txtennisboy
Pretty much a regular
everybody and their al is on it.....why? bigten vs sec:hang:
iowa....
- Thread starter txtennisboy
- Start date
Big Ten SEC argument cracks me up. Some Big10 teams dominate SEC. Others such as tUOS get dominated. SEC was pretty bad this year in comparison to their normal god-like supremacy.
Yanks27Sox9
CTG Partner
some sensitivity here, TX 
i mean i like iowa...just like the under better. why? cuz scary has problems on offense. if those problems (much of which is at qb) weren't so prevalant, then scary would be the side.
but they're there...the problems, i mean...and iowa's a very good defense...so cant see scary lighting up any scoreboards.
on the other side...can't see iowa doing all that much either, providing scary shows up to play defensively.
look at how the beavs handled mccoy, and disrupted the statue/stull. a focused defense isn't given many problems by a one-dimensional offense...unless of course it's a total mismatch in the trenches, which this game won't be. anyways, brought up basically the same thing fading michigan st a few times this year...in that u stop 1 thing, u ruin that offense.
so the bottom line is this...if scary's front is focused...they will contain SG, and keep the iowa offense in check.
that said...iowa will also be keeping scary's offense in check...and considering scary...iowa could be working with some short fields, which would obviously be a tremendous advantage.
anyhow...jsut see a tight, low scoring affair. part of me wants to add iowa...but part of me isn't allowing that. but a nice 13-6 win would make everyone happy...so that's what i'm pulling for.
but lastly...the big unknown factor in this game, remember, is if scary will even show up.
you'd like to think so...but it's a legitimate question the way they ended the season...and the way their HC was rumored to go elsewhere.
big question...motivation...as we can safely assume iowa will be motivated.
i mean i like iowa...just like the under better. why? cuz scary has problems on offense. if those problems (much of which is at qb) weren't so prevalant, then scary would be the side.
but they're there...the problems, i mean...and iowa's a very good defense...so cant see scary lighting up any scoreboards.
on the other side...can't see iowa doing all that much either, providing scary shows up to play defensively.
look at how the beavs handled mccoy, and disrupted the statue/stull. a focused defense isn't given many problems by a one-dimensional offense...unless of course it's a total mismatch in the trenches, which this game won't be. anyways, brought up basically the same thing fading michigan st a few times this year...in that u stop 1 thing, u ruin that offense.
so the bottom line is this...if scary's front is focused...they will contain SG, and keep the iowa offense in check.
that said...iowa will also be keeping scary's offense in check...and considering scary...iowa could be working with some short fields, which would obviously be a tremendous advantage.
anyhow...jsut see a tight, low scoring affair. part of me wants to add iowa...but part of me isn't allowing that. but a nice 13-6 win would make everyone happy...so that's what i'm pulling for.
but lastly...the big unknown factor in this game, remember, is if scary will even show up.
you'd like to think so...but it's a legitimate question the way they ended the season...and the way their HC was rumored to go elsewhere.
big question...motivation...as we can safely assume iowa will be motivated.
tee*dub
Head of Loggerhead Turtle Society
some sensitivity here, TX
i mean i like iowa...just like the under better. why? cuz scary has problems on offense. if those problems (much of which is at qb) weren't so prevalant, then scary would be the side.
but they're there...the problems, i mean...and iowa's a very good defense...so cant see scary lighting up any scoreboards.
on the other side...can't see iowa doing all that much either, providing scary shows up to play defensively.
look at how the beavs handled mccoy, and disrupted the statue/stull. a focused defense isn't given many problems by a one-dimensional offense...unless of course it's a total mismatch in the trenches, which this game won't be. anyways, brought up basically the same thing fading michigan st a few times this year...in that u stop 1 thing, u ruin that offense.
so the bottom line is this...if scary's front is focused...they will contain SG, and keep the iowa offense in check.
that said...iowa will also be keeping scary's offense in check...and considering scary...iowa could be working with some short fields, which would obviously be a tremendous advantage.
anyhow...jsut see a tight, low scoring affair. part of me wants to add iowa...but part of me isn't allowing that. but a nice 13-6 win would make everyone happy...so that's what i'm pulling for.
but lastly...the big unknown factor in this game, remember, is if scary will even show up.
you'd like to think so...but it's a legitimate question the way they ended the season...and the way their HC was rumored to go elsewhere.
big question...motivation...as we can safely assume iowa will be motivated.
Very good write-up Yanks.. I could see the 13-6 scenario but thinking more 20-12 ish..
TexTennis-- didn't mean to be disrespectful in my post above.. Pretty fired up about this game.. Check a few pro-Iowa threads (BAR, VegasKyle, Tee*dub's) before going all in on Scary..:shake:
spanishshark
Youngest guy on the forum
SEC is dominant.. Powerful South Carolina offense should have their way..opcorn:
Look at their last two games..I mean losses. :4_12_12:
tee*dub
Head of Loggerhead Turtle Society
sarcasm Shark.. Obviously I kind of like Iowa
spanishshark
Youngest guy on the forum
I knew that, it was just my attempt at sarcasm that failed :36_11_6::36_11_6:
txtennisboy
Pretty much a regular
iowa was awesome.....i made a little coin....thanks guys
