tee*dub
Head of Loggerhead Turtle Society
Aplous asked my opinion on a couple cfb games over in my NFL thread and rather than bury it in that thread, I'll put it over here.
Iowa/Wisky--
Iowa getting 9.5 at home.. My oh my, what have we here? Ferentz coached teams do not typically get man handled up front but this is something that has to be considered when handicapping the game.. Badgers front seven defensively is stout but the backend is young and less talented IMO. ASU lit up the group for 325 yards. OSU's Braxton Miller completed 68% and had four TD's....
However, just double checked my notes, Iowa is not ASU and they do not have Braxton Miller at QB.. Against OSU whisky had to inch the safeties up because of the threat of Braxton's legs, leaving the corners very vulnerable and they paid.. They won't be inching up against Iowa as the front seven should be able to do everything they need to do without help.
So, can Iowa run the ball on Whisky.. My answer is no. Gameplan will be Rudock and a somewhat improving receiver core.. Without a lot of help I don't see Iowa scoring more than 17.. Will that be enough to cover the 9?
On the other side, can Iowa put the brakes on the roller skates their front 4 will be wearing? Iowa will likely play more "4-3 over" with the secondary in cover 4. This is the defense Iowa played under retired DC Norm Parker and its probably SGUs best chance to slow the run. (think 2010 Orange Bowl vs GT).. They will struggle getting off the field tho IMO.. Wisky only allowed 44 yards rushing to NW, Iowa allowed 225:thinking:
I never play that much chalk and its either dog or no play for me. Would lean the under and if Iowa covers it will need to be the back door variety which is very possible with this number.. 28-17 kinda game is what I am seeing if turnovers are in the neutral range.
Iowa/Wisky--
Iowa getting 9.5 at home.. My oh my, what have we here? Ferentz coached teams do not typically get man handled up front but this is something that has to be considered when handicapping the game.. Badgers front seven defensively is stout but the backend is young and less talented IMO. ASU lit up the group for 325 yards. OSU's Braxton Miller completed 68% and had four TD's....
However, just double checked my notes, Iowa is not ASU and they do not have Braxton Miller at QB.. Against OSU whisky had to inch the safeties up because of the threat of Braxton's legs, leaving the corners very vulnerable and they paid.. They won't be inching up against Iowa as the front seven should be able to do everything they need to do without help.
So, can Iowa run the ball on Whisky.. My answer is no. Gameplan will be Rudock and a somewhat improving receiver core.. Without a lot of help I don't see Iowa scoring more than 17.. Will that be enough to cover the 9?
On the other side, can Iowa put the brakes on the roller skates their front 4 will be wearing? Iowa will likely play more "4-3 over" with the secondary in cover 4. This is the defense Iowa played under retired DC Norm Parker and its probably SGUs best chance to slow the run. (think 2010 Orange Bowl vs GT).. They will struggle getting off the field tho IMO.. Wisky only allowed 44 yards rushing to NW, Iowa allowed 225:thinking:
I never play that much chalk and its either dog or no play for me. Would lean the under and if Iowa covers it will need to be the back door variety which is very possible with this number.. 28-17 kinda game is what I am seeing if turnovers are in the neutral range.