C-Gold's week 5, 5 finger discount

  • Thread starter Thread starter C-Gold
  • Start date Start date
C

C-Gold

Guest
Week 1 3-3-1 ATS, 0-0 ML, -4.75 units
Week 2 3-4-1 ATS, 0-1 ML, -6 units
Week 3 0-0-1 ATS, 1-0 ML, +3 units
Week 4 +7 units
Season = -.75 units

Congrats to all who rode me week 4, and it sucks for those who faded me.

Week 5 card
Arizona -3 @ St. Louis ( 1 unit)(beted)
NY Jets @ NY Giants -3 ( 1 unit)(beted)
Detroit @ Deadskins -3 ( bought hook) 1 unit
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Zona is 4-0 ATS and certainly a better team than people think. I was going to ride them last week against the Steelers as a home dog, but I tried to once again " keep it simple stupid".
The Rams are 0-4 and have major injuries on offense. I have been watching these teams all year, and the rams are in trouble.

Even when Bulger was in there, the Rams didn't look like the Rams. They weren't getting much on the ground, they weren't in good sync passing the ball ( as far as timing goes), it just looked ugly. Now you take away a dominant LT in Pace, Bulger at QB, Jackson at RB, and Bruce is hurt and might not play. Do you really want to bet on Gus Ferrit ( the guy who injures himself) and a rookie RB from Rutgers? In Rams first game of the year against Carolina, they were still pretty close late in the game, but the fans just gave up on that team. The Rams defense isn't very good, and the offense is trying out new unproven bodies.

The reason why this line is +3.5 at many places, is because the books think that the rams are "due" for a better performance, not because they think this will be a FG game or anything. If you like the Rams in this spot, take them ML.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Detroit at Deadskins -3.
I think the Deadskins win this game due to turnovers. If you were to pull up the Lions TO differential, they are listed as (+1), but they really got 4 cheap turnovers against that terrible quarterback Tavaras Jackson in Minnesota. I mean, the turd was tossing out pop flies to the Lions defenders that you usually don't see at the pro level. The Lions also got some picks from Brian Greasy in his first start in years last week. So the Lions were fortunate enough to find 7 turnovers on the weak links of NFL Quarterbacks.

Lions 13 take aways ( over inflated thanks to Tavaras and Greasy)
Lions 12 give aways and I do see that as a repeatable thing.

Joe Gibbs has been playing that whole boring, conservative Martyball/Herm Edwards football. He has a young flawed quarterback in Jason Campbell, and he has taken the ball out of his hands as much as he could by turning his offense into a bunch of screen passes to his runningbacks, with that occasional deep ball thrown down field.

Above average quarterbacks will carve this lions defense apart, but Jason isn't that guy. He is a boring Trent Dilfer-like quarterback that the "local" fans in DC love. Joe Gibbs will hide jason with an entire offense centered on passes 10 yards and shorter, while he tries to attack with his running backs.

You would figure that the Lions move the ball in this game, while washington runs that boring conservative offense that waits for you to make mistakes. This is more of a fade on the Lions than a play on washington. Gibbs will try and keep it close and let that defense gambel a little bit on turnovers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jets at Gints.
I really wanted to get into a long lesson about "home field advantage" before capping this game. Home field isn't as much about how far you travel or how many fans you have in the stands, but it is about "focus".

For the first time ever, those Jets will be in the VISITORS locker room, standing on the other side of the field, with the endzone painted for the Giants. If the Jets weren't the 2nd class team of NY in the first place, they will certainly be sunday. I know that this isn't your typical road game, but it is not like they are playing a "real" home game.

When you play a home game, you usually sleep in your own bed ( not a hotel bed), you are used to the weather, you don't have to travel, you don't have a million other things to worry about. You know the field, the background, the stands, and everything. Visitors have all sorts of other things to focus on that are not even related to the play the coach calls. Some people can win on the road, some people have trouble focusing.

I know the public like the Giants in this one, but the public isn't always wrong. The Giants have an offense and they are working out their kinks on defense.

Pennys arm doesn't scare anybody, and if the Giants don't have a threat to honor downfield ( like the Washington game), they can cover that more conservative offense the Jets run ( and redskins ran).

The Jets run defense isn't that great, which is a great time for that big bowling ball Brandon Jacobs to potentially come back for the G-Unit.

The Giants are 2-2, with their only two losses against undefeated teams. The Blue New York team will clearly be the better team on the field, and they will treat their pesky little brother green team as such.



I am headed out of town for the weekend, but I am going to hopefully get back for the 4pm games to maybe add some plays. Good luck.
 
Since I said I didn't look last week, I figured this week I would.

If I can get three flat I'll be with you in St. Louis.

Probably against you in Washington, on the fence but leaning toward the Jets--despite how much they suck.
 
I can't believe the Public isn't going head over heels with the Cardinals. I don't think they understand that they have an offense, a defense, and that coach looks pretty good too.

The Rams on the other hand are a team that is spiraling downward with bad news after bad news. I would think the public would love to fade Gus " let me slam my head into the wall" Fair it, but I guess not. I would think the public wouldn't like that tall, full back looking running back, without Orlando Pace, but what do I know.

4-0 ATS that is better than people think, vs a 0-4 team ATS that is out of sync. The books are betting that the rams " play better" but who knows.

If there were no such thing as turnovers, the Lions might win... but there are such thing as turnovers. The Lions might gain more yards than the deadskins, but I don't think they win this game. They would have maybe the 2nd worst turnover margin in the NFC if they weren't paired up against Tavaras ( I didn't even start at a D1 program in college) Jackson.

The Giants are the better team, and they win. Tell Mangenius that me might want to double team Osi Omenoyori too.
 
I can't believe the Public isn't going head over heels with the Cardinals. I don't think they understand that they have an offense, a defense, and that coach looks pretty good too.

I'm sort of surprised they're flying under the radar as well. Maybe it's because the general public (not the band, and not me) have been burned so many times on them in the past, oh, four years.

But they should win this game. St. Louis has fallen completely apart due to injury and although I actually like Brian Leonard there's no way in hell I expect that guy to be able to carry an NFL team to victory at this point in his career, perhaps ever.

This is really becoming the Year of the Injury, even more than last, and the Rams are just one of those teams that's a shell of its former self, sort of like Buffalo. And they weren't a great team before this all happened.

If Arizona has any self-respect they should win this game by 10.

That said, there was an article early in the week out of St. Louis about the Rams potentially going 0-16 and this is that sort of wounded animal scenario.

Thankfully the Cardinals can run the football. If all they could do was throw I'd be more worried.

If they're smart and control the clock, again, they really should win this easily.

------

The Lions, however, have the very problem Arizona doesn't, running the football. If they could run better I'd feel better about taking them here. But what they do is throw, and they do it pretty well, but that's what Washington is most built to stop.

I lean toward Detroit because, one, I think they're the better team, and two because Washington isn't healthy on offense. Their O-line is banged up, Santana Moss won't play, Portis isn't healthy, and Campbell is still very raw.

Thank God for him he's playing a poor defense this week.

----

In NY I lean toward the Jets because every single little thing points toward the Giants.

Oh, they're so big and strong, oh, their defensive line is so dominant, blah, blah, blah.

Everybody saw them beat up on Winston Justice on Sunday night and now they're going to the Super Bowl. Sorry, I just don't believe it.

The problem is the Jets suck-diddily-uck. Zero points in the first half against the Bills? How can you not be embarrassed by that if you're a Jets player, coach, or fan?

I may just stay off this one all together, but at plus-money on the even three or at 3.5 I might just take this based on value alone because I see these teams as somewhat evenly matched.
 
The St. Louis Lambs are the worst team in football. I am going to keep fading them.

I also like Washington at -3 even with Gibbs boring ass offense. I'm sure they'll have some tricks up their sleeves after the bye week. I've been thinking skins all week and its nice to see you on it.

I with Giants also, Jets defense hasnt gotten any pressure on the QB this season, they are 3rd worst in sacks with 3. If you give Eli time, he'll carve you up. Plax is the biggest mismatch in the NFL IMO. Go to him in the redzone allll day.


I think I am going to be on all you these plays come Sunday. I am most familiar with NFC east teams and it seems like you love to bet the NFCe. Its looking good this weekend.
 
C-Gold -- On the Giants with you, but one point. Home teams stay in hotels the night before games as well. Some teams might allow the occasional veteran/superstar to stay home, but most of the team is holed up in a hotel, settling into a routine and having position meetings. Not sure who it was on Sirius NFL, but an O lineman for the Bills stayed in the same Buffalo Hilton room for 8 years whenever they were at home. That's neither here nor there, just a point.

Good luck with your plays.
 
2-0-1 ( +2 units)

Fucking prevent defense and 2 point conversion in St. Louis. You would think when your up by 11 with under 2 minutues that you'd have it locked up.

Aaron Ross and the Giants defense looked better, and big Brandon Jacobs looks like that player Blitz, Glyde and I have been talking about. The Giants are 3-2, and have their easy part of their schedule coming up.
 
The national media had the Giants as a 5-6 win team since ( Tiki Barber was their entire team), but the Giants might already be at 5-6 wins after that next leg of their schedule.

maybe the national media should hire the studs of this site who said otherwise.
 
2-0-1 not bad. Got blindsided by the Rams backdoor cover.

I was leaning Jax, SD, Bears, and Bears under, but I figured I didn't want to fade the home dogs after last week ( I liked my plays better). I guess I could have went 3-1 with that crap, but who cares, I'd rather be undefeated baby.

I had a long conversation breaking down the Bears on about page 17-18 of the week 5 in-game which was pretty spot on ( even though it was a no play)...

Bears "due" to play better
Pack "due" to play worse
Bears #1 at forcing turnovers last year
Hester
Rivalry game
dog on a nationally televeised game etc.
( none of this "statement game" bullshit).

( yeah somebody owes me an apology).
 
write this down....

I believe Dallas will be 6 point dogs against the Patriots in week 6.
 
Back
Top