-over 9 in detroit
-over 11 in colorado
-under 6.5 in pitt
-over 7 in SF
-don't think tropeano should be that big of a fav
-someone talk to me about the mutts, saw a funny stat: -The Mets became the 2nd team since 1920 to start No. 4 and No. 5 hitters with batting averages under .180 and at least 100 ABs...I know G's been praising how Niese has thrown since coming back and being on the trade block.
to each their own, but it's there as is ball park factor, FIP, xFIP, BABIP, WHIP and ERA for me atleast.Do you guys actually use run support when capping a game? Seems like one of the most useless stats available with no correlation year to year or am I missing something?
Do you guys actually use run support when capping a game? Seems like one of the most useless stats available with no correlation year to year or am I missing something?
-over 9 in detroit
-over 11 in colorado
-under 6.5 in pitt
-over 7 in SF
-don't think tropeano should be that big of a fav
-someone talk to me about the mutts, saw a funny stat: -The Mets became the 2nd team since 1920 to start No. 4 and No. 5 hitters with batting averages under .180 and at least 100 ABs...I know G's been praising how Niese has thrown since coming back and being on the trade block.
Do you guys actually use run support when capping a game? Seems like one of the most useless stats available with no correlation year to year or am I missing something?
i dont blame you on fish, i would have probably played at that number too. when i saw overnight my initial reaction was cashner was overpriced. now im kinda starting to warm to the pads, i think if i could get -120ish id prob end up playing them. cashner has screwed me a ton but he has been pitching more efficiently of late.
might play Pitt 17-3 at home on Friday and Max has had some recent problems with the ump.