Dollaz
Egor Demin Watch Club Member
Dodgers -145 (2 unit)
Tigers +115 (will add if they lose game 1)
My quick and easy breakdown of the teams:
Tigers starters vs. Red Sox starters (pitching)
Will the Red Sox have a better starter in any of the matchups this series?
Lester vs. Sanchez
Lackey vs. Scherzer
Buckholtz vs. Verlander
Peavy vs. Fister
Maybe game 4 the Sox have the edge. Game 1 could be considered a toss up, I guess, but Sanchez has had an outstanding year. But, the Tigers have a combined line of .378/.439/.577 vs. Lester in 173 PAs. Notables Hunter .433, Cabrera .526, V-Mart .427. Sox haven't seen Sanchez a lot, but they have hit .279 with a .791 OPS against.
Scherzer and Verlander over Lackey and Buckholtz is self explanatory. Sox have hit Fister better than Tigers have hit Peavy so I will give them an edge in game 4.
On offense, the Red Sox like to grind teams down with patience/high OBP type hitters. They like to get to those middle relievers in the 5/6th innings and just wear teams out. That is a successful strategy in the playoffs, imo. The problem for them is these Tigers pitchers do not walk many batters. Verlander walks the most at 3.1/9 innings, but the others really don't walk guys. I think that could neutralize something Boston is very successful at.
The Red Sox bench is vastly superior offensively. How much will that come into play in an American League series? Time will tell.
Bullpen. This is going to be interesting. The Sox have a far more reliable closer. But, the middle innings, I give the edge to the Tigers.
I picked Tigers in a long series mainly due to the superior rotation, but also bc they hit the Red Sox ace very well.
Tigers +115 (will add if they lose game 1)
My quick and easy breakdown of the teams:
Tigers starters vs. Red Sox starters (pitching)
Will the Red Sox have a better starter in any of the matchups this series?
Lester vs. Sanchez
Lackey vs. Scherzer
Buckholtz vs. Verlander
Peavy vs. Fister
Maybe game 4 the Sox have the edge. Game 1 could be considered a toss up, I guess, but Sanchez has had an outstanding year. But, the Tigers have a combined line of .378/.439/.577 vs. Lester in 173 PAs. Notables Hunter .433, Cabrera .526, V-Mart .427. Sox haven't seen Sanchez a lot, but they have hit .279 with a .791 OPS against.
Scherzer and Verlander over Lackey and Buckholtz is self explanatory. Sox have hit Fister better than Tigers have hit Peavy so I will give them an edge in game 4.
On offense, the Red Sox like to grind teams down with patience/high OBP type hitters. They like to get to those middle relievers in the 5/6th innings and just wear teams out. That is a successful strategy in the playoffs, imo. The problem for them is these Tigers pitchers do not walk many batters. Verlander walks the most at 3.1/9 innings, but the others really don't walk guys. I think that could neutralize something Boston is very successful at.
The Red Sox bench is vastly superior offensively. How much will that come into play in an American League series? Time will tell.
Bullpen. This is going to be interesting. The Sox have a far more reliable closer. But, the middle innings, I give the edge to the Tigers.
I picked Tigers in a long series mainly due to the superior rotation, but also bc they hit the Red Sox ace very well.