NBA playoffs historical data...

brewers7

Pretty much a regular
Checking on Swede's hypothesis that the Teams that have at least 10 more wins than their opponents cover the spread in Game 1 of Round 1, I found the following data (all are ATS):

2005-06: 3-1
2004-05: 4-0
2003-04: 3-1
2002-03: 2-1
2001-02: 1-2
2000-01: 0-2
1999-00: 1-2
1998-99: 1-0
1997-98: 3-3
1996-97: 2-2
1995-96: 5-0
1994-95: 5-1
1993-94: 3-1
1992-93: 3-2
1991-92: 3-2
1990-91: 1-2-1
1989-90: 3-3
1988-89: 1-3
1987-88: 1-2-1
1986-87: 4-1
1985-86: 3-1-1

last 21 years: 52-32-3 ATS, 61.9%


Games that fit for this weekend:

Detroit vs. Orlando
Dallas vs. Golden State
Phoenix vs. L.A. Lakers
San Antonio vs. Denver

<!-- / message -->
 
hey steve good to see ya posting on here. we can sure use your input here for the playoffs!
 
2005-06: 3-1
2004-05: 4-0
2003-04: 3-1
2002-03: 2-1

i'm more interested in the last 4 years....12-3...why? b/c there's more seperation in the league's best and worst playoff teams now
 
Good info, since I like to bet dogs.....certain to steer me off some of some of them on tha fav's
 
So far, if you got Detroit -8 the first one is a push.

Anyone here thinks the other three game 1's win ATS?
 
c.r.e.a.m., he uses closing lines in getting these ats results.

Ok, didn't know that. So, that's 0-1 for this trend this year. Anyone thinks the other three favorites cover tomorrow? If so, which one is the strongest play tomorrow based on this trend?

Thanks!!!
 
clev/wash is interesting. clev has won 50 games. wash 41. however, wash would not have 41 games w/ their current roster (no gilbert, no caron).

hmmm ....
 
i'd say, san antonio and dallas. both home teams have reason to win by DD. (they both got emabarassed by the same opponent last time out...)
 
Checking on Swede's hypothesis that Elimination games go Under, I found the following data (all are ATS):

2005-06: 10-10-1 to the Under
2004-05: 13-7 to the Under
2003-04: 10-8 to the Under
2002-03: 9-14-1 to the Under
2001-02: 9-10-3 to the Under
2000-01: 7-16-1 to the Under
1999-00: 18-11-1 to the Under
1998-99: 13-7-1 to the Under
1997-98: 17-6 to the Under
1996-97: 13-12 to the Under
1995-96: 10-13-2 to the Under
1994-95: 10-12 to the Under
1993-94: 16-11-1 to the Under
1992-93: 12-10-2 to the Under
1991-92: 11-11 to the Under

last 15 years: 178-158-13 to the Under, 52.98%

<!-- / message -->
 
Checking on brewers7's hypothesis that the Teams that have a 3-0 series lead will close out the series with a sweep in Game 4, I found the following data (SU & ATS):

2005-06: 1-0 SU & ATS
2004-05: 3-1 SU & ATS
2003-04: 3-0 SU & ATS
2002-03: 2-1 SU & ATS
2001-02: 1-0 SU & ATS
2000-01: 2-1 SU & ATS
1999-00: 0-2 SU & ATS
1998-99: 4-0 SU & ATS
1997-98: 1-0 SU & ATS
1996-97: 0-1 SU & ATS
1995-96: 2-2 SU & 1-3 ATS
1994-95: 1-0 SU & ATS
1993-94: 0-1 SU & 1-0 ATS
1992-93: 1-0 SU & ATS
1991-92: 0-0
1990-91: 1-0 SU & ATS
1989-90: 0-0
1988-89: 4-0 SU & 3-1 ATS
1987-88: 0-0
1986-87: 1-1 SU & ATS
1985-86: 1-1 SU & ATS

last 21 years: 28-10 SU, 73.68% & 27-11 ATS, 71.05%


Obviously the Pistons and Bulls fit this criteria SAT and SUN, respectively...
<!-- / message -->
<!-- / message -->
 
good bump. someone figure out what the plays are. im assuming they all come from the east. too lazy to look myself. breakfast more important at this point.
 
Games that fit the at least 10 more wins rule:

Boston vs. Atlanta
Detroit vs. Philly

* possibly Orlando vs. Toronto (Orlando has exactly 10 more wins with 1 game left for both teams tonight)
 
Re the Teams that have at least 10 more wins than their opponents cover the spread in Game 1 of Round 1 stats:

For 2006-2007, this trend was 0-4 ATS (or if you got the opening line on Detroit, 0-3-1).

I'm taking as fact the teams listed above qualified. The last two on Sunday (SA and Dallas) lost SU.
 
yea pretty much all the teams in the west will be ruled out for this system play for the 10 or more wins. wow, how close can the west get!!!
 
Back
Top