NBA chase

[cisco]

I have been running 2 chase systems that have been churning out winners. Credit goes to Tony1 for this system. He no longer runs it. Maybe he's rich or maybe he's broke.

This is a 3 game, six halfs road system so keep your pepto and maalox handy if you're going to play. The player should have around 100 units available to risk.

Play against a road team on the last 3 road games. If it's a 3 game road trip we start with game 1. There are some top teams I won't play against except if they are playing against each other.

Year to date 95-1 +59.40 (or +71.78 with Limited betting progression.)

H1. 50
H2. 27
H3. 12
H4. 3
H5. 3
H6. 0
Lost 1
PM me if you want to see all games played.
The one loss was against Memphis. H6 ended with a push so I took the hit. They covered the next road game.

Anyway...

Play resumes Feb 22 against Boston. There are about 44 plays left in the season.

Feb 22 Boston
Feb 23 Cleveland
Feb 26 Sacramento
Feb 26 Minnesota
Feb 27 Golden St
Feb 27 Dallas
Feb 27 Detroit

<tbody>
</tbody>

 

[cisco]

Limited betting progression.

Limited betting progression (based -110)

#1...1st half game 1...... risk 1.1 to win 1.0 unit

#2...2nd half game 1......risk 2.3 to win 2.1 units (net 1.0 unit)

#3...1st half game 2.......risk 4.85 to win 4.41 units (net 1.0 unit)

if no cover after the first 3 plays

#4..2nd half game 2.......risk 6.6 to win 6.0 units

#5..1st half game 3.......risk 8.8 to win 8.0 units

#6..2nd half game 3......risk 13.2 to win 12.0 units

If no cover is made thru 6 plays, your loss of units is reduced more than half compared to the standard betting progression method.

If a cover is made on the 4th play, you can stop with a 2.25 unit loss or continue with the progression and profit by covering one of the next 2 plays.

<colgroup><col width="1277"></colgroup> <tbody>
[TD="width: 1277"] The idea is to reduce risk and stress with the potential to win more units. [/TD]

</tbody>

 

[cisco]

2010-11..... 80-0 series wins and 0 loss
2009-10......125 series wins and 1 loss
2008- 09 ... 127 series wins and 1 loss
2007- 08 ... 90 series wins and 2 losses
2006- 07.... 83 series wins and 1 loss
2005- 06 ... 108 series wins and 1 loss
2004- 05 ... 99 series wins and 0 loss
2003- 04 ... 102 series wins and 0 loss

This info came from Tony1.

 

[Pyppurs]

ML or ats?

 

[cisco]

ATS.

 

[sinkhole]

What about spurs Nov 26 against wiz, then against orl and last miami, spurs covered al 6 halves?

 

[cisco]

I can't remember back that far. I have that series as an H5 winner. Nobody questioned the play on my google doc where I was posting the plays at the time. It's possible we caught H5 at -2.5 earlier in the day before it came out that 3-4 SA players would not be playing.

I called Memphis a loss when others didn't. Call it a trade-off.

The Clippers series Jan 14-17 we didn't play.

Hey mods. will I ever get back the proper number of my posts?

 

[Lareux]

What about spurs Nov 26 against wiz, then against orl and last miami, spurs covered al 6 halves?

They wouldn't need to cover all 6 halves though.

 

[sinkhole]

They wouldn't need to cover all 6 halves though.

system is to bet against spurs there
last 3road games

 

[cisco]

Tony1 6 half chase
Suns lose both halfs Friday. Warriors win H3.


Saturday

orlando H1

optional

milwaukee H1 http://tinyurl.com/9hvewfv GL-

<tbody>
</tbody>

 

[cisco]

Orlando covers the +3 first half.

 

[cisco]

4 games tonight.

 

[sinkhole]

So how do u decide which teams that are optional?

 

[cisco]

Atlanta is on a 6 game road trip. The system says to play the last three games of the road trip. The first three game were optional.

3-0 tonight. All first half. Did you have them?

 

[cisco]

What about spurs Nov 26 against wiz, then against orl and last miami, spurs covered al 6 halves?

Found it sinkhole
Sa/Mia

[TABLE="class: data, align: left"]
<tbody>[TR="class: info_line_alternate2"]
[TD="class: left"]11/29 12:36 AM[/TD]
[TD]+5½ -110[/TD]
[TD]-5½ -110[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: info_line_alternate1"]
[TD="class: left"]11/28 11:44 PM[/TD]
[TD]+6 -110[/TD]
[TD]-6 -110[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]

 

[sinkhole]

so was that not a loss?
Spurs covered both halves?