Pittsburgh vs Philly

I don't know but I'm rolling with it. Eagles too deep at QB and have an overall deeper team in the trenches.
 
i dont see them beein too deep at qb. why isnt pitt on tha same level?

big ben > mcnabb
batch > feeley (maybe an even matchup here)
dixon < kolb
 
I think the rotation is Ben for 1 series. Charlie 2-3... then Dixon and Potts

Eagle starters are "supposed" to go 1.5q then 1.5 for backups, then scrubs for the 4th.
 
yeah i jus heard about philly starters. heard 1q earlier. but dont like to see mcnabb goin up against 2nd team D
 
hoopsstar22 said:
I think the rotation is Ben for 1 series. Charlie 2-3... then Dixon and Potts

Eagle starters are "supposed" to go 1.5q then 1.5 for backups, then scrubs for the 4th.
Click to expand...
Bro, can't see McNabb in there for more than a series or two. Westbrook is out. Batch will play the majority of the 1H and he's one of the better back-ups in the league (IMO). After Frye who's left, Kolb? Agree with TRU 100% = depth at QB is a push at worse for Pittsburgh. If anything, I think Pittsburgh is deeper at QB, RB, WR and DB. Aren't like 3 of 4 of Philly's starting secondary out as well?
 
Mcnabb if healthy is better than Big Ben. He has one of the lowest TD to INT ratios of all time and is a winner. Never been handed a superbowl behind a nasty d/running game like Ben.

Feely = Batch? I don't know... Batch can make some plays but Feely showed he's as good a backup as there is last year vs. Pats.

Dixon to Kolb aint even close... and that's where I would say 90% of my statement was generated from. I like Dixon though but game 1 might be a little tough on him.
 
Pittsburgh +1x 220/200 :36_1_36:

Doesn't make any sense to me, I guess we'll find out in a little while.
 
Last edited:
Inspekdah said:
Mcnabb if healthy is better than Big Ben. He has one of the lowest TD to INT ratios of all time and is a winner. Never been handed a superbowl behind a nasty d/running game like Ben.

Feely = Batch? I don't know... Batch can make some plays but Feely showed he's as good a backup as there is last year vs. Pats.

Dixon to Kolb aint even close... and that's where I would say 90% of my statement was generated from. I like Dixon though but game 1 might be a little tough on him.
Click to expand...

Bro, to say that McNabb is better than Ben is crazy. Ben's only been around a four years and he's putting up crazy numbers! Look at 07', 3rd in TD passes ans 2nd in rating. Other than the year he was hurt he hasn't had a QB rating under 98 I think. Handed a Superbowl? They were a wild card and beat Denver and Indy ON THE ROAD? McNabb, what the hell has he ever won? Not trying to start anything but I really think that was a rediculous statement.
 
Seattle +3 110/100 :36_1_36:

Too much at QB for Seattle.
 
Last edited:
San Fransisco +1 (110/100) :down:

Screw the Raiders although they are my boys. I think there's more depth at the skill positions for SF.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

wiseplayer
Texans Preseason
Replies
2
Views
67
wiseplayer
wiseplayer
skanless13
Colorado vs Baylor
Replies
0
Views
68
skanless13
skanless13
Wiretowire
NFL 9/23
Replies
2
Views
94
B.A.R.
B.A.R.
L
🏈 2024-2025
Replies
0
Views
163
Loves2kickass
L
RBTrojan
NFL week seven
Replies
3
Views
193
STEED
STEED
Back
Top