divol
The Spurs can suck my manhood
But they get paid for what they can in the postseason
Nothing against him, but only Alpha on the team can put up that many shots on a bad night and Jerome ain't him...
*** Conference Semifinals Discussion ***
- Thread starter B.A.R.
- Start date
Nothing against him, but only Alpha on the team can put up that many shots on a bad night and Jerome ain't him...
He averaged 16.3 points per game on 52.4 percent shooting in the Miami series.But they get paid for what they can in the postseason
Nothing against him, but only Alpha on the team can put up that many shots on a bad night and Jerome ain't him...
Efficiency wasn't great in Game 1 against Indy but it was close to Mitchell's and he had twice as many assists as Mitchell.
He finally had a bad game in Game 2. Now he doesn't deserve to be on an NBA roster because this doesn't happen to other players, too, eventually? Just so overblown. This guy is not getting paid as much as Hunter Tyson or Zeke Nnaji ffs, he was just supposed to play a tiny role. He has vastly exceeded expectations. His role in Cleveland is immense and well-deserved.
He is not supposed to be taking this many shots. I don't know why Cleveland's offense isn't moving more through Allen and Mobley. The same thing happened against Miami for some reason especially at the beginning of that series. Mitchell needs to shoot less, too, get those bigs more involved inside somehow. Not like Turner is a world-class rim protector.
divol
The Spurs can suck my manhood
Mate, I'm kidding. Obviously out of 500+- NBA players, he is not the worst. But you kinda proving my point... He shot in Game 1 almost the same amount of shots as Mitchell... Mitchell the superstar of the team, Ty came off the bench. I understand if he was red hot, but he was very mediocre.
Btw, I hated when even Kobe (RIP) did it, but I can kind of understand that from megastars, since you need to be in flow of the game if you want to make those shots when it counts. What's his accuse to shoot the same number of shots as Mobley and Allen combined or more almost twice as both starting guards (Strus and Merrill). Game two he was ice cold. Be humble - try to find better spots, focus on feeding your teammates. If there is one thing that NBA has in bundles is gunners and how many managed to build a career out of this? He reminds me of Clarkson for example...
survive&advance
Nothing but net MFer!
All sounding probable
But in Game 1 he added just about as much as Mitchell in terms of efficiency and assists. In Game 2 he shot a lot while cold, yes, but he's been a better scorer certainly than Merrill and a more consistent scorer than Strus. Mobley was out as well as Garland, so who else was there to take shots? He's definitely a better scorer than Okoro. Cleveland is banged-up now and it's bad timing that Jerome was also cold without Mobley, Garland, or Hunter available to take shots.
Oh wow, as Spek noted, Cavs went from -2.5 to -5
2daBank
Voice of Reason
Are they really gonna go down 0-3? NBA been fucjing up my baseball mojo. Hockey has luckily been more in on script. Of course I say that but I got stung hard live betting Vegas every time oilers scored, I was sure Vegas would get the split at home, I think they actually tied and lost in ot luckily I feel asleep before I bankrupted myself! lol. I did at least hit some of Boston role players when they lost 2md at home but it hurt a bit. Luckily okc actually did their jobs and I did get the dogs to start the series. Just don’t expect to see favs like this dump 2 straight. As long as Cavs healthy tonight I think they win this but not sure what I think means much. Lol
I played Mobley ov 15.5 points cause I feel like they need him badly.
Mathurun ov 10.5 points cause he been fantastic, love his game and now they back home where roll players tend to play better.
And haliburton ov 9.5 dimes cause again back home I expect his passes to find the bottom the net more at home. Not sure these props are making a great case for Cavs? Despite the fact I don’t really think they can prevent haliburton from either getting to rim or distributing I thinj this is probably a really high scoring matchup and offense gonna have to win this. I really like pacers but having a hard time seeing Cavs fall down to 3-0. Maybe poor logic?
2daBank
Voice of Reason
Mobley ov 15.5 if he healthy and if Cavs gonna win I think a must. Are they gonna win or is he healthy tho?
2daBank
Voice of Reason
In the late game so far just
Murray ov 20.5 points
No clue who wins, I think they split honestly which prob means I should nr playing Denver in the ml, they didn’t have to lose last game by so much! Lol. Anyways the way I see it the only way they winning is if Murray is playoff Murray here, they could win or lose and he hit this number, barring a blowout which unfortunately is the biggest problem in nba now, everything runs and blowouts with all the 3 point dependence! Regardless this the bet I trust the most in this game.
Murray ov 20.5 points
No clue who wins, I think they split honestly which prob means I should nr playing Denver in the ml, they didn’t have to lose last game by so much! Lol. Anyways the way I see it the only way they winning is if Murray is playoff Murray here, they could win or lose and he hit this number, barring a blowout which unfortunately is the biggest problem in nba now, everything runs and blowouts with all the 3 point dependence! Regardless this the bet I trust the most in this game.
Inspekdah
My man, Michael Jordan!
These are very minimal line moves for the home teams. We usually see 8 point swings.
Cavs go from 8.5-9 to 5.5? Basically 3-3.5 move.
Thunder go from 10.5 to 5.5 - only 5.
C's only going down about 5, too.
Obviously the must win spot for the teams down 0-2 is showing.
Cavs go from 8.5-9 to 5.5? Basically 3-3.5 move.
Thunder go from 10.5 to 5.5 - only 5.
C's only going down about 5, too.
Obviously the must win spot for the teams down 0-2 is showing.
Similar threads
