NCAAF Week 6

CrimsonK

Sid Bream Supporter
Week 0: 3-1 (+1.87 units)
Week 1: 31-19 (+16.53 units)
Week 2: 29-10 (+26.28 units)
Week 3: 22-28 (-16.76 units)
Week 4: 28-19 (+2.67 units)
Week 5: 19-15 (+1.28 units)
Overall: 132-92 (+31.87 units)

Games already played in futures markets:

ECU +8.5 v. Temple -110 (1 unit)
Cincinnati +6 v. UCF -120 (1 unit)
UCF -3 @ Cincinnati -125 (1 unit)
Miami -3/4 v. VT -110 (3.5 units)
VT +11 @ Miami -110 (1 unit)
Florida -3 v. Auburn -110 (1 unit)
Auburn +8 @ Florida -120 (1 unit)
Michigan State +17 @ Ohio State -110 (1 unit)
 
Week 0: 3-1 (+1.87 units)
Week 1: 31-19 (+16.53 units)
Week 2: 29-10 (+26.28 units)
Week 3: 22-28 (-16.76 units)
Week 4: 28-19 (+2.67 units)
Week 5: 19-15 (+1.28 units)
Overall: 132-92 (+31.87 units)

Games already played in futures markets:

ECU +8.5 v. Temple -110 (1 unit)
Cincinnati +6 v. UCF -120 (1 unit)
UCF -3 @ Cincinnati -125 (1 unit)
Miami -3/4 v. VT -110 (3.5 units)
VT +11 @ Miami -110 (1 unit)
Florida -3 v. Auburn -110 (1 unit)
Auburn +8 @ Florida -120 (1 unit)
Michigan State +17 @ Ohio State -110 (1 unit)
Some big moves already. Good luck with your middles!
 
Week 0: 3-1 (+1.87 units)
Week 1: 31-19 (+16.53 units)
Week 2: 29-10 (+26.28 units)
Week 3: 22-28 (-16.76 units)
Week 4: 28-19 (+2.67 units)
Week 5: 19-15 (+1.28 units)
Overall: 132-92 (+31.87 units)

Games already played in futures markets:

ECU +8.5 v. Temple -110 (1 unit)
Cincinnati +6 v. UCF -120 (1 unit)
UCF -3 @ Cincinnati -125 (1 unit)
Miami -3/4 v. VT -110 (3.5 units)
VT +11 @ Miami -110 (1 unit)
Florida -3 v. Auburn -110 (1 unit)
Auburn +8 @ Florida -120 (1 unit)
Michigan State +17 @ Ohio State -110 (1 unit)

Fine. I will do this next year. Wondering if you still have my number form a decade ago. I would like to discuss your methodology on this if you would. I have been watching enough the last couple of years to figure out some of it .... the main thing that it appears to me looking from the outside in ...

1. You look at the future GOY line. Then you look at the upcoming schedule leading into the game and likely outcomes of those events. Then you determine how the likely results will impact the line (perception or reality) and bet accordingly, thus creating middle opportunities,

Anyway, I think I would like to learn your methods if you are willing to share them with me sometime.
 
Fine. I will do this next year. Wondering if you still have my number form a decade ago. I would like to discuss your methodology on this if you would. I have been watching enough the last couple of years to figure out some of it .... the main thing that it appears to me looking from the outside in ...

1. You look at the future GOY line. Then you look at the upcoming schedule leading into the game and likely outcomes of those events. Then you determine how the likely results will impact the line (perception or reality) and bet accordingly, thus creating middle opportunities,

Anyway, I think I would like to learn your methods if you are willing to share them with me sometime.
I think I still have your number. I’ll look and text you, if so. You are right about much.
 
Ball State +7.5 @ NIU -115 (1 unit)
Oklahoma State -7 @ Texas Tech -120 (1 unit)
Iowa State -3 v. TCU -110 (1 unit)
Ole Miss -6.5 v Vanderbilt -115 (1 unit)
Michigan State +21.5 @ Ohio State -105 (1 unit)
 
Temple/ECU Under 49.5 -110 (1 unit)
UCF -3.5 @ Cincinnati -110 (1 unit)
USF/UConn Over 51.5 -105 (1 unit)
Purdue/Penn State Over 54 -113 (1 unit)
Ball State/NIU Over 54 -110 (2 units)
Tulane -2.5 @ Army -108 (1 unit)
Pitt/Duke Over 48 -110 (1 unit)
Kent State/Wisconsin Over 56.5 -123 (1 unit)
EMU/ CMU Over 52 -110 (1 unit)
Troy/Missouri Over 63/65.5 -110 (3 units)
Oregon State +8.5 @ UCLA -110 (1.5 units)
Northwestern/Nebraska Over 49.5/52 -110 (1.5 units)
Vanderbilt/Ole Miss Over 58 -110 (1.5 units)
Arkansas State/Georgia State Over 66.5 -115 (1 unit)
Utah State/LSU Over 68 -115 (1 unit)
Boise State/UNLV Over 55.5 -110 (1 unit)
 
Michigan St not going to score more than 10 points.. no way they hold them
That's definitely in the range of possibilities. OSU hasn't been tested yet, so we will learn a lot about them this week. Sparty has thrown the ball well enough that I feel good about their chance to hang, in a variety of ways that the game could play out.
 
Isn't Dantonio crazy good as a DD road dog? Or am I pulling this out of nowhere?
I'm not sure, I don't keep records of stuff like that. I look at it more big picture, and Sparty is the type of team that I've had a lot of success backing in past as a middle/big dog. When i can get three scores in a game totaled in the 40's, I'll take a hard look, just about every time.
 
Weather related, played both overs early in week. Been watching forecast for couple days, been consistent.

Kent State/Wisconsin Under 58.5 -110 (1 unit)
Ball State/NIU Under 54 -110 (1 unit)
 
I know its late in the week to ask this but can u give me ur thoughts o the Tulane play? Was about to fire on Army but always hesitate when I see someone like you on the other side
 
I know its late in the week to ask this but can u give me ur thoughts o the Tulane play? Was about to fire on Army but always hesitate when I see someone like you on the other side
Tulane really good against option. They should shut army down. Key will be how tulane utilizes their speed advantages against a slow army secondary. I think with Tulane's experience in seeing a traditional option, which they did in practice for years, and their balance, they are too much for army to handle.
 
They may hold out Johnson for OU. Still has a tight hammy. My site doesn’t offer props but would keep riding the Duv over in receptions.

I would prefer to see Marcus Washington, Kennedy Lewis or Jordan Pouncey taking some reps from Epps who is trapped in Tweener land between TE and WR. But Eagles, Johnson, Smith and Duv is a solid quartet of options for Ehlinger and Brewer is having a nice comeback season at TE.
 
Tulane really good against option. They should shut army down. Key will be how tulane utilizes their speed advantages against a slow army secondary. I think with Tulane's experience in seeing a traditional option, which they did in practice for years, and their balance, they are too much for army to handle.
Spot on
 
Back
Top