What's next for Sooners?: Oklahoma may face sanctions
By GUERIN EMIG World Sports Writer
8/3/2006
NORMAN -- The news that Oklahoma football players Rhett Bomar and J.D. Quinn had been dismissed from the team for NCAA rules violations was something of a kick in the Sooners' gut.
But is another still to come?
What are the ramifications for an athletic department whose men's basketball program just went on probation in May?
"You can't make any judgment right now," said Gary Roberts, who has been active in NCAA legislative cases for 20 years as director of the sports law program at Tulane Law School. "All the facts must come out."
Right now, those facts are that Bomar and Quinn accepted payments for services that went unperformed at the Norman car dealership Big Red Sports and Imports. An OU investigation uncovered the extra benefits violation, and Sooner coach Bob Stoops permanently removed Bomar and Quinn on Wednesday.
In a telephone interview Wednesday, an NCAA spokesman refused to speculate on OU's situation.
Stoops' pre-emptive strike, according to Roberts, bodes well for OU, should the NCAA become a more central figure in this case.
And should the NCAA come sniffing around, its investigators are bound to ask questions.
"How did these kids get these jobs? Was there
http://www.cappingthegame.com/forum/a systematic pattern by which they were paid?" Roberts said. "Most important, what did the people in the athletic department know about this? How close is the booster to the department or the coaches?
"Unless (investigators) find a direct link between the scheme and the department, the ramifications shouldn't be too serious."
The most serious is found in NCAA Bylaw 19.5.2.3: "An institution shall be considered a 'repeat' violator if the Committee on Infractions finds that a major violation has occurred within five years of the starting date of a major penalty."
OU was put on a two-year probation for major men's basketball violations in May. Further NCAA sanctions as a result of the Bomar / Quinn violations could, therefore, expose OU to repeat violator penalties such as that which is outlined in NCAA Bylaw 19.5.2.3.2: "The prohibition of some or all outside competition in the sport involved in the latest major violation for one or two sports seasons. . ."
"If the university were to allow (the rule breakers) to participate in practices or games with the knowledge they were committing infractions, that would subject the football program to very serious penalties," Roberts said. "If the coaches were somehow implicated -- if it was found this wasn't just the work of some rogue booster -- then you have something very serious."
As it stands, that isn't the case.
"Right now, this doesn't appear to be the kind of case that would trigger severe penalties," Roberts said. "To know for sure we'll have to wait until everything comes to light."