Did you notice any misleading scores in week one? Please post them

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gyno
  • Start date Start date
G

Gyno

Guest
Please post them if you did....


We did this last year.


Post any game where you think the final score was misleading.. This can be caused by turnovers or just bad luck.

For example

TEAM A had 420 yards offense, 23 FD's but 4 turnovers and two of them in the red zone.
TEAM B had 276 yards of offense 17 FD's

TEAM B won 31-20..



You get the point.


Thanks..
 
Thursday night, Las Vegas outgained Minny 419-320 but the Goofers had three second half touchdowns that were not scored by the offense (kick return to start the half, blocked field goal runback and interception return on a 14-point swing). The final score was hardly indicative of how the game was played.
 
Villanova was stopped on downs at BC 1 following a 9 play 64 yard drive in 2nd qrt (Nova led 14-7 at the time). Nova also threw a 4th qrt INT that led to BC 35y drive for FG. Next Nova went on a 50 yard drive and had 1st and 10 at BC 19, but QB was sacked and fumbled with 2:36 left. Nova got ball back deep in own territory with 2:13 left, but threw an INT on 2nd down. On the day Villanova had 4 TOs to BC’s 1. And Villanova rushed for 197y (5.5 ypc), but BC’s Rettig did go 22-30-285-2-0.

Big penalty is a pivotal moment in Buffalo – OSU game. 3rd and 8, trailing 20-30, Buffalo LB Khalil Mack got a sack fumble on Braxton Miller, which Buff recovered for a TD, but Mack was called for illegal hands to face (right call) nullifying the fumble and Buff defensive TD (would have been 2nd on the day) and giving OSU an automatic first down. Instead of a 30-27 3 pt lead, with the penalty OSU went on for a 14p 91y TD drive for a 17 pt lead. In the 4th qrt Buffalo was stopped on downs at the OSU 2 following a 15p 75y drive.

Illinois did not record a sack vs Southern Illinois despite them throwing 40 times, but Salukis got 5 sacks of their own.

Toledo only had one drive longer than 40 yards, was 1 of 13 on 3rd downs yet only lost by 18. Florida ended the game at the Toledo 4.

La Tech had 4.3 ypc on 33 attempts (NC St 4.2 on 56 att). 1st qrt LT fumbled on 2nd down at the NC St 2 following a 16p 85y drive. 2nd qrt, two drives later LT fumbled at NC St 9 after a 6p 66y drive. LT had 321 yards but only scored 14 pts. Those yards were not garbage time either as LT actually had -14 yards on 3 drives in the 4th qrt, so they gained 335 yards in 3 qrts.

Maryland should have won by even more than 43-10. FIU recovered a fumbled Maryland punt at the Terp 15, got –5y on 3 plays and kicked a FG. Later in the 2nd qrt FIU took over at the Mary 25 following a sack/fumble and took 9 plays before scoring their only TD on the day. If not for 2 Maryland fumbles FIU would have been shut out. FIU’s longest drive of the day was their final one of 42 yards.

Notre Dame had a 1st down at the Temple 4, but failed to score before game ended (up by 22 laying about 28). Temple’s running QB often frustrated ND D and he rushed for multiple first downs. Owls had 25-21 FD advantage, but 362-543 yard deficit as Irish got big play after big play while Owls had to nickel and dime (which they often did effectively). Both teams missed 2 FGs, Temple also missed an x-pt. Temple was SOD at ND 6 and 33 in 2nd half. So on one hand ND could have covered this game, but also Temple could have made it closer on the scoreboard.
 
Alabama benefited from 2 special teams TDs and a pick-6. Offense looked subpar, especially the offensive line. Defense looked excellent as usual
 
Southern Miss had 400 - 215 yard and 16-13 FD edge, but had a -5 TO deficit and lost 15-22.

Tx St had a 44y fum ret TD and they actually gained 84 of their 215 yards in the 4th qrt (one good drive all game). SMiss att'd 53 passes (Tx St 22) while they only ran the ball 24x for 1 ypc with no ball carrier getting more than 8 att (Tx St 40 att for 2 ypc).
 
Old Dominion had first half leads of 10-7 and 17-14 before trailing 17-21 at half. In the third quarter ECU recovered two fumbles, one ran back 26y for TD the other recovered in the EZ for a TD for a double digit lead that held up until the end. First downs and yards were essentially even (26-26, 481ECU – 460 ODU).

Oklahoma D dominates, the O starts slow. ULM QB Browning completed 20 passes for just 3.3 ypc! ULM runs for just 1.7 ypc and finishes with just 9 first downs! Three of OU’s first four drives were 3-and-out. All of OU’s pts were scored in 2nd and 3rd qrts. QB Knight only goes 11 of 28 for 86y (3.1), but ran for 103 (7.9).

Turnovers and field position directly cost Wash St points and hand points to Auburn. Wash St racks up 28-16 FD, 464-394 TY, 344-99 PY edges, but has a –2 TO deficit and Auburn runs KO back. After two drives totaling 10 plays and 35 yards combined, Aub goes on a 28y TD drive following a Wash St INT. Two other W St INTs did not result any Aub scores, however one occurred in the EZ on 1st and goal following a 11p-62y drive. W St was SOD at their own 45 which led to a Aub 16y FG drive. Inside 2 minutes W St was also SOD at Aub 27 trailing by 7.
 
Virginia's two TD drives combined for just 29 yards (the later with 1:30 left in game following BYU INT ran back to BYU 13 yard line). BYU did have a 32y TD drive following a punt return and a 5p-9y drive for a FG following a Vir fmbl'd mid in the 4th. BYU edges: 21-14 FD, 362-223 TY, 187-109 RY, 175-114 PY, 3.5-2.6 rush ypc. BYU was +1 TO and did give up a safety. BYU QB Taysom Hill was 13 of 40 passing.
 
Back
Top