU had slammed the door shut, knocked it off its hinges in the process, replaced it with another door, and slammed the new door shut. With authoriteh.
Virginia Tech's offensive woes - seven points on 149 total yards, with eight punts - were entirely unsurprising. The Hokies weren't much better than that against East Carolina. But there is no accounting for Tech's defense allowing 600 yards to anyone. Five-hundred ninety-eight yards and 48 points. For real. It was ripped up front, it was ripped deep, it allowed long, sustained drives and big plays. It never had a chance.
So either Saturday night was the definitive exposure of a derelict team already burdened with popular skepticism, or LSU is a sledgehammer and the SEC is a big, fat watermelon. It might turn out to be the former, and sincere condolences to Hokie partisans if the first two weeks are representative of the rest of your season, but for everyone else, I'd be prepping the plastic splash guards anyway.
Onwards:
SMQ WATCHED...
...with various degrees of vigilance...
OREGON 39 • MICHIGAN 7
- - -
We have our answer: if Appalachian State was a mirage or aberration, its scarring effects on the Wolverine psyche will prove enduring, and have already wrecked 2007. Except nothing Oregon did Saturday seemed like a mirage: <TABLE cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=2><CAPTION align=top>Michigan Defense</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #5364b7"><TD align=middle></TD><TD align=middle>2006 (Games 1-11)</TD><TD align=middle>vs. Oregon</TD><TD align=middle>Last 4 Games</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Pts./Game</TD><TD align=middle>12.1</TD><TD align=middle>39</TD><TD align=middle>36.8</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=right>Yds./Game</TD><TD align=middle>231.5</TD><TD align=middle>624</TD><TD align=middle>488.3</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Yds./Carry</TD><TD align=middle>1.3</TD><TD align=middle>6.5</TD><TD align=middle>4.9</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD align=right>Yds./Pass</TD><TD align=middle>5.5</TD><TD align=middle>11.3</TD><TD align=middle>9.1</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>Sacks/Game</TD><TD align=middle>3.73</TD><TD align=middle>1</TD><TD align=middle>1.4</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

d7227e9b_4cf2_47d1_a6bf_a8c0ed98882d.jpg

It wasn't supposed to end like this.
- - -
The last two weeks could easily be chalked up to the departure of unprecedented all-American experience and talent in tandem with the youthful folly of its replacements. This was a ubiquitous preseason storyline, and obviously a correct one. But "youth," as you know, is a shallow scapegoat. Going back to Troy Smith's breakout game in 2004, in fact, the one that preceded Vince Young's breakout game in the Rose Bowl and the worst (full) season of Carr's tenure in 2005, it could be argued that the first, dominant two and a half months of last season was the mirage in a slow descent that hit bottom last week and plunged right through it, Wile E. Coyote style, in a very public display of confusion, mental lapse and plain physical dominance. It's this idea, which the rest of the country is only just beginning to realize, that had Michiganders seemingly irrationally close to the edge about the defense in the offseason, then plunging off it even before Saturday's debacle.

The only individual on the roster who has looked like a player from Michigan - rather than, say, Indiana or Northwestern - is the nigh-unstoppable Mike Hart, the put-upon engine who singlehandedly pushes the rest of the machine forward when it doesn't want to budge. That includes the quarterback whose fate has been intrinsically tied with Hart's from the beginning, and who ultimately might stand as the defining face of Michigan in their era. With Hart and Braylon Edwards, Chad Henne led Michigan to the Big Ten title and came within a point of outduelling Young in the Rose Bowl as a true freshman. He's started more games, thrown for more touchdowns, done more of anything else than any other Michigan quarterback, and has always seemed so uniquely poised to reach greater heights. He was making his 40th straight start Saturday, very possibly one of his last, and you couldn't help but wonder watching him against Oregon if the culmination of his career will be one of personal regression. Henne was erratic and threw a killer fourth quarter interception against Appalachian State. His first touchdown Saturday was an impressive, veteran throw up high to an ostensibly covered Adrian Arrington, but he had already been baited into an interception earlier on a presnap blitz read that led to a one-man route into double coverage and he continued to struggle with reads against heavy blitzing until the decision to keep in the locker room at halftime. At this stage of his career, is it still so difficult to find and man coverage when the defense sends six? On a desperate 4th-and-goal, is the best option a no-read lob to a receiver lucky to be listed at six feet even, as Henne unsuccessfully tossed at Mario Manningham on his team's last chance to remain in the game in the second quarter?
abaa65b0_4d3d_4db5_aa51_11c7159ff37c.jpg

Even the innocent shall not be spared.
- - -
And so, though it was due to injury rather than incompetence, the accession to Ryan Mallett in the second half seemed symbolic of Michigan's mindset: there is a future, at least, and the present anguish is best spent in its service. When Henne returns, if Henne returns, it will be only to salvage what's left of his legacy, not add to it, and even then, even with Notre Dame and the entire Big Ten schedule looming, it's apparent the next era of Michigan football is already moving into the offices as the old one moves out.

• Lost in the Wolverines' spectacular demise is the really frightening speed on display from Oregon, which looked fantastic again Saturday under any circumstances.The Statue of Liberty and Dennis Dixon's touchdown off the same action was just a little fun at the dying beast's expense, but Dixon was effortlessly running circles around the Michigan D as Jonathan Stewart was plowing through it and Brian Paysinger and Derrick Jones and Jaison Williams were pouring gasoline and throwing matches all over the highly flammable secondary.
But we've seen such fireworks from the Ducks before, haven't we? And we know they don't always last. The same offense did this to Oklahoma last year, right? And then went on to a losing record in the Pac Ten because Dixon and Stewart proved unfocused, inconsistent and gimpy week-to-week, and the defense was repeatedly trashed. And we saw that Saturday, too, didn't we? Michigan had 365 total yards, and Hart averaged five per carry, and long first half drives by the Wolverines ended in a missed field goal and a turnover on downs, and if not for the four Michigan turnovers - the kind that didn't go Oregon's way last year, when it was minus-15 in six losses - Saturday's game is much closer than it was.
So there's no denying how good Oregon looked and how tough that offense is going to be to defend over the rest of the season if it remains healthy, even if the evidence came against a defense in full-on retreat. But we'll have to judge over the next three weeks, culminating against Cal on Sept. 29, whether or not that appears more sustainable this time.
SOUTH CAROLINA 16 • GEORGIA 12
- - -
The Gamecocks' beleaguered offensive line deserves some praise for faciliatating a sustained running game in tough circumstances, but the story of the game is the resiliency of South Carolina's defense. USC couldn't stop Knowshon Moreno, but against the wall, it held every time:
Moreno averaged 7.4 per carry and maybe deserved more than 14 of them - after Mikey Henderson returned a punt 31 yards to the Carolina 47 with six minutes to go, with UGA down 16-9 and needing a touchdown to tie, Moreno broke off two straight first down runs to the USC 11...and didn't touch the ball again as three straight Matt Stafford passes fell incomplete and the Bulldogs had to settle for another field goal. Which proved worthless.
<TABLE cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=2><CAPTION align=top>Georgia Drives in USC Territory</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #f26e6e"><TD></TD><TD>Plays</TD><TD>Yards</TD><TD>Result</TD></TR><TR><TD>1st Qtr.</TD><TD align=middle>12</TD><TD align=middle>44</TD><TD>Missed FG</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD>2nd Qtr.</TD><TD align=middle>13</TD><TD align=middle>71</TD><TD>FG Good</TD></TR><TR><TD>3rd Qtr.</TD><TD align=middle>5</TD><TD align=middle>44</TD><TD>TO on Downs</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD>3rd Qtr.</TD><TD align=middle>6</TD><TD align=middle>49</TD><TD>FG Good</TD></TR><TR><TD>4th Qtr.</TD><TD align=middle>7</TD><TD align=middle>38</TD><TD>FG Good</TD></TR><TR><TR style="BACKGROUND: #eaeaea"><TD>4th Qtr.</TD><TD align=middle>7</TD><TD align=middle>31</TD><TD>FG Good</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
But Georgia did the same thing, repeatedly forcing kicks of one variety or another - the difference in the game was South Carolina's touchdown drive in the second half, the one finished by a sweet Cory Boyd juke that literally provided the winning margin in the end, because it was the only drive either offense finished. If there's any criticism to be drawn of Georgia's defense that isn't equally deserved by Carolina's, it's that UGA allowed Boyd to rumble for three first downs on the Gamecocks' final drive, milking 3:16 off the clock before forcing a punt and thus putting Stafford in too tough a position - 80 yards for a touchdown in 1:14 - for a realistic comeback.
This might be the biggest win in Spurrier's short tenure at Carolina, moreso than beating struggling Florida and Tennessee teams in 2005, because it's exactly the kind of tense game his team lost again and again last year. The Cocks have never been a serious division contender, and breaking through on the road, off a lackluster effort in the first game, against one of the most impressive teams of opening weekend, lends real credibility to that ambition. For now. OKLAHOMA 51 • MIAMI 13
- - -
The only question about Oklahoma coming into the season was its quarterback, and answering with a redshirt freshman is generally a fatal liability in the big picture. Two weeks in, the only question about Sam Bradford is his deep ball, because he's been perfect on everything else. He treated North Texas' defense like it didn't exist and was about as perfect in the system against a very fast, presumably very competent Miami defense Saturday. Coaches are only asking Bradford to hit a lot of quick throws right now, mostly slants and little flares, and his receivers have done a brilliant job of taking good throws and bad safety angles to the house - there was very little difference in any of Malcolm Kelly's three touchdowns Saturday, two of them slant-and-runs, and the 65-yard slant he broke against North Texas (watch #28 Willie Cooper's terrible pursuit on Kelly's second touchdown here).
8d102400_f742_4db4_bf2d_68f60217f6fa.jpg

Taking candy from a 'Cane.
- - -
Down the road, it makes sense that some defense will walk up on the receivers to take away the short, sweet stuff and force Bradford to make plays over their head. Right now, that looks like their only chance, and it's still not necessarily a very good one.

• Where OU's freshman was a sensation, the 'Canes' upperclassmen were regularly sitting ducks without a clue. Kyle Wright's first drive of the season - Miami's first touchdown drive - took up almost the entire second half of the second quarter and holds the early lead for Most Tortured Possession of the season. Eighteen plays, three third-and-long conversions, a fake field goal attempt that survived a botched snap, a goal line stand bailed out by the second end zone pass interference penalty in five plays, a fumbled option pitch and finally, mercifully, a touchdown.
At that moment, it looked like Wright possessed some rejuvenative powers the 100 percent ineffective Kirby Freeman did not, especially after Wright also brought the Hurricanes within eight points on a short field goal drive after a Sooner fumble early in the third quarter. It wasn't much of a reprieve, though: under Wright's guidance the rest of the half, Miami racked up a first down on its first snap of the third quarter and didn't gain another, going three-and-out on its last five possessions. Oklahoma scored after every one of them, and Miami's long offseason debate goes on in the most pessimistic fashion possible.
• Oklahoma punter Michael Cohen should have just kicked the snap that sailed over his head in the first quarter out of the end zone for two points rather than falling on it so the `Canes could have a shot at seven instead (they settled for a field goal, natch), but the worst part of that play is this: rather than count the botch as a turnover, new NCAA rules mark the yardage off as a fourth down loss against the offense - the play by play registers it as a "team loss" of 42 yards. So the Sooners' official rushing numbers - 116 yards on 2.6 per carry - are totally misleading; DeMarco Murray had 63 yards on 4.3 per, Allen Patrick averaged 6.7 for 47 yards, and OU moved the ball effectively on the ground against a defense that allowed 2.3 per carry last year.
You just don't get cameraman humor: Ron Franklin had no idea who he was, and thus ignored his cameraman's no doubt ironic shot in the third quarter of iconic, over-the-top pro wrestling announcer and OU alum Jim Ross. I only mention this because the comedic potential of having Ross introduce the Sooner starting lineups is about as great as that very limited format could allow - "Oh my god, here comes Jermaine Gresham at tight end...and he's got a steel chair!!" - and ABC instead went with the detestable Toby Keith. If you're going to go with a redneck homer, at least pick the one who doesn't bend the bill of his quasi-chic faux cowboy hat up like a girl.
NEBRASKA 20, WAKE FOREST 17
- - -
Officials missed the late, obvious fourth down pass interference penalty that would have extended Wake's game-tying/winning drive, but the Deacons blew this game earlier, after Sam Keller's awful pocket gaffe giftwrapped points for the Wake offense at the Husker 13. Poor Brett Hodges, playing okay in his first start, picked the only way to bail Keller out, throwing a terrible pick into double coverage in the end zone that negated an easy tying kick on fourth down and let the air out of the home crowd.
Otherwise, Wake might be more competitive than I had given it credit for (er, denied it credit for, actually), for two reasons that go beyond just keeping this close: one, it wasn't a turnover-driven fluke that the margin was only a field goal, like so many of Wake's wins last year - the Deacons' defense held an offense that ran for 400 in the opener to 115 on less than three-and-a-half per carry. And Wake also has a terrific weapon in wingback-type Kenneth Moore, who is some kind of blazer to average more than 14 per carry and singlehandedly keep the reverse-heavy running game afloat when regular runners Micah Andrews and Kevin Harris did very little.
• Sam "One Sleeve" Keller's favorite movies are Top Gun and Superbad, and this tells us a lot about his personality, I think. First, he's inevitably described as a "gunslinger," and has been known to emerge in public with heavily gelled hair, an image he obviously cultivates from one of the all-time cinematic paeans to cocksure bravado. I haven't seen Superbad, and I'm certain from its pedigree that it's a hilarious experience, but anyone who picks the flavor-of-the-moment that made him laugh last week very likely tends to be an impulsive, impatient sort, an optimist who looks for the immediate opportunity in all circumstances, who perhaps throws an interception that's returned for a touchdown one week and holds the ball in a passing position far away from his body even as defenders cascade over him deep in his own territory in the fourth quarter of a close game the next. Besides just not really giving a damn about movies.
(Now watch Superbad become the next Annie Hall).
Glimpses
- - -
• West Virginia in the first half at Marshall: seven possessions, 118 yards, six punts. In the second half: seven possessions, 393 yards, six touchdowns. • Colt McCoy was not particularly impressive against TCU - the Frogs' only points came directly from his two first half interceptions, and he nearly fumbled away a key possession in the third quarter - but he contined to show that intangible instinct that defines so many less dominant quarterbacks who manage to improvise their way to wins. This most evident last night on the Longhorns' go-ahead drive, when TCU end Chase Ortiz beat a double team on 3rd-and-8 and came bearing down from McCoy's blind side for an obvious sack. There was no particular reason for McCoy to step up, with no other pressure, but he either felt Ortiz in that undefinable, instinctual way or had the internal alarm ringing that time was up, and subsequently took off at the last possible millisecond to leave Ortiz improbably grasping at air at the line of scrimmage. McCoy wound up out of bounds 22 yards later, setting up a one-yard run by Vondrell McGee that kept the momentum permanently in Texas' favor.
4b09d86e_1c5c_4dc9_a17f_d3dbf3fcdc70.jpg

McCoy beats you one or another.
- - -
Not that it didn't help to have Jamaal Charles (22 carries, 134 yds., 1 TD) obliterate TCU's 20-plus game streak of holding opposing runners under 100 yards, of course. After the opening struggles with Arkansas State, Texas desperately needed that second half.

• Officiating and other rule complaints:
- The first overtime of the Texas A&M-Fresno State game was marred by a lengthy replay that overshadowed the eventual ending. Fresno, needing a touchdown to win after allowing an A&M field goal on the first extra possession, completed a wide open pass inside the TAMU five, which looked like a certain game-winner until the receiver stretched his arm out at the goalline and lost the ball into the end zone. A&M recovered for the win, but the nearest official marked the ball out of bound at the one. Replay showed this was obviously wrong: the receiver was clearly still in-bounds when the ball came out, so either he had stretched it out beyond the line for a touchdown or - more likely - he had fumbled it away. In either case, the game was over.
Except the official looked at it, for a very long time, and came back out to announce the play stood as called - Fresno ball at the one - which was not possible. After making this announcement, the official then went back to listen to the replay booth a second time, with no explanation at all what was going on, and Pat Hill somehow wound up all the way across the field (he obviously ran that distance, which tells you how long this replay lasteD) arguing his case side-by-side with an equally pissed Dennis Franchione in front of the A&M bench. Eventually, they came to the right decision: fumble into the end zone, A&M recovery. A&M victory. Crowd goes crazy. But, from nowhere, a previously unannounced flag was assessed against the Aggies for roughing the passer, negating the play and giving Fresno another shot with first down from the TAMU 13. From whence it kicked a field goal that eventually led to three overtimes that kept interested viewers' attention divided with the South Carolina-Georgia game.
A&M still won, 49-47, but it would have been a lot better for everyone if it could have just recovered that fumble and that been the end of it.
- Colorado scored its second touchdown after a drive-extending 15-yard penalty against Arizona State, which was guilty of a "leaping violation" during a CU field goal attempt in the first quarter, i.e., a Sun Devil player went up as high as he could for the block and randomly came down on top of a CU lineman. The same penalty may have cost LSU a win against Auburn back in 2004 and, though ASU stormed back easily for 33 unanswered points, it remains one of the stupidest, most arbitrary rules on the books. Why can't the defense form a human pyramid to try for a block if it wants? Whatever tactic it uses will only come at the expense of allowing a successful fake. Who cares about leaping and leverage? Block that kick! This is a very NFL-style rule that makes no sense and needs to go.
Upwards...
Conceit...
SMQ was right about: Argh, I only wish I was wrong about Southern Miss' chances at Tennessee:
Even if they were to somehow neutralize the significant size disadvantages along both lines, I still fear Ainge will have his pick of the Eagles' young and shuffled secondary...
[...]
...What actually will happen is a shaky start, some stabilization as the game descends into a taut defensive bog, and a late run by the Vols facilitated at least in part by a USM turnover as it shifts into must-pass comeback mode. I've seen this before.

Other than the "shaky start" and "defensive bog" part of that - USM led in the first half 3-0, 10-7 and 16-10 and schockingly hit a series of big plays through the air - I nailed the ending: Ainge had 276 with two touchdowns and no picks and the Vols outscored USM 22-3 in the second half. A fumble on Southern's first drive of the second half, leading to the touchdown that put UT up ten, was essentially the nail.
On Penn State and Notre Dame:
...the Irish offense is trotting out young Jimmy Clausen for trial by fire, and every expectation is he will be burnt crispy by the PSU defense, which is no more likely to be blocked than the Georgia Tech onslaught that poured through the ND line at will last week. Charlie Weis is not a bum, and thus I expect some fight from his team. His hopelessly young, outgunned team and its first-time, true freshman quarterback.

Projected points by Notre Dame's offense: 6. Actual points by Notre Dame's offense: 3.
Texas, UCLA, Arizona State and Rutgers all won by scores very near what I projected - in the latter case, I picked ASU to win 35-20, and the Devils came out over Colorado 33-14.
...and Contrition...
SMQ was wrong about: Michigan could have gone in either of two directions, and I definitely picked the wrong one:
I do not have confidence in Michigan's defense, and I can picture vividly the reality of the season-long downward spiral sinking in as Dixon traipses to his fourth touchdown in an Oregon blowout. ... But I do have respect for the Michigan "brand," and for the talent assembled there, and its ability to right itself at home against a team with a recent history of total unpredictability. I don't think Oregon will come close to stopping Mike Hart - the Ducks were obliterated for 300 yards on the ground alone by Houston last week - and the Wolverines will do what they have to do to salvage a chance at a meaningful season.

If only I'd stopped with the traipsing for touchdowns in a blowout. I saw it clearly, and defied common sense, and so I pay with the scorn of my peers.
I was right to see UGA-South Carolina as a tight defensive game in the teens, but wrong on the outcome:
At home this time, Georgia pushes the `Cocks around - again - and joins Florida as the early division favorite.

Washington over Boise State? Saw that, too, and met my vision of a triumphant Jake Locker as force of nature with denial:
The upset rumblings are loud here after Washington's "impressive" opening rout at Syracuse, and everybody's joining the Husky faithful's ongoing fawning over UW quarterback Jake Locker. Boise State is also not quite the same dominant team off the blue turf. But the Broncos still win, and still bring one of the half dozen most dangerous players in the country in Ian Johnson.

Johnson was held to 81 yards and no touchdowns, pretty easily his worst game as a starter. Locker accounted for 277 and two touchdowns, and the run on the Huskies' rocketing stock hits new heights.
And on the day's other chic upset pick:
Matt Grothe's laurels center on his all-purpose versatility, but Auburn is too fast on defense to let him escape for much damage as a scrambler. Make him throw, especially with Quentin groves screaming around the end, and it could get ugly. This looks like a carbon copy of the KSU game last week: close, but Auburn pulls away late.

Missing USF's overtime win doubles as my regret of the day. Grothe wasn't spectacular, but he gained 67 and a touchdown before sacks and threw for another without turning the ball over.
Stream of Consciousness
Thinking fast.
- - -
Minnesota dominated Miami, Ohio, on the line of scrimmage (306 yards rushing) but gave up 16 points in the last 6:31 of the fourth quarter and went to overtime with a MAC team for the second straight week. At least the Gophers won this time, unlike Iowa State, which followed up a nine-point loss to Kent State with an 11-point loss to I-AA Northern Iowa ... True freshman Peter Lalich may have taken the starting quarterback job from Jameel Sewell in Virginia's 24-13 win over Duke ... If we needed any more confirmation, Colorado State was willing to oblige: Cal's secondary is in for a long year ... N.C. State outgained Boston College, but here's a good recipe for losing: allow six yards per carry and throw five interceptions ... Allegedly "new look" Air Force brought the option back to Utah and ran for 324 yards ... Central Michigan and Toledo were tied entering the fourth quarter, and it wound up a Chippewa blowout ... Texas Tech outscored UTEP 28-3 in the second half for (another) comeback win ... It was only Tulane, but Mississippi State needed this kind of turnaround ... No turnaround for Syracuse: the Orange are just terrible ... Wisconsin trailed until the final two minutes before pulling out the win at UNLV. Interesting/Not Necessarily Relevant Stats
- - -
Akron had three first downs and 69 yards total offense in a 20-2 loss at Ohio State ... Nevada outgained Northwestern by 110 yards and 12 first downs in a five-point loss ... C.J. Spiller and James Davis ran for 116 yards on just 13 carries against UL-Monroe ... So much for Temple's improvement: the favored Owls allowed 42 points and 414 yards to Buffalo ... Florida State and UAB combined for 24 penalties for 231 yards ... After two games, Notre Dame has negative-eight yards rushing for the season ... Missouri and Ole Miss combined for 1,100 yards and 55 first downs ... BYU outgained UCLA by 199 yards and lost by ten ... Rice allowed 412 yards passing and six touchdowns to Baylor ... Alex Brink threw for 467 and five touchdowns against San Diego State ... North Texas' Daniel Meager threw for 601 yards as UNT and SMU combined for 1,145 in total offense.
 
anybody that thinks that should have been pass interference on the last play of Nebraska/WF automatically loses all credibility.
 
Back
Top