Oregon vs Wyoming Preview Article

VirginiaCavs

CTG Super Moderator
Staff member
Back Oregon to Cover First Half at Wyoming

Oregon (2-0) faces its first true road test this season at Wyoming (1-1) this Saturday at 7:00 PM ET. The Ducks are favored by two touchdowns. The game total has plummeted from 65 to 59.5.

Wyoming enjoyed a major turnaround, progressing from a 2-10 record in 2015 to 8-6 in 2016. Wyoming improved because of its solid offensive production, consisting of quarterback Josh Allen, running back Brian Hill and a talented crew of receivers. Hill, Wyoming's all-time leading rusher, departed, as did his backup and Allen's top three pass catchers. Wyoming will suffer from a plummet in the talent of Allen's supporting cast.

Wyoming would be just fine if Allen deserved the massive hype that surrounded him last season. While he has racked up impressive numbers against sub-par Mountain West competition, he is largely unproven against schools from the larger conferences.

In week 1, Allen struggled against Iowa. Because of Wyoming's offseason departures, Allen was much more conservative in his throwing. Instead of relying on the vertical "gunslinging" that has ignited his fame, he focused more on horizontal quick passes.

In Allen's last 2 performances against Power 5 teams (the other team being Nebraska), he threw one touchdown and seven interceptions. Against Iowa, Allen repeated much of the same mistakes that he committed vs Nebraska. The concerning aspect of his mistakes is that they largely stem from his strengths.

Allen prefers to be a gunslinger. He is a well-sized quarterback who, despite his mobility, prefers to utilize his quick release and arm strength in order to go down the field. But, he often forces his passes into windows that are too tight. His decision-making is problematic. So is his accuracy. His inconsistent throwing mechanics often prevents him from executing different pass plays. His sore shoulder (in the non-throwing arm), is a lingering problem that can only hurt him.

The protection will be there with an experienced offensive line. But the support cast is missing from last year and Allen doesn't have the talent to make up for last season's departures.

Oregon's offense does not face the same questions. They put up 42 points in the first half last week against Nebraska thanks to the duo of Justin Herbert at quarterback and Royce Freeman at running back. Herbert is capable of achieving big gains with his legs and with his live arm, all the while eliminating turnovers. His biggest playmaker is Charles Nelson, whose versatility allows him to excel in the slot, as a deep threat, and in the back field. Freeman is a workhorse who is difficult to bring down upon first contact. He is a strong runner who gladly trucks opponents, but also makes life easier for himself by using his excellent vision and ability to find holes in the defense.

Oregon's ability to eliminate turnovers is huge because Wyoming thrived on causing turnovers. Overall, Wyoming's defense was pedestrian last season and continues to be a huge liability. They boast the conference's top duo in the safety position, but they are especially soft against the run. A strong back like Freeman, behind an experienced and deep offensive line, should be productive against a Wyoming defense that finished outside the top 100 in yards allowed per game despite playing in a smaller conference.

Oregon's defense last season was a disaster. But they got some help in the offseason. They hired Colorado's defensive coordinator Jim Leavitt, who has deserved a reputation for making bad defenses good. They also received Scott Pagano, who was Clemson's top reserve on the defensive line and played a part in their national championship.

At linebacker, the Ducks are led by Troy Dye, the Freshman All-American who led all Freshmen, and his team, with 91 tackles. He also led the Ducks with 13 tackles for loss and and 6.5 sacks. The secondary is led by senior Arrion Springs, who led the Ducks last season with 12 passes broken up.

The Ducks' defense is on the rise with their talent under Leavitt, who will improve their fundamental and schematic soundness, better utilize their skill set, by, for instance, utilizing Dye as a pass rusher more often than leaving him in space, and steel them against the frequency of assignment errors that plagued them last season. Their depth is thin, but this is not worrisome in the start of the season.

The Verdict

Wyoming does not have the tools to keep up with an Oregon offense that is both balanced and prolific. Oregon's defense still faces questions after a disastrous campaign last season, but Wyoming's offense, given its departures from last season, has even more questions. Oregon has improved its ability to prevent turnovers on offense, which should kill the defense of Wyoming's last hope. Oregon's defense boasts playmakers on the line, and in the linebacking corps and secondary to ensure a strong lead for Oregon. By betting on the first half, we account for Oregon's notorious tendency to take the foot off of the gas pedal with a large lead.

NCAAF Pick: Oregon 1H -7.5
 
Maybe should try to tweet Allen how his shoulder is. But no matter what I feel like this is the play
 
That offensive line for Wyoming may have experience but they were terrible against Iowa. Allen was unimpressive in that game but I blame it on the talent around him which is very bad. I took Wyoming in that game and would normally look to take them again at home getting all those points but I think they may truly be a terrible team so I will probably lay off the game altogether.
 
Yea I think they're missing their center from last year, which is an impactful loss. Being forced to shorten my articles.
 
Told that my articles are still too long. Any one care to tell me what here is superfluous? One example I was given is going on about Josh Allen when I am on Oregon.
 
Younger generation lives their lives with number of character restrictions. There was an interesting 1-hour special on how the younger generations simply won't read a longer written piece (like books or long magazine articles). They don't have the attention span or willingness to get in depth about most things. Just a product of Text and Twitter and Facebook living.

The articles are great, imo. Reduce them and you reduce the quality. Period. However, that doesn't necessarily mean you reduce the number of readers (sadly).
 
I read about 90-95% of your posts in their entirety. While I won't always agree, without fail, you'll give me a few new things to consider. No need to shorten the writings, but if you decided that route, maybe bullet points?
 
I read about 90-95% of your posts in their entirety. While I won't always agree, without fail, you'll give me a few new things to consider. No need to shorten the writings, but if you decided that route, maybe bullet points?

Bullet points or bold to emphasize fundamental points to your logic would be nice. I appreciate your efforts because its not easy to be prolific writer, however at the end of the day people want winners cause most are add and looking to tail, others like a majority of this site use some of the info of some of the dudes with their own info, most probably making their own decisions. With your college and ambition you prolly get a door open at ESPN, but nobody really cares about your words unless you bring winners and are in rare air like CK or Dmoney. You are on a good path, no doubt. GL with it, but never go tout route.
 
Bullet points or bold to emphasize fundamental points to your logic would be nice. I appreciate your efforts because its not easy to be prolific writer, however at the end of the day people want winners cause most are add and looking to tail, others like a majority of this site use some of the info of some of the dudes with their own info, most probably making their own decisions. With your college and ambition you prolly get a door open at ESPN, but nobody really cares about your words unless you bring winners and are in rare air like CK or Dmoney. You are on a good path, no doubt. GL with it, but never go tout route.

Yes I quit the tout business before I got into it. Partly out of inspiration from GameHunter partly because I felt like a car salesman, telling lies to make money off of people. I'd rather drop dead than cheat people for money. Now, cheating to beat friends in ping pong because I hate losing, I think that's ok :)
 
Last edited:
If I could write as much as you I would follow in the footsteps of my writer heroes like Thomas Perry and write sick fiction and figure out a sports gambling approach that brings you enjoyment. Keep writing. Keep grinding. You are so young.
 
Last edited:
I don't keep track of how consistently I win. But either way I feel like I would be just as good at previews that details pros and cons for both sides and so doesn't actually make a pick.

Thanks for the feedback. It varies by audience. The main guys here are all highly intelligent, provide solid substance themselves and have good things to discuss with my articles. But I think kj said once he would do write-ups but even here only so many read the whole thing. But at covers I got a lot of hate from users there who detest write-ups and in fact any form of reasoning. I'm afraid to consider which group (smart ctg guys or covers squares) composes the majority of bettors.
Looking into ESPN Chalk. I got a masters in history and studied philosophy at UVA. Writing analytically is simply what I do.
 
I used to do extensive write ups when I had more time to do it. It was fun for a few years and I would get great discussion from other people about the games. We all helped eachother. Then, it sort of became a labor of love as I wrote the long write ups but hardly anyone read them anymore or contributed something back to me to make it worth my while to write it. It eventually gets demoralizing when you work very hard trying to organize your thoughts in a coherent way to show others why you like what you like and to hopefully give them hints on ways to improve their handicapping and then all you get is "gl" or "thanks". You start to wonder what you are wasting your time for. I quit doing it. I post some quick thoughts now but I don't post the comparative analytics that lead me to what I do anymore. Again, it is mostly about not having the time (my work is very time punitive now) but it is also because I don't feel the gratification of helping people anymore that I once did and I receive far less information in return for my efforts than I did before too.

It is what it is.

You can always do your article and then have a "cliff notes" at the bottom to detail the main drivers to your selection without the detail. shrug. I don't know. I like your articles the way they are but reading and learning are two of my favorite pass times and most people these days want instant gratification without having to think.
 
I think your articles are a big,big asset to the forum. My vote is to keep things just the way they are.
Very informative. I happen to live in a state that is all about professional sports. We get zero information on college.

Vk have read your posts and understand and agree with just about everything you say. bull
 
16 NFL scouts in Laramie tonight, many to scout Allen.

Alot of pressure on the kid and he is doing it with alot less around him this year. Bad spot for him to have to prove himself. Hope ultimately he comes back to WYO in 2018. He needs to improve in the decision making category..alot, and presumably with better complements to showcase himself next year as well. They just lost so much from last year's team. No idea what happens in this game at the end of the day. I have a propensity to align with underdogs, but can't argue with any of your reasoning for a 1st half Duck play, in fact may have to play it with you.
 
I agree look for dogs first. Look to be contrarian. Probably look for variety (Oregon covered last week's 1h but not fg). I just couldn't convince myself of Wyoming after looking into it
 
I honestly think Oregon are still undervalued based on last year, they're damn good and this coach brings a bit of intensity on defense as well. Like them all over the place in this one.
 
You can always do your article and then have a "cliff notes" at the bottom to detail the main drivers to your selection without the detail. shrug. I don't know. I like your articles the way they are but reading and learning are two of my favorite pass times and most people these days want instant gratification without having to think.

That's what "The Verdict" should hopefully achieve. I'll try to make that clearer
 
Back
Top