Rexy's Super Bowl XLIX...

CollegeKingRex

CTG Regular
The Super Bowl involves one team who doesn’t belong and another team who has possibly skirted the rules to get there once again. Needless to say, I won’t be too excited to watch it. But since there is nothing else on, I’ll watch it when there are actual plays being run. Forget the commercials and halftime show; I don’t even mind if I get the Spanish feed and they don’t show any of that. I also volunteered to cook green beans and potato wedges at my buddy’s house while another one grills the steaks. It will be the first time in many years where I don’t have a sweat in the game and am not out after halftime in a neighborhood establishment. I might be sweating some skirt after the game, as traditionally Super Bowl Sunday is a big party night down here, but I’m not going out of my way to look for it.


WHY NEW ENGLAND CAN WIN:

Super Bowl XLIX is a fun matchup between the top seeds in the AFC and NFC. That is as simple as it can be put, and the matchup (in addition to all of the other soap-opera-type happenings in the NFL the last few months) could well draw a record television audience.

While Seattle had to pull off a miraculous comeback to dump Green Bay in overtime in the NFC Championship, the Patriots blasted Indianapolis 45-7 in the AFC title game.

This battle pits teams that have each caused the league to change the rules in the last few years. The Pats were a clutching and grabbing team; the Seahawks play rough and tough with receivers and were the driving force behind the league calling more pass interference and illegal contact penalties this season.

I will not say anything about the deflated footballs controversy surrounding the Patriots since the AFC Championship domination of the Colts, other than that it might have played a small distraction in the New England preparation for this game. Though with two weeks to get ready, you can be sure head coach Bill Belichick and quarterback Tom Brady will have some wrinkles that Seattle has not seen. In fact, it can easily be argued that this is one more chance for New England to play the ''Us Against the World'' card, and it can be spun into an advantage for the Patriots.

The teams had the same record and each had similar point differentials. New England played a harder schedule. The Patriots have outscored the Ravens and Colts by a combined 66-10 since trailing Baltimore 28-14 in the third quarter of their first playoff game. It’s safe to say that the Pats are peaking at the right time.

The Patriots should have a good blueprint on how to contain Russell Wilson in the pocket. He is just an ordinary passer when not allowed to scramble around and make plays with his legs. Green Bay stymied him for 55 minutes and silenced his home crowd throughout until that fateful final five minutes (and overtime, of course).

New England has a much better and more physical secondary this season. Obviously Darrelle Revis is as good as anyone in football at clinging to the No. 1 opposing receiving threat. But Brandon Browner could well be the key here. He played for Seattle last season and his physicality at the other corner will put all sorts of pressure on Seattle and its offense to try and overcome the two Patriot cornerbacks with ordinary to below-par receivers.

Sure, Jermaine Kearse has four touchdown passes in five career games, but he’s also only got five touchdowns in 37 career regular season games. He was the target of all four of Russell Wilson’s interceptions last week, as well.

On the other side, New England has the more explosive weapons, starting with Brady and Rob Gronkowski. This is the first time the Pats have made a deep playoff run with their superhuman tight end being totally healthy. The Seahawks will have fits trying to figure out how to defend “Gronk” over the middle, and he should eat alive anyone in man coverage, and poke holes in a zone defense that’s looked increasingly suspect as the opposing offenses have improved.

Seattle’s healthy defensive stats look that way in large part because of the bevy of poor and/or backup quarterbacks they faced throughout the second half of the season. Brady and Gronkowski present a different set of challenges than what Seattle coach Pete Carroll has had to prepare for all season.

Running back LeGarrette Blount, who is in off a career-high 148 rushing yards, has the Patriot team record with seven postseason touchdowns, and he’s the only player with multiple three-touchdown rushing games in playoff history.

The Patriots played eight games vs. a top 10 yards per play defense this season. Throw out the Week 17 laydown against Buffalo, and New England averaged over 35 points per game in those games.

Five of the last seven Super Bowls have been decided by six points or less. And New England’s five Super Bowls in the Belichick/Brady Era have been decided by 3, 3, 3, 3 and 4 points. With the line being this close to pick, it’s an edge for the Pats to have Belichick roaming their sidelines with the extra prep time. While Pete Carroll is no idiot, he’s also no Belichick.

The Pats should find a way to win a close one given all of their experience in these situations going back a decade and more. Belichick's 21 playoff wins is the most ever for an NFL coach. Brady won his sixth conference title last week; he stands alone as the all-time record holder in that category over John Elway. He will be just the second player to compete in six Super Bowls. Don’t be surprised if he joins Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw as four-time quarterback winners.



WHY SEATTLE CAN WIN:

Two weeks ago Sunday at around 6 p.m. Eastern time, the Super Bowl’s first team looked for all intents and purposes to be Green Bay. The Packers would await the winner of the AFC Championship between Indianapolis and New England in Glendale, Ariz. The first day of February would be the crowning of a new champion.

The visiting Packers led Super Bowl XLVIII champion Seattle 16-7 with barely five minutes remaining and Wilson had just thrown his fourth interception. The Packers had the ball near midfield starting a new drive with a two possession lead. Some of the boisterous Seattle fans headed for the exits.

So what happened?

The heart of a champion can never be underestimated.

Just ask New England, which overcame two touchdown deficits on a pair of occasions to rally past Baltimore, 35-31, in the divisional round.

Seattle came back to win in overtime (the details of which could be discussed in an entire book), and New England clobbered the overmatched Colts, and Super Bowl XLIX was set.

While Brady will lead his team to his record sixth Super Bowl, it’s also important to note that Wilson is the first quarterback to ever start in two Super Bowls in his first three seasons in the league.

His intestinal fortitude cannot be questioned. Wilson was hideous for three quarters in the Green Bay game. Into the fourth quarter, he was 8-for-22 for 75 yards passing with four interceptions and no scores. He is the first quarterback in the Super Bowl era to win a conference title despite throwing four interceptions. George Blanda of the 1961 Houston Oilers was the last one to throw four interceptions and win a conference (at that time, the AFL) crown.

All four of Wilson's interceptions came when he was targeting Jermaine Kearse. Amazingly enough, Kearse now has four straight playoff games with a touchdown catch. He is just the second player with an overtime touchdown in a conference title game. The first was Alan Ameche, who scored for Baltimore in the 1958 NFL title, known to some old enough to recall it as "The Greatest Game Ever Played".

The Seahawks become the first team since San Francisco in 1981 to win a conference title game with five turnovers and the first since the 1982 Jets to win ANY playoff game. Since then, 45 teams lost in the playoffs because they could not overcome all of those turnovers.

Wilson now stands at 10-0 in his career against quarterbacks who have won a Super Bowl. Though, like with the last game, Seattle’s defense deserves all of the credit for doing the heavy lifting.

The Patriots are known mostly for an innovative offense. A new playoff wrinkle they showed against Baltimore and again against Indy was throwing passes to eligible linemen while leaving backs in as ineligible receivers. Quarterback Tom Brady has enough weapons to make the Seahawks sweat for 60 minutes.

New England had just one scoring drive of longer than 65 yards last week against the Colts, who self-destructed after halftime. But long drives are going to be important for New England, since Seattle only allowed 14 passing plays of 25 yards or longer this season, compared to 36 yielded by the Pats. The teams had the exact same number of those long pass plays on offense, which nullifies some of the public perception of the offensive capabilities for each team.

The Seattle defense carried the day in the Super Bowl victory (43-8, and it wasn’t that close) over Denver last year and it was largely responsible for them getting here this year. It has allowed a total of 13 points in the fourth quarter of the last eight games. The 1.63 average is beyond phenomenal in what is usually the highest scoring quarter in football.

The last three teams to win a conference title game in overtime went on to win the Super Bowl; all three were in the NFC, just like Seattle. The 2007 Giants, 2009 Saints and 2011 Giants were the three teams to win the league title game in overtime before the Seahawks did this season (2014).

New England blew out the Colts, but the last 17 double-digit winners in league championship games are just 7-10 in the Super Bowl. The last time a team won the Super Bowl that won its league title game by more than 17 points was 23 years ago. The Pats are in a situation that has seen six teams go 0-6 since the 1992 Super Bowl!

The Pats have not notched a cover in any of the last four Super Bowls since winning their first one over the Rams 14 years ago. The Seahawks get to stay out west and play at a familiar stadium, which should be an edge for the champs. Public perceptions from the last game offer line value to Seattle, which just had its escape. We saw what New England did last game after its escape against Baltimore. Look for the same sort of game here from Seattle, and that should be enough for the Seahawks to lift the Lombardi Trophy in back-to-back seasons.


WHY I LIKE UNDER:

Seattle has won eight straight, covering in all of those games except for the last one, the overtime win over Green Bay where the Seahawks won by six when laying more than that.

The two Super Bowls that New England lost most recently was more of an indictment on the New England offense than it was on the Patriots' defense. In the loss to the Giants that denied New England a perfect 19-0 season, the Giants held them to 14 points. In their 18 wins that season, New England had scored at least 20 points in every other game. In the 21-17 loss to New York four years later, the 17 points scored tied a season low.

Those Giants (both of them) undoubtedly had good defenses, but this Seattle unit is better than either of those and could give New England quarterback Tom Brady fits. After going seven of the first eight games without an interception, Brady has now thrown at least one pick in eight of the last 10 games.

Andy Iskoe of "The Logical Approach" notes that there have been 15 Super Bowls played in the past with four key stats where the same team has the edge over the course of the regular season. The stats are: allowing fewer points, averaging more rushing yards, allowing fewer rushing yards and allowing fewer total yards. Seattle had the edge in all of those categories this season, and that has led to victory for 12 of the 15 teams straight up in past Super Bowls.

Each team survived a monumental scare in the playoffs. Baltimore twice led the Patriots by two touchdowns in the divisional round before New England rallied to secure a non-covering win. Seattle and its escape is obviously much more publicized, considering they were down 16-7 and the Packers had the ball at near midfield with five minutes left after Russell Wilson threw his FOURTH interception of the NFC Championship game.

Each was a top-3 team in the regular season for fewest giveaways, making the ability of Seattle to overcome five turnovers in the NFC title game all the more impressive. Give the Seattle defense all the credit in the world for keeping the game competitive early.

The Packers were only able to score SIX points off FOUR first half Seattle turnovers in the NFC Championship game! The Seahawks held Green Bay to two field goals inside 20 yards in the first quarter, in addition to snaring an interception on the first Packer drive inside the Seattle 30-yard line. Still, they had to come back from 16 points down in the second half. That’s the third-largest comeback to win a title game since the leagues merged.

Seattle is the first defending champion to return to the Super Bowl since the '04 Pats. The Seahawks are also the Super Bowl winning team in a decade to even win a game in the playoffs the following season.

Neither team will have injuries as an excuse. All 106 players have been practicing this week and there should be no surprising developments on the inactives front when that list is released 90 minutes prior to kickoff.

The size, speed, and aggressiveness of Seattle safety Kam Chancellor could slow mammoth Gronkowski down as much any team has this season. He's nearly impossible to stop, but this could at least limit his productivity when lumbering down the field on seam routes. He's the main offensive weapon for the Patriots.

The only way teams have beaten the Seahawks this year has been with an effective and consistent running game. In all four of the Seahawks’ losses, foes had at least 27 carries and more than 100 yards. San Diego, Dallas, Kansas City and St. Louis all successfully did this, and Green Bay had 135 yards on 30 carries in the NFC title game. But Seattle does have the second-best rushing defense in the league, and the Pats struggled to run the ball at all against Baltimore in their first playoff game, not even giving the ball to a running back after halftime.

On the other side, we all saw what the New England defense did to Indianapolis, and this Seattle offense is far less talented and far less sophisticated. The Seahawks don’t have a good passing game, so it would behoove the Seahawks to run the ball early and often with powerful Marshawn Lynch.

Wilson had thrown just 1 interception in the playoffs, before his 4 last vs the Packers, all of which were targeted for Kearse. You can bet he’ll be more careful in this one, and I expect there to be no more than two turnovers in this one (save for a possible late garbage pick thrown by the rallying team in desperation time).

Pete Carroll is creative enough to figure out how to get the ball to his playmakers, and the Seahawks figure to take a page out of the Baltimore playbook by getting Lynch and Robert Turbin out on the edge while getting Doug Baldwin and tight end Luke Willson involved in the middle of the field. Still, Seattle will not win this game with their offense.

First one to 20 points wins this one in what shapes up to be a tight game. I will call for a 20-17 final score. Gun to my head, Seattle wins it. Since I missed the best number (anything more than 48), I’ll pass.

Back later with some prop plays, but might not post until tomorrow because it’s tough to find outs for these things. GL!

:shake:

:cheers:
 
Your analysis is always articulate, thorough, and thoughtful. And it is much appreciated. I jumped on the under at 49.5 when it opened at Stations so feel like I got the best of that(for now). Do you have any thoughts on the opener of Seattle -3 and the move by most books to PK. Has the action been as lopsided for you towards the Pats as most stats & percentage sites indicate?
 
Patriots are getting more of the "write" in Vegas. 5 of every 7 tickets at one casino, Wynn 10 of 11 at one point earlier this week, though that guy is a reputed liar. Sharps 4 of every 5 on Seattle or so they say. That number also seems high to me.

Offshore a bit different. Money at a couple of northeast-based books show Boston getting about 76 percent of the money, whereas the money is largely even at sharper offshore books. The amount of New England money has gone down a bit in the last few days. The same northeast-based book was getting three in every four bets earlier in the week, but that's now down to less than 70 percent of the bets. That's not far off from the offshore average, where multiple bookmakers reported that two-thirds of straight plays.

Ballghazi is a possible factor for a bit of Seattle money coming this week. Many times the public only remembers what they saw the last time out. That's what drove the opening 3 or 2.5 down to pick. People were seeing NE live and up front maul the Colts, and had just seen Seattle struggle with GB.

You have key numbers there with 48 and 47... if it goes to 46.5 or lower i would consider getting off some of your play if you have a big investment at UN 49.5. Otherwise, hold it all, you've got way the best of it.
 
Back in 1997, Las Vegas bookmaker Jay Kornegay of the Imperial Palace rolled out a bunch of interesting betting offers on Super Bowl XXXI. Green Bay was a two-touchdown favorite over upstart New England, and Kornegay figured he'd try to spice things up on what looked on paper to be yet another dull game. (Green Bay eventually won 35-21 for a PUSH to the closing line of 14).

The Super Bowl was in the middle of a stretch of yawners at that point. Dating back to 1982's Super Bowl XVI, only two of the next 14 games ended with a final margin of less than 10 points. That was Super Bowl XXIII, when Cincinnati lost 20-16 to San Francisco, and Super Bowl XXV, where the Bills missed a last-second field goal wide right to lose 20-19 to the Giants.

Kornegay and his team at the IP introduced proposition betting in that game, and it's been here to stay ever since.

Now he works for the Westgate (formerly Hilton) Superbook, has a 26-page book of Super Bowl props this year, and most books in Vegas have similar offerings.

Offshore, most competant sportsbooks have taken the offerings even further. In Nevada, the sportsbooks are restricted to offer only things that actually happen on the field of play. This means you can't bet on things like "What will the main color of Bill Belichick's hoodie be?" or "Will Katy Perry show cleavage during the halftime show?"

At offshore spots, those and more than 300 other props are available until shortly before kickoff. Among the most popular betting props are "Who will win the coin toss?" or "Heads or Tails"; those are always popular because you will have won or lost a bet and been "in action" before the game even starts. By the way, the NFC has won 15 of the last 17 coin tosses, if you believe in coin toss "trends".

The length of the national anthem is traditionally one of the more popular prop bets as well. Like the coin toss, that one is decided before the ball is even on the tee. I have a friend back home whose wife only bets one thing every year. Yes, she handicaps the Star-Spangled Banner. Of course, I respect her opinion because she's been doing this for many years. With the UNDER at 5-2-1 (Christina Aguilera forgot a verse four years ago, making the bet a no-action) the last eight years, that might be worthwhile info.

However, Idina Menzel sang the song very slowly at the 2014 MLB All-Star game; it took about 2 minutes and 7 seconds. With the Super Bowl on a bigger stage, she's much more likely to draw it out and hold the last notes longer. I would lean OVER, but the wife of my buddy is passing this year (she will bet for a sweat's sake, but doesn't want to be held accountable if it loses so I'm not charting her for Super Bowl XLIX).
Another popular prop is "Will there be a safety?" One of my friends who has been offshore for almost 20 years bet on the "YES" every year as long as it's been offered. Luckily, it wasn't offered at Super Bowl I back in 1967. That's because in each of the first 45 Super Bowls, there was never a safety! But in each of the last three years, there HAS been a safety!

My friend collected close to +700 on the safety in Super Bowl XLVI. That was a particularly painful prop to the Vegas books as well. The Red Rock Casino, for example, had 50-to-1 odds on a safety being the first score of the game, but in Tom Brady's last Super Bowl appearance, the Giants forced an intentional grounding from him in the end zone on their first offensive play to take a 2-0 lead.

The next year, the last score in Super Bowl XLVII between Baltimore and San Francisco was a safety when the Ravens elected to give the 49ers two points in the waning moments of the game rather than risk a blocked punt. Then in last year's Super Bowl between Denver and Seattle, a safety was once again the first score of the game at the same longshot odds you see every year for that prop. After 45 years of no safeties, there has now been a safety in three straight Super Bowls!

Several places in Las Vegas are offering cross-sport props. The Westgate had offers with the Super Bowl that were crossed with the NBA (Lakers first half points on Sunday against the Knicks vs. Jermaine Kearse receiving yards), NHL (Sidney Crosby goals+assists vs. Pats/Seahawks first quarter points), college hoops (Marshawn Lynch rushing yards vs. Miami (Fla) points against Florida State and recently-completed UFC and English Premier League events.

One of the props Sunday will not include Tiger Woods. Earlier in the week, the Westgate (formerly the Las Vegas Hilton) hung up a prop with Seattle running back Robert Turbin's rushing attempts against Tiger's fourth-round birdies in the Waste Management Phoenix Open. Turbin was -1/2 with some juice attached to Tiger's birdies. But anyone who bet that prop will get a refund for "No Action". That's because Woods shot a 44 on his front nine on Friday en route to an 81 for his second round score. When Woods walked off the course Friday around lunchtime, he was in dead last of 132 players, and obviously missed the cut.

My next post will get to the plays I've made tonight.
 
Sunday's Super Bowl, according to the point spread (which is near PICK), should be an exciting one. If you're having a hard time trying to figure out which side to bet, perhaps you'd be better suited to play some props on the game.

My first way to break down the game is to try and find a comparable matchup. The closest thing I could find was the 1991 Super Bowl that was 24 years back. The Giants entered as seven-point underdogs to the high-powered Buffalo Bills, who were making their first of what would be four straight losing and non-covering efforts in the Super Bowl. New York had to force a Roger Craig fumble with just more than two minutes left and drive down to kick a last-second field goal in the NFC Championship to advance to Super Bowl XXV.

The Giants beat the 49ers at Candlestick Park, 15-13, with Lawrence Taylor and other defensive standouts leading the way and finding a way to win a game they had no business winning. They were playing with house money in the Super Bowl, so to speak, much as Seattle is today after beating Green Bay last week despite being dominated for 56 minutes and trailing by as many as 16 points. The main difference in the two Super Bowls is the point spread. The Bills were a touchdown favorite, whereas the Seahawks and New England are virtually a pick. But this gives me a bit of background into the mindset of the NFC team. Let's look at player props first.


WHEN NEW ENGLAND HAS THE BALL:

Betting the props on the Pats has become a tricky proposition (pun intended) the last couple of games since offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels using formations that have made his left tackle eligible. In the AFC Championship game, Nate Solder caught a touchdown pass from Tom Brady (afterward the league did deem the play to be illegal). It will be interesting to see how Seattle reacts to these "trick" formations, and whether the refs will properly identify them and also give the Seahawks enough time to adjust.

Therefore, betting on or against Brady is tough here. Seattle does has the second best run defense in the league, and if the Pats were quick to abandon the run in the AFC divisional round against Baltimore, I would expect them to also resort to a pass, pass and more pass recipe in this one. If they do decide to run, it won't be a sledgehammer-type back like LeGarrette Blount that does the damage, but rather a shifty and versatile one like Shane Vereen. There's a good chance you'll see Vereen motioning out of the backfield, where he might be more effective catching passes and creating mismatches in the Seattle zones than he would be taking handoffs from Brady.

Seattle's defense will bring pressure, but it has only an average sack rate this season. The Patriots trailed only Denver and Peyton Manning in sack rate allowed this year. Brady should have plenty of time with his usual quick trigger. If you can find an 'out' that is booking Brady SACKS, that might be worth an UNDER look. If not, go with the 'both teams UNDER', because the Pats won't get to Seattle quarterback Russell Wilson much, either.

The teams who beat Seattle this year completed less than the league average passes (playing from ahead skewed that stat) and only averaged 10.4 yards per completion. Take away one 47-yard catch by Terrance Williams from Tony Romo, and it drops to single digits per catch. It will take lots of small plays to beat the Seattle defense; you won't hit home runs. Brady has lost some arm strength as he's aged, and his deep ball isn't what it once was. In his five Super Bowl appearances, he's completed a pass longer than 27 yards just one time.

The interesting matchup in the secondary could be Seattle corner Richard Sherman matched up on New England slot Julian Edelman. I would actually like the Edelman match up against Sherman for the Pats; if there is a weakness in Sherman’s game, it's on crossing routes where he can get dragged out of his zone. The Pats might not come up with tons of yards on these plays, but Brady should look to target Edelman on these plays early and often.

Ultimately, if the Pats lead late and are running the ball, the two bets against Blount would be in grave danger. I'll obviously be rooting against that.


Props for when NE has the ball:

Edelman OVER 6.5 catches -110
Blount UNDER 14.5 rushing attempts -125
Blount UNDER 60.5 rushing yards -110
Brady longest completion UNDER 35.5 yards -115


WHEN SEATTLE HAS THE BALL:

I do think the Seahawks will have trouble doing much on offense. The Pats rank ninth in opponents' yards per carry, but they could also force Wilson and the Seattle offense into quick three-and-outs if the Seahawks get away from running the ball. Let's face it, Seattle passes the ball poorly, and Wilson only makes it an adequate attack with his legs. The zone read should be a staple today, and he's got to be more committed to running the ball should the Patriots (properly) key on Marshawn Lynch.

New England coach Bill Belichick typically sets his game plan around putting Darrelle Revis on the offense’s best receiver while allowing Brandon Browner, Devin McCourty and the rest of the secondary to match up against the rest of the receivers, with safety help over the top.

It is looking like Jermaine Kearse will end up on 'Revis Island'; he does have some speed and has shown to be a down field threat but Revis generally eliminates the big play. Expect tight end Luke Willson to be the big target in the Seattle passing game; he's shown to be a solid route runner and has good hands, much in the mold of a Jason Witten.

In the end, it will come down to some Seattle adjustments. Clay Matthews did a great job of spying Wilson last week, and you can bet the Pats will take notes on how Green Bay stopped the Seahawks for 56 minutes. It's up to the Seattle offense to make adjustments and try to be more effective from the get-go in this game.

It will be interesting to see if Seattle tries to do some of what Baltimore did three weeks ago; they will have to use Baldwin and Willson in the middle of the field while getting Lynch and especially backup running back Robert Turbin out on the edge. Surely the Seattle offensive braintrust will be creative enough to set up some quick hitters (screens, end-arounds etc).

Both head coaches, Bill Belichick and Pete Carroll, have built their NFL reputations on defense. This season, both feature secondaries that rank at or near the top of the league. On offense, the two teams both finished in the top three in the league in fewest giveaways during the regular season, so there is a small chance of seeing many big plays and easy scores in this game.

Wilson will be the key. Geno Smith of the Jets did damage with his legs against the Patriot defense, and Miami, Kansas City, and Buffalo also dented the Pats on the ground. None of those teams run the ball as well as Seattle. The old football cliché is by and large dead; in today's NFL, winning teams pass to set up the run. In this game, however, Seattle might really be better off with "the more you run, the better your chance is to win".

With that said, Wilson is also coming off that four-interception nightmare against Green Bay. Before that, he was intercepted just one time in six previous playoff games (152 attempts). Throw out the bad day, and take the big sample size and you can reasonably expect Wilson not to make any mistakes.


Props for when SEA has the ball:

Will Wilson throw an interception? NO +110 (there are places in Vegas that are pricing this as high as +140. I wonder if they would throw me out for trying to make a limit bet?)
Wilson OVER 41.5 rushing yards -130
Willson OVER 2.5 receptions -125


Both quarterbacks should do a decent enough job of avoiding a pass rush, which makes the sacks play a good one.

While Seattle has gained notoriety for its slow starts on offense all season, there's something to be said for New England and its efforts in this game. Under Brady and Belichick, the Pats have ZERO points in the first quarter of all five Super Bowls.


Props for both teams:

Total Sacks by both teams UNDER 4.5 -130
First quarter total points UNDER 9.5 +110

Good luck, and enjoy the game!

:shake:
 
That's because in each of the first 45 Super Bowls, there was never a safety! But in each of the last three years, there HAS been a safety!

Not correct - Giants had a safety in SBXXI (George Martin sacking ELway) as did:
Dwight White, Pittsburgh vs. Minnesota, IX
Reggie Harrison, Pittsburgh vs. Dallas, X
Henry Waechter, Chicago vs. New England, XX
 
Sorry for the mistake. I took the word of a friend who has been betting them for more than 20 years without doing the research.

Here's a correction:

There hadn't been a safety in 25 years before Super Bowl XLVI.

Good to see all of the comments. One fucking person chimes in after 10 hours of work and points out one mistake.

Good luck to you all tonight, think this will probably be the last of my writeups at CTG.
 
I like the Blount under rushing prop and the team sack under in particular, and also played Gronk over 77.5 rec yds, GL Rex.
 
Sorry for the mistake. I took the word of a friend who has been betting them for more than 20 years without doing the research.

Here's a correction:

There hadn't been a safety in 25 years before Super Bowl XLVI.

Good to see all of the comments. One fucking person chimes in after 10 hours of work and points out one mistake.

Good luck to you all tonight, think this will probably be the last of my writeups at CTG.

Apologies - I meant no disrespect - I am a huge fan of your write ups.
 
The Super Bowl involves one team who doesn’t belong and another team who has possibly skirted the rules to get there once again. Needless to say, I won’t be too excited to watch it.... I might be sweating some skirt after the game, as traditionally Super Bowl Sunday is a big party night down here, but I’m not going out of my way to look for it.

Got a feeling one of my "locks" isn't going to happen and I'll end up grudgingly watching the game. Good luck on your biggest play. Hope it hits (and you provide pictures).
 
Awesome info sir. As Always, I appreciate your time and thoughts.

Here's to you finding a skirt tonight! I hope it Doesn't take 10 hours to seal the deal.
 
CKR: Thank you as always for all you do. Good luck on Bowl & more importantly on the skirt
 
Pats look more settled in what they've wanted to do. This is were Belichick has to get in the minds and convince his guys they're doing exactly what they've been told. Collins needs to contain Wilson on this run options and they'll be fine on D
 
Seattle best team in the league in 2H in DVOA on both sides of the ball if I'm not mistaken. I think almost surely they are the top DVOA team combined. They get the ball first. Gun to head, could only have Seattle and OV 24 or better, can't go OV 24.5
 
If Marshawn Lynch is ever tempted to talk at a press conference it might be after this game like "Why the fuck didn't I get the ball at the goal line".
 
Back
Top