DFS/Props Week 7 2025 Discussion

Thursday Night/Showdown Slate

PIT@CIN


Steelers have a great P/RB matchup.
Bengals have a meh P/RB matchup.
Rodgers has a great pressure rate situation, and a good pass potential. Warren~ has a good rush potential.
Flacco has a meh pressure rate situation, and a bad pass potential. Brown has a meh rush potential.
Pace of play is 8th (meh).

- In his first game back, Warren and Gainwell looked like weeks 1 and 2 warren and gainwell, where the snap count breakdown was about 50-40%, now you have to decide was he being eased back in, and will revert back to week 3 (80% snap count, 24 opps, 6 targets), or will this continue as a time share for a bit longer? The fact that there is uncertainty, and his most recent performance will create a preception, I think it is very smart to be a bit overweight on him, because when Wk3 workload hits again it'll be such a spike off of his price. Last week with no austin, no WR outside of Metcalf had a snap count at 45% or higher.... Metcalf finished with a great 31% target share, and great aDOT of 16.8, those are WR1 overall type numbers, and he should be considered again. I don't think we play any other WR, but if we do need a punt/min priced kind of guy, I'd go Miller than Wilson as my choices. I said it last week, but we needed to be alerted on Washington at TE, he hit an 80% snap count his prior game, and with no Austin, we should have expected a higher share of targets too, he finished with a 17% target share (3rd on team), and a good TE aDOT of 8.2, and he isn't that much more expensive than miller/wilson (may not even include them at this point unless mass entering). Joonu would be my 2nd choice, but he is twice as much as washington with lower metrics. Freiermuth is just unrosterable (?).....

We've had our first Flacco start. He attempted 45 passes... that creates a lot of PPR value for these pass catchers. TE's made up 28% of the target share from flacco, the problem is all 3 saw atleast 2 targets, and NONE even had an aDOT that hit 3. But there may only be 2 total TEs left (gesicki got hurt on first plays last week, and Hudson in concussion protocol). This could lead to a higher floor/ceiling game for Fant (too cheap if so), and Sample (almost floor price) to a lesser degree. Who we mainly want to attack is Chase/Higgins, they combined for a 50% target share (30%/20%), but Higgins led in aDOT (13.25/9.5), it doesn't look like roster construction should be to difficult with all the possible value plays listed above, so I will probably lean more into Chase, however I will certainly have both. In the first 4 games with CLV, the RBs had a combined target share over 23%, last week with CIN, that fell to 12%, I am not overly concerned with Perine cutting into Brown when we think CIN can compete, because 2 weeks ago they got crushed by DET, and this week, for 2.5+ quarters they were behind 2 possession whenever the offense touched the ball... and judging by past experiences, I think Flacco does add a bit more checkdowns to the backfield then he did last week... I don't mind Brown as maybe a lesser owned option in tourneys.
 
Last edited:
Sunday Morning/London/Showdown Slate

LAR@JAC


Rams have a meh RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Jags have a meh RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Kyren has a bad rush potential.
Lawrence has a great pressure rate situation, but a bad pass potential.
Pace of play is T-2nd.

- Notes
 
Sunday 1PMs/Main Slate

LVR@KCC


Raiders have a great RB matchup, meh P matchup.
Chiefs have a good P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Geno has a bad pressure rate situation, and a bad pass potential.
Mahomes has a great pass potential. Pacheco? has a good rush potential.
Raiders TTR is 19th (meh).
Chiefs TTR is 2nd (great).
Pace of play is 10th (bad). O/U Rank is 4th.

- In Jeanty's 4 losses this year, he has avg'd 19 opps (4.33 targets/g), those numbers tick up in games they've won (2), I don't love his price, but we've seen his ceiling game already this year, so I think he can remain on your list. I want to say that Geno is now priced under the typical 5K min for starting QBs, I can be convinced of any QB in a positive pass at this price will pay off that salary. In Mayer's return without bowers, which looks to be the case again this week, he had an insane 32% target share, while his aDOT of 2.7 leaves a lot to be desired, that type of PPR floor looks nice, especially with what should be a higher volume game than last weeks win. The Big 2 at WR, if you are playing geno, and want to be different than mayer, pick your poison, but I'll note if meyers doesn't play, I have interest in Bech, he's the stone min, and saw his snaps jump to 75% last week.

I went to lower my expectations on this team this week but before I get there, Mahomes as been really good again this season, and his offense will officially be as healthy as it has ever been this year, they have the #2 TT of the week for the main slate, and they have cheap stacking options (hello Rashee). The thing is, I think they will be extremely popular, and the one poor performance Mahomes had, was in the 2+ possession win vs the NYG where he failed to 2x this salary. I'm not saying they aren't good plays, but I think I want to pivot elsewhere. Having said that, another way to get direct leverage is to play Pacheco or Hunt (or a WR not named Rashee/Kelce), because most probably go there. I don't mind a naked Mahomes too and hope he continues to run some in, and spread the ball around.

PHI@MIN

Eagles have a great RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Vikings have a good RB matchup, meh P matchup.
Hurts has a bad pressure rate situation, and a meh pass potential. Barkley has a good rush potential.
Wentz? has a bad pass potential.
Eagles TTR is 10th.
Vikings TTR is 13th.
Pace of play is 12th (Bad). O/U Rank is 6th.

- This is a confusing matchup. 1) PHI may come in run heavy, or pass heavy... idk, and 2) MIN looks like a run funnel D, but when you look at their opponents, Rodgers, Penix, Caleb all have 2+ possession leads for parts of the game and weren't asked to do much, they got Gabriel in his first start on the road in london where it was a neutral script and they didn't ask him to do much, and then the 5th game was Brownings blowout, so are they really run funnel, or have they not seen a good QB and/or a team playing from behind/needing to throw. I am all for leaning into Barkley, on paper it looks right, and I'll have some shares of him, but he is coming off b2b games where he avg'd 12 opps (3 targets/g), how can we pay almost 8K for that... but the passing offense will very low owned, and can get interesting if MIN can play with a lead. Everyone wants to dog on Brown, but weeks 3-6 with the healthy core of this offense, he has a really good 29% target share, and a good aDOT of 12, Smith is $100 less, and comes with worse metrics, mostly passing. Goedert is interesting, his 21% target share is good, but his aDOT is closing in on 10, over a 4 game sample size, that's really good, only 3 TEs in that 4 week span (albeit in a smaller sample size due to injuries/activations) beat him, and that's Waller/Kincaid/Kmet, yet none come near his target share.

In 2 closely contested games with Wentz, Mason avg'd 18 opps (3.5 targets/g), those are fine numbers for low 6K pricing, it looks pretty similar with McCarthy based of Jones and his workload weeks 1/2. If we want to take the PHI passing attack, we need MIN to set the pace, or keep up, in 3 weeks with Wentz, JJ clearly stands out, as he hass had a 29% target share, that number does not if you take out the game without addison, as it stays at 29%, and he had a big aDOT of 13.5. I think Hockenson can get their on PPR, but his aDOT of 2.7 is bad, but the plus is he is getting really cheap, and is a pivot off of the popular Fannin or Mayer. I think you can include Addison as a bringback option too, strictly because he is more than 2K cheaper than JJ, yes his target share is much lower, but he still has a big aDOT, and we know he can hit a HR. If McCarthy is in, JJ's metrics look a touch better, but again that was without Addison, as he sits at 32%/13.1 aDOT, I almost feel like it doesn't matter who starts, it shouldn't change the way your needle was leaning --- I'd rather have McCarthy for DFS purposes due to his legs though.

MIA@CLV

Dolphins have a good P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Browns have a great P/RB matchup.
Tua has a good pressure rate situation, but a meh pass potential. Achane has a bad rush potential.
Gabriel has a bad pressure rate situation. Judkins has a great rush potential.
Dolphins TTR is T-16th (meh).
Browns TTR is 12th.
Pace of play is T-2nd. O/U Rank is T-9th (meh/last).

- sustained 20-25 mph winds, with gusts up to 40 as of right now, I'll lower my passing expectations. Achane is unfortunately the highest priced he has ever been, going up against a stout D, I think he can smash on any given week, but he hasn't eclipsed 22 opps, but he does a ton with his touches, and has a PPR floor we love. I'm torn here, because I think everyone sees CLV D, and his price and ignore him, but he could see more volume than he has all year with the anticipated shorter throws/wind --- he also hit 90% of snaps last week. In his 2 full games without Hill, Waddle has a really good 27.5% target share, with a big time aDOT of 15.5, which he never really had. Mentioned already, I don't think that aDOT hits this week, but on PPR sites, we will take the dink and dunk all day, the pace of this game only helps. Ikhine plays more, but Washington would the only other piece I'd consider, he has b2b games with 5 targets (16% share), 1 TD, and he will 4x+ this salary.

It is looking like no Njoku this week, and he will vacate a large 18% target share (15 targets), to his teammates. and will note Jeudy is Q, and has had a 21.5% target share, 40% of gabriels passes could cascade to players that are all in the 3K range, and need to be considered for one-offs/salary savers. If Jeudy is in, I will be playing him, as he is to cheap relative to the other players on his team (4.4K), otherwise I will be on one of Bond/Fannin a decent amount. Judkins is avg'g 19 opps (1.5 targets/g), with gabriel, he also sees limited snaps when playing from behind... it's a weird spot. I think with a lead he can easily go 100+ 1+ but a low ppr floor, and from a deficit, he will burn you. Project the type of script you think this game plays out, and go from there.

CAR@NYJ

Panthers have a great P matchup, good RB matchup.
Jets have a great P matchup, meh RB matchup.
Young has a good pass potential. Dowdle~ has a great rush potential.
Fields has a meh pressure rate situation. Hall has a meh rush potential.
Panthers TTR is 11th.
Jets TTR is T-14th.
Pace of play is 9th (meh). O/U Rank is T-7th (meh).

- If Hubbard is out, Dowdle is arguably to cheap again even at 6.8K, the guy is avg'g 31 opps (4.5 targets/g) in his 2 starts, hitting 88% of snaps last week. Now if Hubbard is in, yes Dowdle should remain the lead back, but I am not risking the work he may lose when looking at his current price, maybe a few carries, but a couple of his targets are gone, that limits him enough for me. If debating pass catchers, you have to put yourself in the mindset of this team playing from behind/losing, because in his 3 wins Young is averaging 26.3 pass attempts, in his 3 losses, 40 pass attempts. In either case, I don't think any WR is worth mentioning outside of McMillan, as the rest barely have over 10% target share in L2 weeks (since Legettes return). However McMillan has a 27% target share, and 13.2 aDOT in those games, so if you expect a loss/40~ pass attempts, 11~ targets should lead to a higher end result/range for him, regardless of sauce and co. Will note that Young seems cheap, and aside from the london game, they have surrended, 37,27,29,30,34 points, if the TDs funnel through the air/Youngs legs, then he could easily 4x+ his salary.

I know Fields has sucked, but in 5 games this year he has his 25+ FPs in 3 of them, for tourneys, he can always be considered. Hall has 3 double digit performances this year, with 0 TDs on the season, last weeks 0 target performance I am booking as an anomaly, as prior to that he avg'd 4.8 targets/g, and now with basically no other offensive weapons, he should be at the north side of his range of outcomes. In 4 starts with Fields, Wilson had a 33% target share, Reynolds is Q and also had an 11.5% target share, there's possible 45%~ of Fields targets to be passed on elsewhere. Despite coming off a poor 1 target game, Taylor has a 20% target share with an ok TE aDOT of 7, even if he hits those numbers exactly, he could hit value at 3.4K, I can confidently say that those numbers will be higher on sunday, one of my fave TE plays. If Reynolds is out, I'd add some of these WRs to the salary saver/punt options (Lazard/smith/etc).

NEP@TEN

Pats have a good P/RB matchup.
Titans have a good P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Maye has a good pressure rate situation, and a great pass potential. Stevenson~ has a meh rush potential.
Ward has a meh pressure rate situation, and a meh pass potential. Pollard~ has a bad rush potential.
Pats TTR is 7th (good).
Titans TTR is 18th (meh).
Pace of play is 6th. O/U Rank is T-7th (meh).

- This backfield is crazy. Stevenson L2 weeks? 20 carries, 32 total yards, but 2 TDs. and the guy is running a lot of routes out of the backfield too, AND hit a season high 72% snap count.... I just feel like the plug is going to be pulled eventually, but I've thought that after his 3rd fumble of the season and it didn't stop Vrabel from playing him still, so what do I know. If Stevenson is getting the goaline work, and a good share of the passing work, we have to like him at 5.2K. I'm not in love, but I will sprinkle him here and there in a game where they are favorites --- unless you think it is finally henderson szn, then get ahead of the train before it takes off (I probably won't). I finally go heavy on Diggs, and Boutte/Douglas combine for 164 yards/3tds, thanks... despite the bad last week, when you look at the L3, he still has a 32% target share, with an ok aDOT of 9.4, he still feels cheap, the only other WR I'd consider is Boutte, he actually sees the field more than diggs and has a big aDOT of 16.

Another team, another headache at RB. It looks like if playing in a neutral/lead go pollard, and if playing from behind go spears, but still.... 1) that may not even hold true as the weeks progress (if spears takes over), 2) do we want the lead back who is losing a lot of passing game work on ppr sites? not really..., 3) the titans are favored to be playing from behind most weeks, this pretty much throws pollard out the door. Spears maybe if mass entering on PPR sites can be considered, maybe with a heavier NEP stack as we want them to be scoring points. Ayomanor and Van Jefferson are the cheap salary saver options that should see target upside with no Ridley. Both had big aDOTs last week too (16.8/19.6) so the opportunity is there.

NOS@CHI

Saints have a good P matchup, meh RB matchup.
Bears have a great P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Rattler has a meh pressure rate situation.
Williams has a good pressure rate situation, and good pass potential. Swift has a meh rush potential.
Saints TTR is T-14th.
Bears TTR is 4th (good).
Pace of play is 1st (good). O/U Rank is 3rd (good).

- Olave on the season has a 32.5% target share, with an ok 8.6 aDOT, he has consistently hit double digit FPs every week this year (full ppr) despite having just 1 TD on the season. While there is some concern for wind, the matchup couldn't be better for him to finally break out of this low double digit slump (lol to even say), he's to cheap at 5.4K, I think he can always be considered at this price, and he does have 7 RZ targets on the year, positive regression incoming. If you have more conviction in shaheed, I get why you can consider him for tourneys, we know he has HR upside, and he doesn't break the bank, I probably won't be doing it though as the deep ball is less likely to be there this week. Kamara is interesting, he is back in the 5K range, similar to Olave, he has a semi safe ppr floor, I know Kendre is slowly stealing some of his show, but he has hit at least 5 targets in 3 straight now and virtually nobody will be playing him. Pass at the main TEs, taysom ruins everything. if you think he gets 2 TDs and he is utilized in RZ, play him at 3K, and you are bound to 4x+

Not as bad as MIA/CLV but take note on possible higher winds in this one that could impact deeper throws. Swift is playing roughly 60% of snaps, but is in that lovely 5K range, and sees consistent volume, as he has ranged between 15 to 22 opps all year, never seeing less than 3 targets/g (4.2 avg). CHI played a lot less 2 TE sets this week, maybe that's trust in the Oline/Williams from the coordinator, idk, but because of that both Kmet/Loveland were in the 50% snap count range, and I'd cancel both of my list. And because of that, Zacchaeus saw a season high 84% of snaps, which resulted in a team high 21% target share. There is a chance Moore is out, and if so I will gladly throw some darts at him, he quietly has 4 RZ targets already this year too, despite a mostly limited role early in season. Odunze is obviously the other one to really consider, he was quiet last week with just 5 targets (17% share), but had a big aDOT of 19.6, and still has a season long target share of 25%, he's obviously Williams #1 target, and I will shoot him even higher if moore is out.

Sunday 4PMs/Main Slate (Cont.)

IND@LAC


Colts have a good RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Chargers have a meh RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Taylor has a great rush potential.
Herbert has a good pressure rate situation. Vidal~ has a great rush potential.
Colts TTR is 9th (good).
Chargers TTR is 6th (good).
Pace of play is 11th (bad). O/U Rank is 2nd (good).

- Over Taylors last 4 games he hasn't seen fewer than 17 carries OR 4 targets, while hitting over 80% of snaps (92% last week and that average considers a 34 point blowout win too), in 4 of INDs 5 wins this season he has not had fewer than 26.7 FPs.... If you want to play him, by all means. The colts are left to only 3 WRs, Pittman, Pierce, and AD Mitchell. The last time 1 of the big 3 was out (pierce), AD was given a shot, and is the reason the colts aren't undefeated (although they should have lost to DEN, anyways). AD had a big time aDOT of 21.7, and played 89% of snaps, he then gets bench, and Dulin replaces him and also has an aDOT of 20.4 (5 targets), well now with no dulin (nor Downs), I do think AD could be interesting, but I actually like Pierce a bit more, imo he has been the deep threat on this team and should be out there for 90%+ of snaps. Pittman can always be considered on PPR sites where his volume ship rises. Honestly I like Warren to lmao, the O/U in this game is 2nd on the slate, and we have what should be concentrated volume on the IND side, just last week Warren is coming off a 30% target share, which is elite era Kelce status -- and that's with downs, out, taking up 23% target share.

Vidal is coming off a 22 opp (4 target) game, and played 67% of snaps, while everywhere I see is chalking it up to a porous MIA Run D, prior to the matchup we were complaining about the Oline injuries they had, while I think both play a factor, Joe Alt looks to be returning and in general we love RBs in the 5K range with ppr floors and 20+ opp upside, especially one that plays on a team that can move the ball. Welp Johnston is back, and the 3 headed monster returns. If you look at weeks 1-5 metrics with all 3 healthy WRs, McConkey was really the worst, and he is the most expensive. I think I have it at QJ>Allen>Ladd, but I am fine with any 1 or combination of 2 if you have conviction. Pass at TE, I know Gadsen may be a smart play, and I think you can take a shot in tourneys, they still do have Dissly, conklin on the backburner, and the return of QJ, in weeks 1-5 TEs only had a 13% target share combined.

NYG@DEN

Giants have a meh RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Broncos have a great RB matchup, meh P matchup.
Dart has a bad pressure rate situation, and a bad pass potential.
Nix has a great pressure rate situation, but a meh pass potential. Dobbins~ has a good rush potential.
Giants TTR is 20th (bad/last).
Broncos TTR is 8th (good).
Pace of play is 7th. O/U Rank is T-9th (meh/last).

- In Skattebo's 3 real starts (which align with all of Darts) he has avg'd 23.33 opps/g (3.67 targets/g), never fewer than 21opps/2targets, he's playing over 70% of snaps too, he is passed the 20 opp 5K price range, and is kind of becoming more of those alpha backs, so I have no problem going here at 6.5K if we expect these metrics to continue. Well I didn't expect last week Lil'Jordan to be the guy (thought I could get a cheap beaux collins hit), but without slayton it was really the Wandale/Humphrey show. They accounted for 57% of Darts targets. Humphrey had an elite 31% target share, with a really good 14.75 aDOT, those are also elite metrics, and imo should be considered even in a tough matchup as he is priced $100 above the floor level, 3.1K. I'm off Wandale because of humphrey's., but on PPR sites I think you can go him too. Pass elsewhere.

Dobbins has no PPR floor, and plays 50% of snaps, we can't pay the 5K range for him when there are so many better options. I like Sutton, and he is now below 6K, so he screams value, but I will note over the last 3 weeks, no pass catcher has a target share at or above 19%, and there are 5 of them in the teens.... aka the offense feels a bit spread out. If you like DEN this week, and they do have a good team total, you could naked Nix with a Skattebo, or Humphrey bring back. Engram has been trending up, I just like others around him more, passing elsewhere.

GBP@ARI

Packers have a meh P/RB matchup.
Cardinals have a good RB matchup, meh P matchup.
Love has a meh pressure rate situation, but a great pass potential. Jacobs has a good rush potential.
Kyler? has a meh pass potential. Carter~ has a meh rush potential.
Packers TTR is 5th (good).
Cards TTR is T-16th (meh).
Pace of play is 13th (bad/last). O/U Rank is 5th.

- This is an interesting one, and could possibly create serious leverage over the field. Jacobs having a late start time today with a true Q status will keep his ownership low, and he is in a prime spot/we know he is a bellcow, I think if you take him, with a cheap other late window option, you can then switch to wilson if he is out, and pivot your other position player to a lamb/taylor/mcbride type. The last 3 weeks, doubs has a really good 27.5% target share to go with a 10 aDOT, and he is just 5K, Reed is still out, Watson is not back, and Wicks is Q..... I'll be overweight. Golden is fine, his aDOT is better at 13.8, but only an 18% target share, and priced similarly to Doubs, if mass entering and attaching doubs, I would switch a couple to golden (or to a double stack with love, especially if no jacobs). Kraft is just to expensive, and has seen over 5 targets just once this year, pass.

I am not playing this backfield timeshare in a negative script, but I lean carter if you go here, as he is 4.8K and is the pass catcher. Idk how much MHJ concussion inflated the numbers of Mcbride, but I think it actually did of the other WRs more. With Brissett, Mcbride had a great 28% target share, with a good te aDOT of 8.1, 5.7K for alpha WR1 numbers is a steal. Last week Zay Jones finisheed with a 20.5% target share, and 13.5 aDOT, I think a chunk of that is MHJ's, and at 5.3K, I have no problem going there too. Imo this is a very cheap game to go in on and allow you to get big dogs elsewhere, as nobody outside of Jacobs (who we may not even playi) is even over 6K.

WAS@DAL

Commanders have a great P/RB matchup.
Cowboys have a good P/RB matchup.
Daniels has a bad pressure rate situation, but a great pass potential. Croskey has a great rush potential.
Dak has a meh pressure rate situation, but a great pass potential.
Commanders TTR is 1st (great).
Cowboys TTR is 3rd (great).
Pace of paly is 4th. O/U Rank is 1st (great).

- This game looks to have it all and will be the most popular game of the week by a mile. IF you want to fully fade and if it crashes and burns, or weird players get the TDs, you could leverage yourself to a #1 spot, but realistically, you probably need a piece of this game at the least. We no longer have Deebo, and still no Mach5, over the L2 weeks since Daniels return, Deebo has an insane 34% target share, that raises the floor of everybody on this team, and they are all below 4K.... Pick your posion, but I think I am sticking to Moore and McCaffrey, I don't mind Ertz, I just like other TEs and we are limited. I would consider Croskey if you completely avoid the passing game, and hope the TDs funnel through him.

Javonte has been used so well this season, and is coming off an 80%+ snap count game, even though it was his worst performance, he still had 21 opps (EIGHT targets), He is getting expensive, but the opportunity is there, and if you have conviction, go for it, there's an argument to be made that WASH can't overcome there WR problems and DAL plays with a lead, in the 1 game that happened this year, Dak attempted jsut 29 pass attempts... this is where we would want to step back and fade the passing offense. But in a closely contest game, which is more likely, he can easily get to 40+, and if thats the case, we need to jump in. The other problem we have, is Ferguson/Pickens prices are ticked up as if Lamb wasn't in... Pickens with Lamb had just a 15% target share, I am not playing him. Ferguson I could consider, as he was still utilized (21%), but he is close to McBride/Warren who are in better spots, so I'll pass there too. Lamb is an alpha that can always be considerd, he had a 28%/12.6 aDOT in weeks 1-2, a 40 pass attempt game shoudl get you to atleast 11-12 targets, that can easily be a 10+-100+-1+ game.
 
Last edited:
Sunday Night/Showdown Slate

ATL@SFO


Falcons have a good P matchup, bad RB matchup.
49ers have a good RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Penix has a great pressure rate situation.
Purdy? has a good pressure rate situation. CMC has a meh rush potential.
Pace of play is 5th.

- Notes
 
Monday Night/2 Game Slate

TBB@DET


Bucs have a meh P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Lions have a good P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Baker has a good pressure rate situation. Bucky? has a bad rush potentail.
Goff has a good pass potential.
Bucs TTR is 2nd (good).
Lions TTR is 1st (great).
Pace of play is 15th (bad). O/U Rank is 1st (great, and by 11 points at the moment).

- Notes

HOU@SEA

Texans have a good P matchup, bad RB matchup.
Seahawks have a good RB matchup, bad P matchup.
Stroud has a meh pressure rate situation.
Darnold has a great pressure rate situation, and a good pass potential.
Texans TTR is 4th (meh).
Seahawks TTR is 3rd.
Pace of play is 14th (bad). O/U Rank is 2nd (meh, 11 less than game above).

- Notes
 
Last edited:
a couple guys that have been getting a bunch of targets & haven't scored much...

olave 64 targets 1 td

Jefferson- 42 targets 1 td

Brian thomas jr 48 targets 0 tds

Jeudy 48 targets 0 td (risky with weather)

AJ Brown 45 targets 1 td

Jacoby myers 43 0 td
 
a couple guys that have been getting a bunch of targets & haven't scored much...

olave 64 targets 1 td

Jefferson- 42 targets 1 td

Brian thomas jr 48 targets 0 tds

Jeudy 48 targets 0 td (risky with weather)

AJ Brown 45 targets 1 td

Jacoby myers 43 0 td
1760880526112.png

current weather notes that I see for everyone.
 
1 PMs

M. Mayer Rec Yds O42.5 -112
J. Jefferson Receptions O5.5 -152
B. Hall Rush & Rec Yds O95.5 -114
(I like taylor over 4.5 receptions too)
E. Ayomanor Rec Yds O37.5 -112 (lol what....like this a lot)

I lean judkins rush over, but set kind of high, Brown or Barkley over but idk what PHI is ever going to do, McMillan receptions too.
 
Judkins all day until Miami can show they can stop the run. He shouldn't have competition but the number is sky high. Playing TD for 3u, over yards for 2u. Like Jalen Coker returning on a small line. Sprinkling on Tyjae Spears o2.5 as we speak.

Loved Pacheco rush yards earlier in week too
 
4 PMs

J. Herbert Passing Yds O256.5 -112
A. Pierce Rec Yds O38.5 -112
Lil'Jordan Humphrey Receptions O2.5 -128
(love too)
E. Engram Receptions O3.5 +102
C. Moore Rec Yds O35.5 -112
C. Lamb Receptions O6.5 -104
M. Harrison Receptions O3.5 -148
(was going to play mcbride, but these feels awfully low)
R. Doubs Rec Yds O49.5 -112
 
Back
Top