Biggest NHL Line Ever?

I'm pretty sure there was a game a few years ago where the Wings were like -450, possibly against the Islanders. I'll look it up but, in the meantime, good luck GLB.
 
hugh613 said:
I'm pretty sure there was a game a few years ago where the Wings were like -450, possibly against the Islanders. I'll look it up but, in the meantime, good luck GLB.
Click to expand...
DATEHOME

<tbody>
[TD="width: 5%"]GOALS[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]AWAY[/TD]
[TD="width: 5%"]GOALS[/TD]
[TD="width: 6%"]SU RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 5%"]O/U[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]O/U RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]MONEY LINE[/TD]
[TD="width: 13%"]HOME GOALIE[/TD]
[TD="width: 13%"]AWAY GOALIE[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]03/27/2009[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]DET[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 5%"]0[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]NYI[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 5%"]2[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 6%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 5%"]6[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]U[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]-400[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 13%"]Osgood[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 13%"]MacDonald[/TD]

</tbody>
I'm sure there were bigger lines with the Devils in the 90's, never mind the Penguins, Canadiens, etc.. but at least now you know there's a chance...
 
You are probably fine as Buff stinks, but I will take +400 any day in the NHL.
 
Thought the same thing (biggest line in history) when I saw it earlier today. Worth a shot at that price, and Buff left a day early so they could have an acclimation day for the time change. Probably doesn't mean anything though, as this team is pretty damn bad.
 
It's kind of a moot point in that the dynasty teams probably had soccer type ML's back when, but here's what I found across the street for the Wings back in 2005:

Regular Season

[TABLE="class: data"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="class: datahead"]Date[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead"]Vs[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead"]Score[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead, width: 17%"]Goalie[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead, width: 17%"]Opp. Goalie[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead, width: 8%"]M/L[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead, width: 12%"]O/U[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 3/31/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chicago[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L 2-3 (OT)[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chris Osgood[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Nikolai Khabibulin[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L -458[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] U 6.5 -103[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 3/25/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Columbus[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L 4-5 (SO)[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chris Osgood[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Pascal Leclaire[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L -448[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] O 6.5 -115[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 3/11/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chicago[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W 6-4[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Manny Legace[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Nikolai Khabibulin[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W -450[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] O 6.5 108
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 2/1/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] St. Louis[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W 3-2[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Manny Legace[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Curtis Sanford[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W -532[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] U 6.5 -111[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 1/5/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] St. Louis[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W 3-0[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Manny Legace[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Curtis Sanford[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W -475[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] U 6.5 100[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 12/31/05[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Columbus[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W 5-2[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chris Osgood[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Marc Denis[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W -400[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] O 6.5 100[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 11/19/05[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] St. Louis[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L 2-3[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Manny Legace[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Curtis Sanford[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L -400[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] U 6.5 -133[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
You would've come out ahead so I guess there's no real reason not to take a shot...
 
hugh613 said:
It's kind of a moot point in that the dynasty teams probably had soccer type ML's back when, but here's what I found across the street for the Wings back in 2005:

Regular Season

[TABLE="class: data"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="class: datahead"]Date[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead"]Vs[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead"]Score[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead"]Goalie[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead, width: 17%"]Opp. Goalie[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead, width: 8%"]M/L[/TD]
[TD="class: datahead, width: 12%"]O/U[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 3/31/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chicago[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L 2-3 (OT)[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chris Osgood[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Nikolai Khabibulin[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L -458[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] U 6.5 -103[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 3/25/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Columbus[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L 4-5 (SO)[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chris Osgood[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Pascal Leclaire[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L -448[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] O 6.5 -115[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 3/11/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chicago[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W 6-4[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Manny Legace[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Nikolai Khabibulin[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W -450[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] O 6.5 108[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 2/1/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] St. Louis[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W 3-2[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Manny Legace[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Curtis Sanford[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W -532[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] U 6.5 -111[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 1/5/06[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] St. Louis[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W 3-0[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Manny Legace[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Curtis Sanford[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W -475[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] U 6.5 100[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 12/31/05[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Columbus[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W 5-2[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Chris Osgood[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Marc Denis[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] W -400[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] O 6.5 100[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: datacell"] 11/19/05[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] St. Louis[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L 2-3[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Manny Legace[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] Curtis Sanford[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] L -400[/TD]
[TD="class: datacell"] U 6.5 -133[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
You would've come out ahead so I guess there's no real reason not to take a shot...
Click to expand...

You would have come out very nicely ahead too. That's pretty surprising the Wings went only 4-3 in those games.
 
Buff 4-0 L4 meetings - have been better on the road 2-2 L4 road games. SJ has Vancouver on deck - it's definitely worth a shot - what an embarrassing line from the Sabres perspective.
 
:cheers:

lucked out on the missed OT Sharks goal

i0tC6Cu4jW7qI.gif
 
NHL defends no-goal call in Sharks-Sabres OT

Mike Halford
Nov 6, 2013, 1:22 PM EST

The referees got it right last night in San Jose, according to the NHL’s department of hockey operations.

Senior VP Mike Murphy, in speaking with CBC’s Elliotte Friedman, said referee Mike Leggo made the correct call in overtime on Tommy Wingels‘ shot — which looked to cross the line well before the whistle — under rule 78.5, the infamous “intent to blow” rule.

“Leggo waves it off when the puck hits the post and starts to come to the net as a scramble develops. [In the NHL's video review room in Toronto] we’re still looking at the puck off the post, then see the play with Leggo approaching net, putting the whistle in his mouth and he waves aggressively,” Murphy explained.

“Had we called a goal against Buffalo it would have been wrong, because it shouldn’t have been a goal.”

Once again, here’s the play in question:

Murphy’s explanation will likely come under scrutiny, because Leggo’s initial wave off comes well before his second. Leggo’s first motion comes at the 3:07 mark, and his second (with the whistle) comes at 3:04.

The NHL rulebook wording on 78.5 only adds to the confusion.

It states a goal can be disallowed “when the Referee deems the play has been stopped, even if he had not physically had the opportunity to stop play by blowing his whistle.” Of course, this makes it rather convenient to go back and pick the exact moment a referee “deemed” the play to be over, since there doesn’t have to be any emphatic gesture confirming it.

Murphy did say that, as far as optics went, the NHL should’ve reviewed the call with Leggo on-ice.
“The optics would have been better if we got him to put on the headset and asked what he was seeing,” Murphy explained. “We spoke after the game, I told him it did go in, we probably would get some pushback and should have gotten him over [to the headset] for the optics of the review.

“We should have done the headsets, because any controversy would have died.”
Click to expand...

intent to whistle after bout 4-5 secs :thinking:

<iframe src="http://player.theplatform.com/p/pcPFDC/cjUkU8H8GQs9/embed/select/F4Hs6OiUWuzq?params=zone%3Dcsnvideo&autoPlay=false" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" seamless="seamless" allowfullscreen="">Your browser does not support iframes.</iframe>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Monday NHL
Replies
0
Views
131
PirateAlew
P
P
Friday NHL
Replies
0
Views
175
PirateAlew
P
P
Monday I hate all Presidents day NHL
Replies
5
Views
277
B.A.R.
B.A.R.
P
NHL Monday
Replies
0
Views
169
PirateAlew
P
P
NHL Sunday
Replies
1
Views
148
PirateAlew
P
Back
Top