"Pissing your money away" by guaranteeing yourself a profit in sports gambling. Lol oh the laughs never end.
:shake:Long time lurker, first time poster.
What I personally do is utilize Live Betting for hedging. The minute the team you bet on takes a lead (hopefully they do), you take the other team for a small amount at + odds.
Obviously it doesn't work everytime but more often than not you are not forced to hedge in the beginning of the game and wait until your team takes the lead.
Example: yesterday I had the Devil Rays to end a parlay - $300/$485. The minute the Rays took the 1-0 lead, I took the Red Sox at +205 in the 7th inning for $150 guaranteeing I cannot lose money.
Just another angle.
show your work then. i linked to mine. try reading post 11 in my link for more clarity if that will help.
quite simply...if you have a ML parlay or a teaser in b-ball or football and you have time to bet the other way you will have a middle opportunity while locking in a profit.
teaser strategy is much different than what we are talking about here.
Thats an 8 teamer hail mary with a slight middle opp tho Jayhawk..... bit different imo
I get the 'why put them in the parlay if you want to hedge now' argument, and for the most part I agree for a parlay with a small amount of teams or smaller amount of return.
But just speaking of what Cub linked to, I disagree completely.
The other day I had just a stupid parlay. I have mild OCD, and like even numbers on my balances, but found myself on an off number. To compensate, I did just a silly Parlay, it was an 8 teamer for $56 (to win like $8400 or something). Well I had a good day and all of the first 7 legs hit, last leg was the Chargers late Sunday -5.
So I either let $56 ride or try to hedge. No brainer imo. I put $2750-$2500 on the Raiders +6.5 (so had a slight middle opportunity). We all know the Raiders won.
So instead of being -$56 without hedging, I was +$2694 with the hedge. If the Chargers would have covered I would have been +$5650 (Not to mention the middle opportunity).
SO how is hedging dumb? either risk minus money or guarantee plus money. Seems like a pretty easy solution to me. If you can guarantee a profit why wouldn't you take it?
I hear the naysayers but its not to often you get a chance to risk $0 to make $400
Did you even read what I posted or the link? He'd have guaranteed himself more money if he hadn't even put the cardinals into the parlay. There is no logical reason to include a team in a parlay only to hedge it later.
Nothing wrong w/thatCouldn't resist. Just put $40 on Pit +500. Now that's a hedge I can live with!
I don't think Fister at -170 and Kershaw -240 in a 2 team parlay would have been more profitable than the hedge though...
I don't think Fister at -170 and Kershaw -240 in a 2 team parlay would have been more profitable than the hedge though...
Well if you parlay the first two and win... You get the funds deposited in your account. And then since you have TIME... You actually get to decide if or not you want to bet on the cards all the way up until the game starts... And if you don't you make out with with the $250 profit on the kershaw/Fister parlay.
If you decide to then bet on waino... You bet $450 on the cards. And your payout is basically the same. Locking it early is dumb IMO
If I did that, I could have lost my entire original wager amount in addition to my profits. I ended up risking $0 to make $492 and am quite satisfied.
If I did that, I could have lost my entire original wager amount in addition to my profits. I ended up risking $0 to make $492 and am quite satisfied.
So results oriented. What happens if they are down 4-0 and your in-game hedge costs -400 instead of +400?
I would encourage anyone who doesn't see the folly of adding teams to parlays to only hedge them out later to read the link I provided and to play around with the math of the various scenarios. Only one correct conclusion exists.